HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201000039 Review Comments Preliminary Site Plan 2010-05-25 (3)ALg�,��
�'IRGINZ�
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4176
May 7, 2010
Neil Bhatt
NBJ Architecture
11537 -B Nuckols Road
Glen Allen, Virginia 23059
RE: ARB: 2009 -56: Holiday Inn Express
TMP 07800- 00- 00 -009DO
Dear Mr. Bhatt;
I have reviewed your recent submittal for the above - referenced project consisting of:
Site Plan Sheets:
Sheet 1 of 6: General Notes & Details, latest revision date 8/18/09
Sheet 2 of 6: Overall Layout Plan, latest revision date 8/18/09
Sheet 3 of 6: Layout Plan, latest revision date 8/18/09
Sheet 4 of 6: Utility Plan, latest revision date 8/18/09
Sheet 5 of 6: Grading & Drainage Plan, latest revision date 8/18/09
Sheet 6 of 6: Conceptual Landscape Plan, latest revision date 8/18/09
Sheet 1: Photometric Plan, date 6/11/09
Sheet 2: Lighting Cutsheets, date 6/11/09
Architectural Sheets:
Sheet A -100: Cover Sheet, no date
Sheet A -401: First Floor Plan, latest revision date 6/1/09
Sheet A -402: Typical Floor Plan, latest revision date 6/1/09
Sheet A -403: Roof Plan, latest revision date 6/1/09
Sheet A -501: Building Elevations, latest revision date 8/10/09
Sheet A -502: Building Section, date 2/17/09
Sheet A -510: Site Section, latest revision date 6/1/09
Sheet A -515: Details, latest revision date 8/10/09
Outstanding issues that will need to be further addressed are shown in italics after the original comment from
the Action Letter of August 18, 2009.
Original Comment:
Revise the Material /Color Key on Sheet A -501 Building Elevations to include the manufacturer and product ID
for the window glazing and provide a sample of the glazing. Revise the drawing to indicate the color of the
proposed HVAC wall and window grates; a medium bronze color for the window grates would be appropriate.
Revise the Material /Color Key to indicate the same bronze color for the window frames. Revise the drawing to
indicate the wall HVAC units are to be painted to match the brick wall in which they are located and remove
the note Materials to be as listed or similar. Revise Sheet 2 of 6 ARB Overall Layout Plan to note the name of
the brick proposed for the enclosures around the ground- mounted equipment, and to include the height of the
enclosure and the maximum height of the units within.
Issue:
A sample of the proposed window glazing was not included with this submission. Drawings in this submission
do not indicate the name of the brick proposed for the enclosures around the ground- mounted equipment, and
they do not indicate the height of the enclosure and the maximum height of the units within.
Recommendations:
Provide a sample of the window glazing. Revise Sheet 2 of 6 ARB Overall Layout Plan to note the name of the
brick proposed for the enclosures around the ground- mounted equipment, and to include the height of the
enclosure and the maximum height of the units within.
Original Comment:
Revise Sheet 6 of 6 Landscape Plan by reducing the spacing of the Shamrock Hollies, at the head of parking
spaces facing Town and Country Drive, to 4'. Revise the spacing of the Otto Luyken Laurels, shown near the
head of spaces facing the vehicular access easement with the Guadalajara restaurant, to 6'.
Issue:
This comment was not addressed in this latest resubmission.
Recommendations:
Revise Sheet 6 of 6 Landscape Plan by reducing the spacing of the Shamrock Hollies, at the head of parking
spaces facing Town and Country Drive, to 4'. Revise the spacing of the Otto Luyken Laurels, shown near the
head of spaces facing the vehicular access easement with the Guadalajara restaurant, to 6'.
Original Comment:
Revise Sheet 1 of 1 Photometric Plan to include the color and finish of all light poles; a bronze matte finish
would be appropriate. Revise the note Fixture used should be bronze matt finish to read All proposed fixtures
shall be a bronze matt finish. Provide a revised photometric plan with print that is readable.
