HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA198100019 Approval - County Zoning Map Amendment 1981-07-06 topt OF ACB� 4A
; 4
_Car
Department of Planning
ROBERT W. TUCKER.JR. 804/206-5823 RONALD 5. KEELER
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 414 EAST MARKET STREET ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
+CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22001 R. KEITH MABE
_ _ _._ July 6, 1981 .e PRINCIPAL PLANNER
NANCY MASON CAPERTON
- _ SENIOR PLANNER
KRINE L. IMOFF
.. ATHE HPLANNER
Messrs. William and Alvin Breit
18 Deer Path Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
RE: ZMA-81-19
Dear Messrs. Breit:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors at its meeting on July 1, 1981, •
approved your above-referenced request to rezone 6.87 acres currently zoned
RA to LI, located on the eastern side of Route 29 North, County Tax Map 32,
Parcel 5F.
If you should have any questions concerning this action and notification, please
call Mr. Ron Keeler at 296-5823.
-Sincerely,
116740i-
Stuart L. Richard
Department of Planning
slr
cc: 4313 Muirfield Drive
San Antonio, Texas 78229
Mr. Roger Davis, Jr.
•
NAY OF ALBUM
(;,r
`�kG1ty�P
Department of Planning
ROBERT W. TUCKER.JR. 804/206-5823 RONALD S. KEELER
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 414 EAST MARKET STREET ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 R. KEITH MABE
June 10, 1981 PRINCIPAL PLANNER
NANCY MASON CAPERTON
SENIOR PLANNER
KATHERINE L. IMHOFF
PLANNER
Messrs. William and Alvin Breit
18 Deer Path Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
RE: Request for ZMA-81-19
Dear Messrs. Breit:
This letter is to advise you that the Albemarle County Planning
Commission at its meeting on June 9, 1981, unanimously voted to
recommend approval of your above-referenced petition to the Board
of Supervisors.
Your petition will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on
Wednesday, July 1, 1981, 7:30 p.m. , County Courthouse, Court Square,
Charlottesville, Virginia.
YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT THIS MEETING.
If you should have any questions concerning this notification,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ron Keeler at 296-5823.
Sincerely,
Stuart L. Richard
Department of Planning
slr
cc: 4313 Muirfield Drive
San Antonio, Texas 78229
Mr. Roger Davis, Jr.
Miss Lettie E. Neher
STAFF REPORT June 9, 1981
ZMA-81-19 William and Alvin Breit
Requested Zoning: LI Light Industrial
Acreage: 6.87 acres
Existing Zoning: RA Rural Areas
Location: Property, described as Tax Map 32, Parcel 5F, is located on the
east side of Route 29 North, north and adjacent to Ward's
Mobile Home Sales.
Character of the Area
Ward's Mobile Home Sales, Badger-Powhatan, and the Camelot Sewage Treatment Plant
(CSTP) are to the south. Other properties in the immediate vicinity are undeveloped.
Camelot subdivision, Briarwood PRD, and G.E. are across Route 29 North.
This property has been graded to the elevation of Route 29 North in anticipation of
development.
Comprehensive Plan
This property is across Route 29 North from the Piney Mountain village as recommended
in the Comprehensive Plan. As opposed to other development zoning, the Plan does not
recommend industrial location to be restricted exclusively to growth areas. To the
contrary, "Map IV Potential Industrial Development Areas" indicates a number of
potential locations outside of designated growth areas. This property is recommended
as a top priority site when evaluated under the Comprehensive Plan's standards for
industrial location.
Staff Comment
Staff recommends approval of this petition for the following reasons:
1) The site receives top ranking under Comprehensive Plan standards;
2) Considering commercial/industrial uses in the area, adjacency to Route 29
North, size of the property, and past site preparation (and resultant lack of top
soil) , the property appears better-suited to Light Industrial zoning than to Rural
Areas zoning;
3) The Comprehensive Plan recommends identification of 2,000 acres of industrial
land by 1995.
f, Est_
• • LEO E IOS IP Ii
J. DEFL'iY COMMISSIONTA P CHIEFENGINEEP
Jf .
