Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201300079 Assessment - Environmental 2013-06-03 • • 3 ALBEMARLE NELSON FLUVANNA Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville, VA 22903 975-0224 July 22, 2013 TO: Johnathan Newberry Planning Department RE: Soils Report for: Kuttner - Final Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City,Virginia a b (Kuttner) R N N 722280 722300 722320 722340 722360 722380 722400 722420 722440 38°255N ` .* 38°2 55'N IP I. • v ry a v V. r R. s_ v a .. O a ^� Rio ry a 8 Rio Rd E a N a a v N a ( v V N Fa v a v a V N a 8 "fie, v `"" 8 a ' . C°e,<, 1 a ry N a v .. i 1 ' t Ot. g a . .:' g rg 38°2 48"N ,". a. a 38°248"N 722280 722300 722320 722340 722360 722380 722400 722420 722440 3 3 Map Scale:1:1,130 if punted on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet. F N a ,Meters FR, N 0 15 30 60 90 A T 0 50 100 200 300 Map projection:Web Mercator Corner coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 I Wviiir‘ ,,, `` N U_ _ F\ .'1Fj t7 t 4 -7-- E ,g,1 ,_,, E s , 9 cnm tp ul Siin �. ..tea J o ae9,T3 TIhE s::. Al 9" ? kiln c.-1.sma t k i '......,s,......*Z.,:y17_,7'LOZ7.9).tt i .;;'. L , /_____et /FT ij . q ,rR� N. M `.e,., F 4/ r V„ r 4 n ::\\:'''::::: < , cy A ^ry�^lc3' <' 'o Q p r et f,Gr-""'.t" r r< r+r to o o s-"o r r f �*' N N \ ` 0 b C M'M ��rr N S + <.'%t''.'°r r y .,:::=<,,,,� � T e 7- 40* =\,� ° `i E ' f!!' > � 4 i,'<,� �yj6 O m a U ^'N J '� ' M _ . Q . ; a�`r ?,;,/,, .°a -fr.ph. LnFN j 01 `�f tr, n t) r ( t ` , L 'r u0 •� a� n— 3 M O ' u N1 -14 a W). 4 o 0 N o n o 11 B ° \°' sw i , :.,$. n .C o 141 o N r' r o e ,r 4$'e r ' us Ln. 't 0 @ t; €y 'L -- f N Ln;n,'rt r °1 " �Q nr l '. k `n r Q e��°� � R ® 4c 4S ` s r, O G , A � °', -r � 3' b^ ' ` ©/ + � ”,ik'T i. �rs 5 £O 0 r Q Z ! j L O et r r t rUT .14 a , :709 0 �3 @ ,� o � y++ Q n o �'' 0 x 8 Y to D r f�08 ,fN1 O >'4,%42 oAno �o, •H t a 9� tM Oi OS r vstb LB 1M `o,','jt� /.7 � MM N►Ot0M N O,,0 o oM �t0 O kQ ,. O Q oe „„►, 4 ��//-C° H ur� ' ,— i „ , �\ 9 c Q { a � am E, '`"11 N{i r, 7 o V' :�,,,, ` y•{: q, :T c f�•v♦ 1.-� 'r \ '1A. 4a�i V ,,,,,..,:, •...,'''''',C.1,'•••''''' ',...` f,---..1 ,,,,,, F TA s M O f * , I Soil Map—Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City,Virginia Kuttner • Map Unit Legend Albemarle County,Virginia(VA003) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 16 Chewacla silt loam 0.9 28.2% 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 to 25 2.1 69.5% percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 3.0 97.6% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Charlottesville City,Virginia(VA540) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 to 25 0.1 2.4% percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.1 2.4% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)--Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City, Kuttner Virginia Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils.Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however,the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus,the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently,every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. The Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) report displays a generated description of the major soils that occur in a map unit. Descriptions of non-soil (miscellaneous areas) and minor map unit components are not included.This description is generated from the underlying soil attribute data. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other Soil Data Mart reports,which give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many uses.Also,the narratives that accompany the Soil Data Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Report—Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Albemarle County, Virginia Map Unit: 16—Chewacla silt loam Component: Chewacla(85%) The Chewacla component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on flood plains, river valleys. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from granite and gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained.Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is occasionally flooded. It is not ponded.A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 12 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent.Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit:47D—Louisburg sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)--Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City, Kuttner Virginia • • Component: Louisburg (75%) The Louisburg component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent.This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts.The parent material consists of residuum weathered from granite and gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches.The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent.Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Charlottesville City, Virginia Map Unit:47D—Louisburg sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Component: Louisburg (75%) The Louisburg component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from granite and gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent.Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7e.This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data: Version 9,Jan 20, 2010 Soil Survey Area: Charlottesville City,Virginia Survey Area Data: Version 2,Jan 3, 2012 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 C 7 Y f M M w 6E B - ti co 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 - O C O � - o - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- -- - 0 0 a--- a --o. -- a- 0 0 - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -..__ -- _ 0 0•' A 1 ...- ,,,,t,_ ra._iti-__-_______.-:_-._-- -m- 1..- -C, .-..-�_y �p 0'-_Iv---. _-Ca_.- 0 Ra .-. .. O O 0 O O O O O O a) .- 7 iRt - y O g Z +tl. - U U) U CO U O O :.a gl ::_. O O to > (0 (0 CO 1 (ii; ( Q (9 (0 — N LO tO CO a a v v v v Ti v v v v _0 o a .. ; �. E_ o C $ o b. _A N CO co M co M N N . y ,ra R m. m N N O if (i SK to Z a) �_ >-5-: - (") (6 (O (O U) CO (e) _ - - co. () rn 2 .. 5 � .• O py 0 iU- .n- AT:-cs a) iii co 4 4 4 (O 4 co. - 4 co - If) t— n 1,-: V N .. N a) �A 0 V / V c CCI 1 m V ai _ 0 43 0 a0 N d' 0 U) O U) y •y > .0 . . . O O v rn U o o I E -- w 0 co 0.0 - . et 1U 23 CD 1 o - � � Z •N �,o .3- 2" a) E - al - U CO - a o) 0 w i 3 j �' --.=:-_ � a i 2 , .. .-- U O N .J -- O N J - Ni" I - v 3 E a) L 0 Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City,Virginia Kuttner • Septic Tank Absorption Fields Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Summary by Map Unit—Albemarle County,Virginia(VA003) Map unit Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AOI Percent of AOI symbol name(percent) (numeric values) 16 Chewacla silt Very limited Chewacla(85%) Flooding(1.00) 0.9 28.2% loam Depth to saturated zone (1.00) Slow water movement (0.50) 47D Louisburg sandy Very limited Louisburg(75%) Slope(1.00) 2.1 69.5% loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Seepage,bottom layer(1.00) Filtering capacity (1.00) Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 3.0 97.6% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Summary by Map Unit—Charlottesville City,Virginia(VA540) Map unit Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AO1 Percent of AOI symbol name(percent) (numeric values) 47D Louisburg sandy Very limited Louisburg(75%) Slope(1.00) 0.1 2.4% loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Seepage,bottom layer(1.00) Filtering capacity (1.00) Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.1 2.4% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Summary by Rating Value Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Very limited 3.0 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 T Factor—Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City,Virginia Kuttner T Factor t Factor-;-Sunmiary by Masi Unit—Albemarle County,Virginia(VA003) Map u name symbol Map unit ; Rating a per acre Acres in AM. Percent Of AOl 16 Chewacla silt loam 5 0.9 28.2% 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 3 2.1 69.5% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 3.0 97.6% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% T factor-Irby Map Unit—Charlottesville Viy,Virginta;(VAa40) Map u it symbol Map unit nan* # n hating(tons per acre Acres in AOI .. . Percent of AO# 