HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201300131 Review Comments 2013-09-10Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat
Date Completed: Friday, July 25, 2014
Revievrer: Megan Yaniglos
Department, "Di vi9ion1.Agencr: Planning
Reviews Comments:
Review Status: Approved I ' I
Rage: 11 Count of Albemarle Cn: 3124!2015
Community Development Document Review
County Attorney's Office •
TO: V iir-e-
PROJECT NUMBER: 500 fiO (3- P) ,'�' / 4),_S'i IGc -e Phtts.
You have requested that our office review the attached development document identified below:
Drainage easement
- Shared parking agreement/easement
• Open space/greenway easement
Dedication of right-of-way
Parcel determination
/
c/ Other: Lc,ratdn
The document:
is approved
is conditionally approved with minor edits shown on the attached or noted in the comment below
/".;"..---s conditionally approved and ready to be circulated for signatures and acknowledgements
is conditionally approved with minor edits shown on the attached or noted in the comment below and ready
to be circulated for signatures and acknowledgements
is not approved because:
:Signatures or acknowledgement need to be redone(see comment below)
:Legal description needs to be revised(see comment below)
:Other(see comment below)
Comment -
If the document is approved,was submitted with the applicants'signatures,and is one to which the County is a
party,signatures indicating this office's approval as to form and the County Executive's approval or acceptance on
behalf of the County are provided.If the document did not include the applicants'signatures,a final version of the
document with the required signatures may now be submitted.
IL! .�1r Date: wv�31/
�g
�► pu„ 0 ,ty forney
Project Name:
Date Completed
Revievver:
Departments "Divi9ion1.Agency:
Reviews Comments:
Review Comments
Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final
Friday, March 28: 2014
Ellie Ray
Planning 0
Final Plat
Was waiting on signed document from Scott (he said the Deer) hadn't been revised since the previous Submittal)- then
realized that the Deed has changed and }hill need to be revie--xed prior to Owner signature.. Sent to CA.O 3 +12/14
Comments from CA:O received 3!28/14_ Revisions required. See CV folder for CA.O comments.
Review Status:
See Recommendations I ' I
Page: 1 1 Counts of A.1bemarle Cn: 131202015
Review of Private Improvement Maintenance Instrument
(Albemarle County Code§14-317)
TO: L [-(__ R&1
RE: SUB
The instrument required by Albemarle County Code § 14-317 for this subdivision:
�is approved.
V is not approved because it fails to satisfy one or more of the followin- requirement (number references are to
Albemarle County Code§ 14-317(A)):
LA ) 4(0 1. Identify the plat t, which the instrument applies;if the pla i has�en re .rded, the identification shall
D include a de-• .00k and page number.
20U State that the improvement will be maintained in perpetuity.
3. State that the improvement will be maintained to a standard that,at a minimum, ensures that it will
remain in substantially the condition it was in when approved by the county if the improvement was
installed prior to the agent signing the plat or the condition it is to be in when the surety was released
as provided in section 14-436;for a private street, shared driveway,or alley, the instrument also shall
state substantially as follows: "The travelway shall at all times be maintained so that it is safe and
convenient for passenger automobiles and emergency vehicles at all times except in severe temporary
weather conditions."
4. If the instrument pertains to the maintenance of one or more private streets,alleys or shared
driveways,it shall define"maintenance"by stating substantially as follows: "For purposes of this
instrument, `maintenance'includes the maintenance of the private streets or alleys, and all curbs,
curbs and gutters, drainage facilities,utilities,dams,bridges and other private street improvements,
and the prompt removal of snow,water, debris,or any other obstruction so as to keep the private
street or alley reasonably open for usage by all vehicles,including emergency services vehicles."
5. Describe the condition of the improvement when it was approved by the county if the improvement
was installed prior to the agent signing the plat or the condition it is to be in when the surety was
released as provided in section 14-436.
6. Identify the timing or conditions warranting maintenance of the improvement.
7. State a means to collect funds necessary for the cost of maintaining the improvement;at a minimum,
the means stated shall include the right of any landowner subject to the instrument to record a lien
against a non-contributing landowner, to bring an action at law to collect the funds,or both.
8. Describe how maintenance costs will be prorated among the landowners subject to the instrument
(e.g.,"equally,"or on a percentage basis);if any lot within the subdivision may be further divided, the
instrument shall also describe how maintenance costs will be prorated among the landowners after
division.
0 9. State substantially as follows: "No public agency,including the Virginia Department of
Transportation and the County of Albemarle,Virginia,will be responsible for maintaining any
improvement identified herein."
/ Date: 05/26! '
Greg � /
g
Depu 7 C. ty tto ey
Community Development Document Review
County Attorney's Office
TO: , [k.„-- P--Cti
PROJECT NUMBER: 50I Z/ 3 ezD 1 -3 I
You have requested that our office review the attached development document identified below:
Drainage easement
Shared parking agreement/easement
Open space/greenway easement
Dedication of right-of-way
Parcel determination
Other:
The document:
is approved
is conditionally approved with minor edits shown on the attached or noted in the comment below
is conditionally approved and ready to be circulated for signatures and acknowledgements
isc
is conditionally approved with minor edits shown on the attached or noted in the comment below and ready
to be circulated for signatures and acknowledgements
is not approved because:
: Signatures or acknowledgement need to be redone (see comment below)
:Legal description needs to be revised (see comment below)
: Other (see comment below)
Comment: Ott .pale, 1 !�V app r.� 'Ara-" reJreii Ge
101"5 / -Hi rr�l ii +5 (SAD()1d b 'Lots s -,F- 't'Amy? ¢' F ��
If the document is approved,was submitted with the applicants'signatures, and is one to which the County is a
party, signatures indicating this office's approval as to form and the County Executive's approval or acceptance on
behalf of the County are provided. If the document did not include the applicants'signatures, a final version of the
document with the required signatures may now be submitted.
Date: ,0211 4
Grel is to r De.. un A orney
Phone 434 - 296 -5832
C pF ALg�
IRGI �1P�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
Fax 434 - 972 -4126
To:
Scott Collins (scott @collins - engineering.com)
From:
Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner
Division:
Planning
Date:
October 1, 2013
Rev1: November 13, 2013
Rev2: December 10, 2013
Rev3: January 27, 2014
Rev4: March 13, 2014
Subject:
SUB 201300131 Westlake Hills Phase 1 - Final
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval:
1. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. Any necessary easements must be documented and approved during the road
plan or WPO application process. Final: It appears that an off -site easement is proposed on the southern
boundary; it is labeled as `temporary construction, utility and turn - around easement'. Please add the two
adjoining property owners as signatories on this plat, or provide a separate easement plat application which
they will sign. All off -site easements must be recorded prior to, or with, this final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
2. [14- 302(A)8 & 13.4.1(SO)] Proposed lots. Due to the application of the street tree bonus factor, all lots are
to be a minimum of 20,OOOsf with a minimum lot frontage of 80'. Final: It appears that lots 28 and 41 do not
meet the frontage requirement, please revise.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Lot 30 (formerly 28) appears to have the required 80' frontage,
but the dimension provided (63.47') is incorrect. The frontage dimension for Lot 31 is also incorrect.
