Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SDP201300037 Assessment - Environmental 2013-06-18
o.nwrn.� LOUSA ALBEMARLE NELSON FLWANNA Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville, VA 22903 975-0224 July 22, 2013 TO: Brent Nelson Planning Department RE: Soils Report for: At&T Wireless (Stony Point Volunteer Fire Property) Soil Map—Albemarle County,Virginia ',quo' (AT&T-Stony Pt Rd-) k 730350 730400 730450 730500 730550 730600 730650 38°644"N ,., 38°6'44"N & .. . r ry ,,spa° 'I... 4,..4 r- '.*.- s,, 1tw I' v l 4. ° . 4. 27B . 27C •v a rX v .'y v till':' a 0 a 0 a 0 a 38°6 29"N 38°6'29"N 730350 730400 730450 730500 730550 730600 730650 730700 3 3 N Map Scale:1:2,310 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet. N Meters k k N 0 30 60 120 180 ■\ 0 100 200 400 6000 et ///��� Map pro jection:Web Mercator Comer 000rdinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 `""` �, m § :iI N @� 0 a S o Em l' ( 'C o =cu swo ,• our �W?" (, o3 C�. • iV co co 0 ter Tt. !C M 2. I Lc.j,z., .w,;() 1;,...,„,,,,,‘9,e'CP TO CO 'O. fit ? r ° s a3 'c • «t ttS 0. r� 0 co CI co ± ly 1 b$1 9 o t 4 '2 r co IX -.Actit, ...of , I „94,. Tr C � ?j 7---C:N co Tr .w oa \ .. L1\i1 .Z ' . T T,,c `r q k C G3 asuyr° a t bG°gb r ` + eD, i �g �� a , v �+ G'dvao . ca 'tea_ ' °o a+ 8$ v to ri v cv�,„, cit) o EA u a era 'y• r, `L <9, t'i cv o I, csa 4, CNI ' <I. v ' CJ to w ti L.L. d OA t>. rn to o co r. its ' `{ co <'t irk d>3PL'ip rw a" r. e,�e—• ray.0 �t *t F'. is' M1 tom. er, r+,.. c „r. ` r & � tom? v Nor, Soil Map—Albemarle County,Virginia AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- • Map Unit Legend Albemarle County,Virginia(VA003) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AO1 27B Elioak loam,2 to 7 percent 0.3 2.6% slopes 27C Elioak loam,7 to 15 percent 7.8 65.1% slopes 29B Fauquier silt loam,2 to 7 0.0 0.1% percent slopes 34C Glenelg loam,7 to 15 percent 1.7 13.9% slopes 39D Hazel loam, 15 to 25 percent 2.2 18.2% slopes Totals for Area of Interest 12.0 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Albert County,Virginia AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils.Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however,the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena.Thus,the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently,every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. The Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) report displays a generated description of the major soils that occur in a map unit. Descriptions of non-soil (miscellaneous areas)and minor map unit components are not included.This description is generated from the underlying soil attribute data. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other Soil Data Mart reports,which give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many uses.Also,the narratives that accompany the Soil Data Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Report—Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Albemarle County, Virginia Map Unit: 27B—Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Elioak(80%) The Elioak component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent.This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts.The parent material consists of residuum weathered from mica schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low.This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 27C—Elioak loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 airli Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)--Albehlfte County,Virginia AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- Component: Elioak(80%) The Elioak component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts.The parent material consists of residuum weathered from mica schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches.The natural drainage class is well drained.Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit:29B—Fauquier silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Fauquier(85%) The Fauquier component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on piedmonts, hillslopes. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from greenstone. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is low. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 34C—Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Component: Glenelg (85%) The Glenelg component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts.The parent material consists of residuum weathered from mica schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches.The natural drainage class is well drained.Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 39D—Hazel loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Component: Hazel (80%) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Alb it le County,Virginia AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- The Hazel component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on piedmonts, hillslopes.The parent material consists of residuum weathered from graywacke sandstone and mica schist.Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is excessively drained.Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded.There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data: Version 9, Jan 20, 2010 USE Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings—Anarie County,Virginia AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- Information in this table is intended for land use planning,for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction. The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet. Because of the map scale,small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table. Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. Report—Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site.The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00.The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil.The soil may have additional limitations] Dwellings and Simla Commercial-Buildings-Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil 'Pet of Dwellings Wi thout basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings name map 1 unit tip class and Value Rates class and Value Rating class:and • Value limiting features limiting features limit etg features 27B—Elioak loam,2to 7 percent slopes Elioak 80 Not limited Not limited Somewhat limited Slope 0.13 27C—Elioak loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Elioak 80 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Very limited Slope 0.37 Slope 0.37 Slope 1.00 29B—Fauquier silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Fauquier 85 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Shrink-swell 0.50 Shrink-swell 0.50 Shrink-swell 0.50 Depth to soft bedrock 0.15 Slope 0.13 34C—Glenelg loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Glenelg 85 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Very limited Slope 0.37 Slope 0.37 Slope 1.00 i.)5 Natural Resources web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 "ffiri Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings—lnarle County,Virginia AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- Dwellings and Small Commercial Buil dings-Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct-.of Dwellings Va out basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings Ling Rating class:and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value wing features limiting features limiting features 39D—Hazel loam,15 to 25 percent slopes Hazel 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Slope 1.00 Slope 1.00 Slope 1.00 Depth to hard bedrock 0.46 Depth to hard bedrock 1.00 Depth to hard bedrock 0.46 Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data: Version 9, Jan 20, 2010 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and L'IN1fis and Landscaping—Albemarle County, AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- irginia Lawns and landscaping require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and maintained. Irrigation is not considered in the ratings. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth and trafficability after vegetation is established.The properties that affect plant growth are reaction; depth to a water table;ponding;depth to bedrock or a cemented pan;the available water capacity in the upper 40 inches;the content of salts, sodium, or calcium carbonate; and sulfidic materials. The properties that affect trafficability are flooding,depth to a water table,ponding,slope,stoniness,and the amount of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer. Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction. The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table. Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. Report—Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site.The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00.The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil.The soil may have additional limitations] Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping-Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Local roads and streets Shallow excavations Lawns and landscaping name reap unit Rating class and . Value Rating class and Value> Rating class and Value limiting features Limiting features limiting features 27B—Elioak loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Elioak 80 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Frost action 0.50 Too clayey 0.13 Large stones content 0.01 Low strength 0.10 Cutbanks cave 0.10 27C—Elioak loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Elioak 80 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Frost action 0.50 Slope 0.37 Slope 0.37 Slope 0.37 Too clayey 0.13 Large stones content 0.01 Low strength 0.10 Cutbanks cave 0.10 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 alagi Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,anrairms and Landscaping—Albemarle County, *410 AT&T-Stony Pt Rd- Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping-Albemarle County Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of. Local roads and streets Shallow excavations Lawns and landscaping name map t stmt: Rating.class and Value Ratites class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features j features limiting features 29B—Fauquier silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Fauquier 85 Very limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Low strength 1.00 Too clayey 0.28 Depth to bedrock 0.16 Shrink-swell 0.50 Depth to soft bedrock 0.15 Frost action 0.50 Cutbanks cave 0.10 34C—Glenelg loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Glenelg 85 Very limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Low strength 1.00 Slope 0.37 Slope 0.37 Frost action 0.50 Cutbanks cave 0.10 Slope 0.37 T 39D—Hazel loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Hazel 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Slope 1.00 Depth to hard bedrock 1.00 Slope 1.00 Frost action 0.50 Slope 1.00 Depth to bedrock 0.46 Depth to hard bedrock 0.46 Cutbanks cave 0.10 Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data: Version 9, Jan 20, 2010 usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/23/2013 i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 A _.. --- --- M tf) O O N N- 0) 0 L,-...... La U)r N 1 Q 03 m c. 3'� I- LO u) to to � c) M 1A M M U) M N• M M M N V tt) N• • . il i, O N to O to 1!) O N ;_ a M O Q t'�) O O c`,5 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-- 0 0 .- O v �i G Q. O O O 0 O) o) o) O) ' (Ni d a o a a (N• 6 z tv °' I o 0 o 0 o a o th T o at � N .N- N r N • 7 R Q 4 O ... O O O 4 4 N �` U) U) • Co (70 to � — l4 C) !id( u O O O O I cn a •R O 0 c-, O O O O 0 _a pQ J U {3` — o 3.... O O O 00 0 O 0 0 0 ° to "� ° S v• —, $ 8 0• 0 8 Tr Ti et 7 v v v v o a is v q S ° t°o U)i. m •Q ' N M N N (1 N N (`�') 1.� N (DO 1,.. N t0D N M CO 0 _ _ ! t�ii ppp' N V N N 'E'4- N V c � � u 8 r) 6 I C13 a to oo r) n CO M v o) c co) r) v v) r) y to u) N I v UI .0 E to C)„, o I a VN' N N VN' r N N • N I N r � m el c,I E coo. M r M r-- O M ' y f.7 © o a 0 co C') 0 ao C') 0 co '4' 2 0 C 0 Q ai '-) 0 _ In w N .°s(sir., 'E to •°—� � rn =to � $ w d th 0_ N w E- a - w E g Y 'L o a`) W •Q o CD I t o 0 o I t v o o I ..., 0-2 tD a m O I].CO w i y 1.7J "m r� N LL p N N N cn T3 .N T .0 lL Ikare ix (h to C ct m a N a a o la a)a'3 in ,a a c d m 0 W• U) N N el M N CO (� N!►" j 8'M' ::: N (N•) N N 'Cl. o v vv o u. R u) N o 0 4 r o 0 0 0 u) 0 0 ............................... 0 0 0 0 0 Q T o 0 co .3 rn 0) 0? m.o 0 o I o 0 0 0 • O=( N n Q.N N N 0)Q O O G O O I u O 0 O Q O 0 O iii 8 8 r 8 O 1 (4), N O O O a : •1t sg z .- ca C . � O O N N N r 0 - pp 8.. q > N N N pp: Y v O N N I N; ¢ Oi O a O co D 7 C O N N N O __-- N t!J O O I o O 0) CC O O E N N re c,! 'i _ Hr I d ` d a i • C�! L v T G Q 0� • Q F v O > m To y> v v Q = C T v es v O h Z O' N O n it 0 0 N p O O 08 03 O 7 a) ��. c0 O U) 4 O W N •E to ' U) U)Q N N }C� i E a d d C to y 0 N 1 0 E $ O a d N o II p M (7 11 N T t a a CL.._. 0 3 01 01 cn O O N N ~ N ma) F-- r of a a a) a) a V % m a� a) o o c rn 2 x - — O At S ill 12*44 U- a co co co co f 2 2 I J J w pp 1 g = a) a) a) a) �-. 115.4) a. ICI N N t`0 N d d a) a) w 0 0 0 0 0 o Ta .> r• ye "� I I I I I o ' , T 4 I ` • �,o o I I I I i nw 4.1 • a ▪ 0 U E o)13, is • - 4 8 m` c o Y * E z (U L.-U T a t1 in a' 3 t _ t i- ...d I I — ._. I -- I I- L a s y I I 6 I N U j o P.LL I L d•_ O Y N G,^ E V $ p U .-to t - a r 0 a . c c fl. ay' . z• t>o= E c 'OS a m fi o ` �r 0- m¢ I E O v fQ N O O. IA y N zN N r " p U en S a) 1 1 N y Q 1 Ey c 1 0. G)1 rQ 2 o 0. ( 0 0 0 . —0 N! W m N a tT' W ^h y W 0. )i v ° d 0 o9 td = a) f N N N fh M W a) LL O co i' a ^ a ' O M V) O "O N M co C I`.- ai N N = m o d p_ a o g o U m 0 O .m Z N C O_ 0 N 0 N c O t6 U a, a; z _ C ca o_ � 0 Q V iti dZ N co C6 v d as o N O AC) y« t� N VI R d C ,Y N A O U Q (" 2 a) E v; To' LL