The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZMA201300003 Review Comments Zoning Map Amendment 2013-07-05�� pF ALA A� �t �'IRGIN1�` COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 July 5, 2013 Mr. Mike Carmagnola 1874 Clay Drive Crozet, VA 22932 RE: ZMA201300003 - 1306 Crozet Avenue Dear Mr. Carmagnola: Staff has reviewed your submittal dated May 28, 2013, requesting to rezone 1.09 acres from R -2, residential zoning district to R -4, residential zoning district to allow construction of 2 proposed units and 2 existing units for a total of 4 units and offers the following comments: Planning Initial comments on how your proposal generally relates to the Comprehensive Plan are provided below. Comments on conformity with the Comprehensive Plan are provided to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report. Neighborhood Model: The following describes the previous outstanding Neighborhood Model Principles and how they have been addressed with the proposed project: Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale The proposed lot sizes are more in keeping with the existing character of lots on this residential neighborhood street. The proposed building design has not been provided, nor is it necessary at this time. It is not clear if this principle is met. Rev..2 You have provided adequate additional detail regarding the expected design of the two proposed residential units. Relegated Parking — The proposed parking area has not been provided. It is not clear if this principle is met.:Rev.:2 You have provided adequate additional detail regarding off - street parking for the subject units. Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability —This proposal does not provide a mixture of housing types. It is not clear about the longevity of the affordable housing on the site. Provide more information regarding the affordable unit. It is not clear if this principle is met. Rev. 2 You have provided additional adequate detail regarding affordability. Page 1 of 3 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke More detailed comments may be provided after more detailed plans are provided. VDOT The following comments related to traffic concerns have been provided by Troy Austin: We have reviewed the letter and proffers dated May 28, 2013. While our preference would be a shared entrance for Lots 2 and 3, we will allow separate entrances provided that they are installed in accordance with our PE -1 standard for private entrances. In addition, the letter mentions that the driveways would be located adjacent and very close.to each other. While private entrances are exempt from Access Management Regulations, it is good practice to locate them as far as practically possible from each other. The exact locations can be determined during the building permit process. Proffers The following comments related to the proffers have been provided by Francis MacCall: 1. For the Residue Lot 1 the 20' Rear setback shown on Sheet 2 of 2 should be revised and shown as a 15' side setback. 2. Also for the Residue Lot 1 show the existing driveway from State Route 810. 3. For purposes of consistency in application of proffers, I would suggest to revise the proffers as follows, noting that there needs to be mechanisms that need to be identified that will allow the Zoning Administrator properly and efficiently enforce the zoning that the applicant is requesting. Staff believes the original intent as written by the applicant is maintained with no additional restrictions being required: 1. The Property shall. be developed in general accord with Sheet 2 of 2, prepared by Roudabush, Gale & Associates, Inc, with the revision date 2013, (the "Plan "), as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator. To be in general accord with the Plan, development shall reflect the following major elements essential to the design of the development: Total number of lots not to exceed three Driveway location for proposed lots 2 & 3. Existing sidewalk immediately adjacent to the proposed driveways will be maintained. If the sidewalk mentioned above is damaged during installation of said driveways then it will be repaired so as to provide safe and convenient access as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Only two dwelling units on Residue lot 1 (See Proffer #3 for limited exception) as shown on the Plan. Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with-the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Prior to the approval of a final subdivision, plat by the County subdivision agent, the owner shall render or decommission (this language may be revised with final rendition to be approved by County Attorney) one of the two rental dwelling units, identified on the Plan as #1302 and #1304 on Residue Lot 1, to something other than a dwelling unit, to the satisfaction of.the Zoning Administrator. Page 2 of 3 • Revised 4 -25 -11 eke 3. The Owner may maintain the existing rental dwelling units identified in Proffer #2 until a final subdivision plat is approved by the County subdivision agent. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter, please take one. of the actions below: (1) Resubmit in response to review comments on a Resubmittal Monday -- Schedule can be found at this address: http: / /www.albemarle.org /upload /images /forms center /departments /Community Devel opment /forms /schedules /Special Use Permit & Zoning Map Amendment Schedule.pdf (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that a Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application If you choose to resubmit, be aware that a fee of $1,250.00 is required with your resubmittal. Please use the form provided with this letter. This is to confirm that you have paid the $595.20 total fees for notifications. Notification of adjoining owners and an associated fee are not needed unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Please feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is cgrant @albemarle.org Sincerely, ado X2�S- Claudette Grant Senior Planner, Community. Development Department c: Mary Elizabeth Jensen and Keith Cheely, 6183 Plank Road Afton, VA 22920 Page 3 of 3 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP # or ZMA # Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt 4 W By: of neuG£r Resubmittal of information for Special Use Permit or1Y4 ,k Zoning Map Amendment PROJECT NUMBER: I'i') } 01 Ll� PROJECT NAME: J':2 30 r6w+ -Ayoy\ u ,�_ Resubmittal Fee is Required ❑ Per Request ❑ Resubmittal Fee is Not Required C �' Ia1,tde -- _' (2,-, y My-e- Csf- ma 9MIQ Community Development Project Coordinator Name of Applicant Phone Number Signature Dake Signature FEES Date Resubmittal fees for Special Use Permit -- original Special Use Permit fee of $1,000 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $500 011£ k ." Resubmittal fees for original Special Use Permit fee of $2,000 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $1,000 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,500 ❑ First resubmission FREE ach Zditi$onsalresubmission $1,250 ,�5t ,t4 Y,.i.i`z�'F £'Y2,ji T1K €t•+xx r'YSC , f':� :5. ��.F ��.Jyl'9 i �`_ #3 1� i�5 x.�f:� £��.. �.t� ? . ;...�_ St'Y.a1..6. i.4 .�..•:.. 4 =, f...n.. j.. .ni ^':T .;i:.�� i t �i .E, Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $3,500 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $1,750 SINN" ixn ��(� \i£ {5.. :�:ft`. f�.,:A..h, fi�i ��.t��fq�?�y SkT�gy. s?C>•,Y 1,5 lrly E�.: {W k*" `� t� lFY �t Y.L•t17 j,,'Y }i.�tS.... Cfs� Z-\ k t.'f' k„t t u t�s `'��N4F 5.>. N�' i �� Li i ❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request — Add'l notice fees will be required $180 To be paid after staff review for public notice: Most applications for Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. MAKE CHECKS TO COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE/PAYMENT AT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER i Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices $200 + actual cost of first -class postage > Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after ffiy (50) $1.00 for each additional notice + actual cost of first -class postage � Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost 2 (minimum of $_80 for total of 4 publications) County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296 -5832 Fax: (434) 972 -4126 6/7/2017 Page 1 of 1 �� OF ALg� .1 �IRGINI�r.. County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Claudette, Senior Planner From: Francis MacCall, Principal Planner Division: Zoning Date: June 25, 2013 Subject: ZMA 2013 -03 1306 Crozet Ave — 2nd zoning comments Please consider the following comments: 1. For the Residue Lot 1 the 20' Rear setback shown on Sheet 2 of 2 should be revised and shown as a 15' side setback. 2. Also for the Residue Lot 1 show the existing driveway from State Route 810. 3. For purposes of consistency in application of proffers, I would suggest to revise the proffers as follows, noting that there needs to be mechanisms that need to be identified that will allow the Zoning Administrator properly and efficiently enforce the zoning that the applicant is requesting. Staff believes the original intent as written by the applicant is maintained with no additional restrictions being required: 1. The Property shall be developed in general accord with Sheet 2 of 2, prepared by Roudabush, Gale & Associates, Inc, with the revision date 2013, (the "Plan "), as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator. To be in general accord with the Plan, development shall reflect the following major elements essential to the design of the development: • Total number of lots not to exceed three • Driveway location for proposed lots 2 & 3. Existing sidewalk immediately adjacent to the proposed driveways will be maintained. If the sidewalk mentioned above is damaged during installation of said driveways then it will be repaired so as to provide safe and convenient access as determined by the Zoning Administrator. • Only two dwelling units on Residue lot 1 (See Proffer #3 for limited exception) as shown on the Plan. Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Prior to the approval of a final subdivision plat by the County subdivision agent, the owner shall render or decommission (this lanauaae may be revised with final rendition to be approved by County Attorney) one of the two rental dwelling units, identified on the Plan as #1302 and #1304 on Residue Lot 1, to something other than a dwelling unit, to the satisfaction of the Zoning Administrator. 