Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201100037 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2011-09-28Ellie Ray Subject: FW: FW: Greer - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Alex Morrison fmailto :amorrison(@serviceauthority.or Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:17 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: Re: FW: Greer I am currently in VA beach at a conference. I have approved the plans and left them for Gary and Pete to sign. I will follow up on Friday when I return. sound good? - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Ellie Ray fmailto:eray(@albemarle.org] Sent: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:31:41 -0400 To: Alex Morrison Subject: FW: Greer > Hey Alex, > Hate to bug you about this project again, but have you given your > approval? In a previous email, Craig said that you all had worked > everything out and you were ready to approve it. > Thanks, > Ellie Carter Ray, CLA > Senior Planner > Albemarle County Community Development Department > ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 > From: Craig Kotarski fmailto :CraiR.Kotarski(@timmons.coml > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:30 AM > To: Ellie Ray > Subject: Greer > Ellie, 1 > Have you heard from Alex with regards to ACSA approval? Is everything > on track for signatures? > Thanks. > Craig Kotarski, P.E., LEED AP > Project Engineer > TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com <http: / /www.timmons.com /> > 919 2nd Street S.E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 > Office: 434.327.1688 Fax: 434.295.8317 > Mobile: 434.964.7148 craig.kotarski (@timmons.com Your Vision Achieved > Through Ours > To send me files greater than 20MB click here > <https: / /www8. sendthisfile. com /sendthisfile /custom.jsp ?sendthisfilecod > e= LJOhIC79upIDCOWMAd2k5E7D &balance= 13213> . 4 Ellie Ray To: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Lighting Plan From: Ellie Ray Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 12:05 PM To: 'Craig Kotarski' Subject: RE: Lighting Plan Craig, Technically the existing lights should be included in the photometric calculations. However, since these fixtures are internal in the courtyard area and nowhere near a property line we won't worry about it this time. They won't cause spillover onto the neighboring property. For future reference, though, keep in mind that they should be included. The lighting plan looks really good otherwise and I think all of my lighting comments have been addressed. My only other comment is about the date and revisions dates. I hate to be super picky about it, but this is how we get a handle on record keeping. You have the original date noted as 5/20/11, and a revision 1 date of 8/29/11.... but then on the right hand side of the plans the date says 8/24/11 and your seal is signed with the same date. The discrepancy between the dates needs to be fixed. This submittal is also the second revision ... the first was submitted sometime around 8/8/11. Is it a big deal for you to revise this information? Other than that, all I am waiting on now is approval from ACSA. I'll send Alex an email this afternoon to see if I can determine where his review stands. Thanks, Ellie Carter Ray, CLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development Department ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Craig Kotarski [ mailto : Craig. Kotarski-btimmons.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:51 AM To: Ellie Ray Subject: FW: Lighting Plan See below for the answer to the ETR lights on the photometric plan. Would you like us to revise this sheet? Or can it be approved as is? Thanks! Craig Kotarski, P.E., LEED AP Project Engineer TIMMONS GROUP www.timmons.com 9192 nd Street S.E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Office: 434.327.1688 Fax: 434.295.8317 Mobile: 434.964.7148 craig.kotarski(a)timmons.com Your Vision Achieved Through Ours To send me files greater than 20MB click here. From: Dinesh Narang [mailto:DNarang(abSRPENG.COM] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:41 AM To: Craig Kotarski Subject: RE: Lighting Plan The photometric calculation is only for the new lights. "ETR" stands for existing to remain and they are shown for reference only. Best Regards Dinesh Narang, PE, LEED AP Vice President Simmons Rockecharlie & Prince, Inc. 804 - 262 -7323 x 207 From: Craig Kotarski [ mai Ito: Craig. Kota rski(@timmons.