Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201400060 Staff Report 2014-05-06ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB- 2014 -60: Surface Parking Area Expansion — CHO Airport Review Type Site Development Plan — Major Amendment Parcel Identification 03200000001000 Location 15 Aviation Drive, on the west side of Dickerson Road, just south of Airport Road Zoned Rural Areas (RA), Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner /Applicant Charlottesville - Albemarle Airport Authority /William Eschenfelder Magisterial District White Hall Proposal To expand an existing parking lot, to construct a new parking lot, and to construct a new entrance off of Route 606 directly into the proposed parking lot, with associated lighting and landscaping, and to construct a landscaped biofilter east of the main airport entrance. Context The area of proposed work is adjacent to other existing airport parking lots and is located across Dickerson Road from residential developments. Visibility The new parking lot and its landscaping and lighting will be visible from the Airport Road Entrance Corridor. ARB Meeting Date June 23, 2014 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski PROJECT HISTORY DATE APPLICATION RESULT 6/19/2002 ARB- 2001 -34 Approved the expansion of an employee parking lot off of Rt. 606. 8/24/2004 ARB- 2003 -182 Approved entrance road improvements and a freestanding sign. ANALYSIS REF GUIDELINE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development A significant amount of landscaping None. within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that is proposed for the parking lots. This new development within the corridors reflects the traditional level of planting is expected to architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB promote orderly and attractive review and of these Guidelines, that proposed development development, to harmonize with the within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of existing development, and to design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, integrate the parking lots into the buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive surroundings, as viewed from the development within these corridors. Applicants should note Entrance Corridor. The planting is that replication of historic structures is neither required nor expected to sufficiently mitigate the desired. appearance of the parking lot at the entrance to the airport. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. Structure design There are no buildings included in this proposal. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated Ticket machines and small scale Provide a legible canopy into the overall plan of development and shall, to the extent canopies are proposed in three cut sheet on the plan. possible, be compatible with the building designs used on locations in the parking lots. The Include on the plan the site. ticket machines are not expected to be visible due to their size and the information regarding proposed colors and 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these landscaping proposed in the lots. The p g p ro p illumination of the features will still have a negative visual impact on the canopy cut sheet isn't completely canopies. Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to legible. The dimensions can't be read eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, and information on colors and b. Service areas, illumination has not been specified. c. Refuse areas, With appropriate colors and minimal d. Storage areas, lighting, the canopies are not e. Mechanical equipment, expected to have a negative impact f. Above - ground utilities, and on the EC. g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of: a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be A drainage basin exists on the north None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need side of the airport entrance. A for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, biofilter with trees and shrubs is these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. proposed at its south end. The They should not have the appearance of engineered features. improvements are not expected to 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new substantially change or negatively drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished impact the view from the EC. site to the extent possible. Lighting 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto The current lighting plan shows that Revise the photometric adjacent properties or streets; spillover does not exceed .5 plan using a maintenance footcandles. However, the factor of 1.0. Ensure that photometrics were calculated using a spillover does not exceed maintenance factor (LLF) of .9. A .5 footcandles at the maintenance factor of 1.0 is needed property line along to meet county requirements. Dickerson Road. Increasing the maintenance factor will increase the light levels. 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush - mounted to The proposed parking lot fixtures are Include a note on the eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 full cutoff fixtures. However, the lighting plan indicating lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures. product literature suggests that the that the pole fixtures will fixtures can be tilted. A fixture not be tilted and will be installed in a tilted position would no mounted horizontally. longer be considered a full cutoff fixture. Indicate the lamp type for the sign lights. Ensure The plan includes lights that are that the lamps emit less proposed to illuminate new than 3000 lumens. directional signs in the parking lot. The directional signs do not require permits; however, the proposed sign lights won't be full cutoff fixtures if they are ground - mounted and point up at the signs. The exact lamp type is not identified on the plan, and the lamps may exceed 3000 lumens. 24 Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for Over - illumination of the parking lots Revise the photometric display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels would have a negative impact on the plan using a maintenance will apply to most other uses in the Entrance Corridors. Airport Road EC. The current lighting plan shows maximum light factor of 1.0. 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site will levels at 7.5 footcandles. However, be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. the photometrics were calculated using a maintenance factor (LLF) of .9. A maintenance factor of 1.0 is needed to meet county requirements. Increasing the maintenance factor will increase the light levels, but the levels are not expected to increase to excessive levels. 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm The parking lot fixtures are proposed None. soft glow; however, a consistent appearance throughout a with LED lamps, which have been site or development is required. Consequently, if existing approved consistently in the ECs. lamps that emit non -white light are to remain, new lamps may be required to match them. 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for Fixture and pole colors have not been Revise the lighting plan free - standing pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance identified. to include notes Corridors. indicating the color of the light fixtures and poles. Dark brown or bronze is recommended, as is coordinating the color with existing nearby fixtures. 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole- mounted light A note on L4 indicates that the poles, None. fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of with bases, will be 20' tall. the buildings and the sites they are illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding pole- mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance Corridor. 29 The following note should be included on the lighting plan: The note does not appear on the plan. Include the standard "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits lighting note on the plan. 