Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201000024 Review Comments Special Use Permit 2010-09-21STAFF PERSON: Francis H. MacCall PUBLIC HEARING: October 5, 2010 STAFF REPORT: SP -2010 -024 Liberty Hail /Ryan Homes Off -Site Sign PETITION: Ryan Homes LLC (applicant) petitions the Board of Zoning Appeals to issue a special use permit for one (1) off -site freestanding sign in accordance with Section 4.15.5(a)(1) of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to erect one (1) freestanding sign on tax map 55B, parcel 1. This sign will contain the name of the subdivision known as Liberty Hall located 1.6 miles to the east of the sign, and will also contain the name and phone number of the development company for the subdivision. (See Attachment A) The proposed sign would comply with the sign regulations in terms of size, height and setback. No additional signs would be authorized as a result of this special use permit than could otherwise be erected without it. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY: This property is in The Rural Area of the County and not within a Development Area, but is close to the Crozet Community. It is located off the south side of Route 250W and is approximately 1.6 miles from the Liberty Hall Subdivision to the east. The subject parcel is vacant but has recently been proposed to be developed with a gas station /convenience store. Tax Map 55B, Parcel 1 is zoned HC, Highway Commercial along the Entrance Corridor Overlay District along Route 250W. CHARACTER OF THE AREA: This site is located just outside of the Crozet development area. The 250W corridor along the stretch from Interstate 64 continuing east to the Liberty Hall Subdivision consists of various commercial and residential development including three schools, all on both sides of Route 250W. REASON FOR REVIEW: Section 4.15.5 provides that off -site signs are permitted by special use permit in any underlying district. The authority to administer signs by special use permit is granted to the Board of Zoning Appeals. PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY: The site is currently vacant but does have a proposed site plan submitted to the County for a gas station /convenience store which includes a special use permit for water usage. APPLICANT COMMENT: The proposed sign will help clients locate the new homes being built at Liberty Hall. The sign will meet all size and location requirements of the HC zoning district. STAFF COMMENT: The ordinance is written to discourage off -site signs and generally to limit signage to the minimum necessary to provide for the primary goals of signage._ Among other___ considerations, the Board must "find that the issuance of a special use permit is 2 necessary because an on -site sign would be ineffective to communicate its message off -site because of topography or vegetation." The current location of the subdivision and subdivision signs do not appear to be hindered by topography or vegetation. Section 4.15.1 of the Zoning Ordinance provides four goals that signs are to meet: (1) To promote the general health, safety and welfare, including the creation of an attractive and harmonious environment; (2) Protect the public investment in the creation, maintenance, safety and appearance of its streets, highways and other areas open to the public; (3) Improve pedestrian and vehicular safety by avoiding saturation and confusion in the field of vision that could otherwise result if such signs were not regulated as provided herein; and (4) Protect and enhance the county's attractiveness to tourists and other visitors as sources of economic development. The proposed sign serves as a directional sign pointing in the direction of the subdivision along with a phone number for information. Off -site signs typically will advertise a use on an adjoining parcel or within an adjacent development but not one approximately 1.6 miles away. Therefore, this constitutes a different use for an off -site sign than has historically been made or than was anticipated with this ordinance provision. There are multiple residential subdivisions that have developed along the 250W corridor in particular but also along all of the County's major roads, without the need for an off -site sign. The Liberty Hall development does not appear to be any different from the other developments. Pursuant to Section 31.2.4.1 of the Ordinance, the Board must find that the use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, with the uses permitted by right in the district, and with the public health, safety and general welfare. The County regulations for signage make certain that signs are not detrimental to adjacent properties, and that signage is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance and specifically within the individual zoning districts. The main area of concern with offsite signage is the location of signs and how that location may change the character of the area. In this case, allowing a sign to advertise a development as far offsite as the Liberty Hall development will change the character of the area. In a sense this sign would act more like a billboard even though this sign would not be larger than 32 square feet. The design planner for the ARB has provided comments that would need to be considered for the review of the sign permit if the Special Use Permit were granted. Appropriate conditions regarding ARB review for this Special Use Permit pertaining to the comments provided will be provided. It is staff's opinion that this proposal does not satisfy the goals of sign regulations nor the criteria for issuance of a special use permit. 3 SUMMARY: Staff recommends denial of this request. If the Board of Zoning Appeals approves the request then the following conditions should apply; 1. ARB staff approval of color. 2. The sign shall content shall be limited to what is shown in the design schematic provided by this applicant. 3. The sign shall not exceed 16 square feet. 4. The sign shall meet all other applicable sign regulations of Section 4.15 5. The sign shall not be lighted in any manner. 6. The sign shall be removed by October 5, 2012 Attachment A — Applicant's design schematic of proposed sign 00 8,. i° O ,o fD S' F � C. r+ a -gQ 211 �Q I rh rt 6� S2o n� o Uq' 0 a' a r_ r 0 ► i 1 r' r • )0 cr 1 i • CD `, ice; j, S2o n� o Uq' 0 a' a D T T 0 C m e� D G� m m D V M, to s� r�P m f A r_ r 0 ► i 1 r' r • )0 cr 1 i • CD `, ice; D T T 0 C m e� D G� m m D V M, to s� r�P m f A This division is made with the consent of the undersigned. owners, proprietors, and /or trustees. All roads and streets, if not previously dedicated are hereby tendered for dedication to public use. C. N T g -- NCEY ironlLL$ v a 0 0 A ti N Q: ti ai N — N 0 U) W a: o_ x W o: 0 H O W Z Z 0 m L 0 `cam w� o .!2-3 z IV C T v a 0 CL iron 1 mIIT Co _pipe U.S. ROUTE 250 TO CHARLOTTESVILLE iron — — N80° -OOZE 389.20 I S tf� 3 -f"i"b o-G� � � �� Y►1 I � I ALICE WINSTON EST. I D.B 90 -420 Q io m a V7 I--� p ui Z U PARCEL HAS, W 4.06 ACRES W � U J ,Q • N � 3 o W to Nk O �. . O Q • G: J W U X Q a I 1 S 85 ° -22 IN 330.05 iron HUGHES I BROWN I I PLAT OF A TRACT OF LAND IN ALBEMARLE,0 ";-- Y� CO.,. VA. ON U.S. ROUTE 250 ABOUT 1/2 MILE EAST OF YANCLY MILLS ~ SCALE: 1" =60' DATE: 1/2/64 THOMAS D, BLUE CIVIL ENGINEER LAND SURVEYOR CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA / a, 5—ERH PHOTO ?R.HT h SUPPLY CO: OREEHi°ORO. H. c.— 128 $Q I2.63 147 {AK QI �S M d Fe @ RESTOREN STATION ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA TAX MAP 55B, PARCEL I NP ENGINEERING a EXISTING CONDITIONS G DEMOLITION PLAN wuwm. wnmmm.e m� wu.u®