Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA198100019 Approval - County Zoning Map Amendment 1981-07-06 topt OF ACB� 4A ; 4 _Car Department of Planning ROBERT W. TUCKER.JR. 804/206-5823 RONALD 5. KEELER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 414 EAST MARKET STREET ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING +CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22001 R. KEITH MABE _ _ _._ July 6, 1981 .e PRINCIPAL PLANNER NANCY MASON CAPERTON - _ SENIOR PLANNER KRINE L. IMOFF .. ATHE HPLANNER Messrs. William and Alvin Breit 18 Deer Path Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 RE: ZMA-81-19 Dear Messrs. Breit: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors at its meeting on July 1, 1981, • approved your above-referenced request to rezone 6.87 acres currently zoned RA to LI, located on the eastern side of Route 29 North, County Tax Map 32, Parcel 5F. If you should have any questions concerning this action and notification, please call Mr. Ron Keeler at 296-5823. -Sincerely, 116740i- Stuart L. Richard Department of Planning slr cc: 4313 Muirfield Drive San Antonio, Texas 78229 Mr. Roger Davis, Jr. • NAY OF ALBUM (;,r `�kG1ty�P Department of Planning ROBERT W. TUCKER.JR. 804/206-5823 RONALD S. KEELER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 414 EAST MARKET STREET ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 R. KEITH MABE June 10, 1981 PRINCIPAL PLANNER NANCY MASON CAPERTON SENIOR PLANNER KATHERINE L. IMHOFF PLANNER Messrs. William and Alvin Breit 18 Deer Path Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 RE: Request for ZMA-81-19 Dear Messrs. Breit: This letter is to advise you that the Albemarle County Planning Commission at its meeting on June 9, 1981, unanimously voted to recommend approval of your above-referenced petition to the Board of Supervisors. Your petition will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, July 1, 1981, 7:30 p.m. , County Courthouse, Court Square, Charlottesville, Virginia. YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT THIS MEETING. If you should have any questions concerning this notification, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ron Keeler at 296-5823. Sincerely, Stuart L. Richard Department of Planning slr cc: 4313 Muirfield Drive San Antonio, Texas 78229 Mr. Roger Davis, Jr. Miss Lettie E. Neher STAFF REPORT June 9, 1981 ZMA-81-19 William and Alvin Breit Requested Zoning: LI Light Industrial Acreage: 6.87 acres Existing Zoning: RA Rural Areas Location: Property, described as Tax Map 32, Parcel 5F, is located on the east side of Route 29 North, north and adjacent to Ward's Mobile Home Sales. Character of the Area Ward's Mobile Home Sales, Badger-Powhatan, and the Camelot Sewage Treatment Plant (CSTP) are to the south. Other properties in the immediate vicinity are undeveloped. Camelot subdivision, Briarwood PRD, and G.E. are across Route 29 North. This property has been graded to the elevation of Route 29 North in anticipation of development. Comprehensive Plan This property is across Route 29 North from the Piney Mountain village as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. As opposed to other development zoning, the Plan does not recommend industrial location to be restricted exclusively to growth areas. To the contrary, "Map IV Potential Industrial Development Areas" indicates a number of potential locations outside of designated growth areas. This property is recommended as a top priority site when evaluated under the Comprehensive Plan's standards for industrial location. Staff Comment Staff recommends approval of this petition for the following reasons: 1) The site receives top ranking under Comprehensive Plan standards; 2) Considering commercial/industrial uses in the area, adjacency to Route 29 North, size of the property, and past site preparation (and resultant lack of top soil) , the property appears better-suited to Light Industrial zoning than to Rural Areas zoning; 3) The Comprehensive Plan recommends identification of 2,000 acres of industrial land by 1995. f, Est_ • • LEO E IOS IP Ii J. DEFL'iY COMMISSIONTA P CHIEFENGINEEP Jf . L. • IN f DIRECTOR OF F.;]Yi4IETNNTIW� .MF...F as.:a.'..FF.I.:Ns:A.ainuc, .» ...,)-,7 ./ RA -.M F.....a F`_OASC LC..rO.D A<.-an ,� ,.0,RECTON OF OPEfOTIONs "F, .. •- .2.Fl..E..cTU.T y-y N.01PECTOP OF IROGRAM VRNaGEa'ENi .av-a-NFU N.n�+O.\•f1L•:Fa.':a V:R�USTIhT TILE.M / i/ ....a N.•4".SPR,G,ILD CI affeR USTAtt7 w DIPFCTOP OF ENGINEENING!_, Ron Keeler 64-a-.,S E-_,T.,,w<,ro.Dan." COMMONWEALTH o f VIRGINIA OSCAR K MABP. . !: "' Page 2 May 27, 1981 A' DIPECiON O I.. .a,E. ..,D aRI[.aE,T A EFAu. ;: Public hearings for June DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS&TRANSPORTATION .aEEca.DDN:P.M.EwE.a.wrc..Fw.PLUE t)< • i N RECEIVE I - P. O. , V. rgi ZMA-81-21 E. Morris Chisholm Route 43. This appers to be a rezoning Crarlottesville, Virginia a 22902 �/�:;' 7' pp ..rig :�auest May 27, 1981 I1Zq OUNTY L which would bring the existing use into conformance with the appropriate zoning OF class. The existing entrance is adequate for the existing use. .try intensification �(j�AALBEMARLE I my of this property, however, should come under future review of the entrance. Public hearings for J ``�*C SP-81-25 Richard Freedman Westfield Road Route 1452. Providing the proposed use is designed with an adequate commercial entrance having adequate frontage, we, Mr. Ron Keeler have no objection to this special permit. Department of Planning Couurty of Albr-ma-le If you have any questions, please advise. 414 East Market Street Charlottesville, Va. 22901 Yours truly, elp Dear Mr. Keeler: D. S. Roosevelt The following are our comments: Resident Engineer / M-81-17 S. G. Spangler Farm Supply, Inc. Route 20. This appears to be � a rezoning which would allow the existing use to have the proper zoning. Accordingly, By: !mil/o<2 , no additions traffic would be generated. We would recommend, however, that if W. B. Cumin., dr. the property should intensify in the future, sight distance to the southern entrance Ass't. Resident Engineer be improved, if possible. It does not appear, however, that the applicant currently WEC;r�sa� 7 n controls the area which creates the sight distance limitation. ZMA.-81-18 Samuel G. and Judith A. Spangler Route 20. Comments as above. cc: R. D. Harrison SP-81-18 Claude W. Cotten. Route 20N. We have previously had contact with Mr. Cotten in order to review the entrance location for a proposed school K-8 for approximately 25 students. A location has been reviewed which will afford adequate sight distance. This will require relocation and closing of the existing entrance. SP-81-21 Nary H. Leavell Route 787. The proposed use for tennis classes will probably create some additional traffic to the property. Depending upon the location of residence of the students, additional traffic could be expected on Route 787. Providing the entrance has adequate sight distance the entrance itself should not be a problem. I will call your attention, however, to the fact that this area is a rapidly gp'owing area and considerable interest and complaints have been generated frac the new residents expressing their concern over traffic congestion. 00 • Z:,E-81-19 William and Alvin B eit Route 29N. A properly designed commercial entrance will be required at.the time of site plan for any industrial use. This area cf Route 29 should be adequate to handle any additional traffic generated. I will ca11 your attention to the fact that the Route 29 Corridor Study recommends certain improvements to Route 29 (full frontage development, curb and gutter, etc.), we would recommend that the recommendations of the Corridor Study be required. TRANSPORTATION—AMERICA'S LIFELINES Sf