HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201300186 Staff Report 2013-12-26ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB- 2013 -186: Cascadia Blocks 4 -7
Review Type
Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan
Parcel Identification
06200000002500, 07800000005900, 078000000059AO, 078E00000OOOHI
Location
1495 Stony Point Road, on the east side of Route 20, approximately 400' north of Fontana Drive.
Zoned
Neighborhood Model District (NMD), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner /Applicant
Cascadia Development LLC/Dominion Engineering (Michael Myers, PE)
Magisterial District
Rivanna
Proposal
To construct townhouses, a clubhouse, storm water facilities, and associated site improvements, including landscaping.
Context
This site is bounded on the south by the Montessori school, on the north by the Broadus Baptist Memorial Church, and on
the west by the Route 20 Entrance Corridor.
Visibility
Site sections, perspective views and photos have been provided to help clarify the visibility of various parts of the proposed
development as seen from the Route 20 Entrance Corridor. Vegetation currently exists in the right -of -way and on site along
the Route 20 frontage. The plans show vegetation in the right -of -way to remain. Historically, the ARB has not relied on off -
site landscaping, particularly vegetation in the right -of -way, to mitigate on -site development. Large storm water facilities
and their related grading and landscaping are located along the Rt. 20 frontage and will be readily visible from the Entrance
Corridor. The proposed townhouses and clubhouse will have much less visibility from the EC due to their distance from the
road, the topography, and existing and proposed landscaping.
ARB Meeting Date
February 3, 2014
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
The ARB provided advisory comments on the rezoning for this site in 2004 and 2005. The approved Application Plan and Code of
Development guide the layout and other features of the development.
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
Structure design
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows,
Proposed townhouse materials include Hardi-
None.
doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible
siding in a variety of earth tones and black
with the forms and features of the significant historic
asphalt shingles. The townhouses have
buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
traditional residential forms. Side elevations
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design
have windows.
guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met
through scale, materials, and forms which may be
The clubhouse uses traditional forms and
embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in
materials including two shades of earth -tone
Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines.
brick for the walls and a metal gable roof.
Window and chimney treatments are more
modern.
The forms and materials of the townhouses
and clubhouse are expected to have an
appropriate appearance, particularly given the
distance at which they will be viewed from
the EC.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding
The clubhouse has a different form and style
None.
context of buildings.
than the townhouses, but a clear comparison
will be difficult to make from the EC.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale.
Scale should be integral to the building and site design.
The siding, brick, window openings, shutters
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor
should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a
and awnings provide scale for the buildings.
cohesive whole.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building
Blankness does not appear to be an issue with
None.
design should be relieved using design detail or
the townhouses or the clubhouse.
vegetation, or both.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting
The townhouses are proposed as attached
None.
devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within
units. The clubhouse is a separate building,
a development.
which is typical for the building type.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated
Equipment is not expected to be visible from
None.
into the overall plan of development and shall, to the
the EC.
extent possible, be compatible with the building designs
used on the site.
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from
the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting,
these features will still have a negative visual impact on the
Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to
eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c.
Refuse areas, d. Storage areas,
e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above - ground utilities, and
g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar
security fencing devices.
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of
the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may
consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be
Two large stormwater management ponds are
See landscaping
designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need
located along the frontage of the Rt. 20 EC, at
recommendations.
for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor
the base of the sloping site. Landscaping is
street, these features must be fully integrated into the
proposed between the ponds and the EC.
landscape. They should not have the appearance of
engineered features.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the
The note does not appear on the plans.
Add the standard
architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment
mechanical equipment
from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
note to the site and
architectural plans.
Lighting
Lighting has not been proposed.
None.
Landscaping
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the
The approved Code of Development for
Revise the landscape
Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites
Cascadia outlines requirements for the "Entry
schedule to show that at
as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order
Park" along Route 20 as follows: The
least 27 of the large
to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines
developer shall retain as much of the existing
shade trees along the EC
require attention to four primary factors: compatibility
vegetation immediately adjacent to Route 20
will be planted at 3'/2"
with significant historic sites in the area; the character of
as possible. New plantings shall be arranged
caliper.
the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
in multiple groupings and rows of trees and
landscaping.
shrubs for a natural appearance. Given the
Clearly identify the
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping
constraints in the Entry Park for storm water
location and length of the
are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of
many of the area's significant historic sites which is
management and the twenty (20) foot right -of-
board fence on the plans.
characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping
way dedication to Route 20, these groupings
Provide a fence detail in
should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor
and rows of trees and shrubs shall be planted
the plans.
and help to integrate buildings into the existing
at differing distances from the Entrance
environment of the corridor.
Corridor and at the edges of storm water
ponds and shall be consistent with Option B,
Add the plant labels to
the plant schedule.
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be
obtained by planting different types of plant materials that
a plan shown to the County's ARB on May 17,
share similar characteristics. Such common elements
2004. The additional vegetation in the Entry
Include the VR shrub in
allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
Park does not have to take the form of a
the plant schedule.
because common landscape features will help to
continuous screening buffer.
harmonize the appearance of development as seen from
Revise the plant schedule
the street upon which the Corridor is centered.
