HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201200001 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2012-03-01Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 5:05 PM
To: 'Chris Haine'
Cc: Bill Fritz; Sarah Baldwin
Subject: Stonefield (Town Center and Building C1 -IV) final site plan amendments
Chris,
Below are my comments for Stonefield (Town Center and Building C1 -IV) final site plan amendments.
Stonefield Building C1 -IV — SDP2012 -0005
1) Sheet 9 of 35 depicts Block DI's parking area without 4' Planting Areas. Inevitably this modification alters
the impervious surface calculations for the plan. Assure the impervious surface calculations throughout the plan
reflect the changes (notably the cover sheet and sheet 18 of 35, for D1 Parking Area).
2) Also, throughout the plan Tree Wells have been replaced with larger Planting Areas. Inevitably this
modification alters the impervious surface calculations for the plan. Assure the impervious surface calculations
throughout the plan reflect these changes.
3) Sheet 28 of 35 depicts an altered Parking Lot Pavement Section Detail, with regard to the 0 and 2nd layer's
depth and material type. The new figure is similar to the Light Duty parking lot specifications which are
specified in the Town Center plans, sheet 38 of 52. Please explain if and how these modifications to sheet 28 of
35 will affect the site and the reasons for the modification.
Also, after having reviewed the Town Center plans it appears there has been some consideration taken for the
amount of traffic which crosses over various portions of the parking lot through the use of Heavy Duty asphalt.
Why has this strategy not been employed on the Building C1 -IV plan?
Stonefield Town Center — SDP2012 -0001
1) As shown on Sheet 10 of 51 on the revised plan two parking spaces were lost due to the addition of a new
dumpster. Assure the parking calculations on the cover sheet are correct, as currently they are the same as was
provided on the approved final site plan. Revise if appropriate.
2) Also, throughout the plan Tree Wells have been replaced with larger Planting Areas. Inevitably this
modification alters the impervious surface calculations for the plan. Assure the impervious surface calculations
throughout the plan reflect these changes.
3) There is an approved subdivision plat for this property. If the plat has been recorded, Sheet 1 and all other
applicable notations throughout the plan will need to reflect the change in status of the parcels. Revise if
appropriate.
4) Within the most recent submittal of light plans (L1 -L22) that I received on the February 22nd were also a
copy of the "Exterior Elevations Lighting Sheets A302 -A1, A3, A4, A5, B1, B2, B3, C1 -2, C1 -3, and C2 -2 ". If
these sheets are to be included with the site plan amendment please revise sheet 1 of the final site plan to
include these. If they were strictly for ARB review and not a part of the final site plan, please state this for
clarification purposes.
As you know the site plan amendments cannot be signed/approved until the ARB has met and approved the plan
and all other comments have been addressed. The ARB will meet this upcoming Monday and discuss the plan.
Engineering has provided their comments to you individually, and mine are above in this email. If you have
any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you for your patience.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development (County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443