Please revise the dimensions and verify that the minimum lot size is maintained.
Rev1: Two new lots (24 & 25) have been added to the plat; dimension the frontage for each lot.
Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. Please split the dimension that spans both lots 24 and 25 to
provide a frontage dimension for each lot.
Rev3: Comment addressed.
3. [14- 302(A)9] Building sites on proposed lots. The Board of Supervisors approved a critical slope waiver
request for this subdivision. Final: Please note this waiver on the plat. Additionally, in note #19 please
indicate that the minimum building site was determined to be 6038sf during the preliminary plat process.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Note the critical slope waiver as requested above.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
4. [14- 302(B)3] Public areas, facilities or uses. Coordinate with the Department of Parks and Recreation to
establish the exact location of the greenway area and any other facilities as noted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Please refer to comments provided by Parks during preliminary plat review. Final: The plat was sent
to Parks for review; comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev1: The plat was sent to Parks for review; comments, if any, will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev2: The plat was sent to Parks for review; comments, if any, will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev3: Parks hasn't provided any comments.
5. [14- 302(6)8 & 4.6.1(c)] Yards. This subdivision includes many non - standard setback /yard lines to
establish the setback or yard where the minimum lot width is achieved; therefore, all setback /yard lines must
be shown on the final plat. Final: Revise the setback /yard lines shown to establish the depth of all front and
rear yards to where the minimum lot width is achievable. Lots 28, 34, 37 & 38 appear not to meet this
standard on the front setback.
Rev1: Comment addressed. However, please dimension the setback on lot 39 (formerly 37) as it is
just slightly more than 25' and the difference could be overlooked during construction.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
Final Plat Comments:
6. [2.2.3] Minimum open space required. A minimum of 25% open space is required for cluster development,
and must be provided in each phase. It appears this standard has been met, but please list the percent
provided for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
7. [14- 302(6)2] Name of the plat preparer. Provide the name and seal of the person who prepared the plat.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
Rev2: Comment addressed. The purpose of this comment is to make sure the surveyor's seal is
included on the plat prior to submittal for County signature.
Rev3: The surveyor's seal must be on the plat when it's submitted for County signature.
Rev4: The surveyor's seal must be on the plat when it's submitted for County signature.
8. [14- 303(K)] Temporary turnarounds. It is unclear exactly what is proposed in terms of a temporary
turnaround, but please add the following note, if necessary: "The area on this plat designated as a
temporary turnaround will be constructed and used as other streets in the subdivision until (street name)
is /are extended to (street name), at which time the land in the temporary turnaround area will be abandoned
for street purposes and will revert to adjoining property owners in accordance with specific provisions in their
respective deeds."
Rev1: Comment addressed.
9. [14- 303(M)] Street names. Please see E911 comments for information regarding street name approval.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
10. [14- 303(0 &P)] Signature & Notary panels. Please add signature and notary panels for any property owner
impacted by a proposed off -site easement.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
11. [14- 303(S)] Control points. Provide at least four (4) control points, evenly distributed across the property
and located at survey property corners, and shown on each sheet depicting the property. At the option of the
subdivider, the control points may be shown on a copy of the final plat, rather than on the original final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
12. [Comment & 13.3] Provide information regarding bonus factors and approved /proposed density on the
Cover Sheet. The density cannot be exceeded in any phase of the subdivision; please list the proposed
density of phase 1 for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. It appears the proposed density for this phase was calculated
backwards (acre /dwelling unit versus dwelling unit /acre); please revise.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
13. [Comment] A Deed of Easement for the public drainage easements must be approved by the County
Attorney's Office and recorded with this plat; please submit for review.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
Rev2: Deed of Easement submitted and sent to the County Attorney's Office on 1216/13; comments
will be provided once received.
Rev3: Comments on the Deed of Easement were provided via email on December 18`h. If the
Stormwater Management Maintenance and Access Easements are to be combined with this deed,
please revise accordingly. If this deed will remain in the same form as reviewed, then it must be
updated with the final revision date of the plat (once it's deemed approvable) and submitted for
County signature. The Stormwater Management Maintenance and Access Easements must be
conveyed by deed and this process must be finalized prior to Final Plat approval; please coordinate
with Michael and /or Ana.
Rev4: The Deed of Dedication and Easement was sent to the County Attorney's Office for review on
March 12th; comments will be provided once their review is completed. Due to revisions made to
add language regarding the Stormwater Management Maintenance and Access Easements, this
Deed must go through an additional review even though it was deemed approvable on the previous
submittal. Once the Deed is again deemed approvable, it must be submitted for County signature.
The Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is a separate document and it must be recorded prior to
Final Plat approval; please coordinate with Ana regarding the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement.
14. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until ACSA, RWSA, Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews
and grant their approval. Engineering and E911 comments have been provided. Inspections and
Fire /rescue have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, RWSA,
Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911 and Fire /rescue
have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, RWSA,
and VDOT complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911 and Fire /rescue have
reviewed the plat and have no objections. Do not resubmit until you receive comments or approval
from all reviewers.
Rev3: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering and ACSA
complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911, Fire /rescue, VDOT and RWSA
have reviewed the plat and have no objections. Do not resubmit until you receive comments or
approval from all reviewers.
Rev4: Comment addressed. See Engineering comments regarding additional requirements.
15. [Comment] The overview sheet does not include new lots 24 and 25; all lots should be shown.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
16. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. The landscape and maintenance easement appears to be missing on a portion
of Lot 17; please include all necessary easements.
Rev3: Comment addressed.
17. [14 -317] Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain improvements. An instrument for the maintenance
of privately owned improvements (street trees, common areas, etc) must be submitted for review and
approval by the County Attorney's office. This document must be recorded with the plat.
Rev3: Comment not addressed.
Rev4: The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions was sent to the County Attorney's
Office for review on March 12th; comments will be provided once their review is completed.
18. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until the road plans and WPO application are approved. All
bonds must also be posted prior to County signature.
Rev3: Comment not fully addressed. Bonds must be posted prior to Final Plat approval.
Rev4: Comment not fully addressed. Bonds must be posted prior to Final Plat approval.
19. [Comment] Note #21 has been added to sheet 1 since the previous submittal. The note refers to Sheet 9,
but it appears the easement it references is on Sheet 8; please revise. Additionally, the extents of this
easement exceed the limits of disturbance as proposed and approved on the WPO application; please
clarify.
Rev4: Comment addressed. This easement has been removed from the plat.
