Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800130 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2008-11-12c��pF AL &FA9'P �'IRGINIP County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Ammy George From: Gerald Gatobu, Senior Planner Division: Zoning and Current Development Date: November 12, 2008 Subject: SDP2008 -00130 University of Virginia Long Term Acute Care Final The County of Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development will grant or recommend approval of the final site plan referred to above once the following comments have been addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] ❑ 32.5.6 The preliminary /final site plan shall contain the following information: ❑ b. Written schedules or data as necessary to demonstrate that the site can accommodate the proposed use, including: Schedule of parking including maximum amount required and amount provided; [will be addressed by the Zoning Administrator per the parkin sg tudyl. Additionally, there are about two parking spaces that extend beyond the property line of TMP 59 -23B into TMP 59 -23B 1.Section 4.12.16.b Design of spaces. All parking spaces shall be designed so that no part of any vehicle will extend over any lot line, right -of -way line, sidewalk, walkway, and driveway or aisle space. Please consider redesigning the parking spaces close to the concrete loading and utility area. More Parking Spaces extend beyond the boundary line. Boundary line was extended. I will talk to Amelia to see if the waiver will be sufficient for the new extensions caused by the new boundary line. LIGHTING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST El Lumen level (3000 or more must be full cutoff) Cut Sheets have been provided. This has been addressed. Bulb/lamp location (must be totally within house to be full cutoff) Please note Luminaire schedule Catalog # coordinated with cut sheets Luminaire schedule has been included. The catalog# and the cut sheets match, except for the fixture MWB. MWB is similar to MWC but the cut sheets are different [One of the cut sheets is not labeled for the type, and MWB seems to be the only fixture type without a cut sheet. Ordering /catalog numbers are different on the cutsheets. Please clarify /revise. F-1 Fixture quantity /types coordinated with quantity /types on lighting plan Consider breaking down the fixtures shown per the property or site e.g. Fixtures in TMP 59 -23BI and those in TMP59 -23B. Fixture quantity /types do not coordinate with quantity /type on the lighting plan. See Seig lighting plan for direction. F-1 Pole height/mounting height (ARB) Not Applicable Colors /finishes (ARB) Not applicable Tilt (must be 0 for full cutoff) Please make sure all fixtures are full cut off. Fixture locations EJ Location conflicts with trees, utilities, etc. The location of the lights must /shall not conflict with trees and utilities. The boundary of TPM 59 -23BI shown on the lighting plan is incorrect. A boundary line adjustment was done and the lighting plan needs to reflect the change. This has been addressed, thank you! El Coordination with other site plan sheets The proposed fixtures need to be shown on other site plan sheets to make sure that there are no conflicts. El Shielding issues (freestanding signs, wall fixtures, etc.) Please note that all future /intended freestanding signs, and proposed wall fixtures must be shielded. Photometric plan El Adjacent zoning This does not raise any issues /comments 0 Property lines Boundary Line Has been moved. Please reflect this change on the proposed boundary line adjustment. 0 Excessive spillover There is an area by the access easement that has excessive spillover i.e. >0.5 ootcandles. 0 Excessive lighting levels (ARB) Not applicable F-1 Maintenance factor = 1.0 Maintenance factor should be I.0 This has been addressed thank you. El Standard lighting notes Thank you. (I found the note on page C2) Landscape Plan Checklist Comments TMP 59 -23B 1 Symbols in the key (Planting schedule for 23B1) and the trees they represent on the site plan do not match. ■ 9 AA Amelanchier X Grandiflora Autumn Brilliance 10 year canopy figure is not counted i.e. missing from the calculation — (1170) ■ Note on the plan indicates 3 QP when there are only 2 QP ■ I counted 80 VBC and not 75 as shown on the planting schedule. ■ 10 Canopy Coverage for IVLV is incorrect. 10 year canopy for the Henry Garnett Sweet spire is 64 ■ Counted 106 IG and not 104 TMP 59 -23B ■ Only 3 CCL. Boundary line has been moved. ■ Only 9 CL and not 22 ■ FGMA should be FG? Coordinate the Key with what is on the site plan. ■ Counted 26 FGS and not 15 ■ IG (24) not on the same TMP. The Boundary line moved. ■ 26 PVS should be PV? Coordinate the Key on the planting schedule with what is shown on the site plan. Conservation plan checklist needs to be checked. It is signed but not checked. Please contact Gerald Gatobu at the Division of Zoning and Current Development at 296 -5832 ext.3385 for further information. 3