HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA200800007 Review Comments 2008-08-25 A, ALAke
®��ilI1P
Lj�y1P
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Members, Albemarle Board of Zoning Appeals
From: Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator
Division: Zoning
Date: August 25, 2008
Subject: VA 2008-007 American Legion Post 74 Lodge Sign
This sign variance was deferred from the July 8th Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) meeting. The
deferral was to allow the applicant time to respond to comments made by both the Architectural
Review Board (ARB) and the BZA. The applicant has revised the proposed sign design (Attachment
B). A brief summary of the comments and revisions follows in addition to an explanation of staff's
recommendation.
The key ARB comments and the applicant's response include the following:
1. Remove the reader board or redesign such that it does not have a temporary appearance and
is coordinated with the overall sign. The sign has been redesigned with the reader board
incorporated within the main sign panel. It does not have what we normally consider to be a
"temporary appearance."
2. Revise the sign location to the island at the east side of the entrance to the site. The applicant
has agreed to this (with the first BZA meeting). It is also listed as a condition of BZA approval
for clarity.
3. Revise the sign so that the top of the sign panel is located below the brick course at the top of
the monument. This has been done.
The key BZA comment and the applicant's response include the following:
■ Incorporate the main sign and reader board. Reduce the sign variance request to the minimum
necessary. The sign size has been reduced from 44 square feet to just below 35 square feet, a
reduction of 9 square feet. The area necessary for variance is 4 inches wide by 8 ft long. This
amounts to 2.67 square feet. For convenience, we rounded it up to 3 square feet in our
description.
The ARB will discuss the sign proposal in their work session on September 2nd. When asked, the
applicant has indicated a willingness to either remove or change the color of what is now a white band
on the bottom of the sign. This is shown as a condition of approval.
Staff applauds the applicant's diligent efforts to consider the ARB and BZA comments and redesign
the sign. We particularly recognize the fact that the variance request has been reduced to less than a
3 square foot variance. Given the redesign of the sign, we can expect that the sign may not negatively
impact the character of the area. However, that is one of three Virginia Code criteria that must be met.
Staff is still unable to find an undue hardship approaching confiscation. Therefore, we must still
recommend denial of the variance.
Should the Board find cause to approve this request, it will be subject to conditions of ARB approval.
In addition, staff recommends the following conditions:
VA 2008-007 American Legion Post 74 Lodge Sign
August 25, 2008
Page 2
1. This variance is approved for a sign located at the existing entrance. This shall be
either a modification of the existing sign or a replacement of the existing freestanding
sign.
2. The sign shall be redesigned such that the white band on the bottom of the sign is
either deleted or it is black.
Attachment A: Action Letter from ARB dated July 10, 2008
Attachment B: Revised Sign Details
Attachment C: Original Staff Report
Cc: Randy Smith
American Legion Post 74 Lodge Inc.
of AI64.1„ Attachment A
• i����'y91) Action letter from ARB dated
L ®ter M 7/10/08
BZA Meeting 9/9/08
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax (434)972-4012
July 10, 2008
Randy Smith
Talley Anchor Sign Company
1044 Ruritan Boulevard
Chesapeake, VA
23324
RE: ARB2008-00070 American Legion — Sign
Tax Map 79, Parcel 19
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its
meeting on Monday, July 7, 2008. The Board, by a vote of 3:0, unanimously approved
the request, pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions and a work
session with the ARB to discuss the height of the sign and the design of the reader
board:
1. Revise the sign drawings by removing the reader board from the proposal or
providing a reader board design that does not have a temporary appearance and is
completely coordinated with the overall sign, including but not limited to colors,
architectural detail and method of attachment. The reader board design shall be
reviewed by the ARB in a work session.
2. Revise the sign location to the island at the east side of the entrance to the site,
avoiding easements and meeting setbacks.
3. Revise the sign drawings by reducing the overall height of the monument structure to
8'. If 10' or 12' is preferred, provide a mock-up on site for the ARB to review, to be
discussed at a work session.
4. Revise the sign drawings by showing the top of the sign panel located below the
brick soldier course at the top of the monument.
5. Brick sample submitted is approved. Revise the design of the structure with all signs
shown recessed within the structure.
6. The background of the sign panels shall be opaque. The logo and letters may
illuminate. External illumination is permitted. Provide cut sheets of the proposed
lights. All lighting emitting 3,000 lumens or more shall be a full cutoff style fixture. If
internal illumination of the sign panel (with logo), and reader board is approved,
revise the drawings to indicate that the backgrounds of both will be opaque.
7. Revise the site plan drawing to show the dimensioned location of the sign structure,
clearly indicating that it meets the 5' minimum setback requirement.
8. Provide a site plan showing the location of the proposed sign, and base plantings
consistent with the existing condition.
9. Revise the sign drawings to show all design changes.
Please contact me so we can schedule the work session and on-site sign mock up. Also,
please provide:
1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include
updated ARB revision dates on each drawing and an ARB approval signature
panel.
2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been
satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those
changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with
"clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned
with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been
met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Brent Nelson
Landscape Planner
cc: AMERICAN LEGION POST 74 LODGE INC
P 0 BOX 6566
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
22906
Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator (via email)
File
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution.
County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions.
If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the
intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files,in order to be
accepted for submittal.
TO: Brent W. Nelson DATE:
PROJECT NAME: ARB 2008-70 American Legion
Submittal Type Requiring Revisions()indicates County Project Number # Copies
Submittal Code
Erosion& Sediment Control Plan(E&S)
Mitigation Plan(MP)
Waiver Request(WR)
Stormwater Management Plan(SWMP)
Road Plan(RP)
Private Road Request, with private/public comparison
(PRR)
Private Road Request—Development Area(PRR-DA) •
Preliminary Site Plan(PSP)
Final Site Plan(or amendment) (FSP)
Final Plat(FP)
Preliminary Plat(PP)
Easement Plat(EP)
Boundary Adjustment Plat(BAP)
Rezoning Plan(REZ)
Special Use Permit Concept Plan(SP-CP)
Reduced Concept Plan(R-CP)
Proffers(P)
Bond Estimate Request(BER)
Draft Groundwater Management Plan(D-GWMP)
Final Groundwater Management Plan(F-GWMP)
Aquifer Testing Work Plan(ATWP)
Groundwater Assessment Report(GWAR)
Architectural Review Board(ARB) ARB 2008-70 2
Other: Please explain
(For staff use only)
Submittal Code #Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code #Copies Distribute To:
2 Brent W.Nelson
*Unassigned(in County Project Column)—Intake to assign a new Application Number
Attachment B
Sign Revised 8/25/08
BZA Meeting 9/9/08
9 -8" /
/ 8'-0" / NOTES:
1.) LOGO COLORS TO BE SPECIFIED
/10"/ /10"/ BY CUSTOMER PRIOR TO 20"
MANUFACTURING. /Tor CABINET/
2"RETAINER 2.)ALL COLORS TO BE VERIFIED 16"
H ("DARK RED"TO MATCH PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING. )1 BRICK i.
3M 3630-73)
I
I II B
4 8"SOLDIER
_ _
41 -- .080 ALUM.D/F
II AMERICAN Os LEGIO ' SIGN CABINETI.
I r FLAT LEXAN FACE
MirPOST ism FLAT
"WHITE"
BIM "DARK RED"PMS 201
i SUPPORT OUR .BT• (3M 3630-73)
VETERANS am +"LTRS(3)ROWS oF
ENE SUPPORT OUR us
SUPPORT
' - 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - 2"RETAINER"BLACK"
C
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I RESESSED
11 1 1 IIIII I 1 I I I 1 1 I I
Iv 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 I
IIIIIIIII I I I I I I 1 I I
; I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
7LI_1_I_L_I.1.1-1T1 11 1 1 1 1 1 i l 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 4
( 1111 111111111 [ 11111I1I1111111111111
I1 I I 1 1 1 I i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.