3. The Owner may maintain the existing rental dwelling units identified in Proffer #2 until a final subdivision plat is approved by the County subdivision agent. 4$ U E' L7 �'IRGINZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 May 3, 2013 Mr. Mike Carmagnola 1874 Clay Drive Crozet, VA 22932 RE: ZMA201300003 - 1306 Crozet Avenue Dear Mr. Carmagnola: Staff has reviewed your initial submittal requesting to rezone 1.09 acres from R -2, residential zoning district to R -4, residential zoning district to allow construction of 2 proposed units and 2 existing units for a total of 4 units. We have a few comments which we believe should be resolved before your proposal goes to public hearing. We would be glad to meet with you to discuss these issues. Our comments are provided below: Planning Initial comments on how your proposal generally relates to the Comprehensive Plan are provided below. Comments on conformity with the Comprehensive Plan are provided to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report. The land use designation for this property is Neighborhood Density Residential. Neighborhood Density Residential — Residential areas with a desired density of 3 — 6 residential units per acre including existing residential areas within or below this range. Housing in this area is primarily single - family detached with some single - family attached /townhouses. Non - residential uses include institutional uses, such as places of worship, public and private schools, and early childhood education centers (daycare centers and preschools). Neighborhood- serving retail /commercial areas and office uses of less than 5,000 square feet may be allowed by exception only in Neighborhood Density Residential areas located within half a block of Downtown along Blue Ridge Avenue and east of Firehouse Lane. • The County's Open Space Plan does not describe any significant features on this site. Page I of 4 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke Neighborhood Model: The following describes how the proposed development meets or does not meet the principles of the Neighborhood Model: Pedestrian Orientation —This property is on a corner lot with existing residences on it. Sidewalks are located on two sides of the property. This principle is addressed. Neighborhood Friendly Streets and Paths —This property is located in an existing, established neighborhood, inclusive of existing landscape and trees throughout the adjacent streets. This principle is addressed. Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks This property fronts on a major road and is adjacent to an interconnected existing street system. This principle is addressed. Parks and Open Space — Parks and schools are located within a % mile of the property. This principle is addressed. Neighborhood Centers —This property is located within a couple of blocks, walking distance, from downtown Crozet and the new library which is under construction. This principle is addressed. Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale The proposed lot sizes are more in keeping with the existing character of lots on this residential neighborhood street. The proposed building design has not been provided, nor is it necessary at this time. It is not clear if this principle is met. Relegated Parking —The proposed parking area has not been provided. It is not clear if this principle is met. Mixture of Uses —This is a proposed infill development to correct an existing non - conforming dwelling unit on the site. The only proposed use for this site is residential. This principle is not applicable. Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability —This proposal does not provide a mixture of housing types. It is not clear about the longevity of the affordable housing on the site. Provide more information regarding the affordable unit. It is not clear if this principle is met. Redevelopment —This is the redevelopment of an existing lot and residence..This redevelopment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This principle is met. Site Planning That Respects Terrain —This site appears to be relatively flat. This principle is addressed. Clear Boundaries with the Rural Areas — Not Applicable. More detailed comments may be provided after more detailed plans are provided. VDOT Comments from VDOT have not been received, but will be sent upon receipt. Revised 4 -25 -11 eke Proffers 1. Is Keith Cheely also the owner of this property? If yes, then his name should be included within the first paragraph of the proffer statement. The following comments related to the proffers have been provided by Francis MacCall: 1. Revise proffer #1 to the standard language that the site be developed in general accord with Sheet 2 of 2 dated February 1, 2013 ...This would take care of the specifics outlined about the driveway entrances. The driveways could be made one of the specifics outlined for being in general accord. 2. Proffer #2 proposes affordability in some way, I suggest the cottage at #1304 to remain the affordable unit at all times since it appears to be the smaller dwelling. 