HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900006 Review Comments No Submittal Type Selected 2009-02-16�'IRGII`It�`
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
DATE: February 16, 2009
RK &K
801 East Main Street, Suite 1000
Richmond, VA, 23219.
RE: SDP - 2009 -00006 Comfort Suites Inn at Hollymead Town Center [Preliminary]
Dear Sir /Madam,
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary
comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies,
as applicable, are attached: ' .
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner)
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer)
Albemarle County Division of Planning (Principal Planner ARB)
Albemarle County Division of Inspections (Building Official)
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). (Pending)
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) (Pending)
Albemarle County Geographic and Data Services (GDS)
Albemarle County Fire and Rescue
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should
not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
could affect approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site
Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing
justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17"
copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached
comments of the Site Review Committee by Monday March 2, 2009. Failure to submit this information
by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are
submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Current Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902 -4596
Phone: (434)296 -5832 Ext 3385
Fax: (434)972 -4126
� of ALB
�'IRGINZP
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Malachi Mills [RK &K]
From: Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner
Division: Zoning and Current Development
Date: February, 16 2009
Subject: SDP2009 -00006 Comfort Suites Inn at Hollymead Town Center Preliminary
The County of Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development will grant or recommend approval of
the preliminary site plan referred to above once the following comments have been addressed: [Each comment is
preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise
specified.]
❑ 32.5.6 The preliminary site plan shall contain the following information:
❑ a.
Zoning; descriptions of all variances, zoning proffers and bonus factors applicable to the site; A co
of the proffers and special use permit VMA 01 -201 and [SP03 -301 needs to be scanned onto the
preliminary site plan (Il) The preliminary site plan is not in general accord with the application
plan and code of development for Area C Block 1 (lots 1,2 and 3). A variation needs to be granted
by the Albemarle County Planning Division. Please refer to comments by Elaine Echoles and the
accompanying zoning memos. Fill out a variation request and return it in with your preliminary
site plan revisions resubmittal. The total square footage of use for Area C blockl (lots 1, 2, 3) per
the code of development is 55000 square feet. Proposed uses in the code of development differ
from what is proposed.
❑ b. Written schedules or data as necessary to demonstrate that the site can accommodate the proposed use
including:
■ Maximum square footage for commercial and industrial uses; Indicate in the site development data
(cover sheet) the total square footage of the hotel. The figure is on the application but not on the
site plan.
■ Maximum number of employees; Please add on the site plan the proposed maximum number of
employees who will be working at the Hotel.
■ Schedule .of parking including maximum amount required and amount provided: The amount of
parking provided for the hotel exceeds the 20% required for the Hotel. [ACC Section 4.12.4.al
Maximum number of spaces. The number of parking spaces in a parking area may not exceed the
number of spaces required by this section by more than twenty (20) percent. Additionally, there
are off site parking spaces shown on tax maps 32 -41D4 and 32 -41D6. These are off site stand alone
parking spaces that do not serve a primary use (parking is usually accessory to a primary use).
Offsite stand alone parking requires a special use permit per section 22.2.2.(9) and Section
24.2.2.(11) of the Albemarle County Code.
■ If a landscape plan is required, maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation areas.
Please be sure to provide the amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation areas. Total
Parkin area is used in the interior landscaping calculations. Does this include vehicular
circulation areas? Please explain.
❑ m. Location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property, showing the distance to the
centerline of the nearest existing street intersection. Indicate on the site plan the distance to the
centerline of the nearest existing street intersection.
❑ n. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including:
• Outdoor lighting: Lighting is shown on the lighting and photometric plan. A lighting plan is not
required at preliminary site plan stage. I reviewed the lighting plan and it is difficult to locate
most of the proposed lighting fixtures because there is too much detail shown on the plan. Please
make the lighting fixture symbols bigger or provide less detail on a separate sheet that would
make it easier to locate the fixtures.
• Signs. Please indicate the location of any proposed signage (free standing signs).
• Sidewalks: Sidewalks need to be shown per the application plan. Refer to the application plan for
Hollymead Town Center Area C Block 1(lots 1,2and 3)
❑ p. Landscape plan in conformance with section 32.7.9 if required. There are several plants that I could
not locate for TMP 32 -41D5. I could not locate 4 Beni Betula Nigral and 19 AZ Azalea. Please
indicate the location on these two plants. R may have missed them on the plan or they are missingl
(Landscape plans are not required at preliminary).
