The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201100082 Review Comments Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2012-04-02Phone: 434 - 296 -5832 � /RCir�1Q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Rd. North Wing Charlottesville, VA 22902 Memorandum To: Eugene Ryang c/o Alan Franklin From: Joanne Tu Purtsezova Division: Planning Date: April 2, 2012 Subject: SDP201100082 — Boar's Head Sports Club (squash expansion) (Revision #2 submitted 3/12/12) Fax: 434 - 972 -4126 The Albemarle County Planning Division has received and distributed revision #2 last revised and submitted on 3/12/12. The Planner will recommend approval of the major site plan amendment referenced above, once the following comments have been addressed. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code, unless otherwise specified.] 1. [32.5.6a.] Revisions. - #1. Please add a date and description of last revision with each re- submittal. REVISION #1: Date and description of revision #1 confirmed. Please add an additional date and description of last revision for revision #2 and with each re- submittal as necessary REVISION #2: Date and description of revision #2 confirmed. Please add an additional date and description of last revision for revision #3 and with each re- submittal as necessary. 2. -3. [32.5.6a.] Tax Map and Pafeel Number-s. #2. Please add a tax map an _ WERNTeM!9- -rMVeMe*_s_ess�r:�sr�:�e REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED 4. [32.5.6a.] applielable to the site. #4. Please ,-e f ,-enee Zi a n 2004 015. i f any Other-wise, zefe-fenee -to the ZM n f le number- is leient. REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED 4. [32.5.6a.] applielable to the site. #4. Please ,-e f ,-enee Zi a n 2004 015. i f any Other-wise, zefe-fenee -to the ZM n f le number- is leient. REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED 10 [32.5.6b.] Pafking Sehe"Ie. #5. Please add and upda4e the breakdown of the padiing ealetilatiens fFefn pr-eviettsssite plans and sitepl ra [32.5.6b.] 11.-13. [32.5.6s.] 14 [4.12.2/ 4.12.2c./ 4.12.15] REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED Tease add a note Employees shall grated REVISION #1: Alternative language accepted. Comment satisfied. #8 An updated landscape plan has been submitted. Please all areas. (A par-king justiflea4ion may be t!equir-ed. Zoning review is now , o -tits oft what speeifieally needs to be dono REVISION #1: Parking calculation is acceptable. Parking justification is not needed. COMMENT ADDRESSED. t, .1' ' D to 1 .1 is 1,a height ��r�iivccssr�c pran`' eiicmie�i�iiucr ca Y. height of 40' — €er- some 4metttr-es. Are any existing stmetures m0re than 3 5high? f so, please indieate. Also, adjoining e interested in speeifie building heights. I ,vv llling,please add spede building heightlabels is is REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED Struetutws) #10. Please add the square zeetagefor the isting Raequet Glub as well as the squafe footage of the Squash Club REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED i4d4ifienal litfbmiatieH. #11. Please submit a fner-e detailed pafkiag management plan r-egafding day to day management beyond event REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED #12. Please submit a copy of the shared parking agreement referenced in current parking plan. REVISION #1: COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. Please submit a copy of the shared parking agreement. REVISION #2:... still awaiting a copy of the shared parking agreement for review and approval by both Zoning/Planning. REVISION #1: COMMENT ADDRESSED. Curb Waiver. #14. Please submit a curb waiver for proposed employee parking area. See alternatives available per Engineering comments. REVISION #1: A curb and gutter waiver request letter was supplied on 1/19/12. It has since been withdrawn. Please add a curb and gutter for the proposed employee parking area. Please also revise the parking lot paving section to reflect curb and gutter addition (sheet 9) [See also 32.6.6d.6. (typical sections)]. A curb and gutter appears to be necessary for the travelway connecting the proposed employee parking lot and the reconfigured racquet and squash club parking lot. Revision #2: Comment addressed. 15. [32.3.5.] Improvements — Construction and Bonding. Please build or bond proposed improvements. Revision #2:... still applies. Revision #3: comment eliminated 16. [32.5.2] Revisions are necessary. Please provide 7 full -sized revised copies and 1 reduced copy with each set of revisions. Revision #2:... still applies. Revision #3: Please provide one copy for each reviewer for which approval has not been obtained. Please include 1 reduced copy among these. 17. [32.6.4] Once final approval is obtained and the signature copy has been signed by the agent, please return 4 print copies to the agent /planner. Revision #2:... still applies. The planner will stamp, sign, date, and initial the plan once tentative approvals are obtained from all reviewing agencies. Revision #3:... still applies. 18. [32.6.6g.] For all parking and loading areas, indicate size and width of aisles. Please label in the immediate vicinity of where parking spaces are shown. Revision #2: Comment addressed. 19. [32.7.2] Safe and convenient access; Circulation; Pedestrian Ways; Parking and Loading. Based on a field visit on January 24, 2012, it appears that the applicant /design -team suggested 15 MPH will not be adequate for the travelway immediately along the proposed employee parking lot. 25 MPH was found to be a more likely average vehicular speed by the Engineer. Please remove 15 MPH notation and re- design this area to accommodate 25 MPH traffic. Please re- design this area to make circulation and ingress and egress at the entrance from the travelway along the employee parking lot to the employee parking lot have "safe and convenient access." The width of this travelway needs to be 20' or greater at this junction [See also 32.7.2.5/32.7.2.71. Revision #2: The planner will defer to the reviewing engineer on the design of the entrance to the employee parking lot. Obtain engineering approval. However, due to the revised design of the entrance to the employee parking lot, the existing treeline by the proposed lot will no longer be preserved. Specify which landscape features currently exist. The proposed location and type of protective fencing also appears to be missing. On the existing conditions and demolition plan, an area of selective clearing is Note the lumen level If the lumen level is 3000 or more, the lamp needs to be full cutoff If the lumen level is 3000 or more, provide manufacturer's cut sheets on the plan Add the standard lighting note, "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle." Please contact Joanne Tu Purtsezova in the Planning Division at jpurtsezova @albemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3458 for further information. 4 shown. Provide specific information on which trees will be cleared. [See also: 4.3 Tree Cutting, 32.7.9.4b. and c. in particular] 20. [32.7.3.1] Please place "no parking" signs on all travel lanes and streets associated with this major site plan amendment to prohibit parking on any roads that don't already have these signs. Revision #2: Comment addressed. 21. [32.7.5.3] Obtain ACSA /Fire & Rescue approval prior to final signatures. Revision #2: Obtain ACSA approval prior to final signatures. ACSA approval will require RWSA approval. 22. [32.7.6/32.7.6.1] Fire and Rescue has indicated that Fire Protection regulations have not yet been met. Please work directly with them to revise the site design as needed. Revision #2: No objections from Fire and Rescue has been received. Comment addressed. 23. [32.7.9.2] Landscaping shall be bonded prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Revision #2: Comment eliminated. Landscaping only needs to be bonded if it is not provided as indicated. 24. [General] Please remove the reference to approval of the waivers by the Planning Commission on 02/14/12. If desired, indicate that the waivers were approved administratively on the dates that the action letters were provided. Due to the Sinclair vs. County of Albemarle VA Supreme Court case, the Planning Commission no longer has jurisdiction over waiver reviews. However, since the action letters pre -date this case, they are still valid. 25. [4.17] Since lighting changes are proposed, the following comments apply: Note the lumen level If the lumen level is 3000 or more, the lamp needs to be full cutoff If the lumen level is 3000 or more, provide manufacturer's cut sheets on the plan Add the standard lighting note, "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle." Please contact Joanne Tu Purtsezova in the Planning Division at jpurtsezova @albemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3458 for further information. 4