Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO200800052 Review Comments Erosion Control Plan 2009-01-07Page 1 of 2 Philip Custer From: Philip Custer Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:52 AM To: 'Justin Shimp'; 'Tucker Hurt'; 'Denise LaCour' Cc: Patrick Lawrence Subject: RE: Luxor Commercial Easements /Etc I have reviewed the documents regarding the offsite easements for use of the SWM basin, drainage, and access. All of the outstanding engineering concerns have been addressed for the site plan and we grant tentative approval pending the approval of the plats which Pat is currently reviewing. I have also not seen an approval letter from VDOT for this project, though I believe I recall VDOT as having no objections. An approval letter from VDOT should be kept on file before the County requests that mylars be submitted. A WPO bond amount will be calculated for the ESC plan by engineering review and will be relayed to the applicant once it is completed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Phil From: Philip Custer Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:55 AM To: 'Justin Shimp' Cc: Patrick Lawrence Subject: RE: Luxor Commercial Easements /Etc Thanks for the email Justin. It definitely helps to have these items listed out like you have them. I agree with you regarding items 1, 3, and 4. And I trust that Pat's review of the access easements on the Rite Aid - Eckerd property (TMP 78 -12B) will take care of item 5. In addition, we'll need a letter of intent from Eckerd /Rite -Aid for the construction on TMP 79 -12B to install the curb tie -ins and necessary grading. I spoke with Pat regarding item 2. We're going to get with Bill tomorrow afternoon to discuss what we'll need for the future Luxor Road dedication since it is a somewhat unique situation. Also, just to clarify, the parcel in question regarding the Luxor Road issue is 78F -01 - -A according to our records. As far as I can tell, TMP 78 -12B (Rite- Aid / Eckerd) needs no ROW dedication for the Luxor Commercial Development to take place. From: Justin Shimp [mailto:jshimp @ddrva.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:13 AM To: Philip Custer Cc: Patrick Lawrence Subject: Luxor Commercial Easements /Etc Phil, as a follow up to our conversation Jon had made this comment: 3. Please provide all necessary offsite easements for parcels 78 -12, 12B, and 55D. Rev1: It appears construction easements are needed from 78 -12B. Easement plats should be approved and deeded prior to final site plan approval. Rev2: Grading easements are required. Use of the adjacent pond for ESC and SWM requires 1/7/2009 Page 2 of 2 easements. The second interconnection to Eckerd should be shown on the plans. Access easements should be provided to Aunt Sarah's at the entrance locations provided. Rev3: All necessary offsite easements are required prior to final site plan approval. Any pending on site easement plats must be approved prior to final site plan approval. Based on that comment and our conversation it is my understanding that the following is required: 1) deeds of dedication for public drainage easements 2) Letter of intent from the owner of parcel 12B indicating agreement to allow the ROW dedication as shown on the final site plan. 3) Copy of the plat showing drainage easements from the site to the existing regional stormwater facility 4) Copy of the stormwater management agreement for the luxor commercial site to use the regional SWM facility 5) Letter of intent /signed easement plat showing the second connection to Rite -Aid on the north side of the site. (the first connection closest to 250 has been removed from the siteplan) Access easements to Aunt Sarah's have been provided on the easement plat that I submitted most recently. I double checked the grading plan and can confirm that no construction will take place on the Aunt Sarah's parcel. Please let me know if anything is missing from the list above. I will try to pull as many of these things together as I can today and tomorrow. I am trying very hard to have this plan signed by the end of next week so if you'll can think of anything else that may be needed before the plan can be signed please let me know. Thanks! - Justin 1/7/2009 Page 1 of 2 Philip Custer From: Philip Custer Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:52 AM To: 'Justin Shimp'; 'Tucker Hurt'; 'Denise LaCour' Cc: Patrick Lawrence Subject: RE: Luxor Commercial Easements /Etc I have reviewed the documents regarding the offsite easements for use of the SWM basin, drainage, and access. All of the outstanding engineering concerns have been addressed for the site plan and we grant tentative approval pending the approval of the plats which Pat is currently reviewing. I have also not seen an approval letter from VDOT for this project, though I believe I recall VDOT as having no objections. An approval letter from VDOT should be kept on file before the County requests that mylars be submitted. A WPO bond amount will be calculated for the ESC plan by engineering review and will be relayed to the applicant once it is completed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Phil From: Philip Custer Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:55 AM To: 'Justin Shimp' Cc: Patrick Lawrence Subject: RE: Luxor Commercial Easements /Etc Thanks for the email Justin. It definitely helps to have these items listed out like you have them. I agree with you regarding items 1, 3, and 4. And I trust that Pat's review of the access easements on the Rite Aid - Eckerd property (TMP 78 -12B) will take care of item 5. In addition, we'll need a letter of intent from Eckerd /Rite -Aid for the construction on TMP 79 -12B to install the curb tie -ins and necessary grading. I spoke with Pat regarding item 2. We're going to get with Bill tomorrow afternoon to discuss what we'll need for the future Luxor Road dedication since it is a somewhat unique situation. Also, just to clarify, the parcel in question regarding the Luxor Road issue is 78F -01 - -A according to our records. As far as I can tell, TMP 78 -12B (Rite- Aid / Eckerd) needs no ROW dedication for the Luxor Commercial Development to take place. From: Justin Shimp [mailto:jshimp @ddrva.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:13 AM To: Philip Custer Cc: Patrick Lawrence Subject: Luxor Commercial Easements /Etc Phil, as a follow up to our conversation Jon had made this comment: 3. Please provide all necessary offsite easements for parcels 78 -12, 12B, and 55D. Rev1: It appears construction easements are needed from 78 -12B. Easement plats should be approved and deeded prior to final site plan approval. Rev2: Grading easements are required. Use of the adjacent pond for ESC and SWM requires 1/7/2009 Page 2 of 2 easements. The second interconnection to Eckerd should be shown on the plans. Access easements should be provided to Aunt Sarah's at the entrance locations provided. Rev3: All necessary offsite easements are required prior to final site plan approval. Any pending on site easement plats must be approved prior to final site plan approval. Based on that comment and our conversation it is my understanding that the following is required: 1) deeds of dedication for public drainage easements 2) Letter of intent from the owner of parcel 12B indicating agreement to allow the ROW dedication as shown on the final site plan. 3) Copy of the plat showing drainage easements from the site to the existing regional stormwater facility 4) Copy of the stormwater management agreement for the luxor commercial site to use the regional SWM facility 5) Letter of intent /signed easement plat showing the second connection to Rite -Aid on the north side of the site. (the first connection closest to 250 has been removed from the siteplan) Access easements to Aunt Sarah's have been provided on the easement plat that I submitted most recently. I double checked the grading plan and can confirm that no construction will take place on the Aunt Sarah's parcel. Please let me know if anything is missing from the list above. I will try to pull as many of these things together as I can today and tomorrow. I am trying very hard to have this plan signed by the end of next week so if you'll can think of anything else that may be needed before the plan can be signed please let me know. Thanks! - Justin 1/7/2009