L. • IN f DIRECTOR OF F.;]Yi4IETNNTIW�
.MF...F as.:a.'..FF.I.:Ns:A.ainuc, .» ...,)-,7
./ RA
-.M F.....a F`_OASC LC..rO.D A<.-an ,� ,.0,RECTON OF OPEfOTIONs "F,
.. •- .2.Fl..E..cTU.T y-y N.01PECTOP OF IROGRAM VRNaGEa'ENi
.av-a-NFU N.n�+O.\•f1L•:Fa.':a V:R�USTIhT TILE.M / i/
....a N.•4".SPR,G,ILD CI affeR USTAtt7 w DIPFCTOP OF ENGINEENING!_, Ron Keeler 64-a-.,S E-_,T.,,w<,ro.Dan." COMMONWEALTH o f VIRGINIA OSCAR K MABP. . !: "' Page 2 May 27, 1981
A' DIPECiON O
I.. .a,E. ..,D aRI[.aE,T A EFAu. ;: Public hearings for June
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS&TRANSPORTATION
.aEEca.DDN:P.M.EwE.a.wrc..Fw.PLUE t)< • i
N RECEIVE I -
P. O. , V. rgi ZMA-81-21 E. Morris Chisholm Route 43. This appers to be a rezoning
Crarlottesville, Virginia a 22902 �/�:;' 7' pp ..rig :�auest
May 27, 1981 I1Zq
OUNTY L which would bring the existing use into conformance with the appropriate zoning
OF class. The existing entrance is adequate for the existing use. .try intensification
�(j�AALBEMARLE I my of this property, however, should come under future review of the entrance.
Public hearings for J ``�*C SP-81-25 Richard Freedman Westfield Road Route 1452. Providing the proposed
use is designed with an adequate commercial entrance having adequate frontage, we,
Mr. Ron Keeler have no objection to this special permit.
Department of Planning
Couurty of Albr-ma-le If you have any questions, please advise.
414 East Market Street
Charlottesville, Va. 22901 Yours truly,
elp
Dear Mr. Keeler:
D. S. Roosevelt
The following are our comments: Resident Engineer /
M-81-17 S. G. Spangler Farm Supply, Inc. Route 20. This appears to be �
a rezoning which would allow the existing use to have the proper zoning. Accordingly, By: !mil/o<2 ,
no additions traffic would be generated. We would recommend, however, that if W. B. Cumin., dr.
the property should intensify in the future, sight distance to the southern entrance Ass't. Resident Engineer
be improved, if possible. It does not appear, however, that the applicant currently WEC;r�sa� 7
n
controls the area which creates the sight distance limitation.
ZMA.-81-18 Samuel G. and Judith A. Spangler Route 20. Comments as above. cc: R. D. Harrison
SP-81-18 Claude W. Cotten. Route 20N. We have previously had contact with Mr.
Cotten in order to review the entrance location for a proposed school K-8 for
approximately 25 students. A location has been reviewed which will afford adequate
sight distance. This will require relocation and closing of the existing entrance.
SP-81-21 Nary H. Leavell Route 787. The proposed use for tennis classes will
probably create some additional traffic to the property. Depending upon the location
of residence of the students, additional traffic could be expected on Route 787.
Providing the entrance has adequate sight distance the entrance itself should not be
a problem. I will call your attention, however, to the fact that this area is a
rapidly gp'owing area and considerable interest and complaints have been generated
frac the new residents expressing their concern over traffic congestion. 00
•
Z:,E-81-19 William and Alvin B eit Route 29N. A properly designed commercial
entrance will be required at.the time of site plan for any industrial use. This area
cf Route 29 should be adequate to handle any additional traffic generated. I will
ca11 your attention to the fact that the Route 29 Corridor Study recommends certain
improvements to Route 29 (full frontage development, curb and gutter, etc.), we
would recommend that the recommendations of the Corridor Study be required.
TRANSPORTATION—AMERICA'S LIFELINES
Sf