Please contact Ellie Ray in the Planning Division by using erayCa)albemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for
further information.
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat F-I
Date Completed: ITuesday, March 04. 2014
Reviewer: Glenn Brooks F-I
D e p a rtm e nt'D ivi s i o W.Ag e n q : Engineering
Reviews Comments:
Review Status: Pending F-I
Page: 1 Count of A.1 b e m a rl e C n: 3124, "2015 -
�OF _ALg�
�'IRCtN1�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Ellie Ray, Planning
From: Glenn Brooks, County Engineer
Date: 19 Feb 2014
Subject: Westlake Hills (SUB201300131)
The final plat for Westlake Hills has been reviewed against the final plans (WP0201300016). The
following concerns should be addressed prior to approval;
The "S.W.M. Easement & Mitigation Area" does not appear approvable. The county has a policy
against stormwater facilities which will become a nuisance to homeowners, and mitigation is not
practical where the county cannot expect any realistic enforcement, such as in small back yards.
The easement is in the middle of lot 1 and taking a substantial portion of lots
15,16,19,20,40,41,42,43 ... etc. This is onerous to future owners, who expect full use of their lot.
These encroachments of active mitigation areas need to be decreased substantially or removed from
residential lots. Also for small encroachments, the plat needs to clarify, either by referenced deed,
or on the plat itself, what exactly this easement restricts, and just what the mitigation is.
2. The "20' Pond Access Easmt." through proposed lots 13,14,15 does not appear workable. Please
provide alternative access outside lots, and abandon this easement if this area is to be residential
lots.
The stormwater facility and easement is in the floodplain on sheet 6A, and access is on lot 39. This
cannot be approved. Please move this facility and easement out of the floodplain and off residential
lots.
4. The "Variable Width Temporary Grading & Construction Easement" is too burdensome to these
future lots, and too undefined. If the lots essentially cannot be built upon until construction is
complete, then the platting of these lots should wait until that time. The County should not be part
of this exchange through approval of over- extensive easements. This appears to be the case with all
of these lots. On most projects, this sort of thing is arranged between buyer and seller, and the
county is not asked to be involved through the platting of extensive easements. I'll also note that
some of these construction areas double as mitigation areas, which does not appear reasonable.
Bonds will need to be posted prior to approval
6. Stormwater Management Maintenance agreement(s) will need to be recorded prior to approval.
7. Pro -rata share contributions will need to be received prior to approval.
[!, 4 j (�i R V, (�P Jug
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat
Date Completed: IThursday, February 06. 2014
Revievrer: Michael Koskow
Department, "Di vi9ion1.Agenc ,: Engineering
Reviews Comments:
bonds pending grading easements do not appear to match final plans
I
Review Status: Pending I " I
Page: 1 Count of Albemarle Cn: 3124!2015
Phone 434 - 296 -5832
C pF ALg�
IRGI �1P�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
Fax 434 - 972 -4126
To:
Scott Collins (scott @collins - engineering.com)
From:
Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner
Division:
Planning
Date:
October 1, 2013
Rev1: November 13, 2013
Rev2: December 10, 2013
Rev3: January 27, 2014
Subject:
SUB 201300131 Westlake Hills Phase 1 - Final
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval:
1. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. Any necessary easements must be documented and approved during the road
plan or WPO application process. Final: It appears that an off -site easement is proposed on the southern
boundary; it is labeled as `temporary construction, utility and turn - around easement'. Please add the two
adjoining property owners as signatories on this plat, or provide a separate easement plat application which
they will sign. All off -site easements must be recorded prior to, or with, this final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
2. [14- 302(A)8 & 13.4.1(SO)] Proposed lots. Due to the application of the street tree bonus factor, all lots are
to be a minimum of 20,OOOsf with a minimum lot frontage of 80'. Final: It appears that lots 28 and 41 do not
meet the frontage requirement, please revise.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Lot 30 (formerly 28) appears to have the required 80' frontage,
but the dimension provided (63.47') is incorrect. The frontage dimension for Lot 31 is also incorrect.
Please revise the dimensions and verify that the minimum lot size is maintained.
Rev1: Two new lots (24 & 25) have been added to the plat; dimension the frontage for each lot.
Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. Please split the dimension that spans both lots 24 and 25 to
provide a frontage dimension for each lot.
Rev3: Comment addressed.
3. [14- 302(A)9] Building sites on proposed lots. The Board of Supervisors approved a critical slope waiver
request for this subdivision. Final: Please note this waiver on the plat. Additionally, in note #19 please
indicate that the minimum building site was determined to be 6038sf during the preliminary plat process.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Note the critical slope waiver as requested above.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
4. [14- 302(8)3] Public areas, facilities or uses. Coordinate with the Department of Parks and Recreation to
establish the exact location of the greenway area and any other facilities as noted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Please refer to comments provided by Parks during preliminary plat review. Final: The plat was sent
to Parks for review; comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev1: The plat was sent to Parks for review; comments, if any, will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev2: The plat was sent to Parks for review; comments, if any, will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev3: Parks hasn't provided any comments.
5. [14- 302(6)8 & 4.6.1(c)] Yards. This subdivision includes many non - standard setback /yard lines to
establish the setback or yard where the minimum lot width is achieved; therefore, all setback /yard lines must
be shown on the final plat. Final: Revise the setback /yard lines shown to establish the depth of all front and
rear yards to where the minimum lot width is achievable. Lots 28, 34, 37 & 38 appear not to meet this
standard on the front setback.
Rev1: Comment addressed. However, please dimension the setback on lot 39 (formerly 37) as it is
just slightly more than 25' and the difference could be overlooked during construction.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
Final Plat Comments:
6. [2.2.3] Minimum open space required. A minimum of 25% open space is required for cluster development,
and must be provided in each phase. It appears this standard has been met, but please list the percent
provided for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
7. [14- 302(6)2] Name of the plat preparer. Provide the name and seal of the person who prepared the plat.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
Rev2: Comment addressed. The purpose of this comment is to make sure the surveyor's seal is
included on the plat prior to submittal for County signature.
Rev3: The surveyor's seal must be on the plat when it's submitted for County signature.
8. [14- 303(K)] Temporary turnarounds. It is unclear exactly what is proposed in terms of a temporary
turnaround, but please add the following note, if necessary: "The area on this plat designated as a
temporary turnaround will be constructed and used as other streets in the subdivision until (street name)
is /are extended to (street name), at which time the land in the temporary turnaround area will be abandoned
for street purposes and will revert to adjoining property owners in accordance with specific provisions in their
respective deeds."
Rev1: Comment addressed.
