HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201000019 Review Comments Erosion Control Plan 2010-06-15ALg�,��
�'IRGINZ�
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project:
WPO- 2010 - 00019, Meriiields Driveway
Plan preparer:
Roxanne S. Brouse (rsb @rielyandassociates.com)
Owner or rep.:
Woddriff Jaffray P or Merrill Saunton W.
Date received:
12 March 2010
Rev. 1:
20 May 2010
Date of Comment:
14 April 2010
Rev. 1:
15 June 2010
Engineer:
John P. Diez — Engineering Technician
The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the Route 250 East Sidewalk Improvements, received on 20
May 2010 has been reviewed. The plan cannot be approved as submitted and will require the following
corrections before approval can be granted:
A. Erosion and Sediment Control Comments
1. Limits of disturbance do not match between sheets EC -1 through EC -3. Please revise.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
2. Limits of disturbance must be shown on sheet GS -1.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
3. Label all existing and proposed streets.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
4. Please provide Temporary Seeding (TS) and Permanent Seeding (PS).
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
5. Please provide Dust Control (DC).
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
6. Sediment Basin #1 must show proposed grading and contours must be labeled. The basin must
also be included in the limits of disturbance.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
7. Labeling of Sediment Traps must be consistent.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
8. Please clarify as to where Phase #1 and #2 begin and finish.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
9. The construction entrance can be moved up to the area where construction begins.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
10. Proposed contours do not tie in to existing contours in some parts of the proposed driveway.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
11. Any proposed grading and/or construction disturbing critical slopes require a critical slopes waiver
to be submitted.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. However, please add a note on the plans stating that
"no existing critical slopes will be impacted during this project'
12. Pipe locations on the plans do not match with the profiles. Please revise.
(Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. Please see pipes #3 and #7.
13. Grading on any part of the driveway must not exceed 16%.
(Rev. I)Per our previous engineering meeting, comment has been addressed.
14. Please provide stationing and a profile of the driveway up to the house.
(Rev. ])Per our previous engineering meeting, please disregard comment.
15. Elevations on the EC sheets do not match with the elevations on the CALC sheet. Please revise.
16. It seems that the stone weir elevations for Sediment Trap #4 are incorrect. Please revise.
17. Sediment Traps #5 and #6 have embankments that exceed the 5' maximum. Please refer to the
VESCH, Spec. 3.13 for proper embankment heights.
\\ Cob- dts01 \cityviewlnk\Docs \2010 \WPO \WPO201000019 - Merifields Driveway\E2_esc_JPD_10 -00019 - Merifields
Driveway.doc