HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201200021 Review Comments Miscellaneous Submittal 2012-02-28Brent Nelson
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:44 AM
To: 'Randy Smith'
Subject: ARB 2012 -21, University Tire Sign, Staff Comments
Randy,
I have completed my review of the above -noted sign application. Administrative approval will be granted once
the issues outlined below have been adequately addressed.
1. Sign Color:
The Pantone number for the proposed red color is not included on the photo- rendering. Revise the
rendering to include the Pantone number. Be advised that Pantone 485C cannot be administratively
approved.
2. Existing Panel Sign:
The photo- rendering shows both the existing and proposed panel signs — nothing indicating the existing
panel sign is to be removed. Revise the photo- rendering to indicate the existing panel sign is to be
removed.
3. LED Intensity Note:
The photo- rendering indicates that internal LED is proposed for the channel letters; however, the
standard note regarding lighting intensity is not on the rendering. Revise the photo- rendering to include
the following note:
The level of illumination provided by the LED lights will not exceed the illumination produced by a single stroke of
30 milliamp (mo) neon.
Please revise accordingly and email back to me.
Remember that Issue #1 should be addressed in all of your sign proposals and Issue #3 should be addressed in
any that include LED lighting
Brent
Brent W. Nelson, Planner
Department of Community Development
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va 22902
434 - 296 -5832 x 3438