HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900097 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2010-03-15'AL
v
�fRGIlyvc•
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
To: Scott Collins; Collins Engineering via email: scott(a),collins- engineering.com
CC: Todd Doff lemeyer; Cathcart Properties via email: todd @cathcartproperties.com
From: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner
Division: Current Development
Date: March 15, 2010
Subject: SDP2009 -97 The Reserve at Belvedere — Final prior to preliminary
The Planner for the Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community
Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been
satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each
comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.]
Second review comments are in bold italics.
1. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please provide name of developer.
Comment addressed.
2. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] All relevant rezoning, proffer, and variance information must be specifically
listed on cover sheet.
Comment addressed.
3. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Datum reference for elevation seems to be inaccurate.
Comment addressed.
4. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] All information regarding owner, zoning, tax map and parcel number and
present use of all adjacent parcels must be included on plan.
Comment addressed.
5. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(b)] Maximum height of all buildings must be specified on plan.
Comment addressed.
6. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(c)] If phasing of plan is anticipated, phase lines and proposed timing of
development must be indicated on plan.
Comment addressed.
7. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(m)] Distance to centerline of the nearest existing street intersection must be
shown on plan.
Comment addressed.
8. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(p), 18- 32.6.6(i), 18- 32.7.9] Not all labels /lines point to graphics. Please correct.
Comment addressed.
9. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(p), 18- 32.6.6(i), 18- 32.7.9] Graphic depictions of plants do not match numbers
listed in planting schedule. Please correct.
Comment addressed.
10. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(p), 18- 32.6.6(i), 18- 32.7.9] Landscape plan needs to be shown at a larger scale
in order to ensure accurate review is possible.
The Landscape plan does not accurately reflect requirements found in the "Green Space
and Amenities" portion, "Block 2 Open Space 6.2 acres" section of the Belvedere Code
of Development, dated February 3, 2010. Please correct.
11. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(p), 18- 32.6.6(i), 18- 32.7.9] Owner's signature is required on conservation
checklist.
Comment addressed.
12. [ZMA2004 -007, Proffer 6.1] A final report for the archeological survey done on the Belvedere
project site is due January 1, 2010. Failure to meet this proffer deadline will result in all
approvals being withheld for projects on parcels included in the rezoning.
Comment addressed.
13. A complete critical slopes waiver application must be submitted.
Comment addressed.
14. Approval of all applicable variations must be granted by the Director of Planning. It is
understood that neither the appropriate variation application, nor the requested accurately
revised Code of Development, have been submitted to Long Range Planning. It is also
understood that the letter presented with this site plan regarding deviations from the application
plan does not cover all changes identified on site plan. Applicant and owner will need to work
with Long Range Planning to correct the status of the required variations.
Comment addressed.
Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3565
for further information.