HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201200112 Review Comments Preliminary Plat 2012-10-08=LU
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Mike Myers (MMYERS@DOMINION.COM)
From: Christopher P. Perez- Senior Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: October 8, 2012
Subject: SUB2012000112 Lanetown Preliminary Plat and Road Plan
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community
Development will recommend approval of the plat referred above when the following items have
been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this
time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.)
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.]
1. [Section 14- 302A(1)] Name of subdivision. The requested proposal is a
subdivision not a site plan. Please change the title and all reference and notes to
read `Preliminary Subdivision Plat'.
2. [Comment] Remove the signature block on sheet SP 1.
3. [Section 14- 302(A)(2)] Vicinity Map. The map shown on the cover states the
scale as 1 "= 1000'. Is this correct? If so, it should be 1 "= 2000'.
4. [Section 14- 302A(3)] Existing or Platted Streets. On the plat provide the route
numbers for the existing state roads. Lanetown Rd (Rte 684) and Lanetown Way
(Rte 1387).
5. [Section 14- 302(A)51 Easements. Provide and label the location and dimensions
of all existing easements. Existing easements must include the deed book, page
number, and owner of record. Any proposed easements should be labeled
`dedicated to public use'.
6. [Section 14- 302(A)51 Easements. As depicted on sheet SP7, it appears some
offsite grading is taking place on the adjacent property, TMP 55 -63A owned by
Retha Herring. A letter of intent for any off -site easements are required.
7. [Section 14- 302(A)81 Proposed lots. Provide dimensions for all boundary lines
of each lot, including frontage on any proposed street.
8. [Section 14- 302(A)81 Proposed lots. On sheet SP2 the land use schedule lists
post development lot square footage as 105,348; however the square footage of
lots 1 -10 as depicted on sheet SP4 equals 105,765 SF. Also, on sheet SP2 the
land use schedule lists 33,840 SF of open space; however the square footage of all
open space as depicted on sheet SP4 equals 20,426 SF. Revise if appropriate.
9. [Section 14- 302(A)(9)] Building site on proposed lots. Provide the following note
on the plat: "Lots 1 -10 each contain a building site that complies with section
4.2.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance."
10. [Section 14- 302B(5)] Zoning. Sheet SP2 denotes the property as R6 zoning.
However; the proffers associated with this site are also part of the zoning for the
parcel. The proffers need to be referenced on the plat and ZMA2007 -00011
should be referenced on this plat as well.
11. [Section 14- 302B(7)] Reservoir watershed, agricultural forestall district. Sheet
SP2 lists this lot as not being located in a reservoir water shed; however, this
statement is incorrect and needs to be revised. The property is located in the
Lickinghole Creek Water Supply Watershed, which is a part of the South Fork
Rivanna Reservoir water supply watershed.
12. [Section 14- 302B(7)] Reservoir watershed, agricultural forestall district. This
property is not located in an agricultural forestal district. Please provide a note on
the plat which states this.
13. [Section 14- 302(B)(8)] Setbacks. Side yard setbacks for R6 zoning is 15';
however the plan lists and depicts the side yard setbacks as 10'? Revise.
14. [Comment] ZMA2007 -00011 Patterson Subdivision proffers must be satisfied
before final plat approval is granted. (See the attached proffer form and comments
provided below by Zoning's Rebecca Ragsdale for a comprehensive review of the
proffers).
15. [ Proffer 11 Each subdivision plat shall designate the lots or units that will be
subject to the terms of the proffer with regard to affordable housing. Please
provide the appropriate information on the plat.
16. [Proffer 4 & Section 14 -4091 The proposed "Open Space C Reserved for Future
R/W Dedication 6,065 SE" is not in accord with the Concept Plan which shows
the road constructed to the adjoining property. The plat should be revised to
provide for this road as shown on the Concept Plan approved with the rezoning.
17. [Comment] As depicted the open space will be maintained privately by the HOA.
As proposed a maintenance agreement will be required during final plat approval.
The County Attorney will review and approve the document at that time.
