Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB200300116 Correspondence 2023-02-15MEMO To: Janet Miller FROM: Susan Carpenter CC: Jim GRIGG, CHARLES KIRK, STEVE EDWARDS DATE: Nov 11, 2003 RE: Brown Auto Park Final Site Plan — Wall Signage Revision DAGGETT & GRIGG A R C H I T E C T S Attached are 2 copies of a revised Brown Auto Park elevation that has been altered to reflect the stairs recommendations: On November 4, 2003 the staff instructed: "1.) The wall signage for Chrysler and Dodge shall centered over their openings rather than begin left and right justified as shown on the previously submitted plan. Provide a drawing showing the revised locations." We have centered Chrysler and Dodge wall signage with their corresponding openings. Please refer to the attached drawings and renderings. The remaining items (2-5) of the Nov. 4 memo will be addressed and provided by Steve Edwards of McKee Carson. Sincerely / Susin Nnv 1 1 2003 1001 EAST MARKET STREET•SurrE 200• CRARLOTTEsALLE, VIRGINIA 22902 Voice (804)97148B4B•FAX (804)296,"040 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5823 Fax (434) 972 - 4012 November 11, 2003 Steve Edwards McKee Carson 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2003-116 Brown Auto Park Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Edwards: As per staffs review of the revised drawings received in our office November 11, 2003, for the above - referenced project, the following conditions remain outstanding for final approval and must be addressed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness: 1. The wall signage for Chrysler and Dodge shall be centered over their openings rather than being left and right justified as shown on the previously submitted plan. Provide a drawing showing the revised locations. 2. You have moved back the one "Athena' Elm to the southern planting island located in the display area east of the Phase 2 building. However, based upon your memo, the ACSA will not approve this tree so close to the pipe. Therefore, relocate the "Athena" Elm by expanding the island to accommodate the tree. (Based upon our conversation November 10, 2003, 1 will bring this issue of 3 required trees versus a revision of 2 trees to the Board for their review on November 17, 2003.) 3. The limits of grading have been coordinated; however, if the limits of grading after construction do not reflect what the ARB approved, then supplemental landscaping (screening trees 8'-10') will be required north of the 10'-12' high retaining wall. Please provide 2 copies of the revised drawings or other information addressing each of these outstanding conditions at your earliest convenience. Include in a memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. eiy, IO �� er cape Planner Margaret Doherty Max Greene /%Ir., McKEE CARSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS LAND PLANNERS 7 November 2003 Mrs. Janet Miller Albemarle County Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Brown Auto Park: Final Site Plan Review (ARB-2003-116) Comment Response Dear Janet: Our office received the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board's final review comments for the above referenced project (your letter dated November 4, 2003). Our responses to each comment are addressed below: 1. No action required by this office. This will be handled through Daggett & Griggs' office. 2. The Patmore Ash was moved to accommodate ACSA comments in an earlier set of revisions. I have relocated this particular Ash back on -site; however, due to existing conditions and ACSA comments I have shifted this tree, as well as the adjacent tree to the northeast, to the right. This shift will cause the front Entrance Corridor trees not to be 35' O.C. in this area. We feel this is an adequate solution. 3. A third Athena Elm has been reintroduced into the southwest planter island within the display area in front of Phase 2. When speaking to Margaret yesterday I raised a concern about locating this tree in this area, but after discussing the easement and pipe located in this area with Glenn Brooks, I am more comfortable with this than I was earlier. So you know, given the fact that the pipe is so deep in the ground there, however, we will still need to respect the ACSA comments and keep this tree out of their easement. A pipe conflict will occur and we will not increase this planter island. 4. We have reviewed all the sheets and concur there is a discrepancy in the trees being preserved versus those being removed. We have revised Sheets 3, 8 and 13 so they now coordinate with each other. 5. We have adjusted the tree conflicts according to our earlier conversation today. We trust that this addresses the ARB's concerns for the Final Site Development Plan. Provided there are no further comments, we respectively request that we be issued A Certificate of Appropriateness immediately. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, S� W Steve IV.Edwards xc: RBM/File Kenny Brown, Daggett & Grigg 0221 Nnv 1 12003 Affiliated with Field Sport Concepts, Ltd. 301 East High Street • Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 • 434-979-7522 • Fax: 434-977-1194 • mc@mckeecarson.com • www.mckeecarson.com COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5823 Fax (434) 972 - 4012 November 4, 2003 Steve Edwards McKee Carson 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2003-116 Brown Auto Park Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Edwards: As per staffs review of the revised drawings received in our office October 17, 2003, for the above - referenced project, the following conditions remain outstanding for final approval and must be addressed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness: 1. The wall signage for Chrysler and Dodge shall be centered over their openings rather than being left and right justified as shown on the previously submitted plan. Provide a drawing showing the revised locations. 