HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201000007 Review Comments Miscellaneous Submittal 2010-02-17Philip Custer
From: Amelia McCulley
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:59 PM
To: Philip Custer
Cc: Bill Fritz; Ron Higgins
Subject: WPO 2010 -007 Vierbuchen Residence
Phil,
This email is in response to your question to me about the critical slopes disturbance
that is proposed with this WPO plan. We reviewed this proposal in our A -team meeting
this past Tuesday and concluded that it is exempt from our critical slopes regulations.
It is exempt based on the fact that the proposed activity:
a) Does not require the issuance of a building permit;
b) Does not require a site plan; and
c) Does not require subdivision of the property;
Please let me know if any of these presumptions are incorrect or if you think I'm not
considering something. As you know and see by the reference below, the regulations
of Section 4.2 apply to structures and improvements for which a bldg permit is
required.
4.2.3 LOCATION OF STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS (Amended 11- 15 -89)
Except as otherwise permitted pursuant to section 4.2.2, the provisions of this section shall apply
to the location of any structure for which a permit is required under the Uniform Statewide
Building Code and to any improvement shown on a site development plan pursuant to section 32.0
of this chapter. (Amended 11- 15 -89; 10- 17 -01)
1