1 I 1 I I I I I T- I I 1 1 I I 1 I
1 1 1 1 I 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'
1 I 1 I 1 1 i 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1
1T11-1 L_l_I I -r-1-T]-1-11_t .L1L. BRICK BY OTHERS
I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
L I I I : I 1 1 1 : 1 1 I . I 1
._111„1117111 I 1_1_1 L TLr.T111.1Ti-,.1- _1 GRADE
TIT' T1.1: _ I'
` T 7 1 `
SIDE VIEW
Client Name: AMERICAN LEGION(RANDY SMITH) General Sign Specifications: WO#:
• TAu.EY ANCHOR
1T4isLocation: ❑ ■E Reno ■unwed
SIGN COMPANY P :
1044 RWIGN I0(M
C Sign Type: PYLON SIGN ❑ SI"°;e Faced ■ Double Face ❑Non Ult Usre'
0134 0AIa.Yi5054A 2�J'd g •
(757)545-8802 FAX(757)SASA132 0 Non-Illuminated III Illuminated 0 NEON Mont Approval Landlord Approval
A FULL SERVICE SIGN CO Sales Rep: its Start Date: oa/29/zoos Co File#: A1042908 El120 AT,pg+,-I •LEo
Designer: MM Last Revision: 07-28-08 WM (2) Scale: 3/8"=1'-0" 0 277sioi, Anpsl+Y-I ❑MO.LAMPS Page:1 of 2
0 COPYRIGHT 2005.BY TALLEYANCHOR SIGN COMPANY MLL DESIGNS PRESENTED ARE TIE SOLE PROPERTY OF TALLEY ANCHOR SIGN COMPANY;AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN PART OR WHORE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM TALLEY ANCHOR SIGN COMPANY
Attachment C
Original Staff Report
BZA Meeting 9/9/08
STAFF PERSON: Amelia McLuiiey
PUBLIC HEARING:July 8, 2008
STAFF REPORT VA-2008-007
OWNER / APPLICANT: American Legion Post 74 Lodge, Inc.
TAX MAP / PARCEL: 79 / 19
ZONING: C1, Commercial and EC, Entrance Corridor
ACREAGE: 1.988 acres
LOCATION: 3025 Louisa Road. Located on the south side of Rt. 22
(Louisa Rd), 500 feet east of the intersection with Route 250
East.
TECHNICAL REQUEST AND EXPLANATION:
The applicant requests relief from Section 4.15.12 of the Sign Regulations for the C1
district. This district allows a maximum 32 square feet of sign area for a freestanding
sign and they propose a 48 square foot freestanding sign. This is a variance request for
16 additional square feet of sign area.
They propose the installation of a new internally illuminated freestanding sign with a
reader board. The main sign panel is a fixed sign which consists of 32 square feet with
the American Legion logo and the following text:
Charlottesville & Albemarle
American Legion
Post 74 Since 1919
The reader board consists of 16 square feet with 3 lines for 4 inch tall changeable text.
While the content or purpose of the additional sign area may not be relevant, it is
provided for the Board's information. They propose to use the reader board for patriotic
messages such as "Support our Veterans."
Because this site is located on an Entrance Corridor, the sign is subject to ARB review.
The ARB review is scheduled for Monday, July 7th, the day prior to the BZA meeting.
The staff report, including recommendations, is found in Attachment A.
The variance application proposes a new sign location rather than using the existing
sign location on the east side of the entrance into the site. The new sign location would
necessitate removal of existing required landscaping in order for the sign to be installed
and be visible. Zoning staff and the ARB staff recommend that the applicant use the
existing sign location instead of the proposed new location. Use of the existing sign
location will: a) be more visible and better identify the entrance for turning movements
on a busy road; and b) not necessitate the removal of existing required landscaping.
The applicant has agreed to this condition.
VA-2008-007 2 July 8, 2008
RELEVANT HISTORY:
• Shadwell Antiquaries Preliminary Site Plan was approved in January, 1999 and
the Final Site Plan was approved in June, 1999.
• A special use permit (SP 2002-50) was approved for Shadwell Animal Hospital.
• The American Legion Post 74 purchased the property recently.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND QUALIFYING CONDITIONS:
This area is largely rural in character with most of the commercial development located
along the north side of Route 250E at the intersection with Route 22. This section of
Route 22 is scheduled for a road improvement project which will include widening.
This property is improved with two buildings which are connected with a covered
walkway. This lot is not particularly small for a commercial property. The topography is
not exceptional. It is not difficult to view a freestanding sign on the property frontage or
a wall sign on the building, from the road.
Staff can not recall another freestanding sign area variance in recent history. We have
typically considered physical qualifying conditions such as difficult topography impacting
sign visibility, in granting increased sign area, sign height and the like.
We are very supportive of the mission of the American Legion organization. However,
we are not able to find qualifying conditions for this request. If the reader board (the
additional 16 square feet above the maximum sign area) is critical to the applicants,
they have other options which do not necessitate a variance. For example, they could
redesign the sign panel area to include the reader board and not to exceed 32 square
feet. This would involve either reducing the size of the text and/or logo or eliminating a
portion of it. Another option would be to eliminate or not utilize a reader board.
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION AND STAFF COMMENT: A review of the variance
criteria provided by the applicant and comments by staff follows:
Hardship
Staff comments are written in italics and follow the applicant's comments. The applicant
notes that the variance is necessary:
• Request sign permit to be approved as submitted. Translucent background on
faces (to see American Legion logo).
• Community message board 2 ft. x 6 ft. to promote and inform the public about
our flag, our troops, our veterans, Americanism and Patriotism. This is what the
American Legion is all about.
VA-2008-007 3 July 8, 2008
• We won't promote sales or sell hot dogs off this board.
While staff is supportive of the applicant's mission and their intentions, they have not
provided evidence of undue hardship in accordance with the State Code criteria for
granting a variance. Although they offer to limit the messages for the reader board, we
may not be legally able to condition the message.
1. The applicant has not provided evidence that the strict application of
the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
Uniqueness of Hardship
The applicant notes:
• There is no other organization here that was formed by an act of Congress in
1919 or promotes patriotism as we do. Post 74 was chartered in 1919.
• Support your veterans and active duty troops.
Because we are not able to find evidence of a hardship, staff can not find that there is a
unique hardship. The need for additional sign area is not unique to this applicant.
People who use signs such as property owners and business owners are often "in
need"of additional signage. They often have to choose which businesses or services
can be listed on a limited maximum sign area.
2. The applicant has not provided evidence that such hardship is not
shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and
the same vicinity.
Impact on Character of the Area
The applicant offers:
• We hope our American flag and messages inform and educate the public.
• To be a member of the American legion, you must have served on active duty
during war time, no exceptions.
• We have over 600 active members from World War II, Vietnam, Cuban crisis,
and the current war.
• Stand up and support us. We fought for you.
Again, staff recognizes, appreciates and supports the sacrifice and mission embodied in
this organization. However, this alone does not meet the criteria for approval of a sign
variance.
VA-2008-007 4 July 8, 2008
A significant consideration in terms of the character of the area is the impact on the
Entrance Corridor. As stated in the staff report for this ARB sign review, reader boards
are generally discouraged. The ARB staff recommends that either the reader board be
removed or that it be redesigned so that it "does not have a temporary appearance and
is completely coordinated with the overall sign, including but not limited to colors and
method of attachment." Staff is not able to make positive findings that the proposed
sign with the 16 square feet of additional sign area positively impacts the character of
the area.
3. The applicant has not provided evidence that the authorization of
such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent
property and that the character of the district will not be changed by
the granting of the variance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since none of the three criteria for approval has been
met, staff must recommend denial of this variance request.