2. The ARB approved landscape plan showed the required 3Y2" caliper shade trees, 35' o.c., on - site. You have moved a "Patmore" Ash from an on -site location at the northeast corner of the property to an off -site location. Relocate the "Patmore" Ash on -site. 3. You have removed one "Athena" Elm from the southern planting island located in the display area east of the Phase 2 building. Three trees are required. If you are unable to maintain the tree in the previous location, expand the island to accommodate the tree. 4. Your plans provide conflicting information regarding trees to remain and trees to be removed at the northeast comer of the property. The "limits of grading" line suggest more trees will be removed than what was approved by the ARB. Coordinate sheets 3, 8, and 13 to clearly delineate the extent of trees to remain. If the limits of grading do not reflect what the ARB approved, then supplemental landscaping is required north of the 10'-12' high retaining wall. 5. It appears since the last review that trees have shifted in the planting island south of the Route 29 entrance and there are now tree/pipe conflicts. Locate trees off the pipes. Please provide 2 copies of the revised drawings or other information addressing each of these outstanding conditions at your earliest convenience. Include in a memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate oygppropriateness may be issued. SincereLv �'. Janet L. Miller T Lpe Planner Margaret Doherty Max Greene Post -It® Fax Note 7671 Date NAPpages To From A . N• Co./Dept. 6 Phone # ne # Fax # _1 C Fax # 1 � ALgF / 1- a im V�RCIN� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5823 Fax (434) 972 — 4012 September 17, 2003 Steve Edwards 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2003-116 Brown Auto Park Final Site Plan; Tax Map 45, Parcel 68D4 and 68D6 Dear Mr. Edwards: On August 18, 2003 the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item and outlined the following conditions of approval: 1. Rectify the discrepancy between the lighting schedule and the lighting plan regarding the number of light fixtures labeled "G". 2. The monument sign shall be externally illuminated. If internal illumination is desired, then the sign will have to return to the Board. 3. Tree clusters in the planting islands located in the display area east of the Phase 2 building shall be composed of a combination of the already specified deciduous trees and evergreen shrubs. 4. The wall signage for Chrysler and Dodge shall be centered over their openings rather than being left and right justified as shown on the plan. 5. The design of the Phase 2 building shall be compatible with the Phase 1 building, as determined by the ARB. In addition, your office has noted that two Magnolias have been deleted from the plan in the vicinity of the entrance from Hilton Heights Road. I have reviewed the plan with revision date of 9/2/3 and have the following comments relative to the above - noted conditions and changes. 1. This condition has been satisfied. 2. No information has been received relative to this condition. 3. Evergreen shrubs have not been proposed for the planting islands in the display area east of the Phase 2 building. Rather, Sargent Juniper has been specified as a replacement for the Liriope. Sargent Juniper is a low -growing groundcover reaching a mature height of 1.5'. Evergreen shrubs reaching a mature height of 3'-4' are required. 4. No information has been received relative to this condition. 5. No further information is required regarding this condition at this time. 6. It appears that the two Magnolias that were eliminated can be added back in if the light fixture is slightly shifted to the west and the Magnolias are slightly shifted within the planting bed. An acceptable alternative would be the addition of one Magnolia back in the planting area for a total of two at the entrance from Hilton Heights Road, and the relocation of the third Magnolia to the southeast comer of the display parking area (east of the Trident Maple). In summary, the following conditions remain outstanding: 1. The monument sign shall be externally illuminated. (If internal illumination is desired, then the sign will have to return to the Board.) Provide complete fixture information on the plan. 2. Provide evergreen shrubs that reach a mature height of 3'-4' — not ground cover — in the planting islands located in the display area east of the Phase 2 building. 3. The wall signage for Chrysler and Dodge shall be centered over their openings rather than being left and right justified as shown on the plan. Provide a drawing showing the revised locations. 4. Regarding the deleted Magnolias, either a) Add back in the two deleted Magnolias by shifting the light fixture slightly to the west and shifting the Magnolias slightly within the planting bed; or b) Add one Magnolia back in the planting area for a total of two at the entrance from Hilton Heights Road, and move the third Magnolia to the southeast comer of the display parking area (east of the Trident Maple). Please provide 2 copies of revised drawings or other information addressing each of these conditions at your earliest convenience. Include a memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness maybe issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, l J ���L�fiW/ /j (aQ,.f�GYlr'.Lt/� Margaret ahszewski (J Design Planner Cc: ZFile Margaret Doherty Alan G. Franklin, PE, McKee Carson /%I r" McKEECARSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS LAND PLANNERS 10 September 2003 Mrs. Janet Miller Albemarle County Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Brown Auto Park: Final Site Plan Review (ARB-2003-116) Comment Response Dear Janet: Our office received the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board's final review comments for the above referenced project (your letter dated September 17, 2003). Our responses to each comment are addressed below: 1. No action required. 2. See Sheet 9; detail'B' 3. Sargent Juniper has been substituted with'Otto Luyken Cherry Laurel 4. Issue to be addressed with architect (Daggett & Grigg) 5. No action required. 6. 3 'tree -form Magnolias have been chosen for the entrance at Hilton Heights Road. In addition, we have chosen another'tree-form Magnolia to be planted at the southeast corner of the display parking area (east of the Trident Maple). We trust that this addresses the County's concerns for the Final Site Development Plan. Provided there are no further Board comments, we respectively request that the Board consider granting us final approval. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Steve W. Edwards xc: RBM/File Kenny Brown Daggett & Grigg encl: plans 0221 Affiliated with Field Sport Concepts, Ltd. aCi Z003 301 East High Street • Chadottesville, Virginia 22902 •434-979-7522 • Fax: 434-977-1194 • me@mckeecarson.com • www.mckeecarson.com 4. I• COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Departmerlt of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 /1/3 Charlottesville, , Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5823 Fax (434) 972 - 4012 7 /JL/�� August 20, 2003 Steve Edwards 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2003-116 Brown Auto Park Final Site Plan; Tax Map 45, Parcel 68D4 and 68D6 Dear Mr. Edwards: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday, August 18, 2003. The Board, by a vote of 4:1, approved the request as presented , pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions: llll� Rectify the discrepancy between the lighting schedule and the lighting plan regarding the number of light fixtures labeled "G". /ttWU-V 2. The monument sign shall be externally illumin ted. If internal illur�in�ticn is desired, then the, sign will have to return to the Board. /IU lig1.s rncirvcfal ox l esL�r� 3. Tree clusters in the planting islands located in the display area east of the Phase 2 building shall be composed of a combination of the already specified deci uous trees and evergreen shrubs. U rto fA t cri&" m1 A50'-} ew � — 90( {r' n�✓S /+ ti¢e0 bThe wall signage for Chrysler and Dodge shall be centered ov r their o nings rather than being left and right justified as shown on the plan. The design of the Phase 2 building shall be compatible with the Phase 1 building, as determined by the ARB. S(C I wo v► tnclw�Trm s rCtvry rcd �rvM eni+*.r,ce Iry o, I�145 lk%kk VU. " �Q Please provide 2 copies of the revised drawings or other information addressing each of these conditions �cc�lC at your earliest convenience. Include a memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If L�'l changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Design Planner MM/jcf Cc: Fi/ Margaret Dohertv 6�;lei��g McKEE CARSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS LAND PLANNERS 2 September 2003 Mrs. Margaret Doherty Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Brown Auto Park: Final Site Plan Review (SDP-03-67) Comment Response Dear Margaret: Our office received the County's final review comments for the above referenced project (your letter dated August 8, 2003. Our responses to each of the agency comments are addressed as follows: Planning (Margaret Doherty): 1. Everything was done as requested except for adding the sidewalk on the south side of the Phase 11 building. We would like to request that this sidewalk be a condition of approval for the Phase II construction. 2. No action required. 3. No action required. 4. In process. Zoning (Keith Lancaster): 1. No action required. 2. This proposed site plan proposes 214 non -display parking spaces (required) plus the replacement of 80 spillover parking spaces for Double Tree Hotel for a total of 294 parking spaces. 3. Done. See Sheet 3. 4. Done. See Sheet 1. 5. Done. See Sheet 9. 6. Done. See Sheet 9. 7. Plat to be submitted by Thomas B. Lincoln, Land Surveyor. 8. hi process. 9. Duly noted. Affiliated with Field Sport Concepts, Ltd. ClEIVIED SEP 0 8 2003 301 East High Street • Chadottesville, Virginia 22902 •434-979-7522 • Fax: 434-977-1194 • mc@mckeecarson.com • www.mckeecarson,com Mrs. Margaret Doherty 2 September 2003 Page 2 Building Code (Jay Schlothauer): 1. Done. See Sheet 4. Engineering (Kim Cameron): 1. Duly noted. 2. Duly noted. 3. Done. 4. Existing ditches are shown on Sheet 3. Proposed grading for area in question is now shown on Sheet 5. 5. Travelway dimension changed to 12'. 6. Note revised. See Sheet 1. 7. Done. See Sheet 5. 8. Done. See Sheet 5. 9. Done. See revised calculation package. 10. See response to VDOT comments below. 11. Plat to be submitted by Thomas B. Lincoln, Land Surveyor. 12. Duly noted. 13. Met with Engineering Staff on 8/27/03 to resolve this item. Erosion Control (Max Greene): 1. Done. See revised narrative. 2. Done. See revised narrative. 3. Done. See revised narrative. 4. Done. See revised narrative. 5. Done. See revised narrative. 6. Done. See revised narrative. 7. Done. See revised narrative. 8. Done. See Sheet 13. 9. Done. See Sheet 13. Mrs. Margaret Doherty 2 September 2003 Page 3 10. Done. See Sheet 13. 11. Done. See Sheet 13. 12. Stormwater Detention Waiver Request approved by the Department of Engineering on January 21, 2003. 13. Done. See revised narrative in calculations package. 14. Done. See Sheet 13. 15. Met via phone on 8/27/03. 16. A full detailed topographic survey of the site was performed in the spring of 2003. I found that the layer depicting the existing parking lot was turned off on a previous submittal. 17. Per our phone conversation, the site was broken into three sub drainage areas with diversion dykes and sediment traps are proposed in lieu of one sediment basin. 18. See Sheet 13. 19. Done. See Sheet 13. 20, Done. See Sheet 13. VDOT (Matt Grimes): 1. Done. See Sheets 4 and 5. 2. We will email these turning movements to VOOT in PDF format. 3. Note was added. See Sheet 5. 4. Notes depicting right-of-way contribution added to Sheet 5. 5. Done. See Sheet 4. ARB (Margaret Maliszewski): (ARB-2003-116) 1. The discrepancy in the light fixture 'G' has been corrected. 2. Still needs to be addressed by Daggett & Grigg. 3. We have substituted the previously shown Liriope in the two front planting islands for Sargent Juniper. 4. This will be addressed by Daggett & Grigg. 5. Duly noted. This comment requires no action. Mrs. Margaret Doherty 2 September 2003 Page 4 In addition to the above I would like to point out that in our recent Site Review meeting the Planning Department requested additional sidewalks. This new sidewalks have impacted the landscape slightly which the Board approved on August 18, 2003. As a res o is request/comment we have had to lose (2) Magnolia's at the entrance off Hilton Heights Road given the remaining space. In our opinion, this reduction will not significantly impact or change the approved site plan and we request this modification be permitted. If you have additional concerns regarding this we suggest you discuss this with Margaret Doherty directly. We trust that this addresses the County's concerns for the Final Site Development Plan. Provided there are no further Staff comments, we respectively request that Staff consider granting us tentative approval. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Alan G. Franklin, P.E. xc: Staff Agencies RBM/File Kenny Brown Daggett & Grigg encL• Final Site Development Plans Drainage Calculations/Narratives 0221 Margaret Maliszewski From: Steve Edwards [sedwards@mckeecarson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:50 PM To: 'Margaret Maliszewski' Cc: Keith Lancaster Subject: FW: Brown Auto Sign light 4524.pdf ,', 4524.pdf Margaret/Keith, You should have received our resubmittal by now on the above project. Our comment response letter indicates the sign light has not been completed. Here is the information on that. We will have it on the plans the next time you see it. Hopefully this will satisfy you enough to grant us a tentative approval. Steven W. Edwards, CLA McKee Carson 301 East High Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434.979.7522 (tele) 434.977.1194 (fax) -----Original Message ----- From: Alan Franklin [mailto:afranklin@mckeecarson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:42 PM To: 'Steve Edwards' Subject: FW: Brown Auto Sign light 4524.pdf -----Original Message ----- From: richard boyd [mailto:rsboyd@dgarchs.com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:43 PM To: afranklin@mckeecarson.com Subject: Brown Auto Sign light 4524.pdf Al and Steve Here is the light we want to use for the external sign light. Let me know if you need anything else Richard HYDREL 4524 ACCENT LIGHT 120 VOLT DESCRIPTION: A small compact cast unit designed for rugged applications. This compact unit is popular for accenting of small trees, shrubs, signs and walls. The addition of the glare shield assures a sharp cutoff. SPECIFICATIONS: MATERIAL: Fixture and knuckle: Cast aluminum or cast bronze. LAMP: See ordering guide. Lamp by others VOLTAGE: See ordering guide. SOCKET: Pulse rated medium base. B27, European standard FINISH: Bronze (BZ) textured powder coat standard. Other colors available. LIGHT DISTRIBUTION: N/A - Beam spread by lamp type. LENS: Convex tempered glass. MOUNTING: 1/2" NPT adjustable knuckle (IN). FASTENERS: Stainless steel. [7i 0!71 + 3 7/8" (98) GLARE SHIELD —>\ HYDREL is a registered trademark of Lirhonia Lighting TYPE MODEL#: FOR ORDERING OPTIONS SEE REVERSE SIDE NOTE: HYDREL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE ANY SPECIFICATION WITHOUT NOTICE. Any dimension on this sheet is to be assumed as a reference dimension: 'Used for information purposes only. It does not govern manufacturing or inspection requirements." (ANSI YI4.5-1973) DIMENSIONS: 5 5/8' (140) U.L. LISTED FOR WET LOCATIONS IF RATING: 65 12881 BRAOLEY AVENUE, SYLMAR, CALIFORNIA 91342 • PHONE: 818/382-9465 • FAX: 818/362-6548 HYDREL STANDARD DATA SHEETS\LTG-4524 ACCENT 7/2000 HYDREL FIXTURE OPTIONS Ordering and Specification Guide 4524 A 35M 120 EBA02 GS BZ Model: 4524 N4524 (European) Material: A Aluminum B Bronze Lamp Type: (Lamps by others)* us European INC (PAR-20 3 R20, med. base) INC P20 50W Max. P20 60W rr R20 50W Max. R20 50W rn HID (PAR-20, med. base) HID 35M (MH) 35M (MH), E2 `Some restrictions may apply Voltage: 60HZ 50HZ 120 23050HZ 208 24050HZ 220 240 277 347 1201277 TB (120, 208, 240, 277) Note: Not all voltagellamp combinations are available. Consult factory for more information. Mounting Options: JBA02 J-Box, two x 3/4" NPT bottom, cover t/2" JBB02 J-Box, two x 3/4" NPT bottom, cover 1/2" JBA05 J-Box, two x 3/4" NPT side, cover 1/2' NI JBS05 J-Box, two x 314" NPT side, cover 112" NI NJBA16 J-Box, two x PG16 bottom, alum. NJBB16 J-Box, two x PG16 bottom, bronze NJBAI6S J-Box, two x PG16 side, alum. NJBBI6S J-Box, two x PG16 side, bronze NJBA16 J-box, two x PG16 bottom, aluminum NJBB16 J-box, two x PG16 bottom, bronze NJBAI6S J-box, two x PG16 side, aluminum NJBBI6S J-box, two x PG16 side, bronze (HID Ballast Enclosures - Ballast Included) CEA02 Combo Box, two x 3/4" NPT bottom, cove CBB02 Combo Box, two x 314" NPT bottom, cove NCBA16 Combo Box, two x PG16 bottom, alum. NCBAI68 Combo Box, two x PG16 side, alum. NCBB16 Combo Box, two x PG16 bottom, bronze NCBBI6S Combo Box, two x PG16 side, bronze EBA02 Encapsulated Ballast Box, three x 314" NF 1/2" NPT alum. lid. (100 watt max.) EBB02 Encapsulated Ballast Box, three x 314" NF 1/2" NPT bronze lid. (100 watt max.) NEBA16 Encapsulated Ballast Box(plastic), three F alum. lid (100 watt max.) NEBB16 Encapsulated Ballast Box(plastic), three F bronze lid (100 watt max.) rsories: Internal Honeycomb Louver Glare Shield is (Options for Aluminum model only) Bronze (Standard) Black Green Gray White Terra Verde Green Custom Finish For Replacement Parts Consult Factory HYDREL is a registered tr waW or UNonle Ughling 12881 BRADLEY AVENUE, SYLMAR, CALIFORNIA 91342 • PHONE: 818/362-9465 • FAX: 818/362-6548 HYDREL STANDARD DATA SHEETSILTG-4524ACCENT 7/2000 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5823 Fax (434) 972 - 4012 August 20, 2003 Steve Edwards 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2003-116 Brown Auto Park Final Site Plan; Tax Map 45, Parcel 68D4 and 68D6 Dear Mr. Edwards: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday, August 18, 2003. The Board, by a vote of 4:1, approved the request as presented , pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions: 1. Rectify the discrepancy between the lighting schedule and the lighting plan regarding the number of light fixtures labeled "G". 2. The monument sign shall be externally illuminated. If internal illumination is desired, then the sign will have to return to the Board. 3. Tree clusters in the planting islands located in the display area east of the Phase 2 building shall be composed of a combination of the already specified deciduous trees and evergreen shrubs. 4. The wall signage for Chrysler and Dodge shall be centered over their openings rather than being left and right justified as shown on the plan. 5. The design of the Phase 2 building shall be compatible with the Phase 1 building, as determined by the ARB. Please provide 2 copies of the revised drawings or other information addressing each of these conditions at your earliest convenience. Include a memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Design Planner M M/j cf Cc: Fi Margaret Doherty ALBEMARLE COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD TENTATIVE AGENDA, AUGUST 18, 2003 ALBEMARLE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING MEETING ROOM #241 1:15 PM 1) Overview of wireless microphones 1:30 PM 2) Call to Order 3) Establish a Quorum 4) Public Comment 5) Consent Agenda 6) Signs a) ARB-2003-104: Asian Buffet Sign Application Type: Certificate of Appropriateness for a Sign Contact Person: Chuck Newton 7) Regular Review Items b) ARB-2003-103: Pantops Service Center Application Type: Final Review of a Site Development Plan Contact Person: Clark Gathright c) ARB-20031Brown Auto Park Application Type: Final Review of a Site Development Plan Contact Person: Steve Edwards 8) Other Business a) Coffee Drive -through b) Flaming Wok: Sign c) Next ARB Meeting: September 2, 2003, 12:30 9) Administratively Approved Certificate of Appropriateness 10) Adjournment ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #: Name ARB-2003-88 Brown Auto Park Final - Revised Review Type Final review of a site development plan Parcel Identification Tax Map 45, Parcels 68D4 and 68D6 Location Northwest corner of the intersection of Route 29 North and Hilton Heights Road Zoned Entrance Corridor (EC), Highway Commercial (HQ Magisterial District Rio