HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800035 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2008-05-06FW: Old Trail Block 3
Megan Yaniglos
From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .Denunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 10:40 AM
To: Megan Yaniglos
Subject: FW: Old Trail Block 3
FW: Old Trail Block 3
Megan,
I have reviewed the final site plan for the above project and have the following comments:
• Structures #8 and #14 are missing computations.
Page 1 of 2
• The spread on structure #27 exceeds the maximum allowable spread according to VDOT Drainage
Manual.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
434 -293 -0011 Ext. 120
joel.denunzio @vdot.virginia.gov
From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E.
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 4:20 PM
To: Megan Yaniglos
Cc: 'Scott Collins'
Subject: FW: Old Trail Block 3
Megan,
I have reviewed the above plan and have one comment. Sight distance on a 20 mph road is 225 feet. It appears
that all other comments have been adequately addressed for the preliminary plan. If you have any questions,
please let me know.
Thanks,
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
5/6/2008
FW: Old Trail Block 3
Staff Engineer
434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120
ioeL den unzio@vdot.virginia.aov
From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E.
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:26 PM
To: 'Philip Custer'
Subject: Old Trail Block 3
Phil,
Page 2 of 2
I have re- checked the widths on the Old Trail Block 3 plan. Brookley Drive is projected to carry 1200 VPD. The
VDOT standard for this volume is 36 feet from face of curb to face of curb. If they are to restrict parking to one
side of the street the 36 feet can be reduced by an 7 foot parking lane to a total width from face of curb to face of
curb of 29 feet. However, I have no problem with 30 feet of width on this road if that is what you and Glenn think
is appropriate. For Claremont and Marlbeck, the projected traffic is under 400 VPD for each street and the
corresponding width from face of curb to face of curb needs to be at least 28 feet. The plan shows 30 feet and
that is fine. The only reason I would think that this needs any additioanl width is if we expect that the traffic
projections are low.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120
joel.denunzio @vdot.virginia.gov
5/6/2008