Should the Board find cause to approve this request, it will be subject to conditions of
ARB approval. In addition, staff recommends the following condition:
1. This variance is approved for a sign located at the existing entrance. This
shall be either a modification of the existing sign or a replacement of the
existing freestanding sign.
2. The main sign panel and reader board shall be redesigned in accordance
with ARB recommendations for color and method of attachment.
Attachments:
A — ARB 2008-70 American Legion Sign staff report
B — Variance Application
Attachment A
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project#: Name ARB-2008-70: American Legion Sign
Review Type Certificate of Appropriateness for a Sign
Parcel Identification Tax Map 79, Parcel 19
Location 3025 Louisa Road. Located on the south side of Rt. 22 (Louisa Rd), 500'
east of the intersection with Route 250E. •
Zoned Commercial (C1)and Entrance Corridor(EC)
Owner/Applicant American Legion Post 74 Lodge Inc.
Magisterial District Scottsville
Proposal To install an internally illuminated freestanding sign with reader board.
ARB Meeting Date July 7,2008
Staff Contact Brent Nelson
SITE/PROJECT HISTORY
• The current application is for the installation of an internally illuminated freestanding sign with a
reader board. A temporary sign was installed, without a sign permit, across the top of the existing
freestanding sign located in the northeast corner of the site, on the east side of the site entrance. A
panel wall sign was installed, without a sign permit, in the pediment above the building entrance
in the northeast elevation.
• May 30, 2008: VA 2008-7, American Legion Sign, Request for additional sign area. The zoning
ordinance permits 32 square feet of sign area by-right. The applicant is requesting an additional
16 square feet of sign area(for a total of 48 square feet)to allow a reader board in addition to the
main sign panel.BZA to review July 8,2008.
• December 30, 2004, ARB 2004-154, In Vino Veritas, Certificate of Appropriateness for 2 Wall
Signs, administrative approval.
• October 18, 1999, ARB 1999-77, Shadwell Antiquaries, Certificate of Appropriateness for a
Freestanding Sign, administrative approval.
• May 19, 2008, Scottsville Elementary School Sign, Proposal for a freestanding sign with non-
illuminated reader board and dark background (to coordinate with brick monument). Presented as
an Other Business item for direction from the Board. The ARB indicated they were willing to
consider the proposal; however, it would require a full review.
• May 7, 2007, Albemarle Baptist Church Sign, Proposal for a freestanding sign with internally
illuminated reader board. Presented as an Other Business item for direction from the Board. The
ARB was not supportive of the reader board request.
o June 28, 2007, the applicant withdrew the sign proposal upon receiving the staff report
recommending denial of the reader board request.
• May 15, 2003, ARB 2003-36, Jiffy Lube Reader Board, a motion to recommend approval of the
request failed by a 1:3 vote.
ARB 7/7/08,American Legion,Sign-Page 1
CONTEXT
The proposed sign is to be located on the south side of the State Route 22 Entrance Corridor, along the
frontage of a two-building commercial development located 500' east of the intersection with Route
250E. This section of the Entrance Comdor is largely rural in character with most of the commercial
development located along the north side of the Route 250E EC and at the intersection with Route 22.
Many of the commercial developments predate the Entrance Corridor and do not reflect established
design guidelines.
VISIBILITY
Due to its close proximity to the road, the sign under review will be highly visible from the State Route
22 EC.The sign is not expected to be visible from the Route 250E EC.
PROPOSAL
Type: Double face freestanding monument sign with reader board
Materials: Sign Panels: Lexan and Aluminum; Base: Brick
Overall Sign Size: 12' H x 9' - 8"W x 20"D
Sign Panel Size 4' H x 8'W x 2"D
Reader Board Size: 2' H x 6' W x 1"D
Text: "CHARLOTTESVILLE&ALBEMARLE"
"AMERICAN LEGION"
"POST 74 Since 1919"
Reader Board: 3 lines provided for 4"tall changeable text
Graphics: Amencan Legion seal
Colors: Base: brick
Sign text: "Dark Red"PMS 201 (3M 3630-73)
Sign background: White
Graphic:Red, blue and yellow
Reader Board: background: white,text: black
Location: Adjacent to State Route 22, 5' offset from right-of-way line, 160' east of the northwest
property corner.
Illumination: Internal,LED
Landscaping: 1 existing Oak street tree, adjacent to the Route 22 right-of-way, to be removed to
provide room for the monument.
ANALYSIS based on: Sign Drawings American Legion, Sheets 1 and 2, latest revision date 6/5/08; Site
Plan Drawing: Major Site Plan Amendment, latest revision date 3/20/2000. Materials: bnck for the
monument structure.
Issue: Reader Board
Comments: EC Guidelines state that reader boards are discouraged because their typical structure, style,
color, and location add an element to the site that is often incompatible with other design elements that
establish the overall appearance of the site. They do not contribute to a cohesive image on site. Their
general appearance is typically temporary in nature. The proposed reader board with its modem design,
light colored vinyl surface, internal illumination, and surface mount style of attachment results in a sign
design that stands in sharp contrast with the traditional character of the building it serves and the overall
site. Revising the sign proposal by eliminating the reader board would result in a sign with a more
traditional character that meets EC guidelines.
Recommendations: Revise the sign drawings by removing the reader board from the proposal or
ARB 7/7/08,American Legion,Sign-Page 2
providing a reader board design that does not have a temporary appearance and is completely coordinated
with the overall sign, including but not limited to colors and method of attachment.
Issue: Existing& Proposed Monument Signs/Location
Comments: The existing site has a monument sign located in the northwest corner, on the east side of the
entrance into the site.The overall size of the monument structure is 8' long, 3' — 8"tall, and 2' wide. The
monument is made of brick that is a medium terracotta color. The wood panel sign on the monument has
a white background with black letters. Although not indicated in the original application,the applicant has
since stated that the removal of this existing monument is part of their proposal. The proposed monument
sign is to be located 140' east of the existing sign and adjacent to Route 22. The location of the existing
monument is more visible from the EC,marking the site entrance and providing direction into the site, all
of which makes it appear more integrated with the overall site and landscape design.
Recommendations: Revise the proposal by adding to the existing monument structure to include signage
for the American Legion proposal, or replace it with an appropriately designed new sign in the same
location.The American Legion sign could be accommodated by increasing the total height of the existing
monument structure.
Issue: Proportion and Scale
Comments: EC guidelines state that the structure of the monument sign shall not overwhelm the sign. The
structure and the sign it supports must be in proportion to each other. The 12' height of the proposed
structure appears to be out of scale with(overpowering)the 4' tall x 8' wide panel sign and the 2' tall x 6'
wide reader board attached to it. From the site plan drawing provided, it appears that the base of the
monument would be situated approximately 4 to 5 feet above the finish floor elevation of the building it is
located in front of. EC views of the proposed monument would include views of the two buildings. Both
buildings on this site are one-story structures with a low roof profile. The 12' height of the proposed sign
structure would appear to be out of scale with the building and the overall development. A monument
structure 8' in height would be more in scale with the front (northeast) elevation of both buildings and the
overall development.
Recommendations: Revise the sign drawings by reducing the overall height of the monument structure to
8'.
Issue: Sign Panel/Monument/Overcrowding
Comments: EC guidelines state that wall signs should not obscure architectural details. The proposed sign
panel is shown overlapping the 8" soldier course located across the top of the monument. This prevents
the soldier course from providing a more finished appearance to the overall structure. Lowering the top of
the sign panel to just below the soldier course would provide a more finished appearance, allowing the
monument to frame the sign panel,no longer obscuring the brick detail.
Comments: Revise the sign drawings by showing the top of the sign panel located just below the brick
soldier course at the top of the monument.
