Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO200800088 Review Comments Stormwater Management Plan 2008-10-09� OF AL ,. vIRGI1`IZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: J.W. Townsend Landscaping Improvements — Minor Amendment [SDP200800081 ] Plan preparer: Jim Taggart, TCS Engineering [fax 361 -1216] Owner or rep.: J.W. Townsend [email jay @townsendlandscape.com] Plan received date: 4 June 2008 Rev, 1: 25 August 2008 Date of comments: 22 July 2008 Rev, 1: 09 Oct.. 2008 Reviewer: Amy Pflaum, Current Development Review Engineer Rev.I : John Diez, Current Development Engineering Technician Minor Site Plan Amendment Comments Easements or letters of intent are required for off -site work. It appears that temporary grading and construction easements will be necessary from TMP's 32 -6A and 32 -22B1. Please submit easement documents for all new easements or demonstrate that these easements are not necessary. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 2. All slopes steeper than 3:1 will require non - grassed low maintenance ground cover, please specify with a note on the plan. [DM] (Rev. I) Comment has been addressed 3. In the Albemarle County Development Area, curbing is required on all parking areas and travelways with VDOT designations (CG -2, CG -6). (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. If you do not wish to add curb, then please submit a waiver request as per section 18.4.12.2.c.2. 4. Although labeled as 8.25% on the plan, the portion of the proposed travelway uphill of the two new parking areas is graded at 20 %. Travelways should not exceed a 10% grade. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. There still seems to be grades that exceed 10% on the travelway. 5. A guardrail with VDOT designations (GR -2, GR -2a, etc.) is required next to parking or travelways adjacent to retaining walls or drop -offs of greater than 4 feet, with start and end sections labeled. [18- 32.7.2] (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 6. An Erosion & Sediment Control Plan and Stormwater Management Plan are required. Please submit along with a Water Protection Ordinance application. Comments #7 -16 will need to be addressed with the WPO. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed 7. Please remove all Erosion & Sediment Control features on the Site Plan. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 8. Location of the retaining wall is not clear. Please provide start and end elevations for the retaining wall, as well as elevation marks throughout the wall. 9. Please provide retaining wall details referenced from the plans. A typical manufacturers drawing for segmented block walls, or VDOT reference, is acceptable, with any applicable safety railings or guardrail shown. 10. Small scale of plan makes it difficult to determine dimensions of parking and loading spaces. Stormwater Management Plan Comments � .. ....... ...... area to the proposed stormwater management pond and sub- areas to the culverts. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed 12. Please provide culvert computations for the two proposed culverts under the travelway. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed 13. Please provide a cross section detail of the proposed pond. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed 14. The pond is sized as a detention facility, but no outlet structure is shown. Please provide details and sizing calculations for the outlet structure. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed 15. Please address the stormwater management of the concentrated run -off from the proposed pond. Identify the adequate channel from this site. It appears a drainage easement may be needed from TMP 32 -22B 1. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. Concentrated run -off from the proposed pond has not been addressed. Concentrated run -off appears to be flowing to the neighboring property. Please identify the adequate channel from this site. Also, please provide a drainage easement from TMP 32 -22B1. 16. A stormwater management easement is required around the proposed swale and pond and any associated structures. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. The easement must be extended to the property line by Rte. 29 17. Please provide for vehicle access to the proposed pond. Access must be graded to 10' width and less than 20% grade, gravel surface or better is required for grades over 10 %. Please provide a minimum 10' wide permanent easement over the access. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed 18. A Stormwater Management bond amount will be computed by the County once the WPO plans have been approved. A completed copy of the standard stormwater management maintenance agreement and fee for recordation for any stormwater management facilities will be required. [17- 304E] 19. Please submit a completed copy of the standard Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and fee for recordation for the proposed stormwater management facilities. 20. Please provide all existing easements with deed book references, locations and dimensions [18- 32.6.6, 14 -302] Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 21. Please provide a detail of the proposed grassed swale per the VSMH (blue book) 3.13 22. Please specify all dimensions on the outlet protection detail. 23. Please include a detention summary table with pre - development and post - development rate calculations. 24. Please provide a float calculation for the pond riser structure 25. If the pond is to provide extended detention, please design per the VSMH (blue book) 3.07. 26. Please simplify post - development calculations so that there is one drainage area to the pond. 27. Please specify water quality volume (WQV) method and counts. 28. Please provide a plan view of the pond at a larger scale so that we may review the grading. Scale should be I" = 20' — 30'. Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Comments 29. An Erosion & Sediment Control bond amount will be computed by the County once the WPO plans have been approved. 30. Please include the acreage of disturbance in the project description of the narrative. (Rev. I) Comment has been addressed 31. Is the proposed pond to serve as a sediment basin during construction? If so, please provide sizing calculations and details per the VESCH 3.14 \\ Cob- dts01 \cityviewlnk\Docs\2008 \SDP \SDP200800081 J.W. Townsend\E2_mia, swm_JPD_JWTownsend.doc