LIGHTING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Lumen level (3000 or more must be full cutoff)
El
One of the fixtures does not mention full cutoff on its cut sheet [fixture A]. The
fixture is also not easily identified on the lighting lan.
Bulb /lamp location (must be totally within house to be full cutoff)
Luminaire schedule
Catalog # coordinated with cut sheets
El
Catalog #`s coordinate with the cut sheets. This has been adequately addressed.
Fixture quantity /types coordinated with quantity /types on lighting plan
El
The fixture quantity / types do not coordinate with the quantity /type on the
lighting plan because there is so much detail on the lighting plan it is almost
impossible to find /locate the light fixtures (symbols). Please revise and make it
easier to locate the fixtures.
Pole height/mounting height (ARB)
Colors /finishes (ARB)
Tilt (must be 0 for full cutoff)
El
Yes, ade ately addressed.
Fixture locations
Location conflicts with trees, utilities, etc.
Please make sure that there are no conflicts between trees, utilities and other site
development features.
Coordination with other site plan sheets
El
Make sure landscaping does not interfere with other features found on other site
plan sheets
Landscape Plan Checklist
Section 32.7.9.4: CONTENTS
Section 32.7.9.7: PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
❑All development subject to site development plan review shall include the following required landscaping for
parking lots consisting of five (5) spaces or more:
❑ (a) Street trees: Street trees shall be planted in accordance with section 32.7.9.6 along the public street
frontage which abuts a parking lot.
❑ (a) The trees shall be planted between the street right -of -way and the parking area, within the parking
setback.
❑ (a) If required street trees cannot be planted within the parking setback or within ten (10) feet of the street
right -of -way due to sight distance, utility easement or other conflicting requirements, then the planting strip
shall be enlarged to accommodate the trees.
❑ (a) If this requirement creates a hardship by causing the relocation of required parking spaces, then the
additional planting area may be counted toward the interior landscaping requirement;
❑ (b) Interior landscaping: Exclusive of the requirements of section 32.7.9.7 (a) and (c), an area equal to
five (5) percent of the paved parking and vehicular circulation area shall be landscaped with trees or
shrubs.
❑ (b) This shall include one (1) large or medium shade tree per ten (10) parldng spaces or portion
thereof, if five (5) spaces or more.
❑ (b) Interior landscaping shall be located in reasonably dispersed planting islands or perimeter areas. Shrub
plantings adjacent to a building shall not be counted as interior landscaping;
❑ (c) Additional plantings along public streets: When a parking lot is located such that the parked cars will be
visible from a public street, then additional landscaping of low street shrubs shall be required between the street
and the parking lot.
❑ (c) Shrubs shall be in a single row planted five (5) feet on center.
❑ (c) Alternate methods of landscaping designed to minimize the visual impact of the parking lot may be approved by the
agent.
Shielding issues (freestanding signs, wall fixtures, etc.)
All the wall fixtures must be fully shielded.
Photometric plan
El
Adjacent zoning
[PDMC] lighting is adequate on adjacent zoning..
El
Property lines
Ade uatel addressed at the property lines.
Excessive spillover None
Excessive lighting levels (ARB)
Maintenance factor = 1.0
Maintenance factor is 1. Thank you.
Standard lighting notes
Add the standard lighting note "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp
that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cut off Luminaire. The
spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential
or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one - half -foot candle."
Landscape Plan Checklist
Section 32.7.9.4: CONTENTS
Section 32.7.9.7: PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
❑All development subject to site development plan review shall include the following required landscaping for
parking lots consisting of five (5) spaces or more:
❑ (a) Street trees: Street trees shall be planted in accordance with section 32.7.9.6 along the public street
frontage which abuts a parking lot.
❑ (a) The trees shall be planted between the street right -of -way and the parking area, within the parking
setback.
❑ (a) If required street trees cannot be planted within the parking setback or within ten (10) feet of the street
right -of -way due to sight distance, utility easement or other conflicting requirements, then the planting strip
shall be enlarged to accommodate the trees.
❑ (a) If this requirement creates a hardship by causing the relocation of required parking spaces, then the
additional planting area may be counted toward the interior landscaping requirement;
❑ (b) Interior landscaping: Exclusive of the requirements of section 32.7.9.7 (a) and (c), an area equal to
five (5) percent of the paved parking and vehicular circulation area shall be landscaped with trees or
shrubs.
❑ (b) This shall include one (1) large or medium shade tree per ten (10) parldng spaces or portion
thereof, if five (5) spaces or more.