Issue: Materials and Colors/Brick Detailing
Comments: EC guidelines state that materials used in both the sign and support structures should be
complimentary. They should also support the aesthetics of the building and/or complex being served by
the sign although a direct duplication is not necessary. It is preferred that the base material match one of
the primary building materials unless the design of the sign represents itself as a freestanding element
complimenting the building. Proposed materials include aluminum and lexan for the sign panel and a dark
red oversized brick for the monument (sample provided). The sign colors include a white background
with dark red letters. The reader board colors include a white background, black letters, and a 1" retainer
ARB 7/7/08,American Legion, Sign-Page 3
(color not indicated). The existing monument sign at the entrance to the site is a medium terracotta color
brick structure with a projecting brick cornice across the top. The panel sign has a white background with
black metal letters and is recessed within the structure giving it a more finished appearance than the
surface mounted panel sign and reader board in the proposed monument. Existing wall panel signs are
located in the west end gable of the smaller building (In Vino Veritas) and in the first story gable on the
front of the same building, facing Route 22. These signs have dark green backgrounds with white letters.
The dark red color of the oversized brick proposed for the monument does not match any of the materials
in the buildings for type or color; however, the medium terracotta color of the brick in the existing
monument sign blends more readily with the colors of the buildings.
Recommendations: Revise the monument proposal to include the use of a brick similar in size and color
to that of the existing monument. Revise the design of the structure to include a projecting brick cornice
across the top similar to that of the existing monument structure, with all signs shown recessed within the
structure.
Issue: Lighting
Comments: EC guidelines encourage the use of external illumination for signs because it allows
consistency with the daytime image of the sign. External lighting appears to the viewer as reflected light
and allows the focus of the sign to be the overall shape, color and complete design of the sign. Internal
lighting produces a fragmented,rather than unified, sign image at night compared to external lighting and
may project light that is distracting to the viewer. The applicant is proposing internal LED lighting for
both the sign and the reader board. Both the sign panel and reader board are proposed with non-opaque
backgrounds, and the sign panel is to have an internally lit logo. The existing monument sign has
external, ground mounted lighting, and the existing wall panel signs have external, gooseneck lights.
External lighting is particularly appropriate for this site, due to its strong traditional styling and location in
a largely rural area. If internal illumination is approved, all backgrounds, including the reader board must
be opaque. The internal illumination of logos, while discouraged in the EC guidelines, have been
approved by the Board on a case by case basis. The proposed logo is 2' x 2" in diameter, centered in the
sign panel, with dark red, blue, yellow, and green colors. Due to its dark colors, small size, and integral
location on the panel, internal illumination of the proposed logo is not expected to have an adverse impact
on the EC, if the sign background is made opaque.
Recommendations: Revise the proposal by removing all proposed internal illumination. Revise the
drawings to show the use of exterior, ground mounted lights. Provide cutsheets of the proposed lights. All
lighting emitting 3,000 lumens or more shall be a full cutoff style fixture. If internal illumination of the
sign panel (with logo),and reader board is approved, revise the drawings to indicate that the backgrounds
of both will be opaque.
Issue: Setback
Comments: The applicant is proposing to locate the sign adjacent to the Route 22 right-of-way. The
Zoning Ordinance requires a 5' minimum setback from the right-of-way in a C-1 zone. The sign location,
as shown on the site plan drawing, is not dimensioned to indicate whether or not this requirement is being
observed.
Recommendations: Revise the site plan drawing to show the dimensioned location of the sign structure,
clearly indicating that it meets the 5' minimum setback requirement.
Issue: Landscaping
Comments: EC guidelines state that ground cover, shrubs, and/or trees shall be used to integrate the
freestanding sign into the overall landscape development of the site. The applicant submitted a copy of
the approved Major Site Plan Amendment for this site; however, the landscaping shown across the
ARB 7/7/08,American Legion, Sign-Page 4
frontage of this site does not correspond with the existing landscaping. Additional proposed landscaping,
addressing the guidelines, was not indicated. The applicant has indicated that the installation of the
monument/sign in the proposed location would require the removal of one of the existing oak street trees
lining the State Route 22 frontage. Disrupting consistent landscaping such as this, to install a
monument/sign, when a reasonable alternate location is available is not recommended. The existing
freestanding sign at the site entrance is located in a bed of low growing junipers. These plantings are not
reflected on the copy of the Major Site Plan Amendment provided with this submission; however,they do
successfully integrate the sign into the overall site and landscape development.
Recommendations: Provide a site plan showing the location of the proposed sign, the correct location of
existing landscaping identified for type, plants to be removed, and the location of any proposed
landscaping addressing the EC guidelines for signage landscaping. A sign in the location currently
proposed by the applicant would require additional landscaping to integrate it into the overall landscape
development. A sign where the existing monument sign is located may integrate successfully with the
existing landscaping.
Issue Wall Sign/No Permit
Comments: A panel wall sign was installed, without ARB review/approval or a sign permit, in the
pediment above the building entrance in the northeast elevation. The applicant needs to make an ARB
application for the review of this circular sign of the American Legion logo. The sign appears to be
overscaled for its location in the pediment.
Recommendations: Submit an ARB application for the wall sign currently located in the pediment above
the building entrance in the northeast elevation.Provide drawings showing the existing sign replaced with
the same sign in a smaller size (diameter), appearing proportionate with the pediment, allowing the
pediment to frame the sign.
SUMMARY OF REVIEW
The proposed sign is overscaled. The proposed reader board materials and lighting do not meet the EC
guidelines. The proposed location of the monument/sign/reader board emphasizes the negative aspects of
this proposal with regards to scale and the lack of an adequate landscape proposal. A freestanding sign,
without the reader board, located where the existing monument structure is located, in a similar color and
design,up to 8' in height,could address most of the staff concerns for this proposal.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Proposed materials and design of the sign and structure.
2. Coordination of the sign proposal with the building and site design.
3. The character of the proposed reader board.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness pending staff administrative approval of
the following conditions:
1. Revise the sign drawings by removing the reader board from the proposal or providing a reader board
design that does not have a temporary appearance and is completely coordinated with the overall sign,
including but not limited to colors and method of attachment.
2. Revise the proposal by adding to the existing monument structure to include signage for the American
Legion proposal, or replace it with an appropriately designed new sign in the same location. The
American Legion sign could be accommodated by increasing the total height of the existing
ARB 7/7/08,American Legion,Sign-Page 5
monument structure.
3. Revise the sign drawings by reducing the overall height of the monument structure to 8'.
4. Revise the sign drawings by showing the top of the sign panel located just below the brick soldier
course at the top of the monument.
5. Revise the monument proposal to include the use of a brick similar in size and color to that of the
existing monument. Revise the design of the structure to include a projecting brick cornice across the
top similar to that of the existing monument structure, with all signs shown recessed within the
structure.
6. Revise the proposal by removing all proposed internal illumination. Revise the drawings to show the
use of exterior, ground mounted lights. Provide cutsheets of the proposed lights. All lighting emitting
3,000 lumens or more shall be a full cutoff style fixture. If internal illumination of the sign panel
(with logo), and reader board is approved, revise the drawings to indicate that the backgrounds of
both will be opaque.
7. Revise the site plan drawing to show the dimensioned location of the sign structure, clearly indicating
that it meets the 5' minimum setback requirement.
8. Provide a site plan showing the location of the proposed sign, the correct location of existing
landscaping identified for type, plants to be removed, and the location of any proposed landscaping
addressing the EC guidelines for signage landscaping. A sign in the location currently proposed by
the applicant would require additional landscaping to integrate it into the overall landscape
development. A sign where the existing monument sign is located may integrate successfully with
the existing landscaping.
9. Submit an ARB application for the wall sign currently located in the pediment above the building
entrance in the northeast elevation. Provide drawings showing the existing sign replaced with the
same sign in a smaller size (diameter), appearing proportionate with the pediment, allowing the
pediment to frame the sign.