The landscaping proposed along Rt. 20
to show shrubs along the
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor
streets should include the following:
includes large shade trees, irregularly spaced,
EC at 24" minimum.
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the
in quantities that meet the EC guidelines
Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3'/z
requirement. (If regularly spaced, 27 would
Consider a greater
inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and
be required.) However, they are all proposed
proportion of evergreen
should be of a plant species common to the area. Such
at 2" caliper. None are proposed at the
trees in the mix of plants
trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
required 3' /z" caliper.
along the EC frontage.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the
area should be interspersed among the trees required by the
Ornamental trees are proposed among the
preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not
shade trees. A board fence is also proposed,
alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be
but its location and length are not clearly
planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing
identified on the plans.
pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board
fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align
The trees are placed in groups of varying size
the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
and species and it is staff's opinion that the
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the
plan is consistent with the code of
foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved
development and the plan previously
parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of
reviewed by the ARB. However, most of the
road right -of -way and utility easements.
trees are deciduous. A greater proportion of
evergreen trees might ensure a more
consistent year -round appearance.
A VR shrub is shown on the plan, but does
not appear to be included in the plant list.
The plant schedule does not include the plant
labels used on the plan.
Shrubs are proposed at 11/2'— 21/2' at planting.
The required minimum is 24 ".
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
Trees are provided along the interior roads
Revise the plant schedule
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior
(which have sidewalks) at approximately 40'
to show interior road
roads. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper
on center. The plans that were submitted do
trees at 21/2" caliper
(measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a
not include plant labels, so tree types can't be
minimum.
plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
determined. No 21/2" caliper trees are
located at least every 40 feet on center.
identified in the plant schedule.
Provide landscape plans
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
with plant labels.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior
pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 21/2 inches
caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should
be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be
located at least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
A parking lot is provided on the east side of
None.
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas,
the clubhouse, but it is not expected to be
located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the
visible from the EC.
interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10
parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed
throughout the interior of the parking area.
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should
measure 21/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the
ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a
species common to the area. Such trees should be planted
in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the
health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the
parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs
should measure 24 inches in height.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
No buildings with long blank walls are
None.
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the
proposed in this phase of development.
front of long buildings as necessary to soften the
appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type
of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the
length, height, and blankness of such walls.
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings,
and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and
structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs.
Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the
The note does not appear on the plans.
Add the standard plant
landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall
note to the plan.
be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height;
Only two types of shrubs are proposed for the
the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall
site. A greater variety would support a
Increase the number of
be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health
healthier landscape.
shrub species so that no
of the plant."
single shrub species
exceeds 25% of the total
number of shrubs
proposed for the site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the
Generally, the proposed grading supports the
Round contours with a
site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of
layout of the development that was approved
ten foot minimum radius
retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of
with the rezoning. The grading proposed on
where they meet the
smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
the far (east) side of the large stormwater
adjacent condition.
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable.
pond is very regular and will not appear
Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with
natural. The applicant has proposed some
a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent
trees on the slope to help limit impacts.
condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than
engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and
Contours are not rounded.
taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend
with the landscape.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Grading and landscape treatment along the EC
2. Visibility and design of townhouses and club house
Staff offers the following comments on the preliminary plan:
1. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site and architectural plans: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the
Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
2. Revise the landscape schedule to show that at least 27 of the large shade trees along the EC will be planted at 31/2" caliper.
3. Clearly identify the location and length of the board fence on the plans. Provide a fence detail in the plans.
4. Add the plant labels to the plant schedule.
5. Include the VR shrub in the plant schedule.
6. Revise the plant schedule to show shrubs along the EC at 24" minimum.
7. Consider a greater proportion of evergreen trees in the mix of plants along the EC frontage.
8. Revise the plant schedule to show interior road trees at 21/2" caliper minimum.
9. Provide landscape plans with plant labels.
10. Add the standard plant note to the plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature
height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
11. Increase the number of shrub species so that no single shrub species exceeds 25% of the total number of shrubs proposed for the site.
12. Round contours with a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition.
TABLE A
This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
ARB1
Cover Sheet
12/23/13
6
Perspective from Photo 5, Existing
Vegetation
-
ARB2
Subdivision Overview
12/23/13
7
Perspective from Photo 5, Proposed
Landscaping Only
-
ARB3
Site Plan
12/23/13
8
Townhouse West Elevation
-
ARB4
Site Plan
12/23/13
9
Material Selections
-
ARB5
Site Plan
12/23/13
10
Community Center Overview
-
ARB6
Site Plan
12/23/13
11
Community Center Plan
-
ARB7
Viewshed Plan
12/23/13
12
Community Center Elevations
-
ARB8
Viewshed Plan
12/23/13
13
Community Center Elevations
-
1
Cover Sheet
-
14
Community Center Elevations
-
2
Photos from Stony Point Rd
-
15
Northeast Community Center Perspective
-
3
Photos from Stony Point Rd
-
16
Southwest Community Center
Perspective
-
4
Perspective from Photo 1 Existing
Vegetation
-
17
Community Center Exterior Materials
List
-
5
Perspective from Photo 1, Proposed
Landscaping Only
-