❑ (b) Interior landscaping shall be located in reasonably dispersed planting islands or perimeter areas. Shrub
plantings adjacent to a building shall not be counted as interior landscaping;
❑ (c) Additional plantings along public streets: When a parking lot is located such that the parked cars will be
visible from a public street, then additional landscaping of low street shrubs shall be required between the street
and the parking lot.
❑ (c) Shrubs shall be in a single row planted five (5) feet on center.
❑ (c) Alternate methods of landscaping designed to minimize the visual impact of the parking lot may be approved by the
agent.
Make sure that paved parking and circulation areas and not just the parking
area is used in the calculation. Proposed Parking for the hotel exceeds the
required parking by 20% and most of the parking that is in excess is off site. Off site
parking is allowed by special use permit. This comment will be resolved after a request
for variation is received, and a review of the square footage of the proposed hotel is
approved The total square footage of use for this block 1 (for lot s 1, 2, 3) per the code
of development is 55000 square feet.
Section 32.7.9.9: TREE CANOPY
❑a. The foregoing notwithstanding, a minimum tree canopy shall be provided in accordance with this section.
"Tree canopy" or "tree cover" shall include all areas of coverage by plant material exceeding five (5) feet in
height at a maturity of ten (10) years after planting. Selection of species for planting shall be in accord with
section 32.7.9.4
❑ (a) Specifications for plantings shall be in accord with section 32.7.9.5
❑ (b) Existing trees to be preserved in accordance with section 32.7.9.4(b) together with trees required
under sections 32.7.9.6, 32.7.9.7 and 32.7.9.8 shall count toward satisfaction of the minimum tree
canopy.
❑b. The following minimum requirements shall apply:
❑1. Ten (10) percent tree canopy for a site to be developed with commercial, office or industrial
uses;
This has been addressed with the calculations shown, however, as I mentioned earlier, I
could not locate some plants on TMP 32 -41D5. I could not locate 4 Beni FBetula Nigral
and 19 AZ Azalea. Please indicate the location on these two plants. FI may have missed
them on the plan or they are missing] (Landscape plans are not required at
preliminarx) I will then be able to ascertain that the canopy calculation is correct once
the location of the missing trees is determined.
of A'
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Gerald Gatobu, Planner
From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review
Division: Current Development
Date: February 17, 2009
Subject: SDP200900006, Comfort Suites Inn at Hollymead Town Center - Preliminary Site Plan
The preliminary site plan for Comfort Suites Inn at Hollymead Town Center, submitted on January 26,
2009, has been reviewed. Current Development Engineering can recommend approval of this site plan
once the following comments have been addressed:
Preliminary Site Plan Comments
1. The hatching on the legend (Cover Sheet) does not match the plans.
2. Please label the existing easements with Deed Book & Page numbers.
3. Please add sizes to the labels on the existing storm sewer pipes.
4. Because of its close proximity (less than 300 ft) to the Timberwood Boulevard round -a -bout, a
left- turning movement into the existing curb cut on Conner Drive is not desirable. Please adjust
the Conner Drive median to prohibit vehicles from turning left into this development. This curb
cut may maintain right -in and right- and left-out movements.
5. The development proposes to utilize an existing curb cut on Timberwood Boulevard which
appears to operate as a right- and left-in and a right -out. There is potential for drivers exiting this
site to attempt to use this curb cut for a left turn onto Timberwood Boulevard. This poses a safety
concern and it is recommended that the entrance be designed to prohibit exiting vehicles from
attempting turning movements other than a right turn out onto Timberwood Boulevard.
6. Existing lane markings on Route 29 south may need to be addressed at the location of the right -in,
right -out entrance on Route 29. The lane markings indicate a right -turn -only lane into this
entrance, however, the lane actually exists as a through lane. Increasing traffic and turning
movements at this entrance without addressing this contradiction creates a potential traffic hazard.
7. The three parking spaces proposed near the Route 29 entrance are a potential circulation hazard. It
is recommended that they are relocated.
8. This site design proposes very little sidewalks and does not provide for walk- ability, from many of
the parking spaces to the hotel or from the hotel to Target or Conner Drive. It is recommended
that sidewalk be added on one or both sides of the travelway from Conner Drive, around the
parking lots to the front entrance of the hotel. Also, connect sidewalks to the proposed walking
path. ( "Entrances and parking lots will be configured to be functional and inviting with walkways
conveniently tied to logical destinations." Page 14 of the Hollymead Towncenter Code of
Development for Area C)
9. Grading between the proposed "curved" parking area and the walking path is steeper than the
maximum allowable 2 to 1 slope. [AC Design Manual 8.A.1]
10. The grading between the existing Target water quality swale and the proposed parking appears to
create a swale behind the back of curb, this will concentrate flow and possibly cause erosion.
