The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB200600131 Review Comments Miscellaneous Submittal 2008-11-18ALg�,�� 'IRGINZ� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012 November 18, 2008 William M. Verebely, Jr. 2200 Dunborton Drive Chesapeake, VA 23325 RE: ARB- 2006 -131: Southside Church of God (Tax Map 90, Parcel 35B) Dear Mr. Verebely: I have reviewed your submittal for the above - referenced project consisting of the following drawings received September 30, 2008: Building Drawings: • Sheet 1: Addition to the Southside Church of God, Left and Right Side Elevations, latest revision date 9/25/08. Sheet 1: Addition to the Southside Church of God, Floor Plan and Front Elevation, latest revision date 9/25/08. Site Plan Drawings: • Sheet C -1: Southside Church of God, Cover Sheet, latest revision date 3/13/08. • Sheet C -2: Southside Church of God, Site Plan Amendment, latest revision date 3/13/08. • Sheet C -3: Southside Church of God, Lighting Plan, latest revision date 3/13/08. Outstanding issues that will need to be further addressed are shown in italics after the original comment from the Action Letter of March 26, 2007. 1. Revise the lobby addition to reduce the slope of the gabled roof form. Design the lobby area windows so that the large windows coordinate with whatever wall material is selected, masonry or siding. Revise the elevations with notes indicating that tinted glass will not be used and glass reflectance shall be held below 7 %. Key all building elevations for proposed materials and colors. Revise the projecting bay of the north elevation of the rear addition, by adding detailing to relieve the blank appearance at the peak. Note: At the November 17, 2008 ARB meeting, staff asked the Board for some direction (explanation) concerning the comment above "Design the lobby area windows so that the large windows coordinate with whatever wall material is selected, masonry or siding." Staff could not recall the exact intent of this comment made at the March 5, 2007 review of this proposal. Below is the Board's clarification of this comment/requirement: From the 11/17/08 ARB meeting: Regarding ARB- 2006 -131, Southside Church of God, it was the consensus of the ARB that the condition regarding the coordination of lobby windows and building material refers to window trim scale and color that should be coordinated with other proposed building materials. For example, if the mullion and window trim colors match or are coordinated with the fascia and siding colors, then the color part of the condition will be met. Comments: The revised elevations have not been keyed for proposed materials and colors. Note: As indicated above, window trim scale and color should be coordinated with other proposed building materials. For example, if the mullion and window trim colors match or are coordinated with the fascia and siding colors, then the color part of the condition will be met. A note was not added to the drawing stating that the glass reflectance shall be held below 7 %. Additional detailing has not been added at the peak of the projecting bay in the north elevation to relieve the blank appearance. Recommendations: Key all building elevations for proposed materials and colors. Revise elevation drawings as needed to address the following comment: Window trim scale and color should be coordinated with other proposed building materials. For example, if the mullion and window trim colors match or are coordinated with the fascia and siding colors, then the color part of the condition will be met. Revise the projecting bay of the rear addition in the north elevation, by adding detailing to relieve the blank appearance at the peak or provide a written explanation in the memo accompanying your resubmission indicating why this cannot be done. 2. Indicate in writing if there are any accessory structures to be located on site. If there are additional site accessories and structures not yet shown, indicate their location(s) on the drawings. Comments: This comment was not addressed in the resubmission. Recommendations: Indicate in the memo accompanying your resubmission if there are any accessory structures to be located on site. If there are additional site accessories and structures not yet shown, indicate their location(s) on the drawings. Provide a revised site plan and erosion control plan clearly showing all relevant Tree Conservation checklist items, the location and type of all tree protection measures, and limits of construction. All tree protection measures are to be installed at the tree drip line. Provide a signed Tree Conservation Checklist on the site plan and erosion control plan. Comments: An Erosion Control Plan was not provided with this resubmission. The type of tree protection proposed was not included on the drawings in this resubmission. The proposed location of the tree protection, as shown on Sheet C -2 "Site Plan Amendment" is not at the drip line of the tree. The Tree Conservation Checklist provided on Sheet C -2 "Site Plan Amendment" was not signed and dated by the owner as required. Recommendations: If an Erosion Control Plan is not required, indicate that in the memo accompanying your resubmission and include an explanation for why it is not required. Revise Sheet C -2 to include a detail of the proposed method of tree protection. Revise the drawing to show the location of the tree protection closer to the drip line of the tree. Whereas proposed site improvements may prevent always placing it at the drip line, it is important to show it as close as possible to the actual drip line. 4. Revise the photometric plan by reducing the height of the three pole fixtures in front of the church to 15', removing the ground mounted flood lights in front of the lobby addition, providing cutsheets of all proposed light fixtures and poles on the photometric plan, and identifying the structure (sign) next to the flood light situated east of the entrance drive. Revise the luminaire schedule to include all proposed pole and fixture colors; bronze is preferred. Comments: Cut sheets of all proposed light fixtures and poles were not provided on the photometric plan. The photometric plan was not revised to identify the structure (sign) next to the flood light situated east of the entrance drive. The luminaire schedule was not revised to include all proposed pole and fixture colors; bronze is preferred. Recommendations: Revise the photometric plan by providing cutsheets of all proposed light fixtures and poles on the photometric plan, and identifying the structure (sign) next to the flood light situated east of the entrance drive. Revise the luminaire schedule to include all proposed pole and fixture colors; bronze is preferred. 5. Provide complete information on all proposed signs. All proposed signage visible from the EC must be reviewed by the ARB and observe ARB sign guidelines. Comments: This comment was not addressed in the resubmission. Recommendations: Provide complete information on all proposed signs. All proposed signage visible from the EC must be reviewed by the ARB and observe ARB sign guidelines. If additional signage is not proposed, note it in the memo that will accompany your resubmission. 6. Provide any information regarding the change of location for the existing house and shed for final site plan approval. If they are not within view of the Entrance Corridor, the ARB will have no comment on them. Comments: This was not addressed in the resubmission. Recommendations: Provide any information regarding the change of location for the existing house and shed for final site plan approval. If they are not within view of the Entrance Corridor, the ARB will have no comment on them. Provide material samples and a material list. Comments: Samples of proposed materials were not included with this resubmission. The elevation drawings were not revised to include a building materials list. Recommendations: With your next resubmission, provide samples of the proposed building materials. Provide elevation drawings revised to include a building materials list. Please provide: 1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal' form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brent W. Nelson Landscape Planner cc: Southside Church of God 1807 Avon Street Ext. Charlottesville, VA. 22902 ARB File COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Brent W. Nelson DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB 2006 -131 Southside Church of God Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S) # Copies Distribute To: Mitigation Plan (MP) 2 Brent W. Nelson Waiver Request (WR) Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Road Plan (RP) Private Road Request, with private /public comparison (PRR) Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA) Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP) Final Plat (FP) Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat (EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP) Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP) Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP) Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB 2006 -131 2 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: 2 Brent W. Nelson *Unassigned (in County Project Column) — Intake to assign a new Application Number