Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900045 Review Comments Letter of Revision 3 2013-03-12'AL y J12Ult� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 March 12, 2013 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street Suite K Charlottesville, VA 22902 Regarding: SDP2009 -045 Letter of Revision to add Patio in Block 2 Mr. Collins: This letter is to inform you that your request to add an outdoor patio area with a seat wall and fire pit in Block 2 has been denied. The request is within County owned property and will need to be purchased by the County and approved by the Board of Supervisors. You will need to contact Parks and Recreation about purchasing the property, and work with the County Attorney's office as well. If you have any questions regarding this, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Megan Yaniglos Senior Planner *-&A County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Megan Yaniglos, Project Planner From: Phil Custer, Engineering Review Date: 26 January 2012 Subject: Old Trail Village, Block 2, Letter of Revision #2 (SDP -2009- 00045) The second letter of revision for the Old Trail Village Block 2 site plan (SDP- 2009 - 00045), received 4 January 2012, has been reviewed by engineering staff. You and I will likely need to discuss these comments before our memos are sent out. It seems the volume and degree of these changes may warrant this plan being considered a minor amendment rather than a letter of revision. 1. The proffered dedication of the park area may complicate any changes to the site plan that are now proposed on county property unless the dedication was done in such a way that granted permission to the applicant to modify the site in any way they choose indefinitely. This application may need to be brought to the attention of the county attorney's office to make sure these changes and the subsequent construction these changes require are suitable without BOS or County Executive approval. Disturbances include or will include: the addition of a grease trap and two sewer laterals, the addition of a drainage pipe from beneath the memory garden, a modification to the grading of the walking path and the area around it on the eastern side of the building, the modification to the pipe system north of the building, and the construction of a channel from pipe 19 to the stormwater facility. 2. There are other areas of the site that do not match the approved plan that have not been identified by the applicant. The applicant should clarify whether these areas are being modified with this plan or whether the mismatch was an accident and have it corrected on the next submittal. The road plan for Golf Drive from Sta. 16 +00 to Sta. 19 +50, the drainage system downstream of pipe 19, and the entire lawn area are a few other sections of the site that do not match the approved plan. The section of Golf Drive that has been removed is not needed to provide frontage or access for any lot currently proposed, but there will be a question as to when it will be required. If the zoning and subdivisions agents allow a portion of this road to be removed from the site plan, they should clarify when staff should require it be constructed. All road sheets of the original set must be amended as part of this application. If the daylighting of pipe 19 was an intentional change, a properly sized channel will need to be designed and constructed from the end section to the biofilter forebay. The drainage calculation and profiles sheets will also need to be amended accordingly. Engineering review has no comments on the design of the lawn. 3. The applicant will need to provide profiles and pipe computations for the modifications that were made on the north and southern ends of this site plan. The profile and calculations sheets of the original application will need to be modified. 4. The sidewalk to the memory garden is graded at a slope of 16% which is hardly convenient for the citizens who will use this site. [18- 32.7.2.8] File: E1_lor_PBC_sdp200900045.doc Megan Yaniglos From: Jeremy Lynn [jlynn @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 4:25 PM To: Megan Yaniglos; kirsten @collins- engineering.com;'Gary Whelan' Subject: RE: SDP2009 -045 Old Trail Block 2- Final Site Plan The Block 2 plans have been approved. From: Megan Yaniglos [mailto:myaniglos @albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:20 AM To: Jeremy Lynn; kirsten @collins - engineering.com; Gary Whelan Subject: RE: SDP2009 -045 Old Trail Block 2- Final Site Plan Jeremy: Does ACSA approve the plan then? Or are you distributing to get approval? And then after that we can have them submit the plans for signatures. Thanks. Megan Yaniglos senior planner Albemarle County Community Development Department Division of Zoning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3004 fax: 434.972.4126 From: Jeremy Lynn [ mailto :jlynn @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:50 AM To: kirsten @collins - engineering.com; Megan Yaniglos; 'Gary Whelan' Subject: RE: SDP2009 -045 Old Trail Block 2- Final Site Plan I am distributing the final set of plans to our Executive Director and Engineering Director today for their approval. From: Kirsten Munz [mailto: kirsten @collins - engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:44 AM To: Megan Yaniglos; Gary Whelan; Jeremy Lynn Subject: RE: SDP2009 -045 Old Trail Block 2- Final Site Plan Please provide an update on this approval. We are ready to bring in final signature sets as soon as ACSA has approved. Thanks. Kirsten Munz, P.E., A.I.C.P. COLLINS ENGINEERING, LLC 800 East Jefferson