•
ARB 7/7/08,American Legion,Sign-Page 6
Application for Attachment B
Variance
LJ Variance =S 120
Piolcrl name m(/� C /fig/ on/ /62, 1' /
lax map and patccl• t 7/O0-00 i72-62/00 Magisterial District Zoning. 1:7,744(f(,AL
Physical Street Address(it assigned) ZOt 5A ,E>f}�yl t'�w/c
Location nt pIoperty(landmalks, uriusectuatti,of othet) oN ! p t- 23'4r
( ontart Person(Who should we call/wttie concerning this protect?) _ ---------
?O 2o�c 61�'S __N' / t�� /- _2// Zip c u
Acldretis / Crh� c b.y � L /_�F, SJtalr �/ / /r6��
Daytime Phne( 7 P-9 �ifFax#( )` E-mail /Y, /tfc//t� /,i-i-/ /r (re
Owner of Record--y4 rG/92(/ te6 r
l/(<'y G . State Zt>
A City /� .� � A r ??.Z9l//
(Wm.Phone( ) Fax#( ) E-mail
Applicant(Who is the Contact person representing9) f77i ' `
Address City ----State Zip
Daytime Phone( ) Fax/J ( ) _E-mail
Aco
`yQ.'
VA 2008-007 Signs # (2 & 16) American Legion Post 74 Lodge Inc. (owner /
applicant) Request variance to increase size for proposed freestanding sign from 32 to
48 square feet, an increase of 16 square feet. Property located at 3025 Louisa Road is
located on the north side of Rt. 250 East (Richmond Rd) at the intersection with Rt. 22
(Louisa Rd). Tax Map 79, Parcel 19 is zoned C1 , Commercial and EC, Entrance
Corridor overlay.
I�OR OFFICE USE ONLY 1l VA # I, 01: T Cam—f` /
I•et AnunariS rv'U JGr Date Paul S/7�%r!�Dv whoferC"fi�/ J7frnh Receipt 1170 JL� Ckll /Lf U / By
County of Albemarle Department of Community Development
'I lit following unto'elation Shall he ,fabinitied with bit application and l' to be piol•Ided I the > pII n - r - ;T.� t ,< - ,F
1 , Ree.ur flee pat of 'lotnld,u;- sul vc l of the pi opel iv r equested for the IeLoning I, thei c I no ilidoi1ed,Yral a I,uu1 din\ ti,n vl\ pl da(
pi(wide 'tuff; ciesetII)IIUII or ill( plui>(.>1\ dlld the Deed Boor\ ill( nil,'( ntlllltle: of Pia' boot and pdr_'t 111111111'W! 2ooU
Mtk\( C
2) '1 he clop'opt ldtc thawing!, ')ilOW1111' ail existing and proposed Improvements on the pioperty with all (Ii,�„Y)1� totailitimu t el,�iu
pi opel t) lines and any !,pec,ldl conditions on the pi open) that may lustif) the request (;ta'it l e
41 't
if
• payable to the Count) of Albemarle
-^ 7,J - /. //�� //LTA%/t
�i r ()r�c.1'piton of Request 7�k �, � 7i�� C��� � 5
5' b Fd ' i ' r.� ; �. x, -;m-�ir r�-s (�J 7"_
Rcti rWI L UN G j0,,' 4.y ) ( ii i_«fir it-y �y. AM, .,- ,� 1._i l
777 7,npap7Ti A.. nEA/1 /i 6 41 7 i,f 0 P.,4'p , Y1i Q
/10/' � Ph" 1/�4�e1 i ' Anti r4�`1 cti v/sid 'n'PI, ,1 1'-Z 1 s '
S- f �
77.6 ;p Co4-1 %2/i- �r �l�'t4NI Z 1�-1✓ 11` /1N( At.p,r1,7` _
;j lu;uticauou shall he hd',ul on Ihese three(3)criteria. J-' j9V51 F `l��,/� 1
A1
I That the !inlet application of this ordinance would produce undue haldship /� ��ii
_Al, 'i •+ 1,Ai_i nt-/./ ail? ( �__1 i� �_2. Pre " "- G'"7,) i�.N•[ a /`
/79Tin1 141
Rrin(fri /J i( 4- Oi4 Y /-/ eJ.--_h/z 2.30ft ),(/
gi v •rre3 14)> r� vow - ;q ,.- ? /4,6 v(-: —, . t N r a4. 7`-
P5A/ICI
2 That such haldship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity
--i-r-I -Rt= ,1 A)o '7:1a EQ-A'i 7;4-1„_zt- �e/' yV-i- hi "pfr�F-,/
JR /C-1 f)I i�� / 191 57), �v 77- 7¢ Gv/4— _'. i f-�z�Y 1 / ,
pt i v :ge(r) 21 o-il 5. , -/i t tJ,nil ,i h1 E 27e Ala a(.I r y nIAl I/t' /Zef'/7,'i
/1-7t, el ,r} ' fir t` r / _7'�' 1rv,eg
3 That the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the
district will not he changed by the granting of the variance. ///(,Jp " h!! Age"e" fir-' 4, ',4,
�'L9 j(' 7v �I e..5A F .mil F;�•�t i'J f z r ,4 17 . i hi;.-r-) 7—v 13 1-
/? i 4 lr s pe.fl� 1f Al .0 /Nu ci /- vc Sf=�iie-d &A/
0 c ti c e `�/,1 94�j it ^ kV ': /4 E1 Alt D _cam „" 7' 3 W /' }J1 P
tv PX b oP 4, x r hol b y r fro W : - i/; <19od � Cu.{i rnti' ee-%.1 r
7-1-)-C Cu 4g EA, �/4Q, Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign
The application ma) he deferred by the staff or the 3oard of Zoning Appeals, if sufficient information necessary to this
I CVICW has not been submitted by the deadline
I hereby certify that the information pi ovided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true and coil eel
to the best of my knowledge an( b-Ir• .
2..—
r '-7 54v h
Signally a- ' ,• it /we ,-Au' r Date
-1/d7 ,.</
. ` ,---./Y1 i V/ ",(___ I — --77 P--- Pi I r-
I'rnll Nam / j� Daytime phone number of Signatory
X �.`1/i Pvf,u(_i J�I 1(I L e I Ali �DIX a„��` cn nv,u..., ')„r
• 44 V FS
_ Imo-
6.-0' NNQTF.i
LOWER CABINET tJ LOGO COLORS TO BE SPECIFIED
to , to", BY CUSTOMER PRIOR IQ 2o'
MANUFACTURING. 'TOP CVINET'
2"RETAINER jJ ALL COLORS TO BE VERIFIED t6'
Pr (-DARK RED"3M 3630-731 '
PRIOR TO MANUFISCT_UB1NG eR,cle
ti CHARLOTTESVILLE E ALBEMARLE SOLDIER
MI "_ 080 ALUM D/F
4110 0 s• SIGN CABINET „Tj LIGHTING DETAIL,
s•< e! AMERICAN - ` - LEGION B- FLAT LEXAN FACE --��
a1.- A ` Bet• BKG-WHITE" - SEE PAGE 2
i ^J^ Q- t
BiINI' POST /4 Since 19�9` 2 RETAINER .-1
- _� a1 -DARK RED"PMS 20 -<_ _ -�
I I 7 r I I I (3M 3630-73) _-- -
1 I I e 1 I_ I 1 ..
.�.-�- t
�}-+-_ ( 080 ALUM.D/F
)ry SUP PORT 'MP'- , t (L I I SIGN CABINET ► _
0
'I 1 r 1 1
��� I _ t �T����� ♦..�-f--«--_f PAINT LINE WI 4'LETTER
- 1 I t`r I'_`---.. 7 C l : I 1 t ZIP-TRACK SKG.TO BE What
-
1_l I I!; E t a I )'IIIr 1 `fir-T., j t"RETAINER
L 7 I t I t 1 1 l r---1-,--- I 1 I 1 I t ' t (COLOR TBD)
l-r` -Lr'--L ,-- L----L-r .. L-- - -1; .i
I T,.TT_ 1 - r?.....1.-..._1T...-1 t-,LT•r —+ri' pock BY 4Tm$R5
-..,-1.T....-L-+- L.=-1...; moI I
- S''7z. .I':"`.IT_3 4'; :.:I:7 GRADE
•
SIDE VIEW
Client Name .r>IoN(RA'• General Sign Specifications: WOO:
SIGN Location: xxx - ❑ rler. ■t.E,I., ■ . . PO/:
T o..l .a.�,.° Sign"Tips. PYLON SIB 0 SK as coceo ■Do tr kro nut WOO —
L J.,MWIM Y.M..,))y.
