Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800159 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2008-11-19ALg�,�� �'IRGINZ�` COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 MEMORANDUM TO: Megan Yanigloss, Senior Planner FROM: Brent Nelson RE: Blue Ridge Shopping Center, Minor Amendment, SDP 08 -159 DATE: November 19, 2008 I have reviewed the Site Plan Minor Amendment for the above referenced proposal (Sheets SP 2 Site Plan and L1 Illumination Plan received November 7, 2008), and I have the following comments: Issue: ARB Application RequiredlAmendment to a Site Development Plan Comments: The proposed changes to this development plan will require a submission to the Architectural Review Board for review and approval. Once an application has been received, it may be determined that the proposed changes can be reviewed administratively without need for a full review by the ARB. The applicant should make a submission to the ARB as an Amendment to a Site Development Plan. The submission package should include a completed checklist for Revisions to a Certificate of Appropriateness /Amendment to a Site Development Plan Checklist. All checklist items should be addressed (included) in the submission package. ARB applications and checklists are available on -line at www.albemarle.org. Issue: Project Description/Guardrails Comments: The drawings submitted did not contain a detailed description of the proposed changes. Proposed changes are difficult to understand as currently shown. Proposed changes should be bubbled on the plan with an explanation of the proposed change included on the drawing. The applicant's memo accompanying this submission indicated that guardrail details have changed; however, details of the change were not provided. Issue: Lighting Cutsheets Comments: Proposed lighting cutsheets need to be on the full size set of site/lighting drawings, not as separate sheets. The lighting maintenance factor (LLF), currently shown as 0.72, needs to be revised to a factor of 1.