HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201200010 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2013-04-01Phone 434 - 296 -5832
<C`tpF aLg�
c
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
To: David Anhold, RLA (danhold(a)hughes.net)
From: Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: March 14, 2012
Revl: April 1, 2013
Subject: SDP 2012— 00010 Contractor Yard (Final Touch Tree Service) - Final
Fax 434 - 972 -4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
1. [32.5.6(a)] Please coordinate the dates on the plan sheets; the cover sheet is dated October 14, 2011 while
the other sheets are dated 3/22/11 with a revision date of 10/19/11, and the seal is dated 11/14/11. No
revisions have yet been submitted on this application, so all sheets should have the same original date and
a revision date should be added for revisions based on this round of comments. The seal should coordinate
with the revision date.
Revl : Comment addressed.
2. [32.5.6(a)] Revise the setback information provided to indicate a 50' building setback along the rear
boundary line as it abuts a residential district (see section 26.10(b)). Please also add a line indicating the
30' undisturbed buffer zone required along the rear boundary line. This buffer zone is required when an
industrial district adjoins a residential district (see section 26.10(c)). Screening in the buffer zone isn't
required on this plan because the storage yard will be screened by the proposed fence. Indicate all
setbacks graphically on the site plan with labels, and list on the cover sheet.
Revl : Comment addressed.
3. [32.5.6(a)] There are multiple boundary line dimensions provided along the eastern property line; please
clarify which is the accurate dimension and delete the others.
Revl : Comment addressed.
4. [32.5.6(f)] Please revise the drinking water watershed note to include that the parcel is in the South Fork
Rivanna Reservoir watershed.
Revl : Comment addressed.
5. [32.5.6(i)] Provide the centerline radii and pavement widths for all existing and proposed access easements
and travelways.
Revl : Comment addressed.
6. [32.6.6(d)] Provide a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan.
Revl : Comment addressed.
7. [32.6.6(i)] The plan you submitted meets the landscape requirements of Section 32; a waiver is not
required, and the fee that was paid will be refunded. ARB review and /or the mitigation plan required by
Engineering may necessitate the installation of landscaping; however, those requirements are not a part of
the `landscape plan' review.
Revl : Comment addressed.
8. [32.7.9.4(b)] When existing trees /plants are to be preserved in lieu of planting new materials in order to
satisfy landscaping and screening requirements the landscape plan shall indicate the trees to be saved;
limits of clearing; location and type of protective fencing; grade changes requiring tree wells or walls; and
trenching or tunneling proposed beyond the limits of clearing. Please indicate the location and type of
protective fencing on the site plan.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
9. [32.7.9.5(b)] Label all pervious areas of the site with what type of material will be used to provide
permanent protection from soil erosion (mulch, grass, etc).
Rev1: Comment addressed.
10. [32.6.60)] No information regarding outdoor lighting was submitted for review; please verify that no outdoor
lighting is proposed.
Rev1: Comment addressed.
11. [Comment] Please provide copies of off -site easements, or letters of intent to grant them from off -site
property owners.
Rev1: Comment not addressed. The easement(s), or letters of intent, must be provided before the
site plan can be approved.
12. [Comment] As indicated in comments provided by Engineering, a WPO application is required and must be
approved before approval of the Final Site Plan can be granted.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
13. [Comment] As indicated in comments provided by the ARB, an ARB application is required and must be
approved before approval of the Final Site Plan can be granted.
Rev1: Comment not addressed.
14. [Comment] This site plan cannot be approved until ACSA, Engineering, VDOT, ARB, and Fire /Rescue
complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections and E911 have reviewed the plan and have no
objections.
Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. This site plan cannot be approved until ACSA, VDOT and
ARB, complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, Engineering, fire /rescue and
E911 have reviewed the plan and have no objections.
Please contact Ellie Ray in the Planning Division by using eraySaMbemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for
further information.