HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800135 Review Comments Major Amendment, Preliminary Plan 2008-11-07vIRG1
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:
Bill Horton (wsh @handp.com)
From:
Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner
Division:
Zoning & Current Development
Date:
October 7, 2008
Revl:
November 7, 2008
Subject:
SDP - 2008 -135- BB &T- Major Site Plan Amendment
The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County
Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when
the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that
have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated
based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the
Albemarle County Code.]
1. The site plan can not be approved until the special use permit (SP2008 -028) has been
approved. See comments for special use permit, attached.
Rev 1: Comment not addressed. The site plan has been deferred by the applicant on
11.5.08 until the special use permit has been approved.
2. [32.5.6 (b)] Coordinate the site plan with the special use permit plan. Some of the parking
spaces are being shown in a different configuration on the special use permit plan. Also,
the reduction in stacking spaces has not been approved by the Zoning Administrator to
date.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
3. [32.5.6 (i)] Provide the following information for Route 250; state route numbers, right -
of -way lines and widths, centerline radii, and pavement widths. Also, show the distance
to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingrees and
egress.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
4. [32.6.5] Revise the plan sheets to be at 1 " =20', so that Route 250 is shown on each sheet.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
5. [32.6.6 (j)] Provide a luminaire schedule of all proposed lighting. Indicate in the schedule
all lighting options chosen, and the colors proposed for the fixtures and poles. Provide the
cut sheets for the light fixtures on the plan. All proposed lighting exceeding the 3,000
lumens threshold shall be a full cut off design. Lighting values shall not exceed 1/z foot
candle at a public right -of -way line or at a property line adjoining a residential or rural
area district. Also, the LLF for the proposed fixtures shall be 1.0.
Rev 1: Comment not addressed. A note has been added to the plan that indicates a LLF
of 1.0, however the luminaire schedule on sheet C6 shows a LLF factor as .65. The
LLF factor must be 1.0.
6. [32.7.9] Show the grading and all utilities on the landscape plan to verify that there are no
conflicts with proposed landscaping.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
7. [32.7.9.7 (b)] Provide a schedule that indicates that the interior landscaping requirement
is being met. Also, Cornus florida is an ornamental tree and the requirements for interior
landscaping are for one large or medium shade tree per ten parking spaces. Provide the
proper amount of shade trees to meet this requirement.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
S. [32.7.9.7 (c)] When a parking lot is located such that the parked cars will be visible from
a public street, then additional landscaping of low street shrubs, planted in a single row
five (5) feet on center, shall be required between the street and the parking lot. Provide
supplemental landscaping in the area between the parking lot and Route 250 in order to
meet this requirement.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
9. [32.7.9.8] In the plan set provided, there wasn't a detail provided for the screening around
the dumpster or the mechanical yard. Provide the detail for this screening. If the fence or
wall is not six (6) feet in height, then landscape screening per this section must be
provided.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
10. [32.7.9.9] Provide tree canopy calculations and information in accordance with this
section.
Rev l: Comment adequately addressed.
11. [4.12.13] The plan submitted removes a required loading space for Building C. Provide a
loading space that meets the requirements for Building C.
1. Rev 1: Comment not addressed. The loading space for Building C must be
addressed before the approval of this site plan. The developer has submitted a
minor site plan amendment that is currently under review that would resolve
this comment. This minor amendment will need to be approved before the
approval of the major site plan amendment for BB &T.
Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext
3004 for further information.
2