3. Proffer #3 should be more specific. It is recommended that it reference the dwelling proposed to be decommissioned be the one at #1302 since it would remain nonconforming if it stayed as a dwelling. This is an opportunity to make sure nonconformity goes away. 4. There is no need to proffer the number of dwellings because it could not exceed four at any time. If rezoned to R -4, the density would be maintained with 4 units Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Recently, the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: $176.30 Cost for newspaper advertisement $242.60 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200 + actual postage /$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $418.90 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. $176.30 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing Revised 4 -25 -11 eke $595.20 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is cgrant @albemarle.org Sincerely, audette Grant Senior Planner, Community Development Department c: Mary Elizabeth Jensen and Keith Cheely 6183 Plank Road Afton, VA 22920 enc: Action After Receipt of Comments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Form Revised 4 -25 -11 eke DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following: (1) Resubmit in response to review comments (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application (1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments If you plan to resubmit within 30 days, make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date as published in the project review schedule. The full resubmittal schedule may be found at www.albemarle.org in the "forms" section at the Community Development page. Be sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your sub_ mitt.al. The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the. initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.) (2) Request Indefinite Deferral If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter, you need to request an indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requesting the deferral. (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit /request a public hearing be set with the Planning Commission after the 30 day period.) (3) Request Planning Commission Public Hearing Date be Set At this time, you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However, we do not advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be addressed with a resubmittal. After outstanding issues have been resolved and /or when you are ready to request a public . hearing, staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with Page I of 6 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke the Planning Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and'the County. The staff report and recommendation will be based on the latest inforrnatio.n provided. by you with your initial submittal or resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date. By no later than twenty -one (21) days before the Planning Commission's public hearing, a newspaper advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid. (See attached Fee Schedule) Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper advertisement is also required twenty -two (22) days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing. These dates are provided on the attached Legal Ad Payments for Public Hearings form. Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only exception to this rule will-be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission meeting. (4) Withdraw Your Application If at anytime you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing. Failure to Respond If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that time, you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your application, b) request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff, or c) request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these choices is made within 10 days, staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal date. Fee Payment Fees may be paid in cash or by check and must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. Page 2 of Remised 4- 2.5-11 eke FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONING APPLICATIONS A. For a special use permit: 1. Additional lots under section 10.5.2.1 • application and first resubmission Fee................................................................................................... ...............I..............3 ;1,000.00 Eachadditional resubmittal ....................................... ............................... .................:......$500.00 2. Public utilities; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$1,000.00 Eachadditional resubmittal ....................................... ............................... ........................$500.00 3. Day care center; application and first resubmission Fee.............................................................................. ............................... ....................$],()00.0() Each additional resubmittal ....................................... ............................... ........................$500.00 4, Horne occupation Class B; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................. ............................... .....................