HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201100056 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2011-05-11Email sent from Margaret Maliszewski to Ron Manslow 5/11/2011
Ron,
Thanks for talking with me this morning about the lighting changes at BB &T. I've listed below the items
we discussed. Also, I will try to coordinate with the Current Development planner to see what else, if
anything, might be needed.
1. We confirmed that the proposed amendment is for the following changes:
a. Moving 2 existing full cutoff wall fixtures on the east elevation of the drive - through
canopy
b. Adding 1 full cutoff wall fixture on the departure elevation of the drive - through canopy
(west, facing Rt. 29)
c. Adding 1 fixture under the awning that is attached to the drive - through canopy.
2. You mentioned that the fixture under the awning is not a full cutoff fixture. Previous
determinations have found that light fixtures, to meet ordinance requirements, must be full
cutoff in and of themselves. Placing them under /within a structure doesn't meet the
requirement. I will check with Zoning to see if this determination still applies in this case. Either
way, it would be best to have a more detailed drawing showing the installation of the fixture in
the awning. It would also be helpful to have a clearer image of the fixture that illustrates its non -
full- cutoff features.
3. I'm confused about the number of lamps in the awning fixture. Is it 6 or 4? It would be helpful if
you could provide a fixture schedule that outlined existing, new and moved fixtures, with their
manufacturers, catalog numbers, lamp type, lumens, etc.
4. Do you have a photometric plan that you can send me? I'm interested in the footcandle levels
on the ground in the vicinity of the drive - through structure with the proposed fixtures in place.
What is the highest footcandle value beneath the fixture in the awning?
Thanks for looking into these items.
Margaret