Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201200056 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2012-10-05i" ,. `IRGINZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Plan preparer: Owner or rep.: Plan received date Date of comments: Reviewer: YVES DELORME INC - MIA Shimp Engineering, PC YVES DELORME INC 18 September 2012 5 October 2012 Max Greene ' 1I► IIIII 11 [Justin @ shimpengineering.com] [No Contact Information Provided] The Site Development Plans (SDP201200056) submitted 11 September 2012 have received Engineering Review and do not appear to meet Albemarle County minimum checklist items for approval. Please adequately address the following comments for final approval: A) Road and drainage plans (SDP200400042) 1) VDOT approval is required. Comments will be forwarded when received. [DM905] 2) Centerline turning radius does not appear large enough to meet the minimum single -unit truck design (30' Truck), as defined by AASHTO. Centerline is from the center of the travel -way (each lane) and should be a minimum 38' radius. The plan appears to show a 30' "Path of Front Overhang ". Please show radius within AASHTO design minimums. 3) Entrance (Right Lane) does not appear to be a smooth transition from the existing pavement. Please show a road profile and spot elevations on the plan for verification. [ 18- 32.6.6.e] 4) Please show a pavement construction detail for review. 5) Location of storm -drain inlet should be at the lowest point possible. This should be clarified with a road profile and spot elevations. 6) Please show spot elevations for top and bottom of wall at grade breaks. 7) VDOT guardrail or wall extended to top of guardrail height will be required. [18- 32.7.2] 8) Existing entrance may require reconstruction to meet VDOT design requirements, but not enough existing topography was included for determination. [18- 32.5.6.d, 18- 32.7.2.1, 18.32.7.3] 9) Proposed topography in the travel -way appears steeper than the 10% as stated on the plan. Please space the proposed travel -way contours to the minimum 10% slope or flatter. B) Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan (WP0200500007) 1) Stormwater Application and fee are required prior to project review. http:// www.albemarle.org/upload/images /forms center /departments /Community Development/for ms/En ing eering_and_WPO_Forms/Plan_ Review _Application_Stormwater_Mana em�ent- BMP Plan.pdf 2) Underground storage /detention needs access manholes for inspection and maintenance. 3) Details may be required for adequate construction and inspection of stormwater system. C) Erosion Control Plan (WP0200500007) 1) Erosion and Sediment Control application and fee are required prior to project review. http:// www.albemarle.org/upload/images /forms center /departments /Community Development/for ms/En ing eering_and_WPO_Forms/Plan_ Review _Application_Stormwater_Management- Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 BMP Plan.pdf 2) Silt fence appears to run down slope like a diversion. Silt fence proposed as a diversion requires a sediment control structure designed for the total drainage area to outlet of diversion. This office recommends showing wire supported -silt fence on a single grade above the roadside drainage Swale to allow for construction of the retaining wall. The wire support will help stop anything that may roll down the slope during construction before it rolls into the road or blocks the drainage Swale. Once these comments have been addressed, please submit 3 copies of the revised plans, calculations, and narratives to Current Development Engineering along with the required review fee and transmittal form. Current Development Engineering is available from 2:30 -4 PM on Thursdays to discuss these review comments. Please contact Max Greene at 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3283 or email mgreene @albemarle.org to schedule an appointment. [17- 204.f] An application for an erosion and sediment control plan that requires modifications, terms, or conditions to be included in order for it to be approved shall be deemed to be withdrawn if the owner fails to submit a revised plan addressing the omitted modifications, terms or conditions within six (6) months after the owner is informed of the omitted information as provided under paragraph (B). File: CDDE1_sdp_MRG_Yves Delmore Inc. - mia.doc