Proposal To construct an automobile showroom with outdoor sales/storage/display of vehicles, including rooftop parking ARB Meeting Date August 18, 2003 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski PROJECT HISTORY This project was most recently reviewed by the ARB on July 21, 2003. (A full ARB history of the project was provided in the staff report prepared for that meeting.) The comments from that review are included in the Analysis section of this report. Staff met with the applicant after the meeting to review the ARB's comments and to discuss the required changes. PROPOSAL/PROJECT CHANGES Following is a summary of the changes to the proposal since the July 21, 2003 review. • The planting islands in the display area east of the Phase 2 building have been increased in size and the plantings have been revised to include additional trees. • The entrances to the building have been revised with the addition of brick bases. • The monument signs have been redesigned and coordinated into a single structure. • The lighting plan has been revised. Fewer pole lights are proposed along the EC. • Some utility lines have shifted. Some grading has been revised. ANALYSIS Included below in italics are the comments made by the ARB at the July 21, 2003 meeting. 1. Reduce the amount ofground level vehicle display. The planting islands in the parking area east of the Phase 2 building were previously proposed at 10' wide x 50' long. They have been revised to 10' wide for a length of 20' and 19' wide for a length of 30'. This constitutes a reduction of approximately 270 sf of display area, which is equivalent to 4 display spaces. The display area has been reduced, but reduction by only 4 spaces will have minimal impact. The applicant has indicated that the islands must increase by factors of 9', which corresponds to the width of a parked car, and any additional increase will limit the display area too much, The width of the display areas located east of the Phase 2 building are 80', 65', and 80'. ARB 8/10003 Brown Auto Display Final - Page I 2. Planting islands in the display area east of the Phase 2 building shall be increased in size to allow for true clustering of trees. Clusters shall be composed of a combination of conifers and broadleaf evergreens. The planting islands have been increased in size as described in #1, above. The southern island previously included one tree and now includes three. The northern island previously included two trees and now includes three. The proposed trees are Athena Chinese Elms at 3%z" — 4" caliper; consequently, the planting does not constitute a "combination of conifers and broadleaf evergreens". Although the concept of using only deciduous trees was discussed at the last ARB meeting, the wording of the SP condition specifically calls for a "combination of conifers and broadleaf evergreens". 3. The brighter blue (Pantone #285) shall not be used in the development. The applicant has agreed to use the darker blue. 4. Revise the designs of the entrances to reflect the historic architecture of the County. The entrances have been revised to include a brick -faced base that rises to a height of about 13' for the Honda entrance and I for the Chrysler entrance. Above the brick bases are found the blue curved Honda element and the white Chrysler entrance element. The Chrysler entrance has also been modified with the addition of a stronger cornice. These changes are steps toward making the design more compatible with the historic architecture of the county, although the Honda entrance, in particular, has a strong modem appearance due to its form and color. 5. Clear window glass shall be used. The elevations include notes indicating that clear glass will be used. 6. Reduce the number ofpole lights across the front of the site to limit impacts on the EC. There are 16 pole lights currently proposed along the front of the parking lot. Previously, 21 poles were proposed. Most poles are now spaced about 30' to 45' apart. The new proposal reduces the pole lights by one light in each parking bay along the front, and removes the lights from the planting islands in the parking area east of the Phase 2 building. However, pole lights have been added in the two islands in front of the Phase 2 building. Lighting levels reach a high of 29.5 footcandles, which is slightly less than the previous proposal. The lighting schedule shows 12 "G" fixtures, but only 11 appear on the plan. (See the analysis section following #21 for more information.) 7. Revise the monument signs to include only external illumination and brick bases to match the brick of the building. The design of the monument signs has been revised. A single structure with two parts is now proposed. The sign is composed of a brick -faced base (matching the brick for the buildings) supporting two separated panels. One panel has a blue background and white letters reading "Honda" with a Honda logo in white. The other panel has a white background. The top half includes the word "Chrysler" in black letters above a Chrysler logo. The bottom half includes the word "Dodge" in red letters below a red Dodge logo. The sides of the cabinets are proposed as stucco in "Seaboard" Colonial Cream, which matches the precast concrete color. A steel panel painted blue (to match the blue used on the building) separates the brick base from the sign panels. The sign meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements for height and area. The revised design is better coordinated with the building than the previous design. The applicant has provided conflicting information on the illumination of the sign. The drawings indicate ARB 8/18/2003 Brown Auto Display Final - Page 2 that the sign will be externally illuminated, but details on the proposed sign lights have not been submitted. Later messages have indicated that the applicant wants the sign to be internally illuminated, but the submittal materials are not clear as to which portions of the sign would be illuminated. External illumination has been recommended. With appropriate external light fixtures, it is anticipated that the sign could be a positive contribution to the Entrance Corridor streetscape. 8. Provide landscaping at the base of the monument signs. Sargent Juniper and Liriope are proposed around the base of the sign. This planting is expected to coordinate well with the other proposed landscaping on site. 9. Provide samples of the proposed segmented block retaining walls. A sample has been provided. The block is proposed to be Anchor Diamond Pro, straight face units. The applicant has indicated that the proposed color is "gray," but the sample appears to be primarily brown in color, with multicolored (white, brown, gray) flecks throughout. 