9. [14- 303(M)] Street names. Please see E911 comments for information regarding street name approval.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
10. [14- 303(0 &P)] Signature & Notary panels. Please add signature and notary panels for any property owner
impacted by a proposed off -site easement.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
11. [14- 303(S)] Control points. Provide at least four (4) control points, evenly distributed across the property
and located at survey property corners, and shown on each sheet depicting the property. At the option of the
subdivider, the control points may be shown on a copy of the final plat, rather than on the original final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
12. [Comment & 13.3] Provide information regarding bonus factors and approved /proposed density on the
Cover Sheet. The density cannot be exceeded in any phase of the subdivision; please list the proposed
density of phase 1 for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. It appears the proposed density for this phase was calculated
backwards (acre /dwelling unit versus dwelling unit /acre); please revise.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
13. [Comment] A Deed of Easement for the public drainage easements must be approved by the County
Attorney's Office and recorded with this plat; please submit for review.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
Rev2: Deed of Easement submitted and sent to the County Attorney's Office on 12/6/13; comments
will be provided once received.
Rev3: Comments on the Deed of Easement were provided via email on December 18'". If the
Stormwater Management Maintenance and Access Easements are to be combined with this deed,
please revise accordingly. If this deed will remain in the same form as reviewed, then it must be
updated with the final revision date of the plat (once it's deemed approvable) and submitted for
County signature. The Stormwater Management Maintenance and Access Easements must be
conveyed by deed and this process must be finalized prior to Final Plat approval; please coordinate
with Michael and /or Ana.
14. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until ACSA, RWSA, Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews
and grant their approval. Engineering and E911 comments have been provided. Inspections and
Fire /rescue have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, RWSA,
Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911 and Fire /rescue
have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, RWSA,
and VDOT complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911 and Fire /rescue have
reviewed the plat and have no objections. Do not resubmit until you receive comments or approval
from all reviewers.
Rev3: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering and ACSA
complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911, Fire /rescue, VDOT and RWSA
have reviewed the plat and have no objections. Do not resubmit until you receive comments or
approval from all reviewers.
15. [Comment] The overview sheet does not include new lots 24 and 25; all lots should be shown.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
16. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. The landscape and maintenance easement appears to be missing on a portion
of Lot 17; please include all necessary easements.
Rev3: Comment addressed.
17. [14 -317] Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain improvements. An instrument for the maintenance
of privately owned improvements (street trees, common areas, etc) must be submitted for review and
approval by the County Attorney's office. This document must be recorded with the plat.
Rev3: Comment not addressed.
18. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until the road plans and WPO application are approved. All
bonds must also be posted prior to County signature.
Rev3: Comment not fully addressed. Bonds must be posted prior to Final Plat approval.
19. [Comment] Note #21 has been added to sheet 1 since the previous submittal. The note refers to Sheet 9,
but it appears the easement it references is on Sheet 8; please revise. Additionally, the extents of this
easement exceed the limits of disturbance as proposed and approved on the WPO application; please
clarify.
Please contact Ellie Ray in the Planning Division by using eray(@a1bemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for
further information.
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) Final Final Plat
Date Completed: |VVmdnmedmy. January O8'2014
Rex/ewer
Michael Ko§mm
DepertmentiD|v|a|on�4gmncy: Engineering F-I
Reviews Comments:
1 VVPO plans f.WPO2O13'OOO15l are approved but need on executed SWA and VVPO'ESC and VVPO'SVVK8bond '
agreements-
12. Road plans (SUB2013-00030) are approved but need aubdiAaion-road and aubdMaion'oower band agreements-
3. SWIVI facility on approved WzC/plans is currently proposed in the flood plain for Uckingho|e Creek After an
|
amendment tothese plans is approved, will need on easement plat to rev�ioe the SWIVI easement for this facility in its
|
/amended location-
Review Status: |SeeRecormmemations []
Page: 11 County cfAlbemarle 0n: F24/ 015
Ellie Ray
From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 3:09 PM
To: Ellie Ray
Subject: SUB201300131: Westlake Hills - Phase 1 - Final Plat
Ellie,
The construction documents have been approved and below you will find the only comment that needs to be addressed
on the plat.
The 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement Extending from the cul -de -sac in Jonna Street through the shared property line of Lots
37 and 38, terminating at the existing RWSA 30' sanitary sewer easement needs to be updated. This easement should be
both a 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement and a RWSA Access easement.
Please have the applicant update the easement callout note. Thank you.
Alexander J. Morrison, EIT
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, VA 22911
[434] 977 -4511 Ext. 116 (0)
[434] 979 -0698 (F)
A16merlo County
Service Auth6rity
9 4rving
`4 Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Ellie Ray
From: Victoria Fort [vfort @rivanna.org]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 6:50 PM
To: Ellie Ray
Cc: Alex Morrison
Subject: SUB - 2013 -00131 Westlake Hills - Phase I Final Plat
Ellie,
RWSA has reviewed the final plat for Westlake Hills Phase I as prepared by Roudabush, Gale, and Associates and dated
November 26, 2013 and has no further comments.
Please let me know if you need anything further or if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Victoria
Victoria Fort, EIT
Civil Engineer
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(P): (434) 977 -2970 ext. 205
(F): (434) 295 -1146
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat F-I
Date Completed: lWednesday, December 18. 2013
Reviewer: Ellie Ray F-I
D e p a rtm e nt'D ivi s i o W.Ag e n cy: Planning
Reviews Comments:
Review status: See Recommendations F-I
Page: 1 Count of A.1 b e m a rl e C n: 3124, "2015 -
Community Development Document Review
County Attorney's Office
TO: l Ire LI .
PROJECT NUMBER: 1 50 . 2013 00 131 Hi
t ��
You have requested that our office review the attached development document identified below:
Drainage easement
Shared parking agreement/easement
Open space /greenway easement
Dedication of right -of -way
Parcel determination
Other:
The document:
is approved CrihGl9 /l eGc� U-/ Lce-. $ r� �� �� Q
ft ttr ivy amp, &. �s Co��4 in feed ' CO��'�,�Ze I Of M
is approved with minor edits as noted on the attached de-ec{ .
is not approved because:
: Signatures or acknowledgement need to be redone (see comment below)
Legal description needs to be revised (see comment below)
: Other. (see comment below)
Comment: .
If the document is approved, was submitted with the applicants' signatures, and is one to which the County is a
party, signatures indicating this office's approval as to form and the County Executive's approval or acceptance
on behalf of the County are provided. If the document did not include the applicants' signatures, a final version
of the document with the required signatures may now be submitted.