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:38 AM To: Dinesh Narang Subject: RE: Lighting Plan Dinesh, There are some symbols shown around the existing gym and school labeled "ETR ", are these existing lights that were used in preparing the photometric plan? The County is asking that if that is the case that they be labeled as existing. Craig Kotarski, P.E., LEED AP Project Engineer TIMMONS GROUP www.timmons.com 9192 nd Street S.E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Office: 434.327.1688 Fax: 434.295.8317 Mobile: 434.964.7148 craig.kotarski(a)timmons.com Your Vision Achieved Through Ours To send me files greater than 20MB click here. Phone 434 - 296 -5832 <C`tpF aLg� c County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Memorandum To: Craig Kotarski (CRAIG. KOTARSKI @GMAIL.COM) From: Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner Division: Zoning and Current Development Date: June o, zu i i Rev1 • Aunu -,t in ?011 Rev2: August 15, 2011 Subject: SDP 2011— 00037 Greer Elementary School Addition - Minor Fax 434 - 972 -4126 The County of Albemarle Division of Current Development Planner will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] [General Comment] For record keeping purposes, please reference the approved Site Development Plan that this plan is amending (SDP 200700121). Rev1: Comment addressed. 2. [General Comment] Please show the dashed boundary that demonstrates the limits of the topographic survey. Rev1: Comment addressed. 3. [32.5.6(n)] Provide dimensions of all proposed improvements including: building; walkways; fences; walls; outdoor lighting; landscaped areas; and recreational areas and facilities. Rev1: Comment addressed. 4. [32.7.9.7(b)] Revise the arrangement of the parking lot trees so that they are more dispersed along the perimeter of the new parking lot area. Rev1: Comment addressed. 5. [4.12.4(b)] Please show a fifth ADA accessible parking space. Rev1: Comment addressed. 6. [32.6.6(g)] Indicate type of surfacing for all paved or gravel areas. The material proposed for a portion of the emergency vehicle access is unclear. Rev1: Comment addressed. 7. [32.6.60)] It is unclear if any lighting is proposed. If it is, please submit a lighting plan that conforms to 4.17 that includes all proposed lighting fixtures. Rev1: No proposed lighting is shown on this plan: therefore, no lighting is approved with this amendment. An additional Minor Amendment application will be required before any additional lighting can be installed on -site. If lighting approval is desired with this application, please submit a lighting plan, photometric plan and fixture cutsheets with your revisions. Rev2: The lighting plan submitted does not meet County standards for review. It is difficult to determine which fixtures are proposed in which locations, and the specific options chosen for each fixture have not been identified. All fixtures which emit 3000 lumens or more must be full cut off and it is impossible to determine lumen level with the information provided. It also appears that not all of the fixtures are included on the photometric plan. Please revise and /or submit the following: 1. A photometric plan that includes all proposed fixtures, stand -alone and wall- mounted; 2. A lighting schedule that provides the fixture symbol and label used on the plan, the quantity of each fixture proposed, the catalog number indicating fixture options selected, a description including any variation in arrangement or distribution of the fixture, and the lumen level using a maintenance factor (or light loss factor) of one (1.0). All information presented in the lighting schedule must coordinate with the fixture cutsheets and the photometric plan. 3. Include fixture cutsheets on the plan sheet. 4. Include the following standard lighting note on the plan: `Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle.' 8. [32.5.6(a)] Please add the date and description of latest revision to the plans. Please contact Ellie Ray at the Division of Current Development by using eray analbemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. <C`tpF aLg� c County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434 - 296 -5832 Fax 434 - 972 -4126 Memorandum To: Craig Kotarski (CRAIG. KOTARSKI @GMAIL.COM) From: Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner Division: Zoning and Current Development Date: Revl: August 10, 2011 Subject: SDP 2011— 00037 Greer Elementary School Addition - Minor The County of Albemarle Division of Current Development Planner will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] [General Comment] For record keeping purposes, please reference the approved Site Development Plan that this plan is amending (SDP 200700121). Rev1: Comment addressed. 2. [General Comment] Please show the dashed boundary that demonstrates the limits of the topographic survey. Rev1: Comment addressed. 