HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB200900053 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2009-09-14ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #: Name
ARB- 2009 -53: Martha Jefferson Hospital (29 North and Proffit Road)
Review Type
Final Review of a Site Development Plan
Parcel Identification
Tax Map 32A, Section 2, Parcel lA
Location
3263 Proffit Road: located in the northeast corner of the intersection of
Route 29 North and State Route 649 Proffit Road.
Zoned
Highway Commercial (HC), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner
Martha Jefferson Hospital
Applicant
Martha Jefferson Hospital, Ron Cottrell
Magisterial District
Rivanna
Proposal
To renovate an existing building, construct an addition to the building, and
expand required site improvements including parking.
ARB Meeting Date
September 21, 2009
Staff Contact
Brent Nelson
SITE/PROJECT HISTORY
• 6/30/09: ARB 2009 -53: Martha Jefferson Hospital (29 North and Proffit Road), Final Site Plan,
Request for indefinite deferral to allow applicant additional time to provide a more complete
submission.
• 4/27/09: SDP 2009 -34: Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center ( Proffit), Major Site Plan
Amendment, Received April 27, 2009 and currently under review.
• 4/20/09: ARB 2009 -18: Martha Jefferson Hospital (29 North and Proffit Road), Preliminary Site Plan,
Comments were provided for the benefit of the applicant's next submission (Attachment A).
• 4/1/02: ARB 2002 -16: MJH North Mobile MRI Parking Reallotment, Approval with conditions.
• 6/23/97: ARB —F (SDP) Martha Jefferson North, ARB- F(Sign)97 -7: Martha Jefferson North, Approval
with conditions for the freestanding and building signage and revisions to the original site plan.
• ARB 1996 -11: Martha Jefferson North, ARB review of the site development plan for the existing
building and site improvements.
PROJECT DETAILS
The applicant is proposing to construct a 2- story, 100' x 106', addition to the southeast corner of the existing
medical office building. Existing site improvements are to be redeveloped and expanded to accommodate the
porte- cocheres proposed in the southeast and northeast elevations and the additional parking required by the
proposal.
CHANGES TO THE PROPOSAL SINCE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
Changes since the previous review have been in response to comments provided and include:
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Final - Page 1
A redesign of the porte - cochere in the south elevation of the proposed building to a more pavilion -like
design that is detached from the adjacent building.
A change in materials, with the use of a 2 -story glass curtain wall and cast stone, where the west
elevation of the proposed building adjoins the existing structure.
SITE CONTEXT/VISIBLITY
The site of the proposed development is located on a parcel in the northeast corner of the intersection of the
Route 29N Entrance Corridor and State Route 640 ( Proffit Road). The site has frontage on both Route 29N and
Proffit Road, with a site entrance /exit from Proffit Road only. The site is currently developed as a medical
office building with associated site improvements. Views of the site from the Corridor are partially screened by
the bank/drive -thru and associated site improvements located between the intersection of Route 29N/Proffit
Road and the southwest edge of the parcel under review. Proposed site and building improvements are
expected to be highly visible from the 29N Corridor directly in front (west of) the site due to the lack of
significant mature landscaping along the Route 29N frontage and the site's position down slope of the corridor.
ANALYSIS based on drawings, materials & photos submitted (see Attachment B):
Building Design
Issue: Materials /Colors /Spandrel Glass/Tint- Reflectance
Comments: At the previous review, the applicant was asked to include a schedule listing all proposed materials
and colors, including the manufacturer's name, product ID and color. Sheet A3.1 Exterior Elevations contains
a material/color key that is coordinated with the elevation drawings. The applicant provided samples for all
proposed building materials and colors with the exception of the proposed spandrel glass. Spandrel glass is
proposed in the south and west elevations of the existing and proposed structures. The location of the glass is
expected to be highly visible, with many windows using a combination of spandrel and non - spandrel glass
panels in an irregular pattern, resulting in an awkward and uncoordinated appearance to the overall elevation.