()6)1{bY01 AM Ili,)611 VI1] ❑ NOr linvnand ■•Ineo.ed ❑'KA CIMIKM�'�'y 1 eMrrJ
Sales Rep: Rs Start Date: Co F'INI. A1042906 �, Tom. •Irc 1TI�•^^a
A FLU SFR�3CE SIGN CO { ❑
•
Designer: MM i Last Revision - Scale' 3/8"= 1' - 0" 0 :77 caw 4 ❑"O LAMPS Page t or 2
0 COPYIIOI)1011 I,TMLE7 M01011 WI CONMI)aL OI]ICM•oE1H ILIMQ'I*101t PROW,,7 TM.tf NK)OM sow GOIMMMT NO 16%0,i01 E REPMOOIKIED M MIM am 61011 MMIO37 MTV.POWNICll MOM TMIF,.001601 counvo
062 063 064 '
pro —
,a;li4' /ki tt ,t r
j I 2
, 80-
f
/ \ \79-5A
' i 1 I ' 79-4,l
I
, \ \ •,
: .
46A \
1 ¢; i / 1 \ 80-2A
11
.
; ' j i
i I \
^., ; , 1 80 2i
/
';r • 5B 1 1 `
��� t I }� / ,I \
vy-"=�' 1 Ili �, I
' 1 8A-
7\ ' I\ {23
5C` 1 \ ,-
5\ \-------12B I
*7910 -. \ Jc \... 1
to / I __ - 2'2, sn" I \N, co
tit I - _� '_ — 1 r. / / j I\` v'J
A v , .
A \\\
`I �' ` r,r I J,
7,‘LI:p:,,,2-‘.A-NCt;
t, �t4' ...'.-.. ' . ��-_7 ?1 , 1. -' w o
of 9�1 "( 3A l --• m� , 1, w i i< \ 1.7
.•I Ai79-4D \ !„ -=^""•z ,,,;? - \ ` • )-,COI..•
79-7A if` \� �117C/- \ .,,�
csitN °C.1i • 16 " 15 "'"'
�cp _ y \ 248 t e
i 1 \ `1. 7 -'''
. 1'8-'''3'.gsf-4:'" ' i ,v P', 23F 1
23A `]
I '. 36D 1 36E 23�. �, 1 1,(... `
• SID
t "14 - ' VA-2008-007 American Legion r '/ `"",,
1_I, ..yam _ atq rill xl ,
", Post 74 Lodge Inc. (owner/ f /�'
1",'m 2 applicant) ,, ,
ti y�
A.
43s l '' 43 -\'3,R Tax map 79, parcel 19 „` -�'�N...ev . ,
j Ch
=i! :43L�43M, t'��_`.ASF� ` t"2 43F1 1'/ MCA�. ill_/ 5 26�
43F2 I� eo
1 g�13n �I 43F4 79 4SF, ,� � N at r,,�
1 f/, A°r'v I n--44 - \ .`a`2�� ,t 93-8A z, ) •-N., ell co of
If `m \'..31 as o� ,,, ti�. iA -- 93A4 y4•I
092 093 094
Scale Albemarle County 079 ap: ,� ',, /'
p I eel
JI Note This map is far display purposes only .--�
+ � and shmvs parcels as of 12/31/2007
See Map Book Introduction for addrhonal details
VA-2008-007 American Legion Post 74 Lodge Inc. Some items on map may not appear In legend,
0 e.m.
Owo
79-10 ® °
'4 _ mac`_.
\? - PT.)...
map Ow
79-9
3 ,...4A
35 9-19::
rC4',y 79-19
O,
LO r
79-7+ .'_
max051. . /2
79-9 250 -14 79-17C
—19 °' �v�
. .,.,_
0
r �1
y .0111
4. 10" 68
..
V GIS-Web
1070 •''y�1 7. Geographic Data Services
aL' www albemarle org
`� 7'—1 (430)296-6632
7 1 ��R41�
Iiii
79-20 •�,}..t n s..
7291 '
—\ O
S. ��
79-21 ��
/�O 0 171 eet_ N
79-23A 79-23F 79-24B
Map is for display purposes only•Aenal Imagery from Commonwealth of Virginia June 2,2008
iICIN IT Y MAP , ,
. ,..,,* -.-...„..7,,..„.................„........................,........4 ,. -,..A,t. •- -ou . ,
I'.:i. ,----;k:, REVISIONS DATE
, -
, \
/ , i-, ,, ..... ,, ,,, .. --i-- 97---.1:-',":-., -RED 4,-.a -PEAS ';',....>•544
f r.,97ENBER 28 999 aP-Em99 P 9 149
/ •>" , 4 64 7.'',A•!---1-1.- -,,-^9FR 4 .99
8 a, EA, - ass, A ..37.18rR 5 999
1111Q11111111r ---, •1, '-,
, rt.13 le ...4.,09
P.NE C -- •••-,'5. .'•-. gul!k.Nat71,..s A.z,z....-95,....,E ..., -0...E /- ",'..,s'.."..•.....2....,.....2........,,, , ...../ as Pill.NG.33 9 7-- ... ,,......\
-...--- ......---.4.,
.s OPE
177.. 1.7: i
,!.. 7,6!". ... ' -',,,, •-•....,.... , . 4. '4• SHADWELL ANTIQUAMES
i
ri
—..I..-------. ,'•• ,9/0,7, -• •,^?•,, _, __
III . ,,' , •"is Z0.7,
.;,',-c•4,--70—,,
D.i.•,.\i9-1—\'-4,3r ,-.,-..,.-.,-,-
„•-,,-g-.i.-,---7--.,---. A;'0-4-5 -r-,.,s1-4 e$,.-
."A '1•:n'•a-1-.0-''-I--r-7-- ,_,;4,-,---,u--,_.._....4.,..,_„-......'. ._9i,,•f-7....•7.--....,,....;4.. ------.H-
A"‹D 4.....E.-..--L0 0_L-- '....;.'
4,_,,..._,:__,-.D--.aE,.,4S_...1,/0•..,s,‘--•.,.C1r-,F'...v',445
R IVzAN NA M'1Erw a7F:A.NiN1 OGC.G,97MIF 734 S9Z.-7ai.R2aETEa 5yAr7E4reBc
7xRa-C CI.A'iP.-r 5 SSL
D7I0I SaiTtORISN
7I C,T
- . , ALB:AARLE COUNTY, VRGIA..,-OPE 4'3..AcaNT)
-\A \4\4,
,..4,Sr1,.,11 C.I.N1A.1 L-'AJ‘E
- _ ,-- : s .,D . Lc,
' TYPICAL OFF-SITE ROUTE 22 IDENING aAROEWOD P,/ a 4 , N
r 1 - , _ , : arC 30 -.Neu -0os
f -r - 09r . A R 2aC 11LRAD RjN RIrp H
/ ."- _----7-. 4 r1 4. ---„ - _ - 3i759 PP 99599 &60 I0R 0 22
. 99,-,P,5ED USE 649
_ -•-E 4.-.TER7, ail I.BE .•,,E.0 :"...d. -27 ',PACE, ‘.0 „
.
I: -_ • S97 •-•, ' . A4-..._.