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping Large trees are proposed along None. are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of many Dickerson Road and along the of the area's significant historic sites which is characterized entrance drive, at 40' on center (or by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote closer), at 31/2" — 4" caliper. Smaller visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to trees and shrubs are also proposed integrate buildings into the existing environment of the among the larger trees. corridor. 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: Trees are provided along the None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior sidewalk that runs along the loop pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 21/2 inches road. The trees are spaced at 35' -50' caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should on center. Some of the trees are be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be specified at 21/2" — 3" caliper, and located at least every 25 feet on center. others are specified at 2" — 2 1/2" caliper. Ornamental trees are interspersed throughout. The smaller size and wider spacing is acceptable in this case due to the quantity of trees and shrubs proposed. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Trees align the perimeter of the Increase the LS, AR, a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, parking lot. Spacing varies from 25' CCA and PO trees at the located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the to 50'. Sizes at planting vary from 2 "- interior of the parking lot interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 21 /z" to 2%z " -3 ", to 3'/z " -4" caliper. to 2' /z" caliper at parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed planting, minimum. throughout the interior of the parking area. A sufficient number of interior b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should parking lot trees are provided. measure 2'/z inches caliper (measured six inches above the However, the LS, AR, CCA and PO ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a trees are proposed at 2" — 2 V2" species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in caliper at planting. planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: The proposed landscaping is expected Provide on the plan the a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the to sufficiently mitigate the impacts of color of the canopies and front of long buildings as necessary to soften the appearance the canopies in the parking lot, information regarding of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of such trees or assuming the color and illumination illumination of the vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and are appropriate. canopies. blankness of such walls. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: The plant species are included on the None. a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff identified lists. based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D). 38 Plant health: The note appears on the plan. None. The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." Site Develo went and la out 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the No buildings are proposed in this None. Entrance Corridor street and to other development within the development. Parking would be corridor should be as follows: extended from an existing lot, toward a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, the airport entrance drive. Although and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. the expansion would bring parking b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street closer to the EC, the parking appears should be parallel to the street. Building groupings should to be expanding in an organized be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. pattern. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site The grading required to establish the None. to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls additional parking is not expected to and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded significantly change the relationship land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill between the site and the EC. No sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the retaining walls are proposed. grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the There does not appear to be any Provide for review the drip line of any trees or other existing features designated for grading proposed within the drip line existing conditions/ preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. of trees to remain, but an existing demolition plan. Identify Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and conditions /demolition plan has not all trees to remain and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion been provided. Tree protection trees to be removed. and sediment control plans. fencing is shown around three trees 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of on the Dickerson Road frontage. Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Layout and location of the expanded parking area 2. General character of the proposed landscaping and lighting Staff recommends approval of the plan with the following conditions: 1. Provide a legible canopy cut sheet on the plan. Include on the plan information regarding proposed colors and illumination of the canopies. 2. Revise the photometric plan using a maintenance factor of 1.0. Ensure that spillover does not exceed .5 footcandles at the property line along Dickerson Road. 3. Include a note on the lighting plan indicating that the pole fixtures will not be tilted and will be mounted horizontally. 4. Indicate the lamp type for the sign lights. Ensure that the lamps emit less than 3000 lumens. 5. Revise the lighting plan to include notes indicating the color of the fixtures and poles. Dark brown or bronze is recommended, as is coordinating the color with existing nearby fixtures. 6. Include the standard lighting note on the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 7. Increase the LS, AR, CCA and PO trees at the interior of the parking lot to 2%" caliper at planting, minimum. 8. Provide for review the existing conditions /demolition plan. Identify all existing trees to remain and trees to be removed. development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Layout and location of the expanded parking area 2. General character of the proposed landscaping and lighting Staff recommends approval of the plan with the following conditions: 1. Provide a legible canopy cut sheet on the plan. Include on the plan information regarding proposed colors and illumination of the canopies. 2. Revise the photometric plan using a maintenance factor of 1.0. Ensure that spillover does not exceed .5 footcandles at the property line along Dickerson Road. 3. Include a note on the lighting plan indicating that the pole fixtures will not be tilted and will be mounted horizontally. 4. Indicate the lamp type for the sign lights. Ensure that the lamps emit less than 3000 lumens. 5. Revise the lighting plan to include notes indicating the color of the fixtures and poles. Dark brown or bronze is recommended, as is coordinating the color with existing nearby fixtures. 6. Include the standard lighting note on the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 7. Increase the LS, AR, CCA and PO trees at the interior of the parking lot to 2%" caliper at planting, minimum. 8. Provide for review the existing conditions /demolition plan. Identify all existing trees to remain and trees to be removed. TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date /Revision Date 1 Cover Sheet May 20, 214 3 Managed Steep Slopes and Albemarle County Notes May 20, 214 4 Airport Property Map May 20, 214 7 Geometric Layout May 20, 214 8 Grading & Drainage May 20, 214 9 Grading & Drainage — Basin May 20, 214 14 Paving & Marking Details and Typical Sections May 20, 214 21 Utility Layout May 20, 214 23 Intersection Sight Distance Plan & Profile May 20, 214 24 Drainage & Waterline & Centerline Profiles May 20, 214 L1 Landscape Plan Feb. 18, 2014 L2 Landscape Plan Feb. 18, 2014 L3 Sign Details Feb. 18, 2014 L4 Landscape, Sign and Lighting Details Feb. 18, 2014 L5 Lighting Photometric Plan Feb. 18, 2014 10