With the exception of the spandrel glass, all other proposed materials /colors are complimentary of each other
and have a well coordinated appearance with the materials in the existing structure. The applicant has provided
a sample of the glazing in the windows of the existing building AGC Flat Glass I "Insulated Unit, Gray on
Clear and a sample of the applicant's preferred glazing AGC Flat Glass I " Insulated Unit, Gray on Low E #3;
both samples have a 7% reflectance value. In the past, the ARB has required that reflectance values be held
below 7 %. The difference in the lighter tint of the existing glazing and the darker tint of the applicant's
preferred glazing is minimal and not expected to be discernible from the EC due to the distance between the
building and the Corridor. The applicant's preferred glazing AGC Flat Glass 1 " Insulated Unit, Gray on Low
E #3 would be an acceptable choice.
Recommendations: Provide a sample of the proposed spandrel glass for review. Revise the location of the
spandrel glass panels to have a less irregular pattern and more coordinated appearance with the overall
elevation.
Issue: Porte- cochere/Redesign
Comments: At the previous review, the applicant was asked to Revise the design of the southeast porte- cochere
to either more effectively integrate with the architecture of the building or identify itself as a pavilion -like
element. In the current submission, the applicant has revised the porte - cochere to a more pavilion -like structure
that is offset approximately 5' from the main building. The 33' x 33' flat roof, with its EIFS parapet, is
supported at each corner by 2' tall steel columns projecting out of 11' tall brick columns. The total height of
the structure is approximately 17'. The blocky, monolithic appearance of the previous design has been
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Final - Page 2
eliminated with a new design that helps to mitigate the large mass of the structure.
Recommendations: None.
Issue: Existing- Proposed Construction/Transition
Comments: At the previous review, the applicant was asked to Create a transition between the new
construction and the existing construction to prevent juxtaposition of new and old materials. Sheet A3.1
Exterior Elevations shows a proposed 2 -story glass curtain wall and cast stone material where the new and
existing construction meet in the west elevation. The applicant is proposing spandrel glazing in the first story
of the glass wall. The glass wall and cast stone material form is an appropriate transitional design between the
existing and proposed structures. This area is expected to be highly visible from the Route 29N Corridor, and
the appropriateness of the spandrel glazing cannot be determined until a sample is provided for review.
Recommendations: Provide a sample of the proposed spandrel glass for review.
Landscape Design
Issue: Entrance Corridor /Street Tree Spacing
Comments: At the previous review, the applicant was asked to Revise the location and/or type of street trees
along the Route 29N Corridor to avoid conflicts with overhead utilities. Sheet LL -3 Proposed Landscape Plan
shows a power line easement, approximately 15' in width, along the Route 29 North right -of -way. Most of the
proposed street trees along the EC frontage have canopies shown extending into the easement. The location
and/or type of street tree would need to be revised to avoid conflicts with the overhead utility.
Recommendations: Revise all applicable landscape drawings by revising the type or location of the frontage
trees to avoid the tree canopy extending into the power line easement adjacent to the Route 29 North right -of-
way.
Issue: Parking Space Numbers/Parking Lot Trees
Comments: At the previous review, the applicant was asked to Revise all applicable drawings by reducing the
number of parking spaces by 3 for a total of 198 spaces. Achieve this reduction by converting 3 equidistant
parking spaces, currently shown along the perimeter of the westernmost parking lot, facing Route 29, to 3
individual planting islands with large canopy trees. In the current submission, the applicant has reduced the
total number of parking spaces by removing 3 spaces at the east end of the site. None of the spaces between the
existing building and Route 29 were converted to planting islands. The intent of the recommendation was to
reduce the amount of parking to only what is required and increase the amount of tree canopy at the west end
of the site, closest to the EC.
Recommendations: Revise all applicable drawings by converting 3 equidistant parking spaces, currently shown
along the perimeter of the western most parking lot, facing Route 29, to 3 individual planting islands with large
canopy trees. Add the 3 additional required parking spaces at the east end of the site.
Issue: Erosion Control Plan/Tree Protection
Comments: At the previous review, the applicant was asked to Provide an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
delineating the limits of grading and clearing and the location and method of tree protection. The applicant
did not include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan in this latest submission. Sheet 2 Demolition & Tree
Protection Plan, included in this latest submission, shows the location of proposed tree protection but does not
delineate the limits of grading and clearing. Sheet 5 Grading and Drainage Plan contains the detail
Construction Operations Relative to the Location of Protected Trees showing the tree protection located at the
drip line; however, Sheet 2 shows the tree protection well inside of the drip line of many trees designated to
remain and in some cases right against the tree trunk.
