HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB200700042 Review Comments Preliminary Site Plan 2008-06-12�'JRGINZ�
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
June 12, 2008
Janet Miller
Dominion Development Resources
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
RE: ARB- 2000 -42: Timberwood Commons
Tax Map 32, Parcel 41D1
Dear Ms. Miller:
I have reviewed your recent submittal for the above - referenced project consisting of:
Site Plan Sheets:
• C1 Final ARB Site Plan, date 5/1/08.
Architectural Sheets:
• C2 Building Elevations, date 5/1/08
• C3 Building Elevations, date 5/1/08
Materials:
• Roof: Atas Rocky Grey
• Roof Atas Hartford Green
• Retaining Wall Brochure: Legacy Concrete Systems Orange & Mediterranean
Outstanding issues that will need to be further addressed are shown in italics after the original
comment from the Action Letter of June 22, 2007.
2. Provide samples of the Atas 16 — Rocky Grey standing seam roofing material, the
matching color for fascia, gutters, and coping, and the Hartford Green window color.
Provide color samples for the fascia, gutters, and coping on the North and South
buildings.
3. Revise the site plan and building elevations to indicate the location and method of
screening for HVAC and related mechanical equipment.
Revise the building elevations to indicate the dimensions (height, width) of the rooftop
mechanical equipment, the installed top elevation of each rooftop mechanical unit behind
a parapet and the top elevation of the parapet in front that conceals its visibility. The
locations of the rooftop mechanical equipment, as shown on Sheet CI Final ARB Site
Plan do not correspond with the locations as shown on Sheets C2 and C3 Building
Elevations. As a suggestion, due to both buildings being located above the Entrance
Corridor, locating rooftop equipment farther back from the edge of the roof would
appear to reduce its chance for being visible.. Add a note to the site plan and building
elevations stating "All rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the EC ".
4. Revise Sheet C1 Preliminary Site Plan, Sheet CIA Site Location Plan and Parking Data,
and Sheet L1.0 Preliminary Landscape Plan to show existing grades. Revise the proposed
grading plan as needed to assure that it observes the following guidelines:
• Grading should respect existing topo characteristics and blend with adjacent
properties
• Grading should not change basic relationship of site to surrounding conditions
• Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable
• Cut and fill slopes should be rounded (minimum 10' radius) to meet adjacent
conditions
Existing contours are not labeled on the site plan. Revise Sheet Cl Final ARB Site Plan
by labeling the every existing contour where it adjoins the project area. This will
facilitate the plan reviewer in determining whether or not the aforementioned grading
guidelines have been observed.
5. Revise Sheet C1 Preliminary Site Plan, Sheet CIA Site Location Plan and Parking Data,
and Sheet L1.0 Preliminary Landscape Plan to show the location of all existing trees,
both on site and adjacent to the site under review. Clearly indicate the method and
location of all measures addressing the following guidelines:
• No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or
other existing features designated for preservation in final CofA
• Areas designated for preservation in final CofA should be clearly delineated and
protected on site prior to any grading activity on the site. Protection should remain in
place until completion of development.
• Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
Sheet Cl Final ARB Site Plan does not show the existing trees on the parcel to the north
that adjoin the project area under review. Revise the drawing to show the trees. Clearly
indicate the location and method of tree protection for these trees. Provide notes on the
drawing that address the following guidelines.
• No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or
other existing features designated for preservation in final CofA
• Areas designated for preservation in final CofA should be clearly delineated and
protected on site prior to any grading activity on the site. Protection should remain
in place until completion of development.
• Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
7. Revise Sheet L1.0 Preliminary Landscape Plan to show trees, 2 1 /z" in caliper, 40' on
center, around the perimeter of all parking areas. Revise the sheet to show trees, 21/2" in
caliper, evenly distributed through the parking area, at a rate of 1 tree for every 10
parking spaces. Provide a parking/ interior tree schedule indicating how this guideline has
been addressed.
Revise Sheet Cl Final ARB Site Plan to show trees, 2 1/2" in caliper, 40' on center along
the eastern perimeter of the parking lot. Sheet Cl Final ARB Site Plan only shows 2
trees, 2 1 /z" in caliper, evenly distributed through the parking area at a rate of 1 tree for
every 10 parking spaces. The parking schedule provided indicates that 5 trees are
required and 7 provided. Trees located along the perimeter of parking areas and
travelways do not fulfill this requirement.
Please provide:
1. Two copies of revised drawings addressing the aforementioned comment.
2. A memo indicating specifically how the condition has been satisfied. If changes other
than those requested have been made, specifically identify those changes in the memo,
also. Clear, specific, and accurate information will facilitate the review of your submittal.
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with
your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staff s review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a
Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
cc: ARB File
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution.
County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions.
If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the
intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be
accepted for submittal.
TO: Brent W. Nelson DATE:
PROJECT NAME: ARB 2007 -42 Timberwood Commons
Submittal Type Requiring Revisions O indicates submittal
Code
County Project
Number
# Copies
Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S)
# Copies
Distribute To:
Mitigation Plan (MP)
2
Brent W. Nelson
Waiver Request (WR)
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
Road Plan (RP)
Private Road Request, with private /public comparison
(PRR)
Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA)
Preliminary Site Plan (PSP)
Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP)
Final Plat (FP)
Preliminary Plat (PP)
Easement Plat (EP)
Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP)
Rezoning Plan (REZ)
Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP)
Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP)
Proffers (P)
Bond Estimate Request (BER)
Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP)
Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP)
Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP)
Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR)
Architectural Review Board (ARB)
ARB 2007 -42
2
Other: Please explain
(For staff use only)
Submittal Code
# Copies
Distribute To:
Submittal Code
# Copies
Distribute To:
2
Brent W. Nelson
*Unassigned (in County Project Column) — Intake to assign a new Application Number