Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201000046 Review Comments Major Amendment, Preliminary Plan 2010-07-02vIRGIN� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: William Moore, Balzer and Associates, Inc. Owner: Morgan Davis, East Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses From: Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: July 2, 2010 Subject: SDP 2010 -46- Charlottesville Kingdom Hall Major Amendment The Planner for the Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [SP2009 -29] Plan must be in conformance with the Concept Plan (dated 11 -16- 09) and conditions approved with the Special Use Permit (June 11, 2010). COMMENT: SP condition #3 indicates the sidewalk easement shall be reserved for future dedication; therefore please amend sidewalk easement callout to say "Proposed sidewalk easement and 5' right -of -way to be dedicated upon demand of the County." 2. [32.5.6.a] Name of development: COMMENT: Add to the cover sheet and/or title blocks that this is "Major Site Plan Amendment SDP2010 -46" 3. [32.5.6.a] COMMENT: Provide magisterial district (Scottsville) on the cover sheet. 4. [32.5.6.a] Descriptions of all variances, zoning proffers, and bonus factors: COMMENT: Conditions of SP2009 -29 must be provided on the plan. Typically, these are added as a list to the cover sheet or notes /details sheet. 5. [32.5.6.a] Source of survey /topography: COMMENT: Provide dates for survey, topography, and tree location. 6. [32.5.6.a] Datum reference: COMMENT: Benchmark symbol on cover sheet C1 does not match that on Sheet C4. Please revise so that Legend matches symbol used in the plans. 7. [32.5.6.a] Total number of sheets: COMMENT: While not required for approval, please add total number of sheets to each sheet, as in "1/15" or "1 of 15 ". This is 1 very helpful when/if the sheets get separated from the set. 8. [32.5.6.a] Minimum setback lines: COMMENT: While setbacks are drawn on C4 etc., please list minimum setbacks as a note on the cover sheet. 9. [32.5.6.d] Critical slopes: COMMENT: On the cover sheet, indicate critical slopes waiver was approved. Then, on the site plan, indicate the critical slopes that were approved for disturbance in the waiver. 10. COMMENT: Remove sign height note; this will be reviewed at the time the sign permit is reviewed. 11. [32.6.6.f] Signature panel COMMENT: Signature panel is not required; this is an amendment and will get an approval stamp. 12. [32.5.6.p, 32.6.6.i] Landscape Plan: COMMENT: Is Note #10 on the cover sheet Cl referring to "interior parking lot landscaping ?" If so, please change the term "green space" to "interior parking lot landscaping" so that it is more clear what code requirements are being met. a. If this is discussing interior parking lot landscaping, then the calculation should be 5% of paved parking and vehicular circulation areas. [32.5.6.n.] Please confirm parking and vehicular circulation areas are accurate, i.e. that the 23,600 stated in Note #11 is correct, as opposed to the 21,095 stated in Note #10. Both figures should match. b. If your calculations are based on something different, please explain in your response letter, or make adjustments on the sheet as necessary. 13. [32.5.6.p, 32.6.6.i] Landscape plan: Conservation Checklist must be updated. Please review checklist to make sure it is accurate, and re -sign and date. 14. [32.5.6.p, 32.6.6.i] Landscape plan: "JS" should probably be called out as "ZS" in the drawing. Also, identify 4 plants to the immediate east of the proposed dumpster. Please revise either landscape schedule or the plan accordingly. a. Trees are proposed very close to water and power lines. Please place trees farther away from the utilities to allow room for utility work and root growth. b. Waterline linetype is not provided in the legend on C1. Please add it to the legend, or revise linetype. 15. [32.6.6J] Lighting plan: The lighting plan must conform to Chapter 18 Section 4.17. Therefore, provide cut - sheets on the plan for all fixtures proposed. (All fixtures must be full- cutoff.) 16. [32.6.6J] Lighting plan: Lighting is not permitted to be over 0.5 footcandle at the property line. Please address 0.8 at the northern property line (entrance). 17. [32.6.6J] Lighting Plan: Albemarle County Code requires a LLF of 1.0. Please revise data and photometrics accordingly. 18. [32.5.6.n] Trash containers: Be sure to label details on Sheet C10 consistently 2 with Legend on C4. For example, C4 calls "T" a "trash enclosure ", but on C10 there is no "trash enclosure." I assume it is the "fence screen detail," but for clarity purposes, either provide a "T" with the detail on C 10, or change the name to match what it is called out on C4. a. Similarly, indicate under "C" and "H" and any other details in the Legend on C4 where exactly that detail can be found (C 10). 19. COMMENT: ACSA approval is required prior to approval of this amendment. However, before ACSA can issue their approval, Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (RWSA) must approve the plans. Unless otherwise directed by ACSA, please coordinate directly with both ACSA and RWSA to obtain ACSA approval. RWSA contact is Justin Weiler, (434)977 -2970 x206. His email is jweiler @rivanna.org. 20. COMMENT: This project proposes private septic; Health Department approval/ confirmation of system proposed is required in writing. If it has already been obtained, please forward a copy of the approval to me for verification. 21. COMMENT: ARB approval is required. ARB meeting is set for August 2, 2010, after which comments will be received. 22. COMMENT: Inspections Division approval is required. See comment in County View dated 6/21/10, and included in the SRC package 7/8/10. 23. COMMENT: Engineering approval is required. See Comments dated July 1, 2010, available online on County View, and included in the 7/8/10 SRC package. 24. COMMENT: VDOT approval is required. Comments are pending. Please contact Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information.