18. [Section 4.7(c)(3)] Limitation on certain elements in open space. Provide calculations on
the open space that not more than eighty (80) percent of the minimum required open
space consists of the following_: (i) land located within the one - hundred year flood plain;
(ii) land subject to occasional, common or frequent flooding as defined in Table 16 Soil
and Water Features of the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation
Service, Soil Survey of Albemarle County, Virginia, August, 1985; (iii) land in slopes of
twenty -five (25) percent or greater; and (iv) land devoted to stormwater management
0)
facilities or flood control devices, except where the facility or feature is incorporated into
a permanent pond, lake or other water feature deemed by the agent to constitute a
desirable open space amenity.
Zoning – Rebecca Ragsdale
1. The proffers should be provided on a sheet of the subdivision plan.
2. Proffer 1- Affordable Housing - -The proffers specify that each subdivision plat
and site plan shall designate the lots or units that will be subject to the terms of
this proffer. Also, there is a County cash in lieu of units option under Proffer 1B.
Ron White, Housing Director with the Albemarle County Housing office should
be consulted regarding whether the cash option will be requested. The plat must
specify how affordable housing proffers will be met.
3. Proffer 2 -Cash Proffer —Cash proffer payments must be made at the time of
building permit application or prior to CO for market -rate units as allowed by
state code. The applicant should contact me prior to making cash proffer
payments to confirm the correct annual adjusted amount under Proffer 2B.
4. Proffer 3 -Total Number of Dwelling Units and Dwelling Types —The proposed
plan shows 10 lots and indicates only single family residential is proposed. This
proffer appears to be met with this proposal.
5. Proffer 4- General Accord with the "Concept Plan" —The proposed subdivision
must be developed in general accord with the Concept Plan dated February 19,
2008. (Zoning has previously commented on the adjustments to Bio Filter Areas
1,2, and 3 and advised the changes are in general accord with the Concept Plan.)
The proposed "Open Space C Reserved for Future R/W Dedication 6,065 Sf." is
not in accord with the proposed where the Concept Plan which shows the road
constructed to the adjoining property. The subdivision plat should be revised to
provide for this road interconnection as shown on the Concept Plan approved with
the rezoning.
E911- Andrew Slack
1. The applicant should contact this office (434.296.5832 ext 3384) with a list of
three (3) alternative road names for 'Baylor Court'. There are already two road
names that start with the word'Baylor'.
Fire and Rescue – Robbie Gilmer
1. Cul -da -sac shall be 96ft fc /fc
2. Fire Flow requirements of 1000 gpm @ 20 psi.
Building Inspections - Jay Schlothauer
No objection
RWSA - Victoria Fort
1. RWSA does not take any objection to the subdivision; however, due to limited
sewer capacity in the Crozet area, RWSA should review and approve anticipated
sewer flows for all developments in this area prior to site plan approval. A note in
the file will suffice at this stage of review, and I'll keep an eye out for the site
plans in the future.
VDOT — Joel DeNunzio
1. Road width should allow for parking on both sides. VDOT standards require a width
of 29' for 25 mph design speed.
2. Crosswalk and curb ramps need to be moved closer to intersection with Lanetown Way
for safer pedestrian crossing.
3. DIs need to be added to curb returns at the intersection of Lanetown Way and Baylor
Court.
4. Drainage line should run directly between structures 2 and 5 or a radial pipe should be
used.
5. Curb returns at intersection of Lanetown Way need to meet the requirements of
connections to a rural type road for an urban road. Shoulders on the rural road need to be
in accordance with the VDOT Road Design Manual.
6. A stub out needs to be built in the open space reserved for future R/W for streets to be
eligible for state maintenance. The stud out street must meet the requirements set in the
VDOT SSAR's.
7. Road and drainage plans will be required with the site plan.
Engineering — Max Greene
1. VDOT approval required.
2. Road will be built or bonded prior to final approval.
3. WPO plans will be approved prior to final approval.
4. SWM agreement will be approved and recorded prior to final approval.
ACSA — Alex Morrison
Comments pending
Please contact Christopher P. Perez at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext.
3443 for further information.
4