Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201000055 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2010-09-03k� �'IRGIly1�' County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Scott Collins ( scott(&collins- engineering.com) Justin Beights- March Mountain Properties austin@beights.com) From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: August 2, 2010 Revl: September 3, 2010 Subject: SDP - 2010 -055- Old Trail Block 4- Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [32.5.6 (b)] The shared parking agreement has been submitted to zoning and will need to be approved before the approval of the site plan. Revl: Comment addressed. 2. [32.5.6 (b)] The chart on sheet T -2 states that there are negative banked units for this block. How can there be negative units? Please clarify. Revl: Comment addressed. 3. [32.5.6 (b)] The variation has been submitted to planning and will need to be approved before the approval of the site plan. Revl: Comment addressed. 4. [32.5.6 (b); Code of Development] The green mall must be 40 feet in width, and 50 feet from face of building to face of building. Revl: Comment addressed 5. [32.5.6] An Architectural Review Board application and certificate or appropriateness needs to be applied for /obtained before the approval of the site plan. Revl: Comment not addressed. An ARB application must be submitted and approved before approval of the site plan. 6. [32.7.9.6] Are the street trees a part of the road plans? If so, submit a copy of the road plans for our review and files. Revl: Comment addressed. 7. [32.7.9.7 (c)] Extend the rows of shrubs at the end of the alleys so that they provide screening for the parking spaces for the units. Specifically for units 23 and 8. Revl: Comment addressed. 8. [32.5.6 (c)] On the cover sheet there is a note that states that no phasing is planned, however on the layout plan phase lines are shown. Please clarify. Revl: Comment addressed. 9. [Code of Development, Table 6- Maximum Lot Coverage] The maximum lot coverage for this block is 80 %. The table provided on sheet S -1 for the areas does not provide the percentage. Taking the numbers provided in the chart, all of the lots are over 80% for the lot coverage. Revise to meet the requirement of 80% maximum lot coverage. Rev1: Comment addressed. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3004 for fixrther information.