..J . '' ' v"..' 1 ..",f)-P'nr' 1' ---- "'I' .-..rel.:,.....--17 ---7.-------.---
'••• • s --' ' ---""-•.-"...- - 4 -*"..- .." ........._ ---"--1--, 1.4.'-,..74, '-•:: "'A ir 0 6, p)--, _.....0"-_...-- --- . 9EiAt .4119.,,E S77.,PE 9190
------,„ A.T1OtiE 9E175P 1,-,3P a_
sT , •„ic _.-1----•.... •
. -.' ' -•-s,-1- ,1;1-4:,--• - 4.,..<.' 4*.. ''- .-_:z--- _:".'-• -...2-,'-'- ' r . '5-- -- - ------------------,,,,7- ,......._ -.•-••••••••••••
v.,„s 4- ‘7..D....9e .‘,r.r.:
4. ,
- ---- ' '....• -• ..b ; / l'•45,.,;.:', - - ------ '..._ 54, ..r...---75-,& --.214:----- 's-44, .- -,-1, - .,<.—.<.2,,.,— :.•,.._‘,„.
ao-44r7- .{y i ,"4-_,, ' 'T-t--.. -- - •. 7:.,,-„'---ot ',-.,, - c13
7 - c ,i, • -44„,,t.i _ -;:___..... •:=. ._,•._ ...._-_-_- ____
P-., L--
,-, -4_ , —4--,.., .,.- - 1 "),-;;-. -' 4.L.: - ''.......`t'x' ----
, 7... ,..., .,..... , --, .,.......
y41 N ., '-'..- -,-1-• •• ..----f--..c.,---- :, ,,'. '--.:7 '7--1-._ i--'..--i.,-- •-"---T.,,Z---.., ----,....
------"-----------------.--".s.7:7---r--'.^.--------- ---------' 54
•,-; - t ".
--"-_z i 'i,/4.1.- ___ 4
I, ..-..f.., ,...,...,,„#. 'tf"-.E.,..... /
•,-/ / ''' F-AF..,:,/,` - ...., '-',.........,
-1-,.•-- . - .... .,.......... `.....,,....„._. *---4e........ "-- V. ...- -.----------.7----.--4-------...-_______
-... .
' r.fr--- 21 7 .131 ' I - '- •''' ' ''-------,-.'':- #.4-,c3d ---1 -,--,--, ' .j.----- '. k -' •a','.-'-'"5‘,.7•5/774-dh44,,- '---;,_ _ - - - _
_ a.
,
, .,.,., - 4 '7"-is ,t,' idl!,a.-'44.4-4 • ':•., .2 • -,,' - "'. :.-,,, '-hr27.;,,,„, - Cil •27)
or--1
It''''......--- - -' .., ti,„,.! •-•,,, -::..11- ,.._,ts- "-. -._ - • ---"'
. 24„,;?otot,fun sox- --WI 7----q• ' ' ,' `--- - ''. • ' • • ..q., W W .4°.
•
-.4
+?''_
._ r a..... _ , • --------_',___L ‘ ---4- % Z
7. 4 ' t ,-6.;'''''r L --. C.- 1... , '' ' "' 't......t.71.,1'.."-5-'" "'''.•••:-...-..-• • ..11111e4P.+7. FA
,_-....,_ r------------
„„
. .., ,
. , . t -
i ..,..„2 --__ --7---_, ' a) .6-
i --. -..0..i ,. )
,-, • 2, ;-:-,--:-tip' .`,',': -- - ....., - --... ; a,.,; --r-A...-',.---4f1±',',—.. -"' -- -.. ,,,,
is...,,-.._4‘,. 71 150112•\...... .,__,I';...-7::-
,..„,.- -Ns„,.. . , ' '---.P$N›,....fr ...,....-' -
./ , ' -a A l - , , , .... ,e't _ i _ ,,,cr - ._ C , , t',,...,..k• .--„,...,-- -__,_ ,---- , -- ,•-• ' , I--r• -E-_-,
•--,i4.,!...,-, ,,.- 'I 4- - IMT •- 4.;"'
, ,..,..-„;• .......-7, 3 : , -• - _„,...,
A riti4 , ,t.4,,,,,,,v
''E f) r ! 1 f: 9 7 .-
. ,.3 , NT . ...„,....s--
r
1 rz4 ..)ez i ..-- .
.'15--'' ' -411 ITh. ---.,,,-,_,r...-1,s,„ ' ..---il,....4:---' _,,..: ...:143::t,,_,\_,Z,;tfts...,..,_„:N. '4,,....,.,,,.-:,1-1.-___<.vvic-',, .17,•er-..,.___Z-0,iiic''-NI vi.' E—I 0
• k- --7,--- .:. :swop ,..?„.. __ __-,•,_ '''9 3, ..,
•1 2 ,... '‘' i , 4 ,..5i., -SX P.99.5,043
'.-7. -
..z.z., ,5? 4
,...4. ...:-..-,50 - ,4,,,, ,
I --- .t-----t:,/,f_ ,:•,/./ .,,,7i,,-.7 -- 2 ,, Q°1%'.7-'I;4114r a ,qa gq 1Fli „E-12
,..,'-‘1% 7,,..
'51 Jr, :.ct,., ,,,IN(1.
.., ',.'2).../.ri.,,,,,, J 7.4 Go- •i e , .
,
't, r /'"'%'' '1\\::-. .',./.;1'.:-'::- '""_ 0 ., ‘tC:r, ,A 1 .•
' op - i - ''''On . _ ,..4.,..,,,,,
,.
_ o - - 77: ; .
,,ris . ...,v,, 41/4z:1_ t .._, , :,....„. , „, 1 ii , ., , ,,., ,,
..?„ /4:,.4
,.. ,,,, • .„.. ,,,,,t _...., , 6 '7 41= .--1 c....1' i
... - . 1 -...... k ANz#0,, _ -,,'!,-A., 1_3 2
-
i ...,.
,i,......• ....., . .. -7,- PrrA-.- -_.,--_ •e 7„,.‘:,t.„). ,. -5..4...„- ..... . s 7.- .! --si.:-.7z. ,..,. ; -1',.al•-•-!,„1 ie., ;:',..4.', \..,. <in.:\/-:;411t.- '..- '''''.1112\'''---12-'''- \:: ;'''" L:T-liTi'L.6.
....'--f
. 5 -,.."4.1 . „....,.., 'Zs', ker.,,., ,-,t4P C /:; '')
-,,,,, -•-,P... OLD,.54,,_, 174 <4 Cil C4
,..•.", ,--, .., 4-4--.7-4._--, :\>,....., '.3i
,,,,,tr 4, LI 1; ‘,C,,,,,,,i4,4":' 4 .'A., '-----% •':-'7 -- ..„,„,..m_ / r-_,,,\-7 1,..„..._-.--',Q;„ i-1 t•;3.
" ; .k" - '-'..- • ' '7""AY ." •-•/•• -.7-47:-‘'..-44- .....-
•-.V:-.7. r 1, ''-g i; *---_ b.'.-A i r.... '' - - ' . -. '-' -----' 1.-'„,„.i" \-.7.•'1.-...''' '''i 4.*::r 7- '''. --, 'A, 259.-7-4 91 04 5-
.4
, , • - F‘.;,•.;•:tf.4A,cE., - -
_ ''''',..:1-•-,- , -,--- ...e.;'.1*.v..''-' ---•,Y31- . 4. N'r-,.>7. ' 'r 1 '1.3.:;- '7 -,`'..‘, - 8-, ;_:.05.055es.., _- ,
. -- /--' ' ------- • ,l'A 7-'0'. - 0 P
CI 4 ' A' '.... . •, % ' ,.• A, - ‘E-: 4 a.F-, , -- _,•,.. ' itE,z - ,,- ,.., .s- --1 ,‘
-4 7F •L'i. 1 0
' 6‘. '774.75,77-_, . ..,,,, .7, -...... , t...„ -„,a._ .. „..,,,, 1084 ,_ ,...;', ,49 l'• 4951-- - - ,, 1 - VI
' es . ' f' •15''. ,i. t- , --',....... C•51.3 '..,.-4-'''i , t-.91:„... 4 girkk, y -',„ -- - c•._..,.so"'.‘o - - is , ,i, . n
, i : / :--_-,:..,,--,--• ".:,-_ / , . 47 '‘VrE'•
\ 7: i '"r's-4-4: .---- ,F-A , c•i-':JA ‘ -- '•'v>i'''. -- 7,4:-c-•-r- - -- R.''Lc-- -----, ..- -
.
