Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201100006 Review Comments Final Plat 2011-05-13 (3)vIRGIN� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Megan Yaniglos, Senior Planner From: Phil Custer, Engineering Review Date: May 13, 2011 Subject: SUB - 2011 -00006 Old Trail Block 23 Final Plat The second revision of the Final Plat for Old Trail Block 23 (SUB- 2010 - 00006), received 22 April 2011, has been reviewed. Engineering can recommend approval to the plat after the following comments have been addressed. 1. All bonds (water + sewer, ESC, and Road) must be paid prior to the signing of this plat. In most cases where the lots are for a multifamily development, an approved final site plan doubles as a road plan (assuming the Chief of Current Development approves the private street with the Zoning Ordinance standards). At this time, no final site or ESC plan has been provided and the plat doesn't match the approved preliminary plat. For these reasons, additional comments may be necessary as the final site plan is submitted and reviewed by all agencies. To receive a bond amount, the applicant must provide a Bond Estimate Request to the County Engineer when all plans have been approved. [14- 302.A.3, 14 -233, 14- 234,14- 303.E, 14 -412, 14 -435] (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. No bonds for this plat have been provided. Neither a road nor a ESC plan have been approved. As previously stated, additional comments may be necessary based on the review of the final site plan. (Rev. 2) Comment has not been addressed. No bonds for this plat have been provided, though thefinal site /road plan is much closer to approval. 2. The private street must be authorized. To have this private street authorized please follow the procedure outlined in 14 -234. If waivers of road standards are needed for the subdivision, they should be requested at that time. [14 -234, 14- 412.B] (Rev. 1) The private street has not yet been authorized. (Rev. 2) Comment has been withdrawn. After a discussion with Megan, we have concluded that the private street was authorized with the rezoning plan. 3. The plat referenced by the deedbook and page number for Golf Drive does not appear to actually dedicate the ROW to public use. It seems to designate the road as an easement. Was there a latter plat or other document that dedicated this ROW? If not, a deed of dedication may be necessary prior to the approval of this subdivision plat for Block 23. (Rev. 1) The applicant has indicated that they agree the ROW has not yet been dedicated to public use and are preparing a deed of dedication for Golf Drive. The plat for Block 23 cannot be approved until this dedication has occurred. (Rev. 2) I have not received a receipt for this recordation yet. The 7.5ft strip along the front of the site should have a note stating the land is "Hereby Dedicated to Public Use." 4. There is a drainage easement on Lot 13 that was platted with DB 3442 PG 188 that needs to be vacated with this document, assuming the construction documents relocate this drainage system. [14- 302.A.5] (Rev. 1) Engineering cannot properly review this drainage easement vacation and replacement until the final site plan is approved and all drainage pipes are fixed in their location. (Rev. 2) The easement appears to match the construction set. However, it should be called out as "Variable Width Public Drainage Easement, Hereby Dedicated to Public Use." 5. Show the sidewalk and utility easement on the front of the property that was recorded with 3442 PG 188. [14- 302.A, 14- 303.E] (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 6. It is anticipated that sight distance easements on Lots 1 and 13 will be needed based on where the existing easement/ROW line has been platted. The site plan assumed the ROW line to be lft off of the sidewalk, where it is normally placed. [14- 303.L] (Rev. 1) Engineering review cannot properly review this easement on the plat. The review of the sight distance easement will occur with the review of the construction drawings /road plan. Any subsequent review of the subdivision plat will make sure the sight distance easement matches the sight line of the construction plan. (Rev. 2) Comment has not been addressed. The sight distance concern has not yet been addressed (see site plan comment letter). Also, a sight distance easement appears on the latest site plan, but it is not provided on the plat. The additional 7.5ft wide strip along the front of the site should be called out with a note stating "Hereby Dedicated to Public Use." 7. The private street statement of 14 -303.N needs to be included on the plat. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 8. The payment of the Lickinghole Basin fee for this block must be paid prior to the approval of a subdivision plat or final site plan. (Rev. 1) No fee has yet been paid for the project. Most likely, a fee will be computed after approval of the site plan once the impervious area is finalized. (Rev. 2) The Lickinghole Basin Fee for the project has been computed to be $3,893.92. If this fee is not paid before January 1s` 2012 or if the design changes significantly, it will need to be recalculated. 9. The stream buffer statement of 14- 302.B.10 needs to be included on the plat. Please also show the location of the pond water surface elevation so the accuracy of the buffer line can be verified. (Rev. I) Comment has been addressed. 10. (Rev. 2) The drainage system has been reconfigured since the last submittal. Some of the new pipes require wider easements. Please refer to the site plan comment letter. 11. (Rev. 2) All public drainage easements must be called out as such (seethe latest site plan for public and private easement delineation) and a note stating "hereby dedicated to public use." 12. (Rev. 2) A Deed of Easement will need to be recorded with the plat for all of the public drainage easements. Please contact the County Attorney's Office for the latest copy of the Deed of Easement template for the drainage easements. The language within the deed must match the language shown on the plat for drainage easements. The County Attorney's Office will need to approve the deed of easement prior to Community Development approval of the plat. 13. (Rev. 2) Per site plan comment 18, a SWU access easement will likely be necessary on the property to delineate how the stormwater facility of WPO- 2004 -00044 is to be accessed for maintenance and inspection. 14. (Rev. 2) The site plan states that the road to the north is Golf Drive but the plat labels it as Reas Creek Drive. Which is correct? E3_fpt_PBC_SUB- 20 1 1 -00006 Old Trail Block 23 Final Plat.doc