3. [32.5.6(n)] Provide dimensions of all proposed improvements including: building; walkways; fences; walls; outdoor lighting; landscaped areas; and recreational areas and facilities. Rev1: Comment addressed. 4. [32.7.9.7(b)] Revise the arrangement of the parking lot trees so that they are more dispersed along the perimeter of the new parking lot area. Rev1: Comment addressed. 5. [4.12.4(b)] Please show a fifth ADA accessible parking space. Rev1: Comment addressed. 6. [32.6.6(g)] Indicate type of surfacing for all paved or gravel areas. The material proposed for a portion of the emergency vehicle access is unclear. Rev1: Comment addressed. 7. [32.6.60)] It is unclear if any lighting is proposed. If it is, please submit a lighting plan that conforms to 4.17 that includes all proposed lighting fixtures. Rev1: No proposed lighting is shown on this plan: therefore, no lighting is approved with this amendment. An additional Minor Amendment application will be required before any additional lighting can be installed on -site. If lighting approval is desired with this application, please submit a lighting plan, photometric plan and fixture cutsheets with your revisions. 8. [32.5.6(a)] Please add the date and description of latest revision to the plans. Please contact Ellie Ray at the Division of Current Development by using erayCcDalbemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. ALg�,�� �'IRGINZ�` COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP - 2011 - 00037, Greer Elementary School Addition — Minor Site Plan Amendment Plan preparer: Craig Kotarski (CRAIG.KOTARSKI @GMAIL.COM) Owner or rep.: County of Albemarle School Board Albemarle High School ETAL Date received: 25 May 2011 Rev. 1: 9 August 2011 Date of Comment: 3 June 2011 Rev. 1: 10 August 2011 Engineer: John Diez The Minor Amendment for Greer Elementary School, received on 9 August 2011 has been reviewed. All comments have been addressed and have received engineering approval. A. Final Site Plan Review Comments Please provide clouds on all features that are being amended (courtyard, 2 -story addition, parking area, etc). (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. Please provide the application number of the approved site plan that is being amended on the cover sheet. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. \\ cob- dts01 \CityViewLnk\Docs \2011 \SDP \SDP201100037 Greer Elementary School Addition - Minor \CDE2_mia_JPD_11 -37 - Greer Elemaentary School - Minor.doc `J I1 pJ11 �11'] �J, r, �) ifilly Service Authority TO: Ellie Carter Ray FROM: Alexander J. Morrison, Civil Engineer DATE: June 14, 2011 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: SDP2011037: Greer Elementary School Addition- Minor The below checked items apply to this site. ✓ 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: ✓ A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service ✓ 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately (ON PROPERTY) distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. ✓ 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 1,100' distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. ✓ 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. 9. No plans are required. ✓ 10. Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. ✓ Comments: • Provide estimated increase in sewer flows so ACSA can verify pump station capacity with RW SA. • Accurately show existing utilities. • Final water plans need to be resubmitted. • Provide new fixture counts to determine if existing meter is sufficient. 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthority.org Phone 434 - 296 -5832 of ALg� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Memorandum To: Craig Kotarski (CRAIG. KOTARSKI @GMAIL.COM) From: Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner Division: Zoning and Current Development Date: June 13, 2011 Subject: SDP 2011— 00037 Greer Elementary School Addition - Minor Fax 434 - 972 -4126 The County of Albemarle Division of Current Development Planner will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] 1. [General Comment] For record keeping purposes, please reference the approved Site Development Plan that this plan is amending (SDP 200700121). 2. [General Comment] Please show the dashed boundary that demonstrates the limits of the topographic survey. 3. [32.5.6(n)] Provide dimensions of all proposed improvements including: building; walkways; fences; walls; outdoor lighting; landscaped areas; and recreational areas and facilities. 4. [32.7.9.7(b)] Revise the arrangement of the parking lot trees so that they are more dispersed along the perimeter of the new parking lot area. 5. [4.12.4(b)] Please show a fifth ADA accessible parking space. 