Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201200056 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2013-02-01z�sr vIRGINIP County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Justin Shimp From: Christopher P. Perez- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: February 1, 2013 Subject: SDP2012 -00056 Yves Delorme -minor amendment The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] Critical Slopes Waiver 1. [Chapter 18 Section 4.21 As proposed a critical slope waiver is required. Please provide the waiver request; one was not included in the initial application. Also, assure the fee of $425 for the modification/ waiver requests is paid at the time of resubmittal. Rev 3: Waiver approved by BOS at their 1 -16 -13 meeting. 2. There appears to be a discrepancy between the proposed access road width depicted on sheet C3 (20' wide) and the site plan amendment narrative on sheet C1 (24' wide). Revise to assure the request is consistent. Rev ]:Comment addressed 3. [Comment] The proposal under review is a minor amendment, thus the Final Site Plan # SDP89 -086 which the amendment is tied to needs to be referenced on sheet C 1 (cover sheet). Assure the information is provided on the cover sheet, preferably in the title. Rev ]:Comment addressed 4. [Comment] It appears there are changes proposed that aren't included in the "site plan amendment narrative" supplied on the cover sheet; please verify and provide a comprehensive list of all proposed site modifications on the cover sheet. Rev ]:Comm ent addressed 5. After a recent site visit it has become apparent that the plan does not accurately reflect what is located onsite with regard to the existing parking lot. I provide the following... Rev LAII comment addressed 6. [Chapter 18 Section 4.12.61 Parking. With this minor amendment the site is updating its onsite building uses /SF calculations with regard to parking requirements. On sheet C 1 under Parking Schedule assure the correct parking calculations are being utilized for "industrial" use. Below I have provided the parking calculations for this use: `Industrial use not otherwise identified: One (1) space per employee on the largest shift plus one (l) space per fve hundred (500) square, feet open to the public for customer parking, but in all cases a minimum of two (2) customer parking spaces. " Revise. Rev ]:Comm ent addressed 7. [Chapter 18 Section 32.7.91 On sheet Cl, under Landscaping Canopy, in the Planting Schedule, for Large Shade Trees, the Plantanus x acerifolia (London Planetree) is required to be between 1.5" and 1.75" caliper. On the plan it is unclear if the size listed is caliper or height. Assure this section of the chart specifies the measurement for each planting type. Revise. Rev ]:Comment addressed 8. [Comment] On the plan indicate the location and deed book/page reference of any existing utility easements on the property. Rev ]:Comment addressed 9. [Comment] The entrance of the proposed access rd is relatively close to the existing entrance to the site. Depending on the type of vehicles entering and exiting the site, tractor trailers /cars /loading trucks, will this be enough space for a complete turn onto or off of Broadway Street? Rev 3: Pending VDOT and Engineering review. 10. [New Comment] As depicted on the plan there is a "New 30' Cross Access Easement" provided on TMP 77 -40MO serving TMP 77 -40C L It is recommended that an easement plat and maintenance agreement be developed for this travel way and submitted to the County for review /approval. Rev 3: The applicant understands the comment and what must be done if subdivision occurs in the future. At this time they do not wish to plat an easement. 11. [New Comment] On sheet 1, under Land Use Schedule, the square footage of the building (existing and proposed) equals 22,340 SF; however, on sheet C2 the square footage of the various areas of the building equal 26,795 SF. If applicable please revise /update these figures to assure they are accurate. Rev 3: Comment addressed. 12. [New Comment] On sheet 1, under Sheet Index, it is recommended the applicant label Sheet C3 as also containing the Landscaping Plan. Rev 3: Comment addressed. VDOT Comments — Joel DeNunzio Comments are pending Engineering Comments — Max Greene Comments are pending ACSA — Alex Morrison Approved Fire and Rescue Comments - Robbie Gilmer No objections Building Inspections — Jay Schlothauer No objections Comments from Engineering and VDOT are pending and will be provided to the applicant once they are received. Please contact Christopher P. Perez at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information.