- ,
•, , ,,.. '„ ,, ... ,ty. ,..-4 ,.--.41_ 71-- _„,••• t ,, , - ‘_ L r,,
,- / -..... . --,•\
.. , ..
,
•• ,-, ' er -i.,- --i„__ ‘ i _ .:',./,,, , , _.1._, • ' `•5--,,,,, , 7-,,-, _l.'s- ----- ,,,45; -
' ,.. '-*- , :<!•.-*-,v...!- c- .:-al-- „e 45-\,3-''. t"; •- -ir •-.1 - , - 1 -"s-', '-----',2.- i ,-..., , I t , -_ i I ., i, -7•-•• '-' itss-' -,.--/,-.7'
_
_.,- • ...• ,•r, - ,-- . • , - _ • , • „,,...., ;.-___ ___
. 1-• , „ _.,, „...,,_ : ., ,• _. -..,,t- -,, •1 ,,,,,A- ----‘\s',4 .1"--;_ - .;;.:::::' ;T.vf --..._ - 4...„---I............--'
• JOB NUMBER
`4?• - _ -
--
..----X--''5----
- 7 '..,..S __.,„.... ,7 -.. --",i,\•,.--; •-•" ' .. --
.5- .,.....-' ;+1 :", '.0
•''. k. i SI' % ' e.,,,,, ..- ;.: .. ..-7 , •, - nte`..,E-Et.% .t i.,' * -. -';',.. e."1-.1 t .., ..1.-..- - --1.(- ).,--- LANDSCAPE PLAN
tN _--, _r- ,,--
- ---•- -,
-- -',, 0- • ::',\>-.. . :: .,.!Er -v .1. f.F,-- 4'd...,-. , '-Al.•:-.N. - -- , GOVERNS ALL PL.ANTING
• --.^ ''CJ ,•4' "0' E._
- 4c"."'/ 41`-' ' 4.., "'i3P0,-t.. '"I 0 ....‘Nr tN, , .s. -- - "
• 7" •eat,
- / * \1 ' ,_,...-. __.•-.,1-----'- ,.._0_1t„,„_'" DWG. NAME
. .V,"•: -.,' ' ' '4';
..., .55..,44......,4 6'4'-"to.,-.7 f'ic",-' 1---,-.4., A.. -,,,c,:_ , -?•-••!--- All- -.5\ --;'!". -F,k11.-,.....--.5",--1.-.1.-- Z A ',NI,.'-''''.777 9. N ."7,rTs .01',MST T.14 4,1,S?,A• ..5 Pr.7,A6
'''-'5, ,r4.... ,, . -4„,r„.„,-,„,--3,,,,a_ p-,.„,,.,,, .,.." , - - • ....k r.,..., ..w,. ;AB- , _,
SPE ::HEET 4 OF 5 _ _ .!.. 4.7E9 AND:41.8•„P" A.OP -4...A.ES -P. 0' 0
0,, ,,, v,`9 - • , '-. :4' . ' 'C'0)... - i ',..... __----'--A04.a.-':-_-• .t ,,,, '
1;oR ouTDooR ,,,,,IITING ,, „... \..--,._.. .•.,. _ .. , _.•-. _ .._ __:• ......„- .FR 9E.49711`,R,"" A.,-.97
4 -,4€:O,Rat AA 7rA. araa 3E fAN.C.FD 3" .7.ROP '_FS-4.7.•..E.',F.. .",zi t",•;,,,,'
", r....) ,, \•.." •• .....
, :..r" •V. IV'..'.' ' -..:. V 4''.''''4 ‘,./'...- ..,-4 .• "-"-',._2.7_,YR.E_A___ ;94".9'.. r •,..r,,..ail RELCA8E.,.. *44D "HE "..,..7 Ar.
,
...,,,„......._
...'._ ,,.4 .• ,,,. .,,,_:.':‘' ..'r,_,_:,. _._,'•0„.--- ----.•.-,,--'-/,•4',f.•..-.-.•.:-„7-'75...'':.r.--_-,-, _ _- - A* ,-.r7-. .1--, , .4t-a':-.,. --.
5" _.,. -.'L,979.E..,-5l.',a4 29.4'm-3,,,,'..,,.._•._9+,4..!A4.1‘,„F.9C2Ef:,R_..aV 4R,I0O...P-U:.!=S‘.;_8.
3,a.-p‘.g8•SE8.,',.'.1 AI
•.-"r.,.
591 1.5". - 9F9 13,.O, 43E. 13.3-.R-i1•_1,,4.T,.4.r..:o,..•A.,122•"E,,.,2•,,i,.fr.E 0-A z.',u._Sa a._-LC01r.•A.'•^.,,-?21:,-E7:4,4 t1.4.t;D,P9 7,-_)i-Aet.4,7,;7;PF..0,,.:,s-P.49-E*4Q,4F7!.V.R..:4,:45
a9RP.3'0lOIr4 l.)53REA a
, . .. ,r - . 3
"09I,f91 4"4,rD0 9.r,•9„9L;9."..NEF L.s•7.,-g,"„,LTA.e a P...rf.•E,.,..."'.E.-.7-;9::.F".14.7F:4,''F4.,I
- - P - Es E I15 k4 rl 4t-
4Er1E3,4<
E.
,..\.„c,,,•...0
. r FA - E Al 5 AN5 4r P. , = rar C
/
- a ? 7F::: D°°: '"F: R ° P:ri:7N ' :
, 7 . ,, $r : : 4'2A-L: N: "AEA7 -, ..P.I : V CN ?E EAEC2A :: IIINR ,4, 2 >
,..-.•-.,.,1-4,.9.„1.4 4.
-.RN_-PEAZ ZONIN..,)VP C7•3 SPA- Ai' .,...CE.i._ .0E-
• • -1,47 ., / ,....-',. ,,4‘ • _
f _P.P-...,EI• ... , -.. ''4 o, , , ....- ,...;! 2, r•COT 9.-N:LE 7t''_‘., s .
, _ . -,', . ,•, -- .AL,:9 -F. ,A EP---Ea
4"..t4; 4 ': '.--,S4•15'.-"..
I - _s.-..------.......7 ".-".V.._ -.3‘;•!.--P-..---'1".",-",'7"I'......-P-'. .....-m--- - -
_,..E.- 9 4 CS-09-,E '" 7. i-, 4,,T L.t _..1,- > Yr% ,r,, .- '7..C.:, -,. • •
' ,...,
:.! P!: .7''r, ..'" Rau —t..•
.....,,,,,,, •,,. '3F..•.,4 E , ...-,-, --•• , •• - -F_2. 4.2 liti SHEET
. - , -t ,-• -- -...; -- .,., : ._ - < .4--.., S 4 3.E ,N3'•=' ...,7, ...F,
C,. 5.11
-rm 7
' '' ' . 77-..F.,4- ...1.•••'•C. 5;77:-. ' .---; ' - .9.--•51'5" ..„'•••,'-E.:-'3'.....,' ,' '','85' -0 1: ' - :7'.i-1
-4,1e*.--A f I.,A P VINIC. I LIT 2, -.D.P.71,7 ...777.1,,D c•F(...p.oN