HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200600002 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2009-10-19SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
Elizabeth Marotta
From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .DeNunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 4:01 PM
To: Elizabeth Marotta
Cc: Amy Pflaum
Subject: SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
Elizabeth,
I have reviewed the above plan and have the following comments:
1. Use CG -7 on the road sections for the curb and gutter.
Page 1 of 3
2. A drainage easement will need to be extended to include the proposed 18" pipe under the entrance.
3. Right of Way lines need to be adjusted to one foot behind the sidewalk. This will also take care of
sight line falling outside the existing right so there won't need to be a sight distance easement.
4. Pavement widening for the turn lane needs to be in accordance with VDOT's WP -2 standard.
5. There is existing UD -4 along the edge of the existing road that will need to be removed and
replaced along the new e.p.
6. A striping detail needs to be shown for the pavement markings.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120
ioel . den unzioCcbvdot.viroinia.00v
From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E.
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:47 AM
To: 'Patrick Lawrence'
Subject: SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
Pat,
10/21/2009
SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
Page 2 of 3
I have reviewed the latest submission of the above site plan and previous comments have not been addressed.
Thanks
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120
ioel . den unzioCcbvdot.viroinia.00v
From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E.
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 11:16 AM
To: 'Patrick Lawrence'
Subject: SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
Pat,
We have reviewed the above site plan and previous comments below have not been addressed. Only the last
comments has been addressed.
Thanks,
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120
ioel . den unzioCcbvdot.viroinia.00v
From: Hamidi, Ajmal
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 01:04 PM
To: 'plawrence @albemarle.org'
Cc: 'aschuck @albemarle.org'; Denunzio, Joel D., P.E.
Subject: SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
Pat Lawrence,
We have reviewed the above plan and have the following comments:
10/21/2009
SDP - 2006 -002 Charlottesville Kingdom Hall
Page 3 of 3
On sheet C.2, the entrance taper is labeled as 1 O but it is actually drawn as approximately 90ft.
;• On sheet E.2, the entrance profile still does not meet VDOT's standard CG -11. The standard requires a
Oft landing for commercial entrances measured from the first grade change to the second grade change, while
only 9ft is proposed in this plan. Therefore, one potential solution would be to extend the 2% grade for another
11 ft. Also, the second grade change of 10% exceeds the maximum of 8% for low volume entrances and needs to
be reduced.
• On sheet E.1, there are two sight distances lines shown to the left of the entrance, one for 525ft and
another for 580ft. Only the appropriate sight distance line should be shown.
• Drainage computations need to be provided for the DI -2A structure located on the right turn lane as well
as for the new 18" RCP culvert. Also outlet protection for the culvert needs to designed in accordance with the
Hydraulic Design Advisory, HDA 06 -03.1. There also appears to be an inconsistency in size of the pipe
connecting the curb inlet at the median of Old Lynchburg Rd to the DI -2A. On sheet E.1 it is labeled as 15" RCP
and on sheet C.3 it is shown as 18" RCP. The correct size needs to be shown.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you,
AJ Hamidi
10/21/2009