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 3 0.1 2.4% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.1 2.4% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Rating Options Units of Measure: tons per acre per year Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Interpret Nulls as Zero: No USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Depth to Water Table—Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City,Virginia Kuttner Depth to Water Table Depth to Water Table—Tabie—SumMary by.Map ti nit-Albema County,Virginia OO) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating(centimeters) Acres in A01 Percent of A01 16 Chewada silt loam 31 0.9 28.2% 47D Louisburg sandy loam, >200 2.1 69.5% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 3.0 97.6% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Depth to Water Table-Summary by Map U nit—Charlottesville City Virginia_(VA540)` Map Ym Map Rating(centimeters) Acres in A01 r Percent of A01 urtg s_ bo# Nfa unit name 47D Louisburg sandy loam, >200 0.1 2.4% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.1 2.4% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Rating Options Units of Measure: centimeters Aggregation Method: Dominant Component Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Interpret Nulls as Zero: No Beginning Month: January Ending Month: December USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Representative Slope—Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City,Virginia Kuttner Representative Slope R. resentative::Slope-S trtary ty p if—Albemarle'icut�,lrrgitia(VAlQ�#: Map unit symbol r Map unit name `: Rating(percent)_ Acres in AO/ Percent of:AIN 16 Chewada silt loam 1.0 0.9 28.2% 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 20.0 2.1 69.5% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 3.0 97.6% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Representative Slopes Summary by Map U nit--Charlottesvllte City,: (VA640) Map unit symbol Map.unit name r;:: Rating(percent) Acres in AOl Percent of A Orl 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 20.0 0.1 2.4% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.1 2.4% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Rating Options Units of Measure: percent Aggregation Method: Dominant Component Component Percent Cutoff None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Interpret Nulls as Zero: No Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Flooding Frequency Class—Albemarle County,Virginia,and Charlottesville City,Virginia Kuttner Flooding Frequency Class Flooding Frequency Cass Summary;by Map Unit----;Albetearle County,Virginia(t Map unit symbol Map name: . Rating Acres in AOl Percent of 4til 16 Chewada silt loam Occasional 0.9 28.2% 47D Louisburg sandy loam, None 2.1 69.5% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 3.0 97.6% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Flooding Frequency Class.-Summary by Map Unit-Charlottesville City,Virginia(VA540} Map unit symbol -; Map unit name Rating Acres in AO! Percent of A01 47D Louisburg sandy loam, None 0.1 2.4% 15 to 25 percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.1 2.4% Totals for Area of Interest 3.0 100.0% Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: More Frequent Beginning Month: January Ending Month: December usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 z- ..< LA . 2 _ C0 A O r _Nq v C p N CAW O, N 0. d --in -0 _ C tl�l N CS I N N 0 ICfl .� en 3 fD `v _ N ,,,0, f�l X D 0 Z N O A N -. Qo O G CD m w ■I 6 O ,Opp 9 Co - - _ �. . N co CC CO CEO O n) O 7 - - - 15 N _ :. 0 N p y▪ �1 O�D J� O C71 CJ1 CO 4.) I O Co/l -Ci n c 2H = 1 m N N N CA N CA CA y 5 7 a ,n (n ? v O co Co co O 0 °1 ffl O N N N N N -b --0- O W W �1 CJ __ tm O en N N N N N D O O- NI O O O 8 O f� ..G O CAA O O O O Co -.•- m = O 88888 0s0 y _ ` O O , I A A A A A O O O O O 0▪ 0 C «_y ID 0 n -c+ Q ' - : _o _0 0 _0 CD _ O C - 06 N (A N CA (A d O O O O O O O J -�_E. ast N N N A A O A A G :. CO C O O O O O O O - ,- 9 O O O 9 9 Q C N N N N to 1 r" <_-_ CO CO CO CO CO CO CO _ O O O O O O O in in to in 2n O - .d. N N N N N A n - CA O O O O O O A ANN NN co OD N OD - A A CO N 0NO N 0 ( a - t-- A-- ----- to .._a to - � , W CA f^ 2 _ �c co CA co 0) N �I CO N Q _ _ O O CA CO C C M U) g 0) o C O � 0j C -- �'� 6 C N 0 N K ti% 3`° "" N 5. oz co co 0 N o i. _ Fr m a m NZ 73 g c m D m D O 40 " c c z 0 C - m o 2y DD v °'• CI <.