10. Revise the heights of the retaining walls on the landscape plan to reflect the heights proposed on the grading plan. The discrepancies have been eliminated by deleting the wall heights from the landscape plan and showing them on the grading plan only. IL Confirm the actual height of the 4' high planter and coordinate the planter with the storefront elevation. The grading plan shows the planter wall as approximately 2' high, which would fall at the bottom of the storefront glass. 12. Include the island landscaping in the parking area east of the Phase 2 building in the Phase I landscaping plan. The phasing lines have been adjusted. 13. Provide a cluster of Southern Magnolia at the southeast corner of the display parking area. The applicant indicates that the utilities and easements in the area do not allow room for a cluster of Magnolias, so none have been added. 14. Replace the stone at the base of the retaining wall (west of the Phase 2 building) with evergreen shrubs or vines. The stone has been replaced with English Ivy. 15. Provide additional plantings (as shown on the previous plan) south of the 8' high concrete wall, south of Deck 2. Specifically, add plants along the wall and trees south of the display parking (Deck 2). Two Athena Chinese Elm, 3 Magnolia, 4 American Hombcam, and Boxwood have been added in this area. The proposed plants are appropriate for the area. 16. Propose trees at the 3 corners of the Phase 2 building. Athena Chinese Elms have been added in these locations. 17. Provide shrubs in the parking island west of the Phase 2 building where 2 shade trees were removed. Shrubs have not been added, but one tree is located in the island where two were originally proposed. This ARB 8/IW003 Brown Auto Display Final - Page 3 appears to be sufficient landscaping for this location. 18. Revise the plant quantities in the plant list to coordinate with the landscape plan. This has been done. 19. Correct all pipe/tree conflicts. The conflicts have been resolved. 20. Label all plants along the EC. This has been done. 21. Documentation of PDOT approval is required for all improvements in the right-of-way. A planting agreement has been provided. In addition, the ARB directed staff to provide comparative photometric information for the Crown and Colonial Auto sites. • The Colonial Auto plan was approved prior to the requirement for photometrics. There is no photometric plan on file for this site. Photos of the site showing light pole locations will be available at the ARB meeting. It should be noted that the lighting and other features of the site do not conform to current standards and guidelines. • The Crown photometric plan shows three light poles along the EC. The lights use a combination of 250 watt and 400 watt metal halide bulbs. They are spaced 80' and 105' apart. Lighting levels are shown at a maximum of 12.5 footcandles. The approved Crown lighting plan appears to differ considerably from the Brown proposal. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff continues to have reservations about the proposed building design and its relationship to the historic architecture of the County. However, based on the ARB's last round of comments, the following items remain outstanding or require further clarification: 1. Rectify the discrepancy between the lighting schedule and the lighting plan regarding the number of light fixtures labeled "G". 2. Provide complete information on the illumination proposed for the monument sign. 3. Tree clusters in the planting islands located in the display area east of the Phase 2 building shall be composed of a combination of conifers and broadleaf evergreens. Furthermore, it is recommended that the Board discuss the following issues: a. Planting island width/reduction in number of display spaces: Has the size of the islands been sufficiently increased? Has the display area been sufficiently decreased? b. Building entrances: Have the entrances been sufficiently revised such that they display a relationship to the historic architecture of the county? c. Guidelines: Does the overall project reflect the traditional architecture of the area? d. Pole lights: Has the number of pole lights been sufficiently reduced to minimize impacts on the EC? e. Monument sign illumination: Is internal illumination (with opaque backgrounds) acceptable? NOTE: This condition will remain for Phase 2: The design of the Phase 2 building shall be compatible with the Phase 1 building, as determined by the ARB. ARB 8/18/2003 Brown Auto Display Final -Page 4 08/07/03 THU 08:59 FAX 434 977 1194 yu.Uui zutlJ 1U.14 1VSA J114. U(:1J(JJ McKEE CARSON NIU1 l VILL Q 001 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF Charlottesville Re 7o1 VDOT Way Charlottesville, VA 22911 Tel (434) 293=0011 Date: 8.8-U3 Steve Edwards McKee Carson Fax # 977-1194 Post-Ir Fax Note 7671 DaIOS. pages j C./Dept Co. Phone# Phone# Fez # Fax # Fax (434) 979-3759 From: J.H.Kesterson Phone: 434-951-6428 comments: Planting Agreement B for Brown Auto Park, Route 29 Steve, Please find a copy of the approved planting agreement for your files. I will retain the original until the permit is issued for the frontage improvements for the site and issue one permit to cover everything. UJ/U,/UJ 1114, 08:39 IAA 434 977 1194 McKEE CARSON Z 002 Jim Bryan Resident Engineer Arc - V`�- PLANTING A GREEMENTB cgR`ol',r'F Cq Vt, k'>r L DATEq Virginia Department Of Transportation 701 VDOT Way Charlottesville, Virginia 229.11 Dear Mr. Bryan: COUNTY Albemarle We.the.undersigned, wishing to cooperate with the Virginia Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as VDOT), request permission to Landscape within the NOT Right -of -Way U.L. Route 29 {Southbo _0 lust befor the site's Tax Map & Parcel # is #45/6 between and PJP G `43 on Route 29 N. 8• L• Area to be Landscaped fronts In requesting this permission, the following provisions are agreed to: 1. Any planting proposed shall be outlined clearly and a sketch of same made a part of this agreement. 2. The applicant assumes the responsibility for the completion of the work outlined. 3. The applicant agrees to indemnify and save harmless VDOT, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, and all its officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions of claims of any character, name or description which might arise from the construction of work permitted by this agreement. 4. It is understood that should any planting allowed under this agreement become a traffic hazard, in the opinion of VDOT, at its discretion VDOT may remove such plantings. 