Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB200800048 Review Comments Preliminary Site Plan 2008-09-12COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 September 12, 2008 BRW Architects c/o Bruce Wardell 112 Fourth St NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB2008 -00048 UVA Long Term Acute Care Hospital Tax Map 59, Parcels 23B, 23131, 23C1, 23D and 23F Dear Mr. Wardell: I have reviewed the revised ARB submittal for the above - referenced application, which included drawings L1.1 through L1.13 with revision date of 7/14/2008. 1 have the following comments: Comment #3 in our May 30, 2008 action letter reads: "Provide complete proposed grading. Show tree lines to remain. Show tree protection fencing. Ensure that existing trees to remain are drawn at actual size. Revise proposed grading to avoid the drip line of trees to remain." Tree protection is not shown. Grading still does not appear to complete in the area north of the proposed LTACH building, and I have learned from other reviewers that a revised design for the utility area wall on the north side of the LTACH building shows the wall at 20' high. • Show tree protection on the grading and landscape plans. • Clarify and complete the proposed grading on the north side of the LTACH building. Provide architectural elevations for the LTACH building that show the utility area walls. Reduce the height of the walls to that which is necessary for screening. Ensure that the utility area walls are coordinated with the architecture of the overall building. • Show proposed grading and tree removal associated with the new sewer line proposed at the north side of the site. 2. Comment #4 in our May 30, 2008 action letter required information on parking spaces. No information has been submitted. • Provide information on the plan regarding the number of proposed and required parking spaces. 3. The landscape plan includes shrubs along the EC side of the Sieg parking lot. They are identified as European Hornbeam, Fagus Sylvatica. The Fagus Sylvatica is a European Beech, and both plants appear to be trees — not shrubs. • Correct and clarify the plant list regarding the European Hornbeam, Fagus Sylvatica. 4. Comment #12 in our May 30, 2008 action letter required "revisions to provide trees along the eastside of the LTACH building outside of utilities and easements ". There still appears to be a water easement adjacent to the east side of the proposed LTACH building and trees and shrubs are proposed within the easement. • Revise the plan to provide trees along the east side of the LTACH building outside of utilities and easements. 5. The cut sheet for the ELA fixture does not include a diagram indicating that it is a full cutoff fixture. The diagram is required to determine that the fixture meets ordinance requirements. A note in the luminaire schedule indicates that the pole for the OA -1 fixture has a "UVA seal ". • Provide a diagram for the ELA fixture that shows it is a full cutoff fixture. • Clarify what the "UVA seal" for the OA -1 light fixture is. What does it look like? How big is it? Where would it be located? What is its purpose? 6. Comment #19 from our May 30, 2008 action letter indicated that the height of the lights in the Sieg parking lot should not exceed the height of the Sieg building. The height of the Sieg building was not provided for comparison. • Provide the height of the Sieg building. 7. Comment #20 in our May 30, 2008 action letter stated: "Include the following note on the site plan: Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle." The note does not appear on the plan. • Include the following note on the site plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle." 8. No light fixtures are proposed at the LTACH building. • Confirm that no light fixtures are proposed at the LTACH building or provide for review a revised lighting plan that includes complete information on proposed lighting. 9. The plans include the Moser Radiation Therapy building site, and the Moser site and building design are not up -to -date. • Revise the site plan to include the approved Moser design, or include a note on the plan that references the appropriate site plan number for changes to the Moser site. 10. Building materials and details were discussed and approved by the ARB in two work sessions. The architectural elevations do not reference all materials /colors. • Provide a current set of architectural elevations. Include a materials schedule identifying all approved materials /colors. Please provide: 1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of the bulleted comments listed above. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing and an ARB approval signature panel. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staff's review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner Cc: Keith Whipple, McKee Carson, 301 East High Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902 UVA Facilities Planning & Capital Dev., PO BOX 800799, Charlottesville, VA 22908 University Of Virginia Health Services Found., 500 Ray C Hunt Dr., Charlottesville, VA 22903 Gerald Gatobu, Current Development ARB File �� OF ALg �'IRGI131�` COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Margaret Maliszewski DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB2008 -00048 UVA Lona Term Acute Care Hospital Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S) # Copies Distribute To: Mitigation Plan (MP) 2 Margaret Maliszewski Waiver Request (WR) Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Road Plan (RP) Private Road Request, with private /public comparison (PRR) Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA) Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP) Final Plat (FP) Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat (EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP) Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP) Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP) Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB2008 -0048 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 2 Margaret Maliszewski