11. Proposed grading creates a low point in the parking lot at the southwest corner of the hotel with no
inlet to collect drainage.
12. The design of the travelway from the existing entrance onto Route 29 allows a large area of the
proposed parking to flow to the existing curb inlets, have these inlets been designed to handle this
flow?
13. The proposed travelway from Conner Drive is steeper than the maximum allowable 10 %. [18-
4.12.17a]
14. In the location of the proposed travelway from Conner Drive, the vertical cover over an existing
sanitary sewer pipe is being reduced by up to 4 feet. Please verify that this pipe is deep enough for
the expected reduction in cover.
15. Proposed grades in the parking area behind the Target exceed the maximum allowable 5 %. [18-
4.12.15c]
16. An existing culvert shown in the parking area between the hotel and the vacant parcel to the
northwest remains on all plans with no notation regarding its removal.
17. The proposed landscaping around the parking area adjacent to the existing rear entrance to Target
may cause sight distance problems for a vehicle taking a right turn from Target toward Route 29.
18. The Hollymead Towncenter Code of Development for Area C (Page 21) states that water quality
swales, which will reduce the amount of untreated runoff entering the ponds, are proposed within
several development Blocks, including Block I. Although an existing water quality swale is
located adjacent to this site, it is not clear that any of the developed flow will enter it.
Final Site Plan comments
19. The Erosion & Sediment Control Plan submitted within this set will not be reviewed with the
preliminary site plan. For review of the E &SC Plan, please submit a Water Protection Ordinance
Application.
20. The Stormwater Management Calculations submitted with this set have only received -a cursory
review with the preliminary site plan. For a full review of the Stormwater Management
calculations, please submit a Water Protection Ordinance Application.
21. This site proposes to utilize the existing C.W. Hurt Basin #1 for water quality and detention. This
plan also proposes modifications, including grading and extensive landscaping, to this pond.
Calculations will be required to validate that the requirements of water quality and quantity for this
site (in conjunction with other sites served by the pond) are being met. As -built conditions on the
existing pond should be utilized rather than topography proposed on previous design plans.
. L .�U�1- £�1.:..,�.C:.L\•la;'�'�: its£`,. �. J: t: sµ.=..€€ ��i .('':S;�J }3�i;t =t)fji {7i) =�.L ii1St'' ¥'yi i�.i:£s .�: €i1�C..�.CT�L 2. lxi. i. isi?�L` 1I ¥L`;': ?.:.�.j':i�3..�i�.J,�3 !': �: _13(';i�iF E�E312I.ii::'€
Application #: SDP200900006 Short Review Comments
Project Name:1 Comfort Suites Inn At Hollymead Town Center - Prelim. Preliminary — Non - residential
Date Completed: 02/13/2009
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Andrew Slack E911
Requested Changes
THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT THIS OFFICE WITH A LIST OF THREE (3) POTENTIAL
ROAD NAMES FOR APPROVAL.
02/12/2009
Elaine Echols Planning
Requested Changes
The maximum square footage on Table A is 55,000 to be split among all of the buildings in Block 1.
The application plan shows this area to be retail and not a hotel. In order to approve the proposed
square footage for the hotel (which is not stated clearly on the plan), there needs to be adequate
square footage left for the other two buildings in the block. Also, a variation is needed for the use as a
hotel. A variation is also needed if additional square footage is to be added to this block. Zoning has
provided this information in letters which are in the CountyView folder for this application. Please
pass the two letters onto the applicant so that he can provide the variation request with the
resubmittal.
02/05/2009
James Barber Fire Rescue
No Objection
Verify adequate fire flow is available. Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
Approval is subject to field inspection and verification.
02/03/2009
Jay Schlothauer Inspections
No Objection
No Objection. (Based on plans dated January 26, 2009).
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Monday, February 16, 2009
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
June 17, 2008
Bill Morrow
1117 E. Market Street, Suite B
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: ZMA 2001 -20 Hollymead Town Center Area C
Dear Mr. Morrow:
You have requested written verification that a 50,000- square foot structure containing three
stories may be developed in Block 1. 1 have reviewed the Application Plan and Code of
Development that were approved on August 6, 2003 and discussed this matter with Elaine
Echols, Principal Planner and Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning. I have determined that this
proposal requires a variation approved by the Director of Planning as set forth in Section 8.5.5.3.