• c.o CD m R ) > o w< = < 6 O a o 0a 5 -' -- — ' co a> 2 0 IT = c_ n w 9 -o n" so cc v c eh w 4 T = n 0 Ca) ;.; na. O •< o_ N- < N Ct n cr Na 0 0 in A ..0 ft _ 5. ni _ a �A �A O 5. °: z c , c 0 m < S6 o 0 0 0='v m D m o o N io to r : <" 4 g4 _ 0 0 o ui ---- 6 N 3 la m in t) 7" A A * +a tfl:"..: A A X a0 w m 3:: W A:: 1 i X it" .. OD -o _1 N) a.� 0 o x" .a" -, 0 N W E C 7 d c 45 Y M M • 5 w O O N M Na) r 2), 0) . a a) co >o u) 7 a) cn m 0 a) 0 a a o g8 m c O Z m c ca m c6 E•.he C O .�.r- 2)N N U 5 O a) O >;N 0 cN = THE DEDICATION OF THE SUBDIVISION APPEARING ON THIS PLAT IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER,(S). DATE: - - - - -- BY: _ OLIVER C. C. KUTTNER TM #61 -190 POWER HAROLD K. HERZ & POLE MJA R. HEYMAN D.B. 3143 P. 274 \ SHED ENCROACHING oy F SHED IRON ENCROACHING REBAR 0.64' FOUND SHED N 56.45'43" E o°0 c\ 177.49' , PART 0� N( BECHMA�K �h1° FOUND 34.28' \� 13 46'22'\ yF �� \13.67' 1 lb Q� . �c N. `h , �o "o`y, TM #61A -02 -36 WILDWOOD OF CHARLOTTESVILLE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., INC. INSTR.NO. 2013000011 'ooe�) REBAR I, — --_, A NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE COUNTY AFORESAID, IN THE STATE OF VIRGINIA DO CERTIFY THAT WHOSE NAMES ARE SIGNED TO THE WRITING ABOVE, BEARING THE DATE ON THE DAY OF HAVING ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAME BEFORE ME IN MY COUNTY AFORESAID GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS, — DAY OF N NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES r� REGISTRATION NO. POLE , Cl 7 X� -N 68'47'57" W 2.27' IRON REBAR �PIO SET " •��Q� s N N M Q7 0 0 z N 63'58'29" W @--WELL ` 51.49' 20' EASEMENT S SS \\FI4'2 , FOR INGRESS & EGRESS RESIDUE PARCEL A --1- -A \ 1.856AC. (PART OF TM #61 -2108) \\ C� 222.10 2 -STORY FRAME SET �\ POWER DWELLING POLE NO. 465 ` wv p � , �� _ POWER \ "� POLE 26 APPROXIMATE v� LOCATION OF FLOOD co ca /� oy \ ZONE AE AS SCALED F` oy FROM F.E.M.A. MAP 3� i0 Sg POWER\ \ , 63, rycb •8' POLE \00, NOTES: 1. THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND DOES NOT, THEREFORE, NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES UPON THE PROPERTY. 2. A PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY AS PLATTED FALLS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE HAZARD AE AS SCALED FROM F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(S). 3. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY DONE PER DATE OF THIS PLAT AND THERE ARE NO VISIBLE EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 4. THIS PROPERTY WILL BE SERVED BY AN PUBLIC WATER AND SEPTIC SYSTEM. 5. THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED R -4. 6. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: FRONT YARD= 25' REAR YARD = 20' SIDE YARD = 15' 7. LOT 1 CONTAINS;A BUILDING SITE THAT COMPLIES WITH THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. 8. THE BUILDING LOT WILL BE SERVICED BY THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE PUBLIC SEWER. R S 49'34'38" E 50.00' IRON REBAR FOUND WATER METER SEPTIC 4- z TM #47A -150 SYSTEM o= DAVID CRAIG & SUSAN G. LANDIN \RISERS J c) o INSTR.NO. 2013000011 m < GUY WIRE POWER _MN POLE (� GUY WIRE APPROVED: ALBEMARLE BOARD OF SUPERVISIORS DATE A GNESE STREET (VARIABLE R /W) SOURCE OF TITLE: THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO OLIVER C. KUTTNER BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 21, 2011 AND RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 4156 PAGE 331 IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT -- OF- ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA LENGTH I RADIUS CHORD CHORD BEARING Cl 18'21'45" 113.87 355.29 113.38 S 59'37'17" E C2 0.32'13" 25.18 2686.04 25.18 S 68'32'01" E C3 2'35'49" 121.75 2686.04 121.74 S 66.57'59" E C4 15'52'41" 61.57 222.16 61.37 S 34'15'22" W C5 21'01'56" 20.641 56.22 20.52 S 03.5954" E FOR. o� m--TH of y RUSSELL E. NIXON Lk. No. 2588 d 05L��/ 50 25 0 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET OLIVER K=NER