HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800154 Review Comments Preliminary Site Plan 2008-11-04vIRG1N�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Summer Frederick, Planner
From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review
Division: Current Development
Date: November 4, 2008
Subject: SDP200800154, Re- Store'n Station - Preliminary
The preliminary site plan for Re- Store'n Station, received on October 13, 2008, has been reviewed. The
engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are
adequately addressed:
1. Please label more clearly the existing right -of -way and edge of asphalt of Route 250 on Existing
Conditions and Road Improvements sheets.
2. Please add sight distance triangles and easements to the entrance onto Route 250. [DM]
3. The Road Improvements Plan states that the existing 15" and 18" pipes in the Route 250 right -of-
way will be extended, please show the proposed extension on the Site Plan. Please also add
direction of flow to these pipes. "Invert In = 701.91" is lower than "Invert Out = 702.14 ".
4. The Grading Plan should show proposed grading associated with the new lanes on Route 250.
There appears to be a low spot where the 15" and 18" pipe meet, will this be filled in?
5. Proposed grades between the parking lot and the existing 15' roadway appear steeper than 2:1,
please revise the grading or use a retaining wall to maintain slopes no greater than 2:1. [DM]
6. Guardrail is required along the edge of the parking lot in all locations where the elevation of the
parking lot is 7 feet higher than the toe of the tie -in slope. [DM]
7. An island is necessary at the edge of the 8 proposed parking spaces toward the back of the site.
[DM]
8. The proposed dumpster pad must extend 8 feet beyond the front of the dumpster. [ 18- 4.12.9]
9. The proposed loading space should be adjacent to the structure. [18- 4.12 -13]
10. The proposed Atlantis D- Raintank does not have a water quality removal rate, please specify the
type of water quality measures that will be provided for this site. [18- 32.5.6.k]
11. The proposed level spreader may not satisfy the requirements of VESCH MS -19. The exit slope
may not have a grade greater than 10%. An adequate channel and easement may be necessary
through neighboring properties.
\\ Cob- dts01 \cityviewlnk\Docs \2008 \SDP \SDP200800154 - Re- Store'n Station Pre1iminary\E1_psp_ADP_08 -00154 Re- Stor'n Station.doc