08/07/03 THU 09:00 FAX 434 977 1194 NcKEE CARSON 12003 NAME Mr. Kenneth Brown SIGNATURE TITLE Presi ADDRESS Virginia's First Family of Fine Cars, Inc. 15920 Seminole Trail Char ottesville, VA - 22901 PHONENUMBER 434 Recommended Approval: ATE RESIDENT ENGINEER '7 • TE - DATE /. Margaret Maliszewski From: Steve Edwards [sedwards@mckeecarson.com] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:34 PM To: 'Margaret Maliszewski' Subject: FW: Brown Auto Park: ARB Questions Importance: High SWE —Original Message ----- From: C J Kirk [mailto:cjkirk@dgarchs.com] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:32 PM To: Steve Edwards Subject: RE: Brown Auto Park: ARB Questions Importance: High Steve: In response to Margaret's questions: 1) Anchor Diamond Pro, Straight Face units in color Gray; locate supplier is Allied Concrete. 2) The monument sign is internally illuminate and therefore there will be no external light fixtures. 3) Steve, not sure why you needed to remove a fixture. And if you did, then the schedule and lighting calculations would need to be re -done. Therefore, add back the "G" type fixture. Please pass this and any other required information / changes to the County. Charles J. Kirk, AIA Project Architect Daggett & Grigg Architects, PC ---Original Message ----- From: Steve Edwards [mailto:sedwards@mckeecarson.com] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:32 PM To:'richard boyd; Charles Kirk Cc: Bob McKee; 'Alan Franklin'; 'Margaret Maliszewski' Subject: FW: Brown Auto Park: ARB Questions Importance: High Richard/Charles, I got this email from Margaret today. Please let her know the answers to Questions 1 & 2 ASAP and please copy us. As far as the count goes for fixture G, I did remove one and I guess I forgot to modify the fixture count. The one I removed is located on the north side of the building, above the retaining wall. We discussed this the last time we submitted b/c it was above the wall and heavily pla, iced. Additionally, it was a way to save cost. I've since reviewed our plans and corrected the quantity to read (11). If cost is no longer an issue, please also let her know otherwise we and she should assume there are 11-G fixtures Revisions can will appear in our next submittal. Steven W. Edwards, CLA McKee Carson 301 East High Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434.979.7522 (tele) 434.977.1194 (fax) ----Original Message ----- From: Margaret Maliszewski[mailto:MMaliszewski@albemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:31 PM To: Steve Edwards (E-mail) Subject: Brown Auto Park Steve, A few questions on your submittal. Can you: 1. provide manufacturer name and color name/number for the segmental block? 2, provide information on the lights that will be used to externally illuminate the monument sign? 3. check the count on light fixture "G"? I find one less on the plan than is indicated in the schedule. diFSi11IM Margaret M. Maliszewski, Design Planner County of Albemarle, Dept. of Planning & Community Development 434-296-5823 x3276 Fax 434-972-4012 model, 1 page agreement Pagel of 2 Margaret Maliszewski From: Steve Edwards [sedwards@mckeecarson.coml Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:53 PM To: 'Margaret Maliszewski' Subject: 07-28-03, Maliszewski, FINAL ARB- Importance: High Sorry for the oversight 28 July 2003 Mrs. Margaret Maliszewski Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Brown Auto Park: Must ARB Review (ARB-2003-88) Comment Response Dear Margaret: Our office received the ARB comments from the July 2151 meeting for the above referenced project. Our responses to each item are as follows: 1. The amount of ground level vehicular display parking has been reduced. 2. The planting islands to the east of Phase 2 have been increased to accommodate a clustering of trees. This comment was amended to allow for deciduous trees, lawn or some kind of green treatment (non -asphalt surface) at the last meeting. 3. The brighter blue will not be used. 4. The entrances have been revised to incorporate brick bases at each dealership side. On the Honda side, the blue cylinder has been truncated with the insertion of a brick entranceway. The Chrysler/Dodge entrance, in addition to a brick base, has been modified by the design of a classically inspired cap at the cornice and a heavier trim detail around the glass opening. 5. Clear window glass has been added to all windows 6. The number of poles has been reduced along Rt. 29 by increasing the spacing between the poles. In addition, the average number of footcandles at the front parking area and driveway has been reduced from 10.22 fc. to 8.74 fc. 7. The monument signs have been combined into a single structure with both manufacturer signs. The names and logos will be contained within surface mounted, opaque panels. The total sign area complies with the signage ordinance for the entrance corridor. The sign will be illuminated externally. 8. Landscaping has been added to the bottom of the monument sign. 9. See included material sample for the color and texture of proposed segmented block retaining walls. 10. The heights of the retaining walls vary across the site and along each wall. Please refer to the grading plan to determine corner heights of each wall. 11. See response #10 above. 8/6/2003 model, 1 page agreement Page 2 of 12. The plantings in the islands east of Phase 2 have been included in Phase 1. 13. Given the amount of public utilities and easements in the southwest comer of the site, it is our opinion that these additional Magnolias are not necessary. The extensive plantings in this area should be sufficient to screen the display area and the future Phase 2 building. 14. The stone indicated at the base of the retaining wall west of Phase 2 has been replaced with an evergreen vine. 15. Additional plantings have been added south of the Phase 1 (deck 2) building. 16. Future trees have been shown in the parking islands of Phase 2. These trees will not be planting until Phase 2 is approved and under construction. 17. Due to reconfiguration of the underground storm structures and easements one tree has been added in that area. No additional shrubs are proposed or desired given the extensive landscaping along the display areas that was not previously shown in our earlier submissions. 18. The plant list has been revised. 19. All pipe and tree conflicts have been resolved to the best of our abilities. 20. All plants along the EC have been labeled. 