6. [32.6.6(g)] Indicate type of surfacing for all paved or gravel areas. The material proposed for a portion of the emergency vehicle access is unclear. 7. [32.6.60)] It is unclear if any lighting is proposed. If it is, please submit a lighting plan that conforms to 4.17 that includes all proposed lighting fixtures. Please contact Ellie Ray at the Division of Current Development by using eray(a)albemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. ALg�,�� 1'IRGINZ� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP - 2011 - 00037, Greer Elementary School Addition — Minor Site Plan Amendment Plan preparer: Craig Kotarski (CRAIG.KOTARSKI @GMAIL.COM) Owner or rep.: County of Albemarle School Board Albemarle High School ETAL Date received: 25 May 2011 Date of Comment: 3 June 2011 Engineer: John Diez The Minor Amendment for Greer Elementary School, received on 25 May 2011 has been reviewed. The plan cannot be approved as submitted and will require the following corrections before approval can be granted: A. Final Site Plan Review Comments 1. Please provide clouds on all features that are being amended (courtyard, 2 -story addition, parking area, etc). 2. Please provide the application number of the approved site plan that is being amended on the cover sheet. \\ Cob- dts01 \cityviewlnk\Docs \2011 \SDP \SDP201100037 Greer Elementary School Addition - Minor \CDE1_ mia_JPD_11 -37 - Greer Elemaentary School - Minor.doc O ® M vIRGIT�e" COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 November 21, 2012 Montie R. Breeden, AIA Senior Project Manager Albemarle County Office of Facilities Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: LOR #1 for SDP201100037, Tax Map /Parcel #06000- 00- 00 -078A0 Dear Mr. Breeden, This letter approves your requested Letter of Revision for the above referenced site plan. The letter of revision proposes the following changes: 1. Add two (2) pole light fixtures at the newly built parking lot (to match existing pole lights). Models Lithonia KAD 250M 277V SR4 and Lithonia KAD 250M 277V SR3, installed as indicated on the attached site plan. 2. Add three (3) wall pack light fixtures onto the existing building. Model RAB WPLED52, installed as indicated on the attached site plan. This is the first (15t) Letter of Revision for this site. Three (3) Letters of Revision are allowed, after which all required changes must submitted in the form of a site plan amendment. Sincerely, o Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 -4596 Phone: (434)296 -5832 Ext 3432 Attachments: Letter of Request Site Plan Change �� OF ALg O G�i W �'IRGII�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Facilities Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 228 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 872 -4501 Fax (434) 972 -4091 November 14, 2012 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Re: Greer Elementary School Additions and Renovations — Phase H SDP 2011 -00037 (TMP 06000- 00- 00- 078A0) Application for Letter of Revision (No. 1) To Whom It May Concern: This request letter serves as a summary of the proposed changes to Minor Site Plan Amendment SDP 2011 -00037 to ensure public and staff safety during dark mornings and evenings (as noted in red on the attached copy of the site plan): 1. Add two (2) pole light fixtures at the newly built parking lot (to match the existing pole lights). 2. Add three (3) wall pack light fixtures onto the existing building (a separate locations). In addition to the plans, I have enclosed cut sheets on the light fixtures proposed for installation. The LED wall pack fixtures are the ones the school division is employing elsewhere through -out the County on its (school) buildings. Also attached is a diagram of the light levels at the parking lot. Sincerely, County of Albemarle Office of Facilities Development Montie R. Breeden, AIA Sr. Project Manager �J 1 / c< W�om Q 3 O o z g NU .� W CL m o I II / �II,� %illilll / LL N C. W H m DU CD U Q !_ O U�2 Z O = VI O,U G m W Z N Z O Z pJ J Z 3 L) WU n > > L m� m3Y ¢w U � Q Z F SL. 3 w 3 o a �g =CD U3 dN �� 3C-1m Zz Lp�i SaMZ W Z O Q W Q W O �Q� mw LLJ o va a d m N I\ CV / \ / 4, O Z N N Z = 7 = En C N = W m C', N W O p Z U ¢ F U a z m0� LLI En �Ia.IJ� O m N p LLj N ¢ m z v) 6 ¢ w m N��nOz cr ZNZO� �s Z ��LFw -w ANxC Z W 00 ¢J p=> En Um w O X N m M W U Q p m� who U U¢4! W Q Z N Z ¢ W C Q w m N S � ¢ =¢?z pmWC, = F L, U N = p V p W Q UmP::Z zp0¢ LLI kLU Zn C U' N NF C.DX CV � W LO N 2 U Z CD p NZ(Oj ¢ F v a ml -�i1N W V)= = CIO 2 < w ¢m N _1 N O W CL ¢ W J Q N a. ¢ Z U' � w N W C C W d Z 0 Q O O I- Z p 0 U CL W U S -L R.R./ YOQIf WATIIXWMWN1AtlMC : k E000/1%? E*57M ✓ACK ✓W--7T M/DDE,E SCHOOL EMBnNG PANEL 'HA' _ I — PROWOE THREE LID WALL PACKS UOOR NWBER