Issue:
The Photometric Plan in this latest submission was not revised to include the color and finish of all light poles.
The lighting cutsheets included in this latest submission are not legible.
Recommendations:
Revise the Photometric Plan to include the color and finish of all light poles; a bronze matte finish would be
appropriate. In the next submission provide lighting cutsheets that are legible.
Original Comment:
Revise the wall signage proposal by:
o Reducing the height, from the ground to the top of the sign/logo box, to 30' maximum. Should the
applicant apply for a variance for the sign height, the ARB recommends that the height illustrated
in the color elevations submitted for the August 17 ARB meeting would be appropriate for the
EC.
o Reducing the width of the signage in the south (front) elevation so as not to overcrowd the space.
o Reposition the sign/logo box so the top or bottom aligns with the top or bottom of the adjacent
window.
o Remove the vertical detailing from the large wall on the right and left elevations and keep the
medallions and single line on the smaller wall of the same elevations from the drawings submitted
August 17, 2009.
o Provide a channel letter detail, showing the method of construction and light source (bulb type),
clearly showing that no light will spill outward from the top, bottom, sides or back. Indicate the
trim cap and return color; bronze would be appropriate.
o Provide a logo box detail, including the method of construction and illumination, demonstrating
the use of a non - illuminated background, or an opaque (zero light transmission) background, with
only the text (H) illuminating. Provide a sample of the green color proposed for the logo box.
Issue:
In this latest resubmission:
• The width of the signage in the south (front) elevation was not reduced so as not to overcrowd the
space.
• The sign logo box was not repositioned so the top or bottom aligns with the top or bottom of the
adjacent window.
• A channel letter detail was not provided, showing the method of construction and light source (bulb
type), clearly showing that no light will spill outward from the top, bottom, sides or back, indicating
the trim cap and return color; bronze would be appropriate.
• A logo box detail was not provided, including the method of construction and illumination,
demonstrating the use of a non - illuminated background, or an opaque (zero light transmission)
background, with only the text (H) illuminating. A sample of the green color proposed for the logo
box was not provided.
Recommendations:
Revise the wall signage proposal by:
• Reducing the width of the signage in the south (front) elevation so as not to overcrowd the space.
• Reposition the sign logo box so the top or bottom aligns with the top or bottom of the adjacent
window.
• Provide a channel letter detail, showing the method of construction and light source (bulb type),
clearly showing that no light will spill outward from the top, bottom, sides or back. Indicate the
trim cap and return color; bronze would be appropriate.
• Provide a logo box detail, including the method of construction and illumination, demonstrating
the use of a non - illuminated background, or an opaque (zero light transmission) background,
with only the text (H) illuminating. Provide a sample of the green color proposed for the logo
box.
Please provide:
1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision
dates on each drawing and an ARB approval signature panel.
2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes
other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the
changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to
ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Brent Nelson
Landscape Planner
cc: ARB File
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff
has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit
additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be
collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal.
TO: Brent Nelson DATE:
PROJECT NAME: ARB2009 -0056 Holiday Inn Express
Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal Cade
County Project Number
# Copies
Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S)
# Copies
Distribute To:
Mitigation Plan (MP)
2
Brent Nelson
Waiver Request (WR)
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
Road Plan (RP)
Private Road Request, with private /public comparison (PRR)
Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA)
Preliminary Site Plan (PSP)
Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP)
Final Plat (FP)
Preliminary Plat (PP)
Easement Plat (EP)
Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP)
Rezoning Plan (REZ)
Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP)
Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP)
Proffers (P)
Bond Estimate Request (BER)
Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP)
Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP)
Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP)
Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR)
Architectural Review Board (ARB)
ARB2009 -56
Other: Please explain
(For staff use only)
Submittal Code
# Copies
Distribute To:
Submittal Code
# Copies
Distribute To:
ARB
2
Brent Nelson