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Final - Page 3
Recommendations: Provide an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan delineating the limits of grading and
clearing and the location and method of tree protection. Revise all applicable drawings to show the location of
the tree protection at the drip line of the trees to remain.
Signage
Issue: Freestanding Signage
Comments: The applicant was asked to provide complete details of all proposed freestanding signage. A sign
package detailing the 2 proposed freestanding signs was included with this submission.
Sign Proposal:
Freestanding Sign 1:
Type: Refacing, existing double -face freestanding monument sign
Materials: Existing brick base, painted aluminum frame, vinyl lettering
Overall Size: 7' -7" (h) x 12'-4" (w) x 16 -1/4" (d)
Cabinet Size: 5'- 3 -1/2" (h) x 12'-4" (w) x 14" (d)
Text: Martha
Jefferson Outpatient
Care Center
EMERGENCY
Graphic: None
Colors:
Base: Existing brick
Cabinet:
Upper Section:
Background: Dark Blue, PMS 2757
Text:
Martha Jefferson: White
Outpatient Care Center: Periwinkle Blue, PMS 2705
Lower Section: Background: Red, PMS 485; Text EMERGENCY. White
Location: Existing, northwest corner of site adjacent to Route 29N right -of -way
Landscaping: As shown on the proposed landscape plan
Illumination: External ground- mounted
Freestanding Sign 2:
Type: Refacing, existing double -face freestanding monument sign
Materials: Existing brick base, painted aluminum frame, vinyl lettering
Overall Size: 9' -3/4" (h) x 5' -2" (w) x 12 -1/4" (d)
Cabinet Size: 6' -6" (h) x 5' -2" (w) x 8 -1/2" (d)
Text: 3263 Proffit Road
Martha
Jefferson
Outpatient
Care Center
EMERGENCY
Graphic: None
Colors:
Base: Existing brick
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Profiit Road, Final - Page 4
Cabinet:
Upper Section:
Background: Dark Blue, PMS 2757
Text:
3263 Proffit Road: White
Martha Jefferson: White
Outpatient Care Center: Periwinkle Blue, PMS 2705
Lower Section: Background: Red, PMS 485; Text EMERGENCY. White
Location: Existing, southwest corner of site adjacent to Proffit Road right -of -way
Landscaping: As shown on the proposed landscape plan
Illumination: External ground- mounted
The following issues have been identified with this signage.
• ARB Sign Guidelines encourage the use of 3 or fewer colors. The applicant is proposing the use of 4
colors; however, the periwinkle blue color is limited in its use and blends with the dark blue
background to reduce its impact.
• The sign drawings do not indicate the cabinet height and the base height/width of the sign structure in
the northwest corner of the site.
• The sign drawings do no indicate the base height and base width of the sign structure in the southwest
corner of the site.
• The method of illumination for the freestanding signs in the northwest and southwest corners of the
site is not indicated on the sign drawings.
Recommendations: Revise the sign drawings to indicate the cabinet height and the base height/width of the
sign structure in the northwest corner of the site and the base height/width of the sign structure in the southwest
corner of the site. Revise the sign drawings to indicate the method of illumination.
Issue: Wall Signage
Comments: The applicant was asked to provide complete details of all proposed wall signage. A sign package,
detailing wall signs on the southeast porte - cochere, was included with this submission.
Sign Proposal
Type: Cabinet
Materials: Aluminum, Plexiglas, paint
Size: 12' -6" (w) x 18 -5/8" (h) x 5" (d)
Text: Emergency
Graphic: None
Colors: Background: Red, PMS 485; Text: White
Location: Fascia of the porte - cochere in south and east elevations
Illumination: Internal fluorescent
The sign drawings do not indicate which sides of the 2 porte - cocheres are to contain the wall signs.
Recommendations: Revise the wall sign drawings to indicate which sides of the 2 porte - cocheres will contain
the emergency signs.
Lighting
Issue: Luminaire Schedule/Lighting Cutsheets
Comments: The Luminaire Schedule is located on Sheet E 1.01 Site Plan Lighting; however, only the site pole
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Final - Page 5
lights and bollards are included in the schedule. Proposed building and signage lighting is not included. The
applicant is proposing recessed canopy lighting in the porte - cocheres located in the south and east elevations of
the proposed building. Ground - mounted building up- lighting is proposed along the west and south elevations
of the proposed building. A cutsheet of the ground- mounted fixture (UL) is included on Sheet E 1.05 Lighting
Cutsheets, and the proposed fixture is less than the 3,000 lumens threshold for full cutoff requirement.