21. We have submitted plans to VDOT for approval. We hope by the time this project is reviewed again we will have some documentation from them approving our design. We trust that this addresses the County's concerns for the Final Site Development Plan. Provided there are no further Staff comments, we respectively request that Staff consider granting us tentative approval. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Steven W. Edwards, CLA xc: RBM/File Ken Brown Daggett & Grigg Architects encl: Final Site Development Plans 0221 8/6/2003 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Roam 218 Charlottesville, Virginia22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5823 Fax (434) 972 - 4012 August 5, 2003 Steve Edwards 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2003-116 Brown Auto Park Final Site Plan Tax Map 46, Parcel 68D4 and 68D6 Dear Mr. Edwards: The above -noted item will be reviewed by the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board on Monday, August 18, 2003. The Board will review this item in Meeting Room #241, at 1:30 p.m. in the County Office Building, Second Floor, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. It will be necessary for someone to be present to speak for the application. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Design Planner MM/jcf Cc: File OFFICE USE ONLY Uate Submitted / Z O d ARB Meeting Date 1 ARB # Architectural Review Board Application Reset Form? (Resets all "Go to Buttons") Preliminary Site Development Plan ✓IF'inal Site Development Plan O No Fee Required ©' $200 Fee Required Preliminary Building Permit C No Fee Required Conceptual Site I Building Design ONo Fee Required Project Name: Brown Auto Park Final Building Permit 0 No Fee Required Advisory Review (SP / ZMA) No Fee Required ❑ Amendment to a Site Development Plan 0 No Fee Required ❑ Sign (Certificate of Appropriateness) 0 $75 Fee Required Revisions to a Certificate of Appropriateness O No Fee Required Tax Map and Parcel: TM 45/ 68D4, 68D6 Magisterial District: Rio Zoning: HC Phvsical Street Address (if assigned): NA Location of property (landmarks, intersections, or other): Northwest corner of the intersection of U.S. Route 29 and Hilton Heights Road. The site is across from Wal-Mart and in front of Sam's Club. Contact Person/Business Name: McKee Carson c/o Steve Edwards Address 301 East High Street Daytime Phone 4U 979-7522 Owner of Record The Dharma Foundation Address 14 S. Swinton Avenue Daytime Phone (561) 243.2400 Applicant (Who is the Contact person representing?): V Address 15920 Seminole Trail City Charlottesville Fax # 4( 34) 977-1194 City Delray Beach State VA Zip 22902 E-mail sedwardsCmckeecarson.com State FL Zip 33444 Fax # (561) 243.3855 E-mail 's First Family of Fine Cars c/o Mr. Kenneth E. Brown City Charlottesville State VA Zip 22901 Daytime Phone (434) 977.3380 Fax ## (434) 977.1466 E-mail Architect: Daggett & Grigg Architects Address 100 Tenth Street, NE, Suite 200 City Charlottesville State VA Zip 22902 434 971.8848 Fax # 1434 296.3040 E-mail ipgriggCdarchs.com Daytime Phone O � OFFICE USE ONLY Fee amount $ Date Paid Check By Who? Receipt # B,fw County of Albemarle Department of Planning & Community Development 401 Nlclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5823 Fax: (434) 972-4012 12/ 18 0_ Paac I of 2 of See the attached sheet for our comment response letter. sheet Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign This application is not complete without the appropriate checklist and submittal materials. The foregoing information is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have read and I understand the provisions of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. July 28, 2003 of Owner, Contract Purchaser, Agent Date Steven W. Edwards, Agent 434.979.7522 Daytime phone number of Signatory Print Name 1211 M2 Page 2 of 2 FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW by the Architectural Review Board Checklist of Requirements ARB-F(SDP)- NOTE TO APPLICANTS: The following information is required, unless specifically waived by the ARB, prior to processing a Certificate of Appropriateness review. The ARB may require additional materials, depending on the proposal. Include this checklist with your submittal package. Your package should include 8 submittal packets. Each packet should contain folded copies of each of your submittal materials. Project Name: Brown Auto Park Fv I. Complete application for final review, including: �✓ tax map and parcel numbers location and street address ✓ name of contact person with current address, phone numbers, and fax number ✓ written description of proposal (include a separate sheet if necessary; identify changes from preliminary submittal) �✓ written narrative of how proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor (include a separate sheet if necessary) �✓ Certificate of Appropriateness fee 0 2. 8 copies of a site plan showing: vv location of the proposed building on the site existing and proposed topography parking, travelways, mechanical equipment and associated screening, and other improvements .7V 3. 8 copies of a complete landscape plan that includes the following: all proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines ✓ a landscape key ✓ location of existing and proposed tree line(s) Q location of existing natural features �✓ location of significant individual trees (6" caliper or greater) and significant groups of trees, with trees indicated by common name and caliper Q location of below -ground utilities & associated easements; location & height of above -ground utilities & easements [� 4. 8 copies of all elevations of the building that will be visible from the Entrance Corridor �✓ 5. 8 copies of a complete lighting plan that includes: ❑✓ location of all proposed wall and site lighting �✓ descriptions of proposed lighting fixtures, including manufacturer's cut sheets for all proposed fixtures. and information on illumination type, intensity, style, shielding, color, and height ✓❑ photometric plan addressing all fixtures, indicating that lighting does not exceed .5 footcandles at property line v indication that lighting plan has been coordinated with landscaping plan E2'6. Samples of all proposed materials and colors 7. 8 copies of site sections to clarify proposed changes in topography and to clarify visibility of the development from the EC 8. 8 copies of color perspective sketches, showing the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor F✓ 9. 8 copies of any additional material necessary to address comments made by the ARB at the preliminary review 10. 8 copies of any additional material the applicant believes will clarify the proposal. County of Albemarle, Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902, Voice: 804-296-5823, Fax: 804-972-4012 5i20!99