$1,000.00 Each additional resubmittal ............. $500.00 .............................................. ............................... .... 5, 5. Amend existing special use permit; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$1,000.00 Each additional resubmittal ....................................... ............................... ........................$500.00 6. Extend existing special use permit; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$1,000.00 Each additional resubmittal ....................................... ............................... ........................$500.00 7. All other special use permits; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$2,000.00 Each additional resubmittal ........................................................... ............................... $1,000.00 8.. Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request Fee............................................................................. ............................... ........................$180.00 B. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance: Fee.................................................................................... ............................... ......................$1000.00. C. Amendment to the zoning map: 1. Less than 50 acres; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$2,500.00 2. Less than 50 acres; each additional resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$1,250.00 3. 50 acres or greater; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................. ............................... .....................$3,500.00 4. 50 acres or greater; each additional resubmission Fee........................................................................... ............................... ......................$1,750.00 5. Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request Fee........................................................................... ............................... .......................$180.00 D. Board of Zoning Appeals: 1. Request for a variance or sign special use permit Fee............................................................................. ............................... ........................$500.00 2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including appeals of zoning administrator's decision) — Fee (to be refunded if the decision of the zoning administrator is overturned) .......$240.00 N. Required notice: 1. Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices: Fee............................................................................. ............................... ........................$200.00 plus the actual cost of first class postage 2. Preparing and mailing or delivering, per notice more than fifty (50): Fee....................:......:................................................... ............................... ..........................$1.00 plus the actual cost of first class postage 3. Published notice: Fee....................................................:......................... ............................... .........................Actual cost Page 3 of 6 Revises! 4 -25 -11 eke 2013 Submittal and Review Schedule Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments Resubmittal Schedule Written Comments and Earliest Planning Commission Public Hearing* Resubmittal Dates Comments to applicant for decision on whether to proceed to Public Hearing Legal Ad Deadline and Decision for Public Hearing ** Planning Commission Public Hearing No sooner than* Monday Wednesday Monday Tuesday Nov 5 2012 Dec 5 2012 Dec 17 2012 Jan 8 Nov 19 2012 Dec 19 2012 Jan 7 Jan 29 Dec 3 2012 Jan 2 Jan 7 Jan 29 Dec 17 2012 Jan 16 Feb 4 Feb 26 Jan 07 Feb 5 Feb 11 Mar 5 Tue Jan 22 Feb 20 Feb 25 Mar 19 Feb 4 Mar 6 Mar 18 Apr 9 Tue Feb 19 Mar 20 Apr 1 Apr 23 Mar 4 Apr 3 Apr 15 May 7 Mar 18 Apr 17 Apr 29 May 21 Apr 1 May 1 May 13 Jun 4 Apr 15 May 15 May 27 Jun 18 May 6 Jun 5 Jun 24 Jul 16 May 20 Jun 19 Jun 24 Jul 16 Jun 3 Jul 03 Jul 8 Jul 30 Jun 17 Jul 17 Jul 29 Aug 20 Jul 1 Jul 31 Aug 19 Sep 10 Jul 15 Aug 14 Aug 19 Sep 10 Aug 5 Sep 4 Sep 16 Oct 8 Aug 19 Sep 18 Sep 30 Oct 22 ,Tue:Sep:3. Oct 2 Oct 21 Nov 12 Sep 16 Oct 16 Oct 28 Nov 19 Oct 7 Nov 6 Nov 18 Dec 10 Oct 21 Nov 20 Nov 25 Dec 17 Nov 4 Dec 4 Dec 23 Jan-:142014: ' Nov 18 Dec 18 -.1-Jan 6.2014 Jan 28:2014...,- Dec 2 ..Jan 1 2014 Jan 62014 Jan.28.2014 . .. Dec 16 Jan 1.5.2014 Feb:32014 - Feb:252014 Dates shown in italics are changes due to a county holiday * The reviewing planner will contact applicant to discuss comments of reviewers and advise that changes that are needed are significant enough to warrant an additional submittal or advise that the the. project is ready for a public hearing. If changes needed are minor, the planner will advise that the project go to public hearing. ** The legal ad deadline is the last date at which an applicant can decide whether to resubmit or go to public hearing. If an applicant decides to go to public hearing against the advice of the reviewing planner, a recommendation for denial will likely result. Generally, the applicant will will have only one opportunity to defer the PC public hearing for the project once it has been advertised for public hearing. Additional deferrals will not be allowed except in extraordinary circumstances such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. N O r O r 0 0) IZ W Q Z L1J ^_ N U a. In L O (n i U) 0 a L fro W N U ^J LL C O_ N N 'r C O U r �a d a 0 0 U Itl 0 N a lv ro v (0 In O Ol b v a 0 (A M 17 M M M M M M M M M M M " C7 17 M M M M M M M M CD (` M (:J M r7 O r CA Q N -CO O 1-- V r N N N M r V N to N O r c- M;3 N co I- o7 r O r r N N N CU 0 (n O m N' l2 I`') M 21—) M M M M 1_2 M M ('7 M fr) M M M M M M f7 c7 M �. Ib W (.