RAB WPUDII BNONTE AND MOUNT AT BANE HEIGHT AS OTHER EMSTINC WALL PACKS, CONNECT TO ORCNT THAT PROWDES POWER TO EMSIINC WALL PATHS VERIFY LOAD ON CNCBE WINE SHALL BE 110 IN 3/4' EMT. RUN CONCEALED ABOVE CO UNGS NSDE SCHOOL SEAL PPNEIRATNINS N EXIUIOLT WALL WEATHERTIGHT. PRDWDE POLE MOUNTED SINGLE SHOE BOX FIXTURE UTHCHIA HAD 25M 277V Si3. MOUNT ON 3D', C SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL POLE SITE UG HTNC SHOWN UGHT IS EMSMIG TO REMAIN. SEE POLE BASE DETAIL THIS DRAWING CONNECT m D0511NG CIRCUIT AT EMSTING POLE AS SHOW USE 1I0 WIDE IN 1' PVC CONDUIT. BORE UNDER ASPHALT FOR NEW WIRING PRDWDE POLE MOUNTED DOUBLE SHOE BOX FIXTURE UTHONIA KAD 250M 277V S44. MOUNT ON 30', 4' SQUARE SMANNT STEEL POLE SITE UGLNINC SHOWN UHT IS EXISTING TO FENIAN. SE POLE BASE DETAIL THIS DRAWING. CCNNECT m E70STNG ORCUIT AT EM G POLE AS SHOWN. USE 110 CORE IN 1' PVC CONDUIT. BASE 1' O PAC- CNWFER SIR HAND TROWEL AND FINISH 70 FINISH FREE SDRONB g4 VERTICAL I /3 n6 0 121 `24' ROUND TYPICAL LIGHT POLE BASE DETAIL w m LT/4E RANCORN WILOMAN Archlt.ctl PLC E YAWN0. IPOC GF N79mm0,2112 WWNPY RRWKE91WlV0 Milo , R WWWW VA TATAMN A L /THON /A L /GHT /NG° FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE —Ideal for parking areas, street lighting, walkways and car lots. CONSTRUCTION —Rugged, die-cast softcomeraluminum housing with 0.12" nominal wall thickness. Die -cast door frame has impact- resistanttempered, glass lens that is fully gasketed with one -piece tubular silicone. Finish: Standard finish is dark bronze (DDB) polyester powder finish, with other architectural colors available. OPTICS — Anodized, aluminum reflectors: IES full cutoff distributions R2 (asymmetric), R3 (asymmetric), R4 (forward throw) and R5S (square) are interchangeable. High - performance anodized, segmented aluminum reflectors IES full cutoff distributions SR2 (asymmetric), SR3 (asymmetric) and SR45C (forward throw, sharp cutoff). High - performance reflectors attach with tool -less fasteners and are rotatable and interchangeable. ELECTRICAL— Ballast: High pressure sodium: 70 -15OW is high reactance, high power factor. Constantwattage autotransformer for 200.400W. Metal halide:70 -15OW is high reactance, high powerfactorand isstandard with pulse- startignitortechnology. "SCWA 'not req uired. Constantwattage autotransformerforl75 -400W. SuperCWA (pulsestart ballast), 88% efficient and EISA legislation compliant, is required for metal halide 151 -40OW (SCWA option) for USshipments only. CSA, NOM or INTL required forprobe start shipments outside ofthe US. Pulse -start ballast (SCWA) required for 200W, 320W, or 350W. Ballast is 100% factory- tested. Socket: Porcelain, horizontallyoriented medium base socketfor70 -150M. Mogul basesocketfor175M and above, and 70 -4005, with copper alloy, nickel - plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 1500W, 600V. LISTINGS — UL Listed (standard). CSA Certified (see Options). UL listed for 25 °C ambient and wet locations. IP65 rated in accordance with standard IEC 529. Spedficationssubjectto change withoutnotice. Catalog Number Notes Type Specifications EPA: 1.2 ft.' *Weight: 35.9lbs (16.28 kg) Length: 17-1/2 (44.5) Width: 17-1/2" (44.5) Depth: 7-1/8 (18.1) All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. *Weight as configured in example below. Soft Square Lighting [AMY METAL HALIDE: 70 -40OW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM: 70 -40OW 20'TO35' MOUNTING 7 -1/8 (181) 10. 17-1/2 1-10.2) (44.5) For shortest lead times, configure product using bolded options. Example: KAD 400M R3 TB SCWA SPD04 LPI KAD 1 Not available with SCWA. 12 9" arm is required when two or more luminaires are oriented 2 Not available with48OV. ona90 "drilling pattern. Series Wattage Options 14 Must specify fi nish when ordered as an accessory. Distribution _ ..____..._. ........ Voltage Ballast Mounting1z Shipped KAD Metal halide High Ceramic Standard reflectors High performance 120 (blank) Magnetic Ships in fixture carton Arm length metal R2 IESt ell reflectors' White 70M'•' *250Ms reo ,sure 2081 ballast SPD_ Square pole q P 04 4 'arm DBL 100M 320M sodium' halide asymmetric' SR2 IES type 11 240' CWI Contant RPD_ Round pole 06 6 "arm PER 150M 350M1•4 70S 70MHC1•= R3 IES type asymmetric' 0277 wattage isolated" WBD_ Wall bracket 09 9" arm REGC1 California Title 20, effective 1/1/2010 1005 100MHC tr asymmetric SR3 IES type III QRS Quartzrestrike system" "arm SC Shorting cap for PER option 175M' 400M'' 1505 150MHC R4 IESt eIV yP asymmetric? 