HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800174 Review Comments Preliminary Site Plan 2009-04-09vIRGIN�
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins (scott @ collins - engineering.com)
March Mountain Properties LLC (Justin @beightsdevelopment.com)
From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner
Division: Zoning & Current Development
Date: December 16, 2008
Revl: January 13, 2009
Rev2: April 9, 2009
Subject: SDP - 2008 -174- Old Trail Block 2- Preliminary Site Plan
The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County
Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when
the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that
have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated
based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the
Albemarle County Code.]
1. [32.5.6 (a); Proffer #1] Before the approval of the Final Site Plan for this block, the
greenspace shown on sheet 5 of 9 of the General Development Plan will need to be
dedicated to the County for public use. This includes the 25- acre park, 10.8- acre
greenway area, and the 6.7- acre greenway area. The notations for dedication need to be
included with the preliminary plan. Please review Proffer #1 for the full description.
Rev]: Commend adequately addressed.
2. [32.5.6 (a)] The removal of the street to the rear of the block requires a variation. Please
submit the application and documentation necessary for the review of this variation to the
plan.
Rev]: Comment addressed. Planning is reviewing the request for the removal and will
comment or approve the variation.
Rev2: The variation is still being reviewed by planning.
3. [32.5.6 (b); 4.12. 10] A parking study will be required for the zoning administrator review
in order to approve the shared parking. Submit the required information as stated in
4.12. 10 of the zoning ordinance.
Rev]: Comment addressed. The Zoning Administrator is reviewing the shared parking
information submitted and will comment or approve.
Rev2: The shared parking was revised and is being reviewed by John Shepherd.
4. [32.5.6 (b); 4.12.8 (e)] Provide an instrument for the shared parking for Block 1 and
Block 2 for review and approval from the County Attorney as specified in section 4.12.8
(e).
Rev]: Comment needs to be addressed with the subdivision application- SUB2008 -281.
This comment has been made for that application.
Rev2: Comment addressed.
5. [32.5.6 (n)] Show the layout and dimensions within the parking garage to assure that
enough spaces are being provided, and that proper site distance is being met.
Rev]: Comment addressed.
6. [32.5.6 (b)] Parking for Block 1 must be provided at all times, regardless of phasing for
Block 2. Show parking for phase 1 and phase 2 separately to ensure parking is being
provided for Block 1. Currently phase 1 is only providing 82 spaces, when Block 1
required 182 additional spaces that are not being provided within Block 1.
Rev]: Comment addressed if shared king is approved.
Rev2: John Shepherd is reviewing the revised shared parking information, which will
address this comment.
7. [32.5.6 (i)] Reas Creek Drive's name has changed. Revise all sheets to reflect the new
approved name per Andy Slack's comment.
Rev]: Comment adequately addressed.
Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext.
3004 for further information.
2