() 4 u) r N m I- M V .~- � i5 (O N ('''l O (O r N M r N nI N 115 N 4 N N N(o r N IZ N O N� r N Q N r N N N rN r r N N M (h V V Q U) M (O I- I- CA O 61 0) O r a Q ra CD N J a N N M T M M M M M M M M C7 M M M_ M c7 M C2 M M r M M M T V r 00 c0 c0 to tom() N O I-z � Q N m T CO O M c0 N to r N r N N N J N N r r N N M M V a' to (n M 0 I-- I- O M O M O O r a N. M M M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M (2 M M M ro m N (e O M r (n N in (p 6`i M I rb Q -M N m J L N Z r N N N O N r N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M fM M M M (2 M M M M a cu t` N Q N r aD to M O O I� N` N m CD Q N T _ N N r N N M 0 Q If7 (() m (0 I- r 0 m m O O .'- rn ❑ J 7 N c0 M M co c0 M N M M M M M Cl) M M c0 IvJ M M M M f0 M a h- co L7 O O N U O -- M W L7 a 0 0 U Itl 0 N a lv ro v (0 In O Ol b v a 0 (A M M M (M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M tf� (O Ln G7 p) m r :,= Q ;5 (D O (O O r N N N M r V N to N O r c- M;3 N co I- o7 r O r r N N w U a N' l2 I`') M M M M N M M (M M M M M M' M M M c'M M M M M �. Ib W (C) :;�: 83 mi:Z 23 �3 N a N N (D O V R r N N N `- N r N r N r iz: N N r a r M r N N N N: r r N N M V V V (f) LO M I- I- CO O O O r 5 a a J N. M M M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M (2 M M M N (e O M r (n N in (p 6`i M I rb Q -M N L N Z r N N N O N r N N N N M Q 47 I- 00 0) r O r a a rn m J N c0 M M co c0 M N M M M M M Cl) M M c0 IvJ M M M M f0 M h- co L7 O O N U O -- M W L7 L') O M -p m N: - r N N M c\ r C L7 I j Lo I- 1- CO G1 f7 O O r- d d ro' a a 0 0 U Itl 0 N a lv ro v (0 In O Ol b v a 0 (A FOR OFFICE USE UNLr 51' # of LNIA # Pee Amount S Dim Paid By who? I:(xeinl # CO Tay: Resubmittal ®f information for Special Use Permit or Zoning leap Amendment PROJECT NUMBER: 'Qr)Aa60 QAI _PROJECT NAME: Cr.15-z 'f' A\/QL ❑ Resubmittal Fee is Required ❑ Per Request Resubmittal Fee is Not Required CI ateJ,i�� m, Community Development Project Coordinator lame of Applicant Phone Nun)ber Signature DAe Signature Date FEES Resubmittal fees for Special Use Permit -- original Special Use Permit fee of $1,000 ❑ First resubtission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $500 Resubmittal fees for original Special Use Permit fee of 52,000 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $1,000 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of 52,500 Fnst ]•esubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $1,250 g mittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of 53,500 rst resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $1,750 ❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request — Add'] notice fees will be required $180 To be naid after staff review for public notice: Most applications for Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public bearing by the Planning Commission and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice are required before n Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. O /TTT/�TJ(T/l nr.T,T.Imv nn Ai WPM ATP T IT) AVMT'NT AT ('OhTMT1NTT)' T)F.'VF.1,(_)PMFNT ('.(1T1NTF.R Preparingwand mailing or deliveringup to fifty (50) notices 1,200+ actual cost of first -class postage 51.00 for each additional notice + actual' r Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50) cost of first -class postage :Actual cost Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) (minimum of 5 3bU for total of 4 publications) Count3, of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, �7A 22902 Voice: (434) 296 -5532 Fax: (434) 972 -4126 6/7/2011 Paae 1 of] pF AL13��r County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Claudette, Senior Planner From: Francis MacCall, Senior Planner Division: Zoning Date: April 25, 2013 Subject: ZMA 2013 -03 1306 Crozet Ave - initial zoning comments Please consider the following comments: 1. Revise proffer #1 to the standard language that the site be developed in general accord with Sheet 2 of 2 dated February 1, 2013 ...This would take care of the specifics they outline about the driveway entrances, the driveways could be made one of the specifics outlined for being in general accord. 2. In proffer #2 they are proposing affordability in some way, my suggestion would be for the cottage at #1304 to remain the affordable unit at all times since it appears to be the smaller dwelling. 3. Proffer #3 should be more specific. It is recommended that it reference the dwelling proposed to be decommissioned be the one at #1302 since it would remain nonconforming if it stayed as a dwelling. This is an opportunity to make sure a nonconformity goes away. 4. 1 would think there is no need to proffer that the number of dwellings because it could not exceed four at any time if rezoned to R -4, the density would be maintained with 4 units.