347 © WWD_ Woodorpolewall "'" 12 12 20OM4 r, forward throw' 4SR4SLi, IEStypelV 480 1 a 1 Ships separately VS,I% R5S IES eV uare tYP forward SCWA Super CWA pulse -start DAD12P Degree arm (pole) 4005 throw TB70 ballast DADI2WB Degree arm (wall) 2305CHZ" NOTE For shipments m U5. WBA Decorative wall bracket's tenitades,SCWAmustbe KMA Mast arm external fitter specified to comply with EISA. KTMB Twin mounting bar Notes 1 Not available with SCWA. 12 9" arm is required when two or more luminaires are oriented 2 Not available with48OV. ona90 "drilling pattern. 3 These wattages do not comply with California Title 20 regulations. 13 May be ordered as an accessory. Options 14 Must specify fi nish when ordered as an accessory. ...._.... _ ..____..._. ........ Finish" __....._ ..._......._. Lamp" Shipped installed in fixture QRSTD QRS time delay" Shipped separately" (blank) Dark bronze LPI Lamp included SF Single fuse (120, 277,347V)" WTB Terminal wiring block" HS, Housesideshield DWH White ULP Less lamp DF Double fuse(208,240,48OV)" CSA CSA Certified PEI NEMA twist-lock PE(120,208,24OV) DBL Black PD Powertray" INTL Available MH for probe start shipping PE3 NEMAtw1stlod(PE(347V) DMB Medium bronze PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only outside the U.S. PE4 NEMAtw1st- lod(PE(480V) DNA Natural (no photocontrol) REGC1 California Title 20, effective 1/1/2010 PE7 NEMAtwist- lod(PE(277V) aluminum NCHTTIME QRS Quartzrestrike system" SC Shorting cap for PER option FRIENDLY C°nro:em wnn tE�•pce VG Vandal guard79 E S:ee� akles` �ene WG Wire guard" Notes 1 Not available with SCWA. 12 9" arm is required when two or more luminaires are oriented 2 Not available with48OV. ona90 "drilling pattern. 3 These wattages do not comply with California Title 20 regulations. 13 May be ordered as an accessory. 4 Must be ordered with SCWA. 14 Must specify fi nish when ordered as an accessory. 5 These wattages require the REGC l option tobe chosen for shipments into 15 Aval lable with SP004 a nd SPD09. California for Title 20 compliance. 250M REGCI in not available in 347 or 48OV. 16 Mustspeciry voltage. N/A with T8. 6 Reduced jacket ED28 required for SR2, SR3 and 5R4SC optics. 17 Only available with SR2, SR3 and SR45C optics. 7 House -side shield available. 18 Max allowable wattage lamp included. 8 High performance reflectors not available with QRSTD. 19 Prefix with KAD when ordered as an accessory. 9 Must specify CWl for use inCanada. 20 See www. lithonia. camlarchcolors for additional color options. 10 Optional multi-tap ballast (120, 208, 240, 277V; in Canada: 120, 277, 347V). 21 Must be specified. ULP not available with MHC. 11 Consult factory for available wattages. 22 Must useRPD09. OUTDOOR Accessories: Tenon Mounting Slipfitter (RPxx required.) Order asseperate catalog number. Mustbe used with pole mounting. Number of fixtures Tenon 0.D. One TwoV80° Twor 90° Three0170° Three690° Fnuregf)* 2 -3/8" T20 -190 T20 -280 T20 -290u T20 -32012 T20 -390" T20 -49012 2 -7/8" T25 -190 T25 -280 T25 -29022 T25 -320 T25 -39012 T25 -49012 4 T35 -190 T35 -280 T35 -29012 T35 -320 T35 -39022 T35 -49022 KAD -M -S KAD Metal Halide, Arm - mounted Soft Square Cutoff Coefficient of Utilization Initial Footcandles KAD 400M R2 Test no. 1193083101 P KAD 400M R3 Test no. 1192040902P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) -3 -3 0.25 C=7 0.25 r? 0.5 -2 w 0.5 -2 w 1•� c9 1.� U' 2.5 -1 2.5 -1 F 5 M 5 02 Oi O d 1� z O 1� z 2z 2z U U 3, � 3 F m 0 4 0 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 40OW pulse start metal halide lamp, rated 38000 40OW pulse start metal halide lamp, rated 38,000 lumens. Footcandle values based on 20' lumens. Footcandle values based on 20' mounting height. mounting height. Classification: Type II, Short, Full Cutoff Classification: Type II, Short, Full Cutoff KAD 400M West no. 1191110101P KAD 400M 114HS Test no. 1192061101P KAD 400M RSS Test no. 1194040801 P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) -3 t— -3 F- 3 0.25 �- -2 W = -2 W 0.5 C=7 1.5 -2 w_ 0.25 = 0.5 2:3$ -1Z = U p 002 2.5 5 1Z F Z D ai Oi 5 Oi LL LL 0 0 Z Z Z n 2? 2? 2W W U W U U Z Z 3N 3F 3� 0 q 0 4 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 40OW pulse start metal halide lamp, rated 38,000 40OW pulse start metal halide lamp, rated 38,000 40OW pulse start metal halide lamp, rated 38000 lumens. Footcandle values based on 20' lumens. Footcandle values based on 20' lumens. Footcandle values based on 20' mounting height. mounting height. mounting height. Classification: Unclassified (Type III, Very Short), Full Cutoff Classification: Unclassified (Type III, Very Short), Full Classification: Unclassified (Type NC, Very Short), Full Cutoff Notes 1 Photometric data for other distributions can be accessed at www .lithonia.com. 2 Tested to current IES and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions. Various operating factors can cause differences between laboratory data and actual field measurements. Dimensions and specifications on this sheet are based on the most current available data and are subject to change without notice. 