Entrance Corridor Guidelines discourage the use of decorative lighting, and the ARB has historically denied
lighting whose sole purpose is to light the building fagade. Wall- mounted building lighting is shown along the
south, east and west elevations of the proposed building. Wall- mounted lighting is also proposed in the
dumpster enclosure adjoining the east elevation of the existing building; this area is not expected to be visible
from the EC. The canopy lighting cutsheet on Sheet E1.05 appears to be mislabeled as Type O. Cutsheets for
the wall- mounted building lights (BL) and the ground- mounted signage lights could not be found in this
submission. Two of the cutsheets on Sheet E 1.05 are not labeled for type and location. The standard lighting
note is not included on the photometric plan.
Recommendations: Revise Sheet E1.05 by correctly identifying the canopy lighting cutsheet and including
cutsheets for the wall- mounted building lights (BL) and the ground mounted signage lights. Make sure that all
cutsheets are clearly labeled for type and location. Include the standard lighting note: Each outdoor luminaire
equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not
exceed one -half footcandle. Revise the lighting proposal by removing the ground- mounted fixture (UL).
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The revised design of the porte - cochere in the south elevation.
2. The glass wall transition in the west elevation of the proposed building.
3. The proposed signage.
Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness, pending staff administrative approval of the
following conditions:
1. Provide a sample of the proposed spandrel glass for review. Revise the location of the spandrel glass
panels to have a less irregular pattern and more coordinated appearance with the overall elevation.
2. Revise all applicable landscape drawings by revising the type or location of the frontage trees to avoid the
tree canopy extending into the power line easement adjacent to the Route 29 North right -of -way.
3. Revise all applicable drawings by converting 3 equidistant parking spaces, currently shown along the
perimeter of the western most parking lot, facing Route 29, to 3 individual planting islands with large
canopy trees. Add the 3 additional required parking spaces at the east end of the site.
4. Provide an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan delineating the limits of grading and clearing and the
location and method of tree protection. Revise all applicable drawings to show the location of the tree
protection at the drip line of the trees to remain.
5. Revise the sign drawings to indicate the cabinet height and the base height/width of the sign structure in
the northwest corner of the site and the base height/width of the sign structure in the southwest corner of
the site. Revise the sign drawings to indicate the method of illumination.
6. Revise the wall sign drawings to indicate which sides of the 2 porte - cocheres will contain the emergency
signs.
7. Revise Sheet E1.05 by correctly identifying the canopy lighting cutsheet and including cutsheets for the
wall- mounted building lights (BL) and the ground mounted signage lights. Make sure that all cutsheets are
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Final - Page 6
clearly labeled for type and location. Include the standard lighting note: Each outdoor luminaire equipped
with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads andproperty in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall
not exceed one -half footcandle. Revise the lighting proposal by removing the ground- mounted fixture
(UL).
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Final - Page 7
Attachment A
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
April 24, 2009
Scott J Swanson AIA
Gresham, Smith and Partners
10 South Sixth St. Suite 100
Richmond VA 23219
RE: ARB2009 -00018 Martha Jefferson Hospital — 29 North /Proffit Additions
Tax Map 32A, Section 2 Parcel 1 A
Dear Mr. Swanson:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on April 20, 2009, completed a preliminary review of
the above -noted request to renovate an existing building, construct an addition to the building, and expand required site
improvements including parking. The Board offered the following comments for the benefit of the applicant's next
submittal. Please note that the following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments
may be added or eliminated based on further review and changes to the plan.
1. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations to include a schedule listing all proposed materials and colors. The schedule should
include the manufacturer's name, product ID, and color for all proposed materials. Revise the building elevations to
clearly indicate the location of each material. Revise the design of the southeast porte - cochere to either more
effectively integrate with the architecture of the building or identify itself as a pavilion -like element. Revise all
applicable drawings to clearly indicate the proposed materials and colors.
2. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations to include a dashed outline delineating the height and location of the rooftop
equipment. Dimension the drawing to show the distance from the top of the equipment to the top of the screen. Add
a note to Sheet A.301 Elevations and Sheet 2 of 3 Layout & Utility Plan stating: All rooftop equipment shall not be
visible from the Route 29N Entrance Corridor.
3. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include details of all plant materials proposed for the bio- filter adjacent to the
southwest boundary. A planting design that disguises the utilitarian purpose of this facility would be appropriate.
4. Revise the Existing Conditions Plan, Layout & Utility Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan to show the location,
species, and size of all existing trees and shrubs. Delineate the plantings that are to remain and those that are to be
removed. Provide an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan delineating the limits of grading and clearing and the
location and method of tree protection. Revise the Landscape Plan by showing all existing planting that is to remain,
identified for species and size.
5. Revise all applicable drawings by reducing the number of parking spaces by 3 for a total of 198 spaces. Achieve this
reduction by converting 3 equidistant parking spaces, currently shown along the perimeter of the western most
parking lot, facing Route 29, to 3 individual planting islands with large canopy trees.
6. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show a total of 8 London Plane trees, 35' on center, along the Route 29N
frontage.
7. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show a total of 4 Crimson King Red Maple trees, 2 ' /z" in caliper, 40' on
center, along the perimeter of the parking lot adjacent to the Proffit Road right -of -way. Revise the drawing to show
trees, 40' on center, 2 1/2" in caliper, along the edge of the curvilinear parking proposed in the southwest corner of
the site.
8. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show the following:
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Attachment A - Page 8
Attachment A
• The location of the existing overhead power line /easement along the Route 29N frontage.
• The proposed underground stormwater management system.
• The proposed sanitary sewer connection west of the addition.
• The proposed underground fire (water) line east of the addition.
• The proposed grading as shown on Sheet 3 of 3 Grading & Drainage Plan.
• The location of all proposed site lighting. If site lighting is not proposed, add a note on the drawing to that effect.
9. Revise the location and /or type of street trees along the Route 29N Corridor to avoid conflicts with overhead utilities.
Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include the following note: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be
allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be
pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant.
10. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan by replacing the linear planting of Compacta Hollies, shown along the perimeter
of the existing /proposed parking lot west of the existing /proposed buildings, with a wider planting area whose outer
(EC) edge parallels the Route 29N Corridor. Provide plant material within this planting area that includes a mix of
shrub types and heights (4 species minimum), arranged in a less structured, natural layout.
11. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan by showing a mix of shrub species, with varying heights, around the foundation
of the proposed addition. Revise the planting proposal in the area formed by the south elevation of the existing
structure, the west elevation of the proposed addition, and the adjacent curvilinear parking with a proposal that
includes more planting, with a mix of plant types and species that will serve, as viewed from the Corridor, as a visual
transition between the existing and proposed buildings.
12. For all proposed signage, provide a complete sign package addressing all of the criteria outlined in the ARB Sign
Review Checklist. Reduce the size of the EMERGENCY sign, proposed directly beneath the cornice in the
southwest corner of the proposed structure, so as not to crowd the sign area, and revise the location to one that is
more coordinated with the architecture. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include a landscape proposal for the
area around the freestanding signs. This proposal should serve to incorporate the sign into the overall planting plan
for the development.
13. Provide a lighting photometric plan showing the location of all proposed site, building and decorative lighting. Include
a luminaire schedule of all proposed exterior lighting on the photometric plan, clearly indicating all lighting options
chosen, including but not limited to heights and colors proposed for all fixtures and poles. All fixtures emitting 3,000
or more lumens shall be full cutoff style fixtures. If site lighting is not proposed, revise Sheet 2 of 3 Layout & Utility
Plan to include a note to that effect.
14. Revise the Plant Schedule on Sheet LL -2 Landscape Plan to correctly identify the plant label for the Nellie Stevens
Holly as NH.
15. Create a transition between the new construction and the existing construction to prevent juxtaposition of new and
old materials.
16. Reconsider the replication of the bay window element by including other forms that reflect the architectural character
in differing ways.
17. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations by:
o Correctly identifying the drawing scale as 1" = 8'.
o Correctly identifying elevation East Exterior Elevation as the West Elevation and elevation North
Exterior Elevation as the South Elevation.
o Correctly identifying existing and new construction.
o Revising all annotation referring to refurbishing existing EIFS to correctly reflect the applicant's
intention of replacing it with the EIFS sample included in this submission.
You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and
schedules are available on -line at www.albemarle.org/planning.
Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates on each
drawing and an ARB approval signature panel. Please provide a memo including detailed responses indicating how each
comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the
memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Attachment A - Page 9
Attachment A
Brent Nelson
Landscape Planner
cc: Ron Cottrell
Martha Jefferson Hospital
459 Locust Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22902
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Attachment A - Page 10
Attachment B
Drawings/Photos/Materials Submitted
Site plan drawings submitted:
• Sheet 1 of 5: Existing Conditions Plan, latest revision August 5, 2009
• Sheet 2 of 5: Demolition & Tree Protection Plan, latest revision date August 5, 2009
• Sheet 3 of 5: Layout Plan, latest revision date August 5, 2009
• Sheet 4 of 5: Utility Plan, latest revision date August 5, 2009
• Sheet 5 of 5: Grading & Drainage Plan, latest revision date August 5, 2009
Lighting plan drawings submitted:
• Sheet E1.01: Site Plan Lighting, date March 31, 2009
• Sheet E1.02: Site Plan Zoning, date March 31, 2009
• Sheet E1.03: Lighting Cutsheets, date March 31, 2009
• Sheet E1.04: Lighting Cutsheets, date March 31, 2009
• Sheet E1.05: Lighting Cutsheets, date March 31, 2009
Landscape plan drawings submitted:
• Sheet LL -1 of 4: Existing Landscape Plan, latest revision date August 4, 2009
• Sheet LL -2 of 4: Removal of Existing Plants Plan, latest revision date August 4, 2009
• Sheet LL -3 of 4: Proposed Landscape Plan, latest revision date August 4, 2009
• Sheet LL -4 of 4: Proposed Landscape Plan, latest revision date August 4, 2009
Architectural drawings submitted:
• Sheet A2.1: First Floor Plan, New Construction & Dimensions, date June 1, 2009
• Sheet A3.1: Exterior Elevations, date July 1, 2009
Signage drawings submitted:
• Sign Package, latest revision date August 3, 2009
• Sheet 1: Freestanding Sign at Route 29N Frontage, Location Drawing
• Sheet 2: Freestanding Sign at Route 29N Frontage, Photo Representation
• Sheet 3: Freestanding Sign at Route 29N Frontage, Sign Drawing
• Sheet 4: Freestanding Sign at Proffit Road Frontage, Location Drawing
• Sheet 5: Freestanding Sign at Proffit Road Frontage, Sign Drawing
• Sheet 6: Canopy Signs, Sign Drawing
• Sheet 7: Canopy Signs, Elevation Sign Drawing
• Sheet 8: Directional Signs, Sign Drawing
• Sheet 9: Directional Signs, Sign Drawing
• Attachment H: Photo representation of proposed signage colors
Samples submitted:
• Brick 1: Glen -Gery Brick Co. Provincetown
• Brick 2: Cherokee Brick & Tile Co. GA Maroon
• Cast Stone: Reading Rock Inc. Buff Stone
• EIFS: Sto Corporation. StoSilco Lit RI.S
• Roof Screen: Firestone Architectural Products. Slate Gray
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Attachment B - Page 11
Attachment B
• Sign Materials: Avery. White Reflective Vinyl
• Sign Materials: Avery. Light Blue Reflective (A 7820 -R -A)
• Sign Materials: Avery. Red Reflective Vinyl
• Sign Materials: Pantone Dark Blue 2757
• Sign Materials: MPC Brushed Aluminum #18076
• Sign Materials: Pantone Periwinkle 2725
• Sign Materials: Pantone Red
• Aluminum Storefront: Oldcastle Glass Vistawall Storefront. Bone White Finish
• Glazing: AGC Flat Glass. 1 "Insulated Unit, Gray on Clear
• Glazing: AGC Flat Glass. 1 " Insulated Unit, Gray on Low E #3
Additional information provided:
• Proposal Description/Report: Architectural Review Board Report, Final Submission, date June 1,
2009
• Attachment D:
• Existing Condition Site Photo: View of Entrance Corridor Heading North, received August
10, 2009
• Existing Condition Site Photo: View of Entrance Corridor Heading South, received August
10, 2009
• Attachment E:
• Photo representation of existing and proposed brick samples: Brick Match, received August
10, 2009
• Photo representation of other proposed material samples /colors: Other Exterior Materials,
received August 10, 2009
ARB 9/21/2009 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care @ Proffit Road, Attachment B - Page 12