Date:
Gr ety tn�er
De unty Att rney
Phone 434 - 296 -5832
C pF ALg�
IRGI �1P�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
Fax 434 - 972 -4126
To:
Scott Collins (scott @collins - engineering.com)
From:
Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner
Division:
Planning
Date:
October 1, 2013
Rev1: November 13, 2013
Rev2: December 10, 2013
Subject:
SUB 201300131 Westlake Hills Phase 1 - Final
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval:
1. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. Any necessary easements must be documented and approved during the road
plan or WPO application process. Final: It appears that an off -site easement is proposed on the southern
boundary; it is labeled as `temporary construction, utility and turn - around easement'. Please add the two
adjoining property owners as signatories on this plat, or provide a separate easement plat application which
they will sign. All off -site easements must be recorded prior to, or with, this final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
2. [14- 302(A)8 & 13.4.1(SO)] Proposed lots. Due to the application of the street tree bonus factor, all lots are
to be a minimum of 20,OOOsf with a minimum lot frontage of 80'. Final: It appears that lots 28 and 41 do not
meet the frontage requirement, please revise.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Lot 30 (formerly 28) appears to have the required 80' frontage,
but the dimension provided (63.47') is incorrect. The frontage dimension for Lot 31 is also incorrect.
Please revise the dimensions and verify that the minimum lot size is maintained.
Rev1: Two new lots (24 & 25) have been added to the plat; dimension the frontage for each lot.
Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. Please split the dimension that spans both lots 24 and 25 to
provide a frontage dimension for each lot.
3. [14- 302(A)9] Building sites on proposed lots. The Board of Supervisors approved a critical slope waiver
request for this subdivision. Final: Please note this waiver on the plat. Additionally, in note #19 please
indicate that the minimum building site was determined to be 6038sf during the preliminary plat process.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Note the critical slope waiver as requested above.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
4. [14- 302(8)3] Public areas, facilities or uses. Coordinate with the Department of Parks and Recreation to
establish the exact location of the greenway area and any other facilities as noted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Please refer to comments provided by Parks during preliminary plat review. Final: The plat was sent
to Parks for review; comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev1: The plat was sent to Parks for review; comments, if any, will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev2: The plat was sent to Parks for review; comments, if any, will be forwarded upon receipt.
5. [14- 302(8)8 & 4.6.1(c)] Yards. This subdivision includes many non - standard setback /yard lines to
establish the setback or yard where the minimum lot width is achieved; therefore, all setback /yard lines must
be shown on the final plat. Final: Revise the setback /yard lines shown to establish the depth of all front and
rear yards to where the minimum lot width is achievable. Lots 28, 34, 37 & 38 appear not to meet this
standard on the front setback.
Rev1: Comment addressed. However, please dimension the setback on lot 39 (formerly 37) as it is
just slightly more than 25' and the difference could be overlooked during construction.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
Final Plat Comments:
6. [2.2.3] Minimuln open space required. A minimum of 25% open space is required for cluster development,
and must be provided in each phase. It appears this standard has been met, but please list the percent
provided for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
7. [14- 302(6)2] Name of the plat preparer. Provide the name and seal of the person who prepared the plat.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
Rev2: Comment addressed. The purpose of this comment is to make sure the surveyor's seal is
included on the plat prior to submittal for County signature.
8. [14- 303(K)] Temporary turnarounds. It is unclear exactly what is proposed in terms of a temporary
turnaround, but please add the following note, if necessary: "The area on this plat designated as a
temporary turnaround will be constructed and used as other streets in the subdivision until (street name)
is /are extended to (street name), at which time the land in the temporary turnaround area will be abandoned
for street purposes and will revert to adjoining property owners in accordance with specific provisions in their
respective deeds."
Rev1: Comment addressed.
9. [14- 303(M)] Street names. Please see E911 comments for information regarding street name approval.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
10. [14- 303(0 &P)] Signature & Notary panels. Please add signature and notary panels for any property owner
impacted by a proposed off -site easement.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
11. [14- 303(S)] Control points. Provide at least four (4) control points, evenly distributed across the property
and located at survey property corners, and shown on each sheet depicting the property. At the option of the
subdivider, the control points may be shown on a copy of the final plat, rather than on the original final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
12. [Comment & 13.3] Provide information regarding bonus factors and approved /proposed density on the
Cover Sheet. The density cannot be exceeded in any phase of the subdivision; please list the proposed
density of phase 1 for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. It appears the proposed density for this phase was calculated
backwards (acre /dwelling unit versus dwelling unit /acre); please revise.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
13. [Comment] A Deed of Easement for the public drainage easements must be approved by the County
Attorney's Office and recorded with this plat; please submit for review.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
Rev2: Deed of Easement submitted and sent to the County Attorney's Office on 12/6/13; comments
will be provided once received.
14. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until ACSA, RWSA, Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews
and grant their approval. Engineering and E911 comments have been provided. Inspections and
Fire /rescue have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, RWSA,
Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911 and Fire /rescue
have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, RWSA,
and VDOT complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911 and Fire /rescue have
reviewed the plat and have no objections. Do not resubmit until you receive comments or approval
from all reviewers.
15. [Comment] The overview sheet does not include new lots 24 and 25; all lots should be shown.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
16. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. The landscape and maintenance easement appears to be missing on a portion
of Lot 17; please include all necessary easements.
17. [14 -317] Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain improvements. An instrument for the maintenance
of privately owned improvements (street trees, common areas, etc) must be submitted for review and
approval by the County Attorney's office. This document must be recorded with the plat.
18. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until the road plans and WPO application are approved. All
bonds must also be posted prior to County signature.
Please contact Ellie Ray in the Planning Division by using erayna albemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for
further information.
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat
Date Completed: I Friday, November 22, 2013
Revievrer: Ellie Ray
Department, "Divi9ion1.Agency: Planning
Reviews Comments:
Applicant resubmitted prior to receiving VDOT.. ACSA and RWSA comments. I requested that they retract their
resubmittal and address comments from ALL revie-,evers prior to resubmitting. They agreed and xithdrew this submittal
I
Review status: See Recommendations F-]
I
Rage: 11 Count of Albemarle Cn: 3124!2015
Ellie Ray
From: Victoria Fort [vfort @rivanna.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:04 PM
To: Ellie Ray
Subject: SUB - 2013 -00131 Westlake Hills - Phase 1 Final Plat
Ellie,
Thank you for providing a new copy of the final plat for review. I met with RWSA engineering staff this morning to
discuss the final easement plat for the Westlake Hills Phase 1 Subdivision Plat, dated November 4, 2013, and from the
discussion, I have the following comments for the engineer.
Sheet 6A:
1. RWSA requests that the additional 20' of sewer easement to be granted to RWSA extend through the SWM
Access and Maintenance Easement.
2. RWSA asks to be granted an access easement along the County SWM Access & Maintenance Easement.
Sheet 7:
1. Remove note stating that Additional 20' RWSA easement is "Outside of SWM Access & Maint. Esmt."
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.