Street, Suite 300 Charlottesville, VA 22902 phone: (434)566 -3013 fax: (434)293 -3719 kirsten @collins- engineerino.com From: Megan Yaniglos [mailto:myaniglos @albemarle.org] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 9:48 AM To: Gary Whelan Cc: Kirsten Munz Subject: SDP2009 -045 Old Trail Block 2- Final Site Plan Importance: High Gary: Do you have any comments for this? I have attached your preliminary approval. I sent you plans a while back. Everyone else has signed off on this site plan, so please let me know if you approve the final or have comments. Thank you. megan yaniglos senior planner Albemarle County Community Development Department Division of Zoning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3004 fax: 434.972.4126 Megan Yaniglos From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .DeNunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 9:09 AM To: kirsten @collins - engineering.com Cc: Megan Yaniglos; Scott Collins Subject: RE: SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final RE: SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final Kirsten, The changes look good. I have no more comments. Thanks Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120 ioel . den unzioCcbvdot.vir4inia.00v From: Kirsten Munz [mailto:kirsten @collins - engineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 12:50 PM To: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. Cc: Megan Yaniglos; Scott Collins Subject: RE: SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final Joel, Please see attached pdfs that address your comments as follows: • Sight distances have been corrected. • One street tree has been eliminated at the location specified. Please let me know if you have any questions or require anything further. Thank you. Kirsten From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ mailto:J oel.DeNunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:01 PM To: Kirsten Munz Cc: Megan Yaniglos; Scott Collins Subject: RE: SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final Kirsten, I reviewed the sheets you sent and have a couple comments: • The sight lines should start at a point that is 20 feet back from the center of the closest through lane. It looks like you have them 20 feet back from the centerline of the road. This change should not cause any sight problems but should be shown correctly on the sheets. • The 2 street trees at station 21 +50 to 21 +00 along Claremont Lane are within the 30 feet of the intersection of Brookley Dr. and the site entrance at station 21 +40 + / -. If you place one tree in between where the two are now, you should meet the 30 foot offset. • The entrance profiles look good. Let me know if you have questions, Thanks Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120 Joel. den unzioCcbvdot.virainia.gov From: Kirsten Munz [mailto:kirsten @collins - engineering.com] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:00 PM To: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. Cc: Megan Yaniglos; Scott Collins Subject: FW: SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final Hi Joel, I am sending you pdfs of sheets S -1 (layout), S -4 (details) and L -1 (landscaping) of the Old Trail Block 2 final site plan. These have been revised to address your comments as follows: 1. Entrance profiles for CG -11's are shown on sheet S -4. 2. Street tree locations have been adjusted and 3 were eliminated to provide 30' clearance from corners. See L -1. 3. Sight distances have been corrected on sheet S -1. Please let us know if your comments are adequately addressed, or if additional changes are needed. Thank you. Kirsten Munz, P.E., A.I.C.P. COLLINS ENGINEERING, LLC 800 East Jefferson Street, Suite 300 Charlottesville, VA 22902 phone: (434)566 -3013 fax: (434)293 -3719 kirsten0collins- enoineerino.com From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ mailto:J oel.DeNunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:03 PM To: Megan Yaniglos Cc: Amy Pflaum Subject: SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final Megan, I have reviewed the above site plan and have the following comments: Entrance profiles in accordance with the CG -11 standard need to be shown on the plan 2. Street trees should not be within 30 feet of any corners in accordance with VDOT's Road Design Manual appendix B Sight distances for a 25 mph road are 280 feet. Thanks Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120 ioel . den unzioCcbvdot.viroinia.00v SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final Megan Yaniglos From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .DeNunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:03 PM To: Megan Yaniglos Cc: Amy Pflaum Subject: SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final SDP - 2009 -00045 Old Trail Phase 8 block2 -final Megan, I have reviewed the above site plan and have the following comments: 1. Entrance profiles in accordance with the CG -11 standard need to be shown on the plan Page 1 of 1 2. Street trees should not be within 30 feet of any corners in accordance with VDOT's Road Design Manual appendix B 3. Sight distances for a 25 mph road are 280 feet. Thanks Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120 joel.denunzio @vdot.virginia.gov 10/16/2009 �� OF ALg �'IRGI131� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 September 23, 2009 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 800 East Jefferson Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB- 2009 -43: Old Trail, Block 2 SDP - 2009 -45 Tax Map 55E -1, Parcel OAl Dear Mr. Collins I have reviewed your submittal for the above - referenced project received August 25, 2009, which included the following drawings. • Sheet S -2, ESC -2 through ESC -4, SWM -2, SWM -3, dated 7/7/09. • Sheets E -1, S -5, R -1, DP -2, DP -5, dated 7/20/09. • Sheets T -1, T -2, S -1, S -3, R -2, DP -3, L -1, L -3, dated 8/11/09. • Sheets S -4, DP -1, DP -4, ESC -1, ESC -5, SWM -1, L -2, submitted 8/25/09. The revisions included in this latest submission address all outstanding conditions of ARB approval. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness (COA). This approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. This application is approved with the condition that mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Eryn Brennan Senior Planner Cc: Jyke Jones Jones & Jones Associates 6120 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 File vIRGIN� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Scott Collins (scott @ collins - engineering.com) From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: July 31, 2009 Revl: September 15, 2009 Subject: SDP2009 -045- Old Trail Block 2- Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [32.5.6 (b); 4.12.8 (e)] Provide an instrument for the shared parking for Block 1 and Block 2 for review and approval from the County Attorney as specified in section 4.12.8 (e). The final site plan will not be signed until this instrument has been received and approved. If the site plan is not signed within 6 months, we will acquire this instrument through other means. Revl: The instrument needs to be submitted to the county for review and approval from the County Attorney. 2. [Shared Parking Agreement] On sheet S -1 the note stating that Phase II will remain as a level grass field for parking for Block 1 is not acceptable. Since Block 1 and 2 are sharing parking, and Block 1 needs the parking that is shown in Phase 11, the parking must be built otherwise the percentage of shared parking will exceed the percentage that was approved. Revl: In your response letter you state that "the parking between Block 1, phase 1 and Block 2, phase 1 is more than adequate for the initial phases of these two blocks ", if this is the case you need to break out the parking per phase in the required parking chart to show how it is being met. It appears that the parking for Phase 2 in Block 2 is needed, since the temporary parking lot was located there. Could you just put the building in Phase 2 and include the parking in Phase 1? 3. [32.6.6 0)] On the lighting plan, provide the LLF in the chart. The LLF needs to be 1.0. Revise the photometric plan if LLF used was less than 1.0. Revl: Comment addressed. 4. [32.6.6 0)] On the lighting plan, provide the lumens for the light fixtures in the chart. Revl: Comment addressed. 5. [32.6.6 0)] On the lighting plan, provide the mounting height for the fixtures in the chart. Revl: Comment addressed. 6. [32.6.6 0)] Show the light fixtures on the landscape and site plan to ensure that there are no conflicts with the landscaping or utilities. Revl: Comment addressed. 7. [32.7.9.8 (c)(3)] Provide screening per this section for the dumpsters, loading area and generator. Revl: Comment addressed. [Shared Parking Agreement] The parking information on sheet T -2 does not match the approved letter from Ron Higgins date 7/1/2009. Revised to be the correct information. Revl: This still is not correct. See attached approval letter. The percentage of Affordable total units does not appear to be correct in the chart on sheet T -2. Please check the numbers and confirm. Revl: Comment addressed. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3004 for further information. vIRGIN� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Scott Collins (scott @ collins - engineering.com) From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: July 31, 2009 Subject: SDP2009 -045- Old Trail Block 2- Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [32.5.6 (b); 4.12.8 (e)] Provide an instrument for the shared parking for Block 1 and Block 2 for review and approval from the County Attorney as specified in section 4.12.8 (e). The final site plan will not be signed until this instrument has been received and approved. If the site plan is not signed within 6 months, we will acquire this instrument through other means. 2. [Shared Parking Agreement] On sheet S -1 the note stating that Phase II will remain as a level grass field for parking for Block 1 is not acceptable. Since Block 1 and 2 are sharing parking, and Block 1 needs the parking that is shown in Phase 11, the parking must be built otherwise the percentage of shared parking will exceed the percentage that was approved. 3. [32.6.6 (j)] On the lighting plan, provide the LLF in the chart. The LLF needs to be 1.0. Revise the photometric plan if LLF used was less than 1.0. 4. [32.6.6 0)] On the lighting plan, provide the lumens for the light fixtures in the chart. 5. [32.6.6 (j)] On the lighting plan, provide the mounting height for the fixtures in the chart. 6. [32.6.6 (j)] Show the light fixtures on the landscape and site plan to ensure that there are no conflicts with the landscaping or utilities. 7. [32.7.9.8 (c)(3)] Provide screening per this section for the dumpsters, loading area and generator. 8. [Shared Parking Agreement] The parking information on sheet T -2 does not match the approved letter from Ron Higgins date 7/1/2009. Revised to be the correct information. 9. The percentage of Affordable total units does not appear to be correct in the chart on sheet T -2. Please check the numbers and confirm. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3004 for further information.