Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP200900002 Review Comments Special Use Permit 2009-03-23ALg�,�� �'IRGINZ�` COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald Gatobu FROM: Eryn Brennan RE: Historic Preservation comments on: SP 2009 -2: Keswick Hunt Club (AT &T CV333- Tier II) DATE: March 16, 2009 I have reviewed the Special Use Permit application for the above referenced proposal, Site Plan Sheets CV333A -A -0 through CV333A -A -11, CV333A -ES -1 through CV333A -E -5, and CV333A -SP -1 through CV333A -SP -3, dated 3/13/09, and I have the following comments: The personal wireless services facility is proposed for a site near the Keswick Hunt Club, a contributing resource in the Southwest Mountains National Register Rural Historic district, on the Route 22 Entrance Corridor. A balloon test was conducted on March 3, 2009. Routes 22, 731, 744, Highway 64, Little Keswick Lane, and a private driveway approximately one mile west of the site were traveled to determine the extent of visibility of the proposal. The balloon was approximately 350 feet south of the EC and only visible for a short distance along portions of the Route 22 EC, including near the entrance to Hunt Club Road and the entrance driveway to Keswick Farm. The balloon was not visible from Highway 64. Given the distance from which the balloon was seen and the treeline in between the balloon and the EC, there was not a substantial difference in visibility when the balloon was reduced in height from 10' to 7' above the reference tree. Similarly, given the significant distance, the balloon was barely visible from the top of the private driveway that was traveled one mile west of the site. The balloon was visible from Keswick County Club, one of the contributing historic resources in the district; however, the balloon was not skylit. The tower is proposed to be wood, yet the applicant has included a paint sample for the tower. Painting the wooden pole would present an awkward appearance and make the pole more noticeable from the Keswick Hunt Club. A wood pole would blend with the wooded hillside background; however, it should be stained a color similar to the SW Java #6090 to match the surrounding trees. Wood poles are often much lighter in color than live trees and can take years to patina. Staining the pole a color similar to the existing trees in the area will mitigate the visual impact of the pole on the Club. The proposal includes the option of removing three large coniferous trees labeled #206, #207, and #208 on the site plan. The loss of these trees would reduce the screening of the monopole and have a detrimental impact on the historic district. In contrast, the removal of trees #214 and #215, given their location and the smaller height of #214, a Mulberry, would not have a detrimental impact on historic properties in the district. At the requested height of 10' above the reference tree, the facility is not expected to have a detrimental impact on important public views or historic landscapes because it would not visually overwhelm its surroundings, dominate the setting, or create a focal point. It is not anticipated that the public will be visually aware of the proposal, allowing their enjoyment of the rural historic district to remain undisrupted; hence, adverse impacts on the scenic quality of the district are not anticipated. If the wood pole is stained to match SW Java #6090 in order to blend with the surrounding landscape and the trees numbered 206, 207, and 208 remain, the proposed work is not expected to cause damage to any historic resource.