Thanks a lot,
Victoria Fort, EIT
Civil Engineer
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(P): (434) 977 -2970 ext. 205
(F): (434) 295 -1146
Ellie Ray
From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:50 AM
To: Ellie Ray
Subject: SUB201300131: Westlake Hills - Phase 1 - Final Plat
Ellie,
The construction drawings are still under review by Jeremy. Because the utility locations should not change, Jeremy has
reviewed the plat. The ACSA has only 1 comment which needs to be addressed in order to grant approval.
The 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement Extending from the cul -de -sac in Jonna Street through the shared property line of Lots
37 and 38, terminating at the existing RWSA 30' sanitary sewer easement needs to be updated. This easement should be
both a 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement and a RWSA Access easement.
Please have the applicant update the easement callout note. Thank you.
Alexander J. Morrison, EIT
Civil Engineer
Service Authb[i
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Office: (434)977-4511 EXT: 116
This email may contain confidential information that should not be shared with anyone other than its intended
recipient(s).
C-10MM ONWEALTH Of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701 -3819
Gregory A. Whirley
Commissioner of Highways
November 19, 2013
Ms. Ellie Carter Ray
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SUB - 2013 -00131 Westlake Hills, Phase I - Final Plat
Dear Ms. Ray:
We have reviewed the Final Subdivision Plat for Westlake Hills, Phase I dated September 3,
2013 with revisions dated November 4, 2013 as submitted by Roudabush, Gale & Associates.
Inc. and offer the following comments:
1. Jonna Street as shown on the final plat is called Guadalupe Drive on the road plans.
These names should agree.
2. Westhall Drive as shown on the final plat is called Colorado Road on the road plans.
These names should agree.
3. The layout of the storm sewer shown on the final plat does not agree with the storm
sewer in the most recent set of road plans. Most notably, additional drainage easement is
needed at the intersections with the Eastern Connector.
If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
1/� *L&�-
Troy Austin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
� OF AL g�
VLRC1 A
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
The 2 "d submittal of the final subdivision plat has been reviewed:
1. Final plat approval cannot precede final road plan (SUB2013- 00030; not yet approved) or WPO
plan (WP02013- 00016; not yet approved) approval for Westlake Hills Phase 1.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
2. Pro -rata share payment to Lickinghole Basin for stormwater treatment is required prior to WPO
plan approval.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
4. Please indicate easements for proposed mitigation (MIT) areas proposed with WPO plans on final
plat after WPO plan approval.
(Rev]) Easements appear; however they may need to be revised pending approval of WPO plan.
5. A VDOT accepted public road or a subdivision - road bond will need to be posted for roads
proposed with Westlake Hills Phase 1 road plan prior to the approval of the final plat.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
6. Subdivision — water & sewer (by ACSA) and WPO (ESC and SWM including MIT by the county)
bonds will need to be posted prior to the approval of the final plat.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
7. A stormwater management maintenance agreement will be required for Westlake Hills Phase 1
prior to grading permit approval. This is recommended prior to final plat approval.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
Memorandum
To:
Ellie Ray, Project Planner
From:
Michael Koslow, Engineering Review (SUB201300131)
Project:
Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Plat
Plan preparer:
Roudabush, Gale & Associates Inc. [434- 977 -0205]
Owner or rep.:
Lickinghole Creek, LLC
Plan received date:
10 September 2013
(Rev])
5 November 2013
Date of comments:
19 September 2013
(Rev])
14 November 2013
Reviewer:
Michael Koslow
The 2 "d submittal of the final subdivision plat has been reviewed:
1. Final plat approval cannot precede final road plan (SUB2013- 00030; not yet approved) or WPO
plan (WP02013- 00016; not yet approved) approval for Westlake Hills Phase 1.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
2. Pro -rata share payment to Lickinghole Basin for stormwater treatment is required prior to WPO
plan approval.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
4. Please indicate easements for proposed mitigation (MIT) areas proposed with WPO plans on final
plat after WPO plan approval.
(Rev]) Easements appear; however they may need to be revised pending approval of WPO plan.
5. A VDOT accepted public road or a subdivision - road bond will need to be posted for roads
proposed with Westlake Hills Phase 1 road plan prior to the approval of the final plat.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
6. Subdivision — water & sewer (by ACSA) and WPO (ESC and SWM including MIT by the county)
bonds will need to be posted prior to the approval of the final plat.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
7. A stormwater management maintenance agreement will be required for Westlake Hills Phase 1
prior to grading permit approval. This is recommended prior to final plat approval.
(Rev]) Comment remains.
Phone 434 - 296 -5832
C pF ALg�
IRGI �1P�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
Fax 434 - 972 -4126
To:
Scott Collins (scott @collins - engineering.com)
From:
Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner
Division:
Planning
Date:
October 1, 2013
Rev1: November 13, 2013
Subject:
SUB 201300131 Westlake Hills Phase 1 - Final
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval:
1. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. Any necessary easements must be documented and approved during the road
plan or WPO application process. Final: It appears that an off -site easement is proposed on the southern
boundary; it is labeled as `temporary construction, utility and turn - around easement'. Please add the two
adjoining property owners as signatories on this plat, or provide a separate easement plat application which
they will sign. All off -site easements must be recorded prior to, or with, this final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
2. [14- 302(A)8 & 13.4.1(SO)] Proposed lots. Due to the application of the street tree bonus factor, all lots are
to be a minimum of 20,OOOsf with a minimum lot frontage of 80'. Final: It appears that lots 28 and 41 do not
meet the frontage requirement, please revise.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Lot 30 (formerly 28) appears to have the required 80' frontage,
but the dimension provided (63.47') is incorrect. The frontage dimension for Lot 31 is also incorrect.
Please revise the dimensions and verify that the minimum lot size is maintained.
Rev1: Two new lots (24 & 25) have been added to the plat; dimension the frontage for each lot.
3. [14- 302(A)9] Building sites on proposed lots. The Board of Supervisors approved a critical slope waiver
request for this subdivision. Final: Please note this waiver on the plat. Additionally, in note #19 please
indicate that the minimum building site was determined to be 6038sf during the preliminary plat process.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Note the critical slope waiver as requested above.
4. [14- 302(8)3] Public areas, facilities or uses. Coordinate with the Department of Parks and Recreation to
establish the exact location of the greenway area and any other facilities as noted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Please refer to comments provided by Parks during preliminary plat review. Final: The plat was sent
to Parks for review; comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev1: The plat was sent to Parks for review; comments, if any, will be forwarded upon receipt.
5. [14- 302(8)8 & 4.6.1(c)] Yards. This subdivision includes many non - standard setback /yard lines to
establish the setback or yard where the minimum lot width is achieved; therefore, all setback /yard lines must
be shown on the final plat. Final: Revise the setback /yard lines shown to establish the depth of all front and
rear yards to where the minimum lot width is achievable. Lots 28, 34, 37 & 38 appear not to meet this
standard on the front setback.
Rev1: Comment addressed. However, please dimension the setback on lot 39 (formerly 37) as it is
just slightly more than 25' and the difference could be overlooked during construction.
