HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800061 Review Comments Certified Engineer’s Report 2009-08-18Certified Engineer's Report Compliance Review
Zoning Ordinance section 18 -4.14
Project: Earlysville Business Park, BBX contractors yard and shop, SDP200800061
Report Revision Date: noise study addition received on 17 Aug 2009
Certifying Engineer (required): addition not certified
Reviewing Engineer: GEB
Overall Level of (Level of Compliance
Compliance C corresponds to the lowest
score on any standard)
Comments:
Key to Grades:
A. Full Compliance: The use does not generate discharge, noise, vibration, etc. Or, the physical
conditions (distance, barriers) assure compliance with the standards indefinitely. Approval is
recommended.
B. Monitored Compliance: This use has the potential to exceed the standards. Preventive and
mitigating measures are proposed which will achieve compliance but require maintenance, such
as fences, shields, vegetation, drains, recycling, oil separators, filters, mufflers, etc. Approval is
recommended with conditions for maintenance and periodic inspection or reporting. Compliance
is likely, with occasional instances of non - compliance.
C. Tentative Compliance: This use has the potential to exceed the standards. Only operational
methods are proposed to address concerns, such as limited hours of business, working inside
only, keeping gates operational, machines turned off, uses on a particular corner of the site, etc.
In other words, compliance is based on a promise of good behavior. Careful consideration is
recommended as this may place a policing burden on the neighbors and County staff. Strict
conditions should be placed on any approvals if possible. Compliance is possible, but instances
of non - compliance will likely occur.
D. Non - compliance: It is likely that the standards will be exceeded. This is not recommended for
approval.
E. Not enough information: The report was insufficient, and it should be completed or revised.
* exempt sounds under 18- 4.18.05 may be considered part of operations and impact this grade
A.
Full
compliance
B.
Monitored
compliance
C.
Tentative
compliance
D.
Non-
compliant
E.
Not enough
information
1. Noise*
x
2. Vibration
x
3. Glare
x
4. Air Pollution
x
5. Water Pollution
x
6. Radioactivity
x
7. Electrical Interference
x
Overall Level of (Level of Compliance
Compliance C corresponds to the lowest
score on any standard)
Comments:
Key to Grades:
A. Full Compliance: The use does not generate discharge, noise, vibration, etc. Or, the physical
conditions (distance, barriers) assure compliance with the standards indefinitely. Approval is
recommended.
B. Monitored Compliance: This use has the potential to exceed the standards. Preventive and
mitigating measures are proposed which will achieve compliance but require maintenance, such
as fences, shields, vegetation, drains, recycling, oil separators, filters, mufflers, etc. Approval is
recommended with conditions for maintenance and periodic inspection or reporting. Compliance
is likely, with occasional instances of non - compliance.
C. Tentative Compliance: This use has the potential to exceed the standards. Only operational
methods are proposed to address concerns, such as limited hours of business, working inside
only, keeping gates operational, machines turned off, uses on a particular corner of the site, etc.
In other words, compliance is based on a promise of good behavior. Careful consideration is
recommended as this may place a policing burden on the neighbors and County staff. Strict
conditions should be placed on any approvals if possible. Compliance is possible, but instances
of non - compliance will likely occur.
D. Non - compliance: It is likely that the standards will be exceeded. This is not recommended for
approval.
E. Not enough information: The report was insufficient, and it should be completed or revised.
* exempt sounds under 18- 4.18.05 may be considered part of operations and impact this grade