HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201400024 Staff Report 2014-02-24ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB- 2014 -24: New Hope Church Final Site Plan
Review Type
Final Site Plan
Parcel Identification
021000000012C1
Location
On the northwest side of the intersection of Dickerson Road (Route 606) and Dickerson Lane (Route 763), east of
Piney Mountain Road, approximately 350' west of the Route 29 Entrance Corridor
Zoned
Rural Areas (RA), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner /Applicant
New Hope Community Church/Michael Henderson, Pastor
Magisterial District
White Hall
Proposal
To construct a church with associated site improvements.
The area around the subject parcel includes residences, wooded lots, and other churches. On the south side of
Context
Dickerson Lane is a substation of the Rappahannock Electric Company. To the east of the subject parcel is a partly
wooded parcel with a billboard. An overhead utility line and its cut through the trees cross the southern end of the
subject parcel.
Only the easternmost 150' of the subject parcel, a strip at the southeast corner of the site parallel to Dickerson Road
Visibility
and Route 29, is included within the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. Proposed in this strip is a portion of the
entrance drive and the grading and tree removal required to construct the drive. None of the proposed buildings or
parking areas is located within this strip. This area with the EC Overlay District has limited visibility from the Route
29 Entrance Corridor due to its distance from Route 29, and due to off -site trees that narrow the view to an
approximate 70' width across Dickerson Lane.
ARB Meeting Date
April 7, 2014
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
DATE
APPLICATION/REVIEW TYPE
RESULT
March 18, 2013
ARB- 2013 -10: Initial Site Plan
The ARB reviewed and provided comments on the initial site plan. See
The proposed church building does not
None.
Attachment A for the action letter.
May 8, 2013
Appeal of the ARB's March 18, 2013
The Board of Supervisors affirmed the ARB's decision on the initial site
decision to the Board of Supervisors
plan.
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
1 -5,
Structure design
The proposed church building does not
None.
9 -16
fall within the Entrance Corridor, so the
building is not subject to ARB review.
17 -21
Accessory structures and equipment
There are no accessory structures or
None.
equipment to be located in the area of the
site that is subject to ARB review.
22 -31
Lighting
There is no lighting proposed within the
None.
area of the site that is subject to ARB
review.
Landscaping
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor
The subject parcel has no EC frontage.
None.
streets should include the following:
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the
Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least
3'/2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the
ground) and should be of a plant species common to
the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35
feet on center.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to
the area should be interspersed among the trees required
by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need
not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They
may be planted among the large shade trees in a less
regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board
fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should
align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the
foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved
parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive
of road right-of-way and utility easements.
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding
The plan shows 2%2" caliper shade trees
Provide documentation
landscaping are intended to reflect the landscaping
that are common to the area (Red Maple,
that VDOT has approved
characteristic of many of the area's significant historic
River Birch, Sweetgum and Willow Oak)
the planting in the right -
sites which is characterized by large shade trees and
spaced 40' on center along the entrance
of -way.
lawns. Landscaping should promote visual order
drive. Smaller trees (Serviceberry,
within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate
Redbud, Sweetbay Magnolia) are
Confirm that the plants
buildings into the existing environment of the corridor.
interspersed among the large trees and
groups of evergreen and deciduous shrubs
proposed on top of the
gas line can be planted in
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be
obtained by planting different types of plant materials
are proposed along both sides of the drive.
that location. If they
that share similar characteristics. Such common
The plan achieves a good mix of trees and
can't shift the plants to
elements allow for more flexibility in the design of
shrubs that fills the slopes adjacent to the
maintain plant quantities
structures because common landscape features will
drive without an overly artificial
and to maintain an
help to harmonize the appearance of development as
seen from the street upon which the Corridor is
appearance. The planting compensates for
appropriate appearance
centered.
the trees removed from the immediate
area and it is expected to blend into the
from the EC.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior
surrounding landscape for an appropriate
Revise the quantity of
roads. Such trees should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper
appearance from the EC.
Little Bluestein in the
(measured six inches above the ground) and should be
plant list from 43 to 53.
of a plant species common to the area. Such trees
Four of the proposed trees are located in
should be located at least every 40 feet on center.
the VDOT right -of -way at the base of the
entrance drive, and several shrubs are to
be located over a gas line. Documentation
from VDOT is needed to confirm that the
planting in the right -of -way is acceptable.
Confirmation that planting can be
accomplished on top of the gas line is also
needed (i.e., is the line deep enough for
planting above ?).
53Little Bluestein are drawn on the plan
but 43 are identified in the plant list.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
There are no interior pedestrian ways
None.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all
within the area of the site that is subject to
interior pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least
ARB review.
2'/Z inches caliper (measured six inches above the
ground) and should be of a species common to the
area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet
on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
There are no parking areas within the area
None.
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking
of the site that is subject to ARB review.
areas, located 40 feet on center. Trees should be
planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of
one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and
should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of
the parking area.
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should
measure 21 /2 inches caliper (measured six inches above
the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of
a species common to the area. Such trees should be
planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to
maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected
by curbing.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize
the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets.
Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
There are no buildings within the area of
None.