Final Plat Comments:
6. L2.2.3] Minimum open space required. A minimum of 25% open space is required for cluster development,
and must be provided in each phase. It appears this standard has been met, but please list the percent
provided for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
7. [14- 302(6)2] Name of the plat preparer. Provide the name and seal of the person who prepared the plat.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
8. [14- 303(K)] Temporary turnarounds. It is unclear exactly what is proposed in terms of a temporary
turnaround, but please add the following note, if necessary: "The area on this plat designated as a
temporary turnaround will be constructed and used as other streets in the subdivision until (street name)
is /are extended to (street name), at which time the land in the temporary turnaround area will be abandoned
for street purposes and will revert to adjoining property owners in accordance with specific provisions in their
respective deeds."
Rev1: Comment addressed.
9. [14- 303(M)] Street names. Please see E911 comments for information regarding street name approval.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
10. [14- 303(0 &P)] Signature & Notary panels. Please add signature and notary panels for any property owner
impacted by a proposed off -site easement.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
11. [14- 303(S)] Control points. Provide at least four (4) control points, evenly distributed across the property
and located at survey property corners, and shown on each sheet depicting the property. At the option of the
subdivider, the control points may be shown on a copy of the final plat, rather than on the original final plat.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
12. [Comment & 13.3] Provide information regarding bonus factors and approved /proposed density on the
Cover Sheet. The density cannot be exceeded in any phase of the subdivision; please list the proposed
density of phase 1 for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. It appears the proposed density for this phase was calculated
backwards (acre /dwelling unit versus dwelling unit /acre); please revise.
13. [Comment] A Deed of Easement for the public drainage easements must be approved by the County
Attorney's Office and recorded with this plat; please submit for review.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
14. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until ACSA, RWSA, Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews
and grant their approval. Engineering and E911 comments have been provided. Inspections and
Fire /rescue have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, RWSA,
Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, E911 and Fire /rescue
have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
15. [Comment] The overview sheet does not include new lots 24 and 25; all lots should be shown.
Please contact Ellie Ray in the Planning Division by using erayCa)albemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for
further information.
Project Name:
Date Completed:
Revievrer:
Department, "Divi9ion1.Agency:
Reviews Comments:
Review Comments
Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat
Tuesday, NGvember 12, 2013
Robbie Gilmer
Fire Rescue
0
Q
Review Status: I No Objection I -
Rage: 11 Count of Albemarle Cn: 3124!2015
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat
Date Completed: lWednesday, November 06, 2013
Revievrer: Andrew Sack
Department "Di vi9ion1.Agenqv: E911
Reviews Comments:
Review Status: Approved F-1
Rage: 11 County of Albemarle !On: 3124!2015
Service A6thkitv
16 ,.o!J- 'T,
TO: Ellie Ray Carter
FROM: Alexander J. Morrison, Civil Engineer, EIT
DATE: October 7, 2013
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: SUB201300131: Westlake Hills - Phase 1 - Final Plat
The below checked items apply to this site.
✓ 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
✓ A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
✓ 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately 200' distant.
3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is
Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
✓ 4. A 15 inch sewer line is located approximately on site distant.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
✓ 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7. and plans are currently under review.
8. and plans have been received and approved.
9. No plans are required.
✓ 10. Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to
granting tentative approval.
11. Final site plan may /may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
✓ Comments:
• No ACSA approval will be granted for SUB201300131 until construction approval is granted for
the construction plans.
• Update easement callout notes to these descriptions-
* 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement Hereby Dedicated to ACSA
o Variable Width Sanitary Sewer Easement Hereby Dedicated to ACSA
0 20' Waterline Easement Hereby Dedicated to ACSA
o Variable Width Waterline Easement Hereby Dedicated to ACSA
• Remove "utility easement" from any ACSA easement.
• Sewer alignment on sheet 6A from cul -de -sac to the existing sewer does not match the plans
that are under review. Please update plat or plans with the correct alignment.
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698
www.serviceauthoriy.org
M mo& Canty
Service uth rit
50* + ` 'J'IqWWq
The Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) has no
technical comments on the SUB being reviewed. Engineering
comments are usually reserved for the site plan review stage.
Subdivision plats should correctly show ownership of properties
and existing easements. Recordation of new easements should
occur before dedication to and acceptance by the ACSA.
The ACSA can review the proposed subdivision plat and
determine if it is included in the jurisdictional area for water
and /or sewer service. [plater and /or sewer connections to the ACSA
system are allotted on a first come, first served basis at the
time connection fees are paid. The ACSA does not reserve
capacity in its system for a specific project.
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698
www.serviceauthoriy.org
Phone 434 - 296 -5832
C pF ALg�
IRGI �1P�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins (scott @collins - engineering.com)
From: Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: October 1, 2013
Subject: SUB 2013 -00131 Westlake Hills Phase 1 - Final
Fax 434 - 972 -4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval:
1. [14- 302(A)4] Easements. Any necessary easements must be documented and approved during the road
plan or WPO application process. Final: It appears that an off -site easement is proposed on the southern
boundary; it is labeled as `temporary construction, utility and turn - around easement'. Please add the two
adjoining property owners as signatories on this plat, or provide a separate easement plat application which
they will sign. All off -site easements must be recorded prior to, or with, this final plat.
2. [14- 302(A)8 & 13.4.1 (SO)] Proposed lots. Due to the application of the street tree bonus factor, all lots are
to be a minimum of 20,000sf with a minimum lot frontage of 80'. Final: It appears that lots 28 and 41 do not
meet the frontage requirement, please revise.
3. [14- 302(A)9] Building sites on proposed lots. The Board of Supervisors approved a critical slope waiver
request for this subdivision. Final: Please note this waiver on the plat. Additionally, in note #19 please
indicate that the minimum building site was determined to be 6038sf during the preliminary plat process.
4. [14- 302(8)3] Public areas, facilities or uses. Coordinate with the Department of Parks and Recreation to
establish the exact location of the greenway area and any other facilities as noted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Please refer to comments provided by Parks during preliminary plat review. Final: The plat was sent
to Parks for review; comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
5. [14- 302(8)8 & 4.6.1(c)] Yards. This subdivision includes many non - standard setback /yard lines to
establish the setback or yard where the minimum lot width is achieved; therefore, all setback /yard lines must
be shown on the final plat. Final: Revise the setback /yard lines shown to establish the depth of all front and
rear yards to where the minimum lot width is achievable. Lots 28, 34, 37 & 38 appear not to meet this
standard on the front setback.
Final Plat Comments:
6. [2.2.3] Minimum open space required. A minimum of 25% open space is required for cluster development,
and must be provided in each phase. It appears this standard has been met, but please list the percent
provided for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
7. [14- 302(8)2] Name of the plat preparer. Provide the name and seal of the person who prepared the plat.
