Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201200006 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2012-03-01Michael Koslow From: Michael Koslow Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:38 AM To: kirsten @collins - engineering.com Cc: Philip Custer; Megan Yaniglos; 'SCOTT @COLLINS- ENGINEERING.COM' Subject: Old Trail Village Block 2 Minor Amendment Engineering comments (SDP2012- 00006), was LOR for SDP2009 -00045 Attachments: E1_lor PBC_sdp200900045.doc Kirsten, I found Phil's review 1/26/2012 comments in CountyView under SDP2009 -00045 (also attached for reference). Per our conversation today, you are waiting for Planning comments before resubmitting the plans as part of the Minor Amendment (SDP2012- 00006). We will provide these comments. - Michael Michael Koslow, PE County of Albemarle Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3297 434 - 972 -4126 (fax) mkoslow @albemarle.org ALES County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Megan Yaniglos, Project Planner From: Phil Custer, Engineering Review Date: 26 January 2012 Subject: Old Trail Village, Block 2, Letter of Revision #2 (SDP- 2009 - 00045) The second letter of revision for the Old Trail Village Block 2 site plan (SDP- 2009 - 00045), received 4 January 2012, has been reviewed by engineering staff. You and I will likely need to discuss these comments before our memos are sent out. It seems the volume and degree of these changes may warrant this plan being considered a minor amendment rather than a letter of revision. 1. The proffered dedication of the park area may complicate any changes to the site plan that are now proposed on county property unless the dedication was done in such a way that granted permission to the applicant to modify the site in any way they choose indefinitely. This application may need to be brought to the attention of the county attorney's office to make sure these changes and the subsequent construction these changes require are suitable without BOS or County Executive approval. Disturbances include or will include: the addition of a grease trap and two sewer laterals, the addition of a drainage pipe from beneath the memory garden, a modification to the grading of the walking path and the area around it on the eastern side of the building, the modification to the pipe system north of the building, and the construction of a channel from pipe 19 to the stormwater facility. 2. There are other areas of the site that do not match the approved plan that have not been identified by the applicant. The applicant should clarify whether these areas are being modified with this plan or whether the mismatch was an accident and have it corrected on the next submittal. The road plan for Golf Drive from Sta. 16 +00 to Sta. 19 +50, the drainage system downstream of pipe 19, and the entire lawn area are a few other sections of the site that do not match the approved plan. The section of Golf Drive that has been removed is not needed to provide frontage or access for any lot currently proposed, but there will be a question as to when it will be required. If the zoning and subdivisions agents allow a portion of this road to be removed from the site plan, they should clarify when staff should require it be constructed. All road sheets of the original set must be amended as part of this application. If the daylighting of pipe 19 was an intentional change, a properly sized channel will need to be designed and constructed from the end section to the biofilter forebay. The drainage calculation and profiles sheets will also need to be amended accordingly. Engineering review has no comments on the design of the lawn. 3. The applicant will need to provide profiles and pipe computations for the modifications that were made on the north and southern ends of this site plan. The profile and calculations sheets of the original application will need to be modified. 4. The sidewalk to the memory garden is graded at a slope of 16% which is hardly convenient for the citizens who will use this site. [18- 32.7.2.8] File: E1_lor_PBC_sdp200900045.doe