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along
the site that is subject to ARB review.
the front of long buildings as necessary to soften the
appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and
type of such trees or vegetation should be determined
by the length, height, and blankness of such walls.
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site,
buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory
buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24
inches in height.
37
Plant species:
The proposed plant species are acceptable
None.
a. Plant species required should be as approved by the
for a central Virginia landscape.
Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic
Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native
Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
38
Plant health:
This note has been provided on Sheet
None.
The following note should be added to the landscape
L1.1.
plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be
allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height;
the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall
be pruned minimally and only to support the overall
health of the plant."
Development pattern
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing
The location of the entrance drive and the
None.
natural landscape and should contribute to the creation
layout of the site were established with the
of an organized development plan. This may be
initial site plan.
accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the
trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting
new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and
choosing species that reflect native forest elements;
insuring that any grading will blend into the
surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous
landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing
significant river and stream valleys which may be
located on the site and integrating these features into
the design of surrounding development; and limiting
the building mass and height to a scale that does not
overpower the natural settings of the site, or the
Entrance Corridor.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to
the Entrance Corridor street and to other development
within the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike
paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of
the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor
street should be parallel to the street. Building
groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance
Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to
adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to
provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site
(including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees
or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such
natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If
the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements
required by that section should be located so as to
maximize the use of existing features in screening such
improvements from Entrance Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should
respect existing views and vistas on and around the
site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of
The width of the graded area at the
None.
the site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use
entrance drive appears to be reduced from
of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through
that shown in the initial plan by
the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with
approximately 20'. This reduces the
the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are
visibility from, and impact on, the
generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the
Entrance Corridor.
grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot
minimum radius where they meet the adjacent
condition. Final grading should achieve a natural,
rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6
feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be
terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur
Tree protection is shown on the plan and
None.
within the drip line of any trees or other existing
has been installed at the site.
features designated for preservation in the final
Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Proposed planting along the Entrance Drive: mix of plant types and species, quantity of plants, anticipated appearance from the EC
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. Provide documentation that VDOT has approved the planting in the right -of -way.
2. Confirm that the plants proposed on top of the gas line can be planted in that location. If they can't shift the plants to maintain plant
quantities and to maintain an appropriate appearance from the EC.
3. Revise the quantity of Little Bluestein in the plant list from 43 to 53.
protection fencing should be shown on, and
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and
erosion and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final
Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly
delineated and protected on the site prior to any
grading activity on the site. This protection should
remain in place until completion of the development of
the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or
movement of heavy equipment within this area.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required,
An underground detention facility is
None.
new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the
proposed under the entrance drive. A rip
finished site to the extent possible.
rap ditch, a paved ditch, and a drop inlet
are located nearby. Given the size of these
features, the distance from the EC, and the
proposed landscaping, these features are
not expected to have an impact on the
appearance of the site from the EC.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Proposed planting along the Entrance Drive: mix of plant types and species, quantity of plants, anticipated appearance from the EC
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. Provide documentation that VDOT has approved the planting in the right -of -way.
2. Confirm that the plants proposed on top of the gas line can be planted in that location. If they can't shift the plants to maintain plant
quantities and to maintain an appropriate appearance from the EC.
3. Revise the quantity of Little Bluestein in the plant list from 43 to 53.
TABLE A
This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing/Revision Date
C1
Title Sheet
8 -28 -13
C2
Site Layout and Utility Plan
8 -28 -13
C3
Grading, ECS and Water Quality Plan
8 -28 -13
C4
Additional Notes and Details
8 -28 -13
C5
Additional Details and Profiles
8 -28 -13
L1
Landscape Plan
L2
Landscape Details
2 -21 -14
A2.1
Elevations
6 -24 -13
Site Photos: EC looking north, EC looking west at Dickerson Lane, EC looking south, aerial
view looking north
-
ATTACHMENT A
�r�lfit��
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
March 19, 2013
New Hope Church
C/O Michael Henderson, Trustee and Pastor
3445 Seminole Trail, Suite 300
Charlottesville, Va 22911
RE: ARB- 2013 -010: New Hope Church
021000000012C1
Dear Mr. Henderson:
At its meeting on Monday, March 18, 2013, the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, by a vote of 3:0, voted to forward the following
recommendations on the above -noted Initial Site Development Plan to the agent for the Site Review Committee:
Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per 30.6.4(2), (3) and (5):
None.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
None.
• Regarding recommended conditions of initial site plan approval:
ARB approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The final site plan shall show 2'/2" caliper trees at 40'
on center (or the equivalent thereof), at a minimum, along the entrance drive; and a mix of additional trees, located and spaced to achieve a
natural appearance, on the slope adjacent to the entrance drive to compensate for lost wooded area.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
Provide a tree conservation plan. Show tree protection fencing along all tree lines to remain, in particular along the entrance drive. Add the
installation of tree protection fencing to the sequence of grading and erosion control work.
You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and schedules are available on-
line at www.albemarle.org /ARB. Please be certain that your ARB submittal addresses the above -noted issues.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Maliszewski
Principal Planner
cc: Edmond H. Blackwell, P.E., Blackwell Engineering, PLC
566 East Market Street
Harrisonburg, Va 22801
File
10