3 For electrical characteristic, consultoutdoortechnicaldataspecificationsheetsonwww .lithonia.com. L /THON /A L /GHT /NG® An - :4cuft yBrands Company Mounting Height Correction Factor (Multiply the fc level by the correction factor) 25 ft. =0.64 35 ft. =0.32 40 ft. =0.25 r Existing Mounting Height l2_ Correction Factor New Mounting Height / KAD -M -S OUTDOOR: One Lithonia Way Conyers, GA 30012 Phone: 770.922.9000 Fax: 770- 918 -1209 wvvw.lithania.com ©2007 -2011 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 11/04/11 Technical Specifications UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations. Lumen Maintenance: 100,000 -hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations. LEDs: Four (4) multi -chip, 13W high- output, long -life LEDs Drivers: Two drivers, constant current, 720mA, Class 2, 100 - 277V, 50 - 60 Hz, 100 - 277VAC .8 Amps. Fixture Efficacy: 64 Lumens per Watt Anobient Temperature: Suitable for use in 40 &deg;C ambient temperatures. Surge Protection: 6 KV Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is - 40 &deg;F /- 40 &deg;C Thermal Management: Cast aluminum Thermal Management system for optimal heat sinking. The WPLED is designed for cool operation, most efficient output and maximum LED life by minimizing LED junction temperature. Housing: Precision die cast aluminum housing, lens frame. Mounting: Die -cast aluminum wall bracket with (5) 1/2" conduit openings with plugs. Two -piece bracket with tether for ease of installation and wiring. AB R L I G H T I N G Tech Help Line: 888 RAB -1000 Copyright 02012 RAB Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved Arm: Die -cast aluminum with wiring access plate. Color Stability: RAB LEDs exceed industry standards for chromatic stability. Color Accuracy: 67 CRI Color Temperature (Nominal CCT): 5000k Color Uniformity: RAB's range of CCT (Correlated color temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377 -2008. Reflector: Hydroformed aluminum designed for maximum efficiency. Gaskets: High temperature silicone. Finish: Chip and fade resistant polyester powder coat finish. Green Technology: WPLEDs are Mercury and UV free. IESNA LM -79 & IESNA LM -80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM -79 and 80, and have received the Department of Energy "Lighting Facts" label. Replacement: The WPLED52 replaces 250W HID Wallpacks. Email: sales @rabweb.com On the web at: www.rabweb.com Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice Page 1 of 2 Created: 11 /1212012 WPLED52 52 Watt LED Wallpack with 3 cutoff options. Equivalent to 250W MH. Color: Bronze Weight: 17.6 Ibs Wallpack has mounting bracket with Tether for hands -free wiring. 5 year warranty. � LZ LED'Info Driver Info w Watts: 52W Type: Constant Current Color Temp: 5000K (Cool) 120V: 0.51. A Color Accuracy: 67 208V: 0.33 A L70 Lifespan: 100000 24OV: 0.29 A LM79 Lumens: 3,884 277V: 0.25 A Efficacy: 65 LPW Input Watts: 60W Efficiency: 87% Technical Specifications UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations. Lumen Maintenance: 100,000 -hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations. LEDs: Four (4) multi -chip, 13W high- output, long -life LEDs Drivers: Two drivers, constant current, 720mA, Class 2, 100 - 277V, 50 - 60 Hz, 100 - 277VAC .8 Amps. Fixture Efficacy: 64 Lumens per Watt Anobient Temperature: Suitable for use in 40 &deg;C ambient temperatures. Surge Protection: 6 KV Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is - 40 &deg;F /- 40 &deg;C Thermal Management: Cast aluminum Thermal Management system for optimal heat sinking. The WPLED is designed for cool operation, most efficient output and maximum LED life by minimizing LED junction temperature. Housing: Precision die cast aluminum housing, lens frame. Mounting: Die -cast aluminum wall bracket with (5) 1/2" conduit openings with plugs. Two -piece bracket with tether for ease of installation and wiring. AB R L I G H T I N G Tech Help Line: 888 RAB -1000 Copyright 02012 RAB Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved Arm: Die -cast aluminum with wiring access plate. Color Stability: RAB LEDs exceed industry standards for chromatic stability. Color Accuracy: 67 CRI Color Temperature (Nominal CCT): 5000k Color Uniformity: RAB's range of CCT (Correlated color temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377 -2008. Reflector: Hydroformed aluminum designed for maximum efficiency. Gaskets: High temperature silicone. Finish: Chip and fade resistant polyester powder coat finish. Green Technology: WPLEDs are Mercury and UV