Table A of the Code of Development allows up'to 55,000 square feet in Block 1. Table B allows
up to three stories . in this Block. Appendix A permits Hotels, motels and inns in Block 1 by right.
Your proposal meets these criteria.
However, the Application Plan shows three separate buildings. The Code contains a description
of the amenities and other important features for Block 1 as well as design schematics. It
specifies, in part, that the block will be divided into three parcels with Lots 2 and 3 being utilized
by mid -sized retailers. The description also addresses a variety of design elements that affect
traffic flow, impacts to.the Entrance Corridor, grading and other features. You. must demonstrate
that your proposal can address these items. I recommend that you discuss this with Mr. Cilimbe.rg.
or Ms. Echols prior to submitting the application for the variation.
An application.for such a variation can be found at this link:
http: / /.www.albemarle.org /upload/ images/ forms _center /departments /community_d evelopment/for
ms /applications/ Application_ Variation_ from_ Application _Pians_Codes_and_Standards_of Devei
opment.pdf .
Sincerely,
John Shepherd
Manager of Zoning Administration
AL���Y
w.
GIS3«
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department o1' Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
ao�
July 28,887 -9
Bill Morrow '
1117 E. Market Street, Suite B
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: ZMA 2001 -20 Hollymead Town Center Area C, Block 1
Dear Mr. Morrow:
You have asked for specific verification that the Code of Development for ZMA - 2001 -20
allows the development of a 3 -story, 49,900- square foot hotel on Block I. 1 can verify
that and have noted that the project must be developed in accord with the approved
rezoning.
You have also asked if the maximum non - residential square -footage shown on Table A
of the Code of Development can be modified with the transfer of 12,000 .square feet
from Block II to Block 1.- It is my determination that this transfer may be varied by the
process set forth in section 8.5.5.3.
You have also asked if a three -story, 49,900 square foot hotel can be developed on Lot
2 in Block 1'. It is my determination that this proposed development will also require a
variation in accord with process set forth in section 8.5.5.3. These variations will be
processed as part of the approval process for the preliminary site development plan.
Please.contact me if you have further questions.
Sincerely,
John Shepherd
Manager of Zoning Administration
Wjshepher dots \HTC -C \Block 1 variation.doc
�'IRGI1�11P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
January 9, 2009
NBJ Architecture
C/O Nitin Kulkarne, ALA.
11537 -B Nuckols Road
Glen Allen, Va 23059
RE: ARB2008 -00160 Comfort Suites at Hollymead Town Center
Tax Map 32, Parcel 41 D5
Dear Mr. Kulkarne,
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday,
January 5, 2009. The Board, by a vote of 3:0, approved the request, pending staff administrative approval of
the following conditions:
1. Revise the architectural elevations to include identification of the color for the window air conditioning
units.
2. The applicant is encouraged to provide complete sign information on the drawings for review at this
time to avoid a future ARB sign submittal.
3. Indicate the color /finish for all fixtures in the luminaire schedule.
4. Add the following note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more
initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and
property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle."
5. Include the cut sheets that illustrate the location of the lamps in the light fixtures within the site plan set —
not separate from it or stapled to it.
6. Revise the photometric plan to include a complete calculation grid showing light levels across the parking
areas and travelways. Revise the photometric plan so that all light levels under the entrance canopy are
legible. Reduce the level of illumination under the entrance canopy to provide for safety and security
without over - illumination.
7. Coordinate all the plans regarding the length of the proposed retaining walls located west of the lower
forebay and the existing /proposed condition of the western end of the existing retaining wall.
8. Coordinate the landscape plan and the plant list regarding quantities, locations and labeling.
9. Revise the 9 Willow Oak in the eastern parking area to 3' /z" caliper at planting.
This approval is based on the following conditions:
1. The planting proposed on the south side of the pond shall be completed with the construction of
the hotel, as illustrated on the plan dated 1/5/09.
2. The additional planting on the, north, east and west sides of the pond shall be completed within
one year of this approval.
Please provide:
1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision
dates on each drawing and an ARB approval signature panel.
2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes
other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting
the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.,
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal' form. This form must be returned with your revisions to
ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staff's review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Maliszewski
Principal Planner
Cc: Hollymead Town Center Hotel LLC
c/o Tejas Patel
8350 Brook Road
Richmond, Va 23227
Neil Bhatt, AIA — NBJ Architecture
11537 -B Nuckols Rd.
Glen Allen, Va 23059
Hollymead Area C Owners Association Inc
195 Riverbend Dr
Charlottesville, Va 22911
File