8. [14- 303(K)] Temporary turnarounds. It is unclear exactly what is proposed in terms of a temporary
turnaround, but please add the following note, if necessary: "The area on this plat designated as a
temporary turnaround will be constructed and used as other streets in the subdivision until (street name)
is /are extended to (street name), at which time the land in the temporary turnaround area will be abandoned
for street purposes and will revert to adjoining property owners in accordance with specific provisions in their
respective deeds."
9. [14- 303(M)] Street names. Please see E911 comments for information regarding street name approval.
10. [14- 303(0 &P)] Signature & Notary panels. Please add signature and notary panels for any property owner
impacted by a proposed off -site easement.
11. [14- 303(S)] Control points. Provide at least four (4) control points, evenly distributed across the property
and located at survey property corners, and shown on each sheet depicting the property. At the option of the
subdivider, the control points may be shown on a copy of the final plat, rather than on the original final plat.
12. [Comment & 13.3] Provide information regarding bonus factors and approved /proposed density on the
Cover Sheet. The density cannot be exceeded in any phase of the subdivision; please list the proposed
density of phase 1 for tracking purposes as subsequent phases are submitted.
13. [Comment] A Deed of Easement for the public drainage easements must be approved by the County
Attorney's Office and recorded with this plat; please submit for review.
14. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until ACSA, RWSA, Parks, and VDOT complete their reviews
and grant their approval. Engineering and E911 comments have been provided. Inspections and
Fire /rescue have reviewed the plat and have no objections.
Please contact Ellie Ray in the Planning Division by using eraVCo)albemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for
further information.
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final final Plat
Date Completed: I Sunday, September 29, 2013
Reviel,ver: Robbie Gilmer
D e p a rtm e nt,D i vi 9 i o n.1.Ag e n qi: Fire Rescue
Reviews Comments:
Review Status: I No Objection F-I
Page: 11 County of Albemarle On: FT2-4i2015
= vY.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701 -3819
Gregory A. Whirley
Commissioner of Highways
September 25, 2013
Ms. Ellie Carter Ray
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SUB - 2013 -00131 Westlake Hills, Phase 1 — Final Plat
Dear Ms. Ray:
We have reviewed the Final Plat for Westlake Hills, Phase 1 dated September 3, 2013 as
submitted by Roudabush, Gale & Associates, Inc. and offer the following comments:
1. The sight easements should be located approximately 5' behind the sight lines as shown
on the construction plans.
2. The current submittal of Road Plans for this project has several locations where the sight
lines are shown at the incorrect location. When the lines are shown correctly, the sight
easements are likely to differ from that shown on the current Final Plat submittal. This
issue will need to be resolved before the Final Plat is approved.
Generally, the plat looks to be in agreement with the current Road Plans. Once the plans are
approved and the sight lines are located properly, we will need to verify that the final plat and
easements accurately reflect what is shown in the approved plans. If you need additional
information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Troy Austin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
� OF AL g�
VLRC1 A
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
The final subdivision plat has been reviewed:
1. Final plat approval cannot precede final road plan (SUB2013- 00030; not yet approved) or WPO
plan (WP02013- 00016; not yet approved) approval for Westlake Hills Phase 1.
2. Pro -rata share payment to Lickinghole Basin for stormwater treatment is required prior to WPO
plan approval.
3. Please indicate proposed water and sewer lines, proposed drainage lines and structures, fire
hydrants, and proposed stormwater management facilities outside of dedicated public R/W after
approved on Westlake Hills Phase 1 road and WPO plans.
4. Please indicate easements for proposed mitigation (MIT) areas proposed with WPO plans on final
plat after WPO plan approval.
5. A VDOT accepted public road or a subdivision - road bond will need to be posted for roads
proposed with Westlake Hills Phase 1 road plan prior to the approval of the final plat.
6. Subdivision — water & sewer (by ACSA) and WPO (ESC and SWM including MIT by the county)
bonds will need to be posted prior to the approval of the final plat.
7. A stormwater management maintenance agreement will be required for Westlake Hills Phase 1
prior to grading permit approval. This is recommended prior to final plat approval.
Memorandum
To:
Ellie Ray, Project Planner
From:
Michael Koslow, Engineering Review (SUB201300131)
Project:
Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Plat
Plan preparer:
Roudabush, Gale & Associates Inc. [434- 977 -0205]
Owner or rep.:
Lickinghole Creek, LLC
Plan received date:
10 September 2013
Date of comments:
19 September 2013
Reviewer:
Michael Koslow
The final subdivision plat has been reviewed:
1. Final plat approval cannot precede final road plan (SUB2013- 00030; not yet approved) or WPO
plan (WP02013- 00016; not yet approved) approval for Westlake Hills Phase 1.
2. Pro -rata share payment to Lickinghole Basin for stormwater treatment is required prior to WPO
plan approval.
3. Please indicate proposed water and sewer lines, proposed drainage lines and structures, fire
hydrants, and proposed stormwater management facilities outside of dedicated public R/W after
approved on Westlake Hills Phase 1 road and WPO plans.
4. Please indicate easements for proposed mitigation (MIT) areas proposed with WPO plans on final
plat after WPO plan approval.
5. A VDOT accepted public road or a subdivision - road bond will need to be posted for roads
proposed with Westlake Hills Phase 1 road plan prior to the approval of the final plat.
6. Subdivision — water & sewer (by ACSA) and WPO (ESC and SWM including MIT by the county)
bonds will need to be posted prior to the approval of the final plat.
7. A stormwater management maintenance agreement will be required for Westlake Hills Phase 1
prior to grading permit approval. This is recommended prior to final plat approval.
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat
Date Completed: Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Revievier: Andrew Slack
D e p a rtm e nVD ivi 9 i o W.Ag e n q� : E911
Reviews Comments:
Upon further review the road name of 'Guadalupe Drive' appears to extend the current road name of'Jonna Street'_
According to the Ordinance the road names should be the same unless the roads are offset by more than 50 feet_ The
road name of 'Colorado Road' appears to be a continuation of what is know as Westhall Drive' so this road name would fall
into the same restrictions as above_ Does the applicant intend for the name 'Eastern Connector Road' to be the actual
road name or is that just a place holder for the future connector road? If it is being used as a place holder then it should
be more clearly apparent and say 'Future Connector Road' or something equally specific. If the applicant desires this road
name then it will not be approved.
Review Status: Requested Changes F-1
Page: 1 Count of A.1bemarle Cn: 3124, "2015
Review Comments
Project Name: Westlake Hills (Phase 1) - Final Final Plat
Date Completed: IThursday, September 12, 2013
Revievrer: Jay Schlothauer
Department "Divi9ion1.Agency: Inspections
Reviews Comments:
Review Status: I No Objection F-1
Rage: 1 County of Albemarle !On: 3124!2015