free. IESNA LM -79 & IESNA LM -80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM -79 and 80, and have received the Department of Energy "Lighting Facts" label. Replacement: The WPLED52 replaces 250W HID Wallpacks. Email: sales @rabweb.com On the web at: www.rabweb.com Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice Page 1 of 2 WPLED52 - continued California Title 24: WPLED complies with California Title 24 building and electrical codes. Warranty: RAB LED fixtures give you peace of mind because both the fixture and driver components are backed by RAB's 5 Year Warranty. For more information, Patents: The WPLED design is protected by patents pending in the U.S., Canada, China, Taiwan and Mexico. RJAM L I G H T I N G Tech Help Line: 888 RAB -1000 Copyright 02012 RAB Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved Created: 11/12/2012 Email: sales @rabweb.com On the web at: www.rabweb.com Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice Page 2 of 2 O O O O O O O O _ O O O Ln M M N N _ _ _ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O + + + + + + + + + + + + + O O O M Ln 0) to V N N r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O q N O V N; N — r r r r p +O +O +O +r O +O NI +O +O +O +O +O +O O O N CD q M N N N r +° + + + +r O + +O O +° +O +O +O +O O O O r Ln W 0) t- V N N N r r O O O O N CV O � C* O O O O O + + + p + + +'� + p+ + + + + + CO co Cl) r O N N G O +O +O +O + +N + O + +° +° + r r +° +° +° +° O O O O r CO M s} 00 LO V M Ln N N r O +O o +O +O +O 0 +'- + + +6 + +O +O +O CV +O +O +O O O N Cl) co Ln Lq I� V M N O O O 0 O N N O O O O O O Lq O O )� r N V M M O t` CO O V N r r N O r r p) M (O N q q 1` Lq M N r p +O +O +O +O Lq; + +M + +N +r +O +O +O O O +O +O i r r M O (O 11; L6J N O +CJ . O + + +r r + + ° + + + + + + + + �) + M LC) N V N O O C) O O O O N M M O O O C) Lq N N N M t O O n O CO V N O 0 O O O 0 O O N CV CD O O O N QO ) V V N N n O O O C W O O V O M C1 + + p + + + + + + O + G M tfj t` W V st to 'Ln (n q 0') N O CD Cn n Ln m N C7 +O +° +O +° CD +O +O +O +° +r +N +M + +° +O +O +° +° t` O LC) Cn O Cn 1. M cq O M q O [F O O (n N +° +r +r +° +- +° +° +° + + � +mac +N +N +r +r +° +° + +° N N N M n + N CO q (n +r +- + N + N +r + O + O + O + � + N + CV + +- + + O O + + O N V Lq W M Lq t` Lq q 1* CA Lq N O M N 1� N co M N N m I�r M M N +r +0 0 ° N M N N +r r ° C +° ° + + + + + + + + + + + + + + (O n V f0 N N N V n j 1� N N CM d +L6 + +,-: +— +r +r /+ +N +N +N +r +CD +O +O M M N 1� Lq M (n V O 1` W /O) V (O CO O Lq 00 V LO N +r + - +r +N +d +N +r +N +N �{e _/ +V- +LO +M +N +N +O +O No' +O (O LC Un 17 LO LO n O O In r O O U'� O O N N M CO (O �' N N O O O + + + + +r + + ,.° + + + + + + + + o r •.� _ _ M M M CO (O n �-.'� CA V M to N O O O N C+) LCJ Ln <t N C) O O I N N L0?0 00 1` C1) W �00 Ln � � N CO V N O O O N 6 N Cl) C7 C7 M C; � O C7 + + /'� + + + + +'- + + + + + +'- + + p - + N IL.011_ N V V O O O N N O I� V N O O D O O O N N N N O O 0 + + O+ + + + 4' +'-. + + + + + + +'� +'� +'- + + + LO LO N) N N V 1� Ln r LO m N O O V V +r 00 1V l LM n V M V p Ln N N O C5 O� + O CV N N + O O C; N + C; + + + + + + + + + + + + 1` t` h L) Ln n O +O + +° + + +m + +O O O � +° +° + + + Application for Letter of Revision �4 o P-t_�, - ["Letter of Revision = $XQO C OD04 " ��� Gl, �'��= 'ry' E vt,;, M C l T.a ��' S. C- t"1 -o�lr -�• Final Site Plan Name and Number: ,6�'» ITl 0 1-� 5 ' ' l2 �-t� o,o� 1 1-4 5 �t7P: °1� o0 3�'��: N Contact Person (Who should we call /write concerning this project ?): t-1T1 0�fZ� Address V -.. 2 2' 2�' City State • Zip Daytime Phone F--/ �2 Fax # L� E -mail rll y�R-L- -'btr N2 OwnerofRecord /-aV 13- G'T� • C"1_4 '°"L' 13 °"4"� Address es �� t -n rzL yam. City G V L'L'Q State VA Zip 219 (Al Daytime Phone L_) Fax # L� E -mail Applicant (Who is the Contact person representing ?): 11­1H ° 1= li(; GOwD Address city Daytime Phone (_) Fax # L__) E -mail SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: XThe appropriate fee, t4 . . The site plan number that the change applies to, L�d,"/'A request letter describing the proposed changes from the owner or authorized agent, M 4 copies of the plan that shows the proposed changes, State Zip Changes must be shown on the sheet or sheets from the approved final site plan, or on an 11"X17" copy of that portion of the approved final site plan. Owner /Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Owner, Agent Date c�,t4 i t c f?' +) Print Name Daytime phone number of Signatory FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LOR # Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# By: County of Albemarle .Department of UommuniTy mevelopure" L 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296 -5832 Fax: (434) 972 -4126 1/1/2011 Page 1 of 1