Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201300013 Review Comments Zoning Map Amendment 2013-09-06mpg AL �'IRGINZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 September 6, 2013 Mr. Michael Myers Dominion Engineering 172 S. Pantops Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: ZMA201300013 /Keswick Lake Dear Mr. Myers: Staff has reviewed your initial submittal to amend the plan on property zoned Planned Residential Development, PRD zoning district with a proposed lot yield of 22 to 24 single family detached units on approximately 66 acres. We have a number of questions and comments which we believe should be resolved before your proposal goes to public hearing. We would be glad to meet with you to discuss these issues. Our comments are provided below:. Planning Initial comments on how your proposal generally relates to the Comprehensive Plan are provided below. Comments on conformity with the Comprehensive Plan are provided to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report. The land use designation for this property is Rural Area. Rural Area — is intended for preservation of agricultural and forestal lands and activities; water supply protection; limited service delivery to the rural areas; and conservation of natural, scenic, and historic resources. Residential development not related to bona fide agricultural /forestal use shall be encouraged to locate in the urban area, communities and villages as designated in the comprehensive plan where services and utilities are available and where such development will not conflict with the agricultural /forestall or other rural objective. Where -- - developemtn does occur, rural residents should expect to receive a lower level of service delivery than will be provided to residential developments in designated growth areas. In Page 1 of 6 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke relation to residential development, agricultural /forestall activities shall be regulated only to the extent necessary to protect public helath and safety. • The County's Open Space Plan describes major and locally important stream valleys and adjacent critical slopes, registered historic properties, and potential greenway corridors in the vicinity of this site. Although this property is zoned PRD zoning district from an old zoning designation prior to 1980, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan designates this area as Rural Area - not necessarily supporting a residential development as this proposal is requesting. Neighborhood Model: The following describes how the proposed development meets or does not meet the principles of the Neighborhood Model: Pedestrian Orientation —Sidewalks do not appear to be proposed. This principle is not addressed. Neighborhood Friendly Streets and Paths —There are two accesses into the residential development. One access is shown as the main access and the second access is shown as a, private, emergency access only. The road sections and paths shown on the plan do not provide the level of detail needed to determine if the proposed streets and paths will be neighborhood friendly. This principle is not addressed. Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks — Due to the sites location and large amounts of critical slopes, interconnected streets will be difficult to provide. The primary access is shown to be off of North Milton Road and a secondary, emergency -only acess is shown off of Shadwell Road. Majority of the roads are proposed to be private with a portion of public roadway from the existing intersection of North Milton Road and Randoph Mills Lane. There is no transit service in this portion of the County. This principle is not fully addressed. Parks and Open Space — Open space and pedestrian paths are shown on the plan for this development. The applicant has also indicated that 1.35 -acres will be donated to Albemarle County Parks and Recreation for a public parking area for the boat launch. The proposed boat launch is to replace the existing boat launch on Randolph Mills Lane, which is in poor condition. This principle is met. Neighborhood Centers —The property is located in a portion of the County that is designated rural. A neighborhood center is not proposed for this development, however, Stone - Robinson Elementary School is considered a nearby neighborhood center. This principle is addressed. Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale —This proposal is for a single family residential development. The proposed maximum building height is 35 feet. Parking is proposed to be located on each individual lot. This principle is addressed. Relegated Parking —This is a proposed single family residential development. It is anticipated that the parking will be relegated; therefore , this principle is met. Page 2 of 6 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke Mixture of Uses —This proposal does not provide a mixture of uses, but it is relatively close( % to 1 mile) to the Pantops Development Area where there is a mix of commercial, office and residential uses. The close proximity of the proposed district to Pantops accomplishes the mixture of uses within the neighborhood. This principle is addressed. Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability —This proposal does not provide a mixture of housing types. Affordable housing will also need to be addressed. Will proffers be provided to address the affordable housing requirement? This principle is not addressed. Redevelopment —This principle does not apply. Site Planning That Respects Terrain — Critical slopes will be disturbed. A waiver request has been submitted for review. Minimal disturbance to the terrain is suggested. Clear Boundaries with the Rural Areas — This proposal is located in the Rural Areas. Clear Boundaries have not been provided. More detailed comments may be provided after more detailed plans are provided. Zoning The following comments related to zoning matters have been provided by Ron Higgins: 1. The proposed "Living Machine" central sewer system will require approval of the Board of Supervisors (BOS) and the State Department of Environmental Quality in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 21 of Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia. BOS approval should be requested,as part of this ZMA process as they are doing with the critical slopes waiver, jurisdictional area for water and private street authorization. 2. Reference in the application narrative, second paragraph of page one, regarding the special permit for fill in the floodplain should be for SP201000040, approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 11, 2012. 3. The Application to Amend the Service Authority Jurisdictional Area checks the box on page 2 for "Water and Sewer" when it is actually for "Water Only ". 4. The proffers should include any other applicable items from the ZMA1977 -024 items as well as a Standard "general accord" statement for the Application Plan. Engineering and Water Resources The following comments related to engineering and water resources have been provided by Michael Koslow: 1. Independent central sewer system review is pending. 2. Please indicate critical slopes impacts associated with clearing for off -site water main and for The Living Machine discharge points. These are not included on sheet C4. While the county recognizes these are exempt critical slopes disturbances, they should be shown for reference. 3. Improvements to Randolph Mill Lane will be required (i.e. widening to 20' minimum width). Page 3 of 6 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke 4. Recommend a typical section for the proposed road over the dam. Specifically, plan indicates a disconnected pedestrian path network. Recommend a path for pedestrian connectivity and safety. 5. Sheet C4 indicates two "Living Machine Discharge Point #2" locations; recommend updating one of these to "Living Machine Discharge Point #1." 6. Outlet pipe to "Living Machine Discharge Point #2 (south outlet) appears to cut across an existing ravine. While this could be possible given drop manholes, it should be noted that as proposed a straight outlet pipe could daylight as currently proposed. 7. Please include sight distance lines and profiles at intersection of Randolph Mill Road and Milton Road due to poor sight distance in field. 8. It appears an off -site easement or adjacent property owner's written permission would be needed to construct the extension of Randolph Mill Lane, water main and dam 'spillway improvements proposed in TM79 -36 and TM79 -23F. This is advisory for a rezoning but would be a requirement for initial site plan and /or preliminary subdivision plat., 9. It appears an access easement and right of way dedication would be needed to construct the extension of Randolph Mill Lane proposed in TM79 -36. This is advisory for a rezoning but would be a requirement for initial site plan and /or preliminary subdivision plat. 10. Additional existing critical slopes areas in 79 -9 -23F are not depicted on sheet C4. Recommend updating the legend for this sheet to also indicate "impacted critical slopes" and including existing critical slope areas for this parcel on the plan. 11. The existing portion of Randolph Mill Lane, proposed to be the primary access for the rezoned subdivided lots, is currently a private road. It appears either public dedication or an access easement would be required prior to subdividing the property. This is an advisory comment for a rezoning but would be a requirement for preliminary subdivision plat. VDOT Comments from VDOT are attached. ASCA /RWSA Comments from ACSA are attached. Fire - Rescue Fire - Rescue is okay with the rezoning request, but recommends the following things to keep in mind as the project moves forward: 1. Fire Flow requirements. 2. 20 ft unobstructed travel ways. 3. Turning Radii shall not be less then 25 ft on roads. 4. Cul -de -sac's shall be 96 ft FC /FC. 5. Hydrant spacing shall be 500 ft per travel way. Proffers 1. Proffers have not been submitted. A proffer statement is needed with the application. 2. More information is needed on housing affordability to assess any housing proffers. Staff suggests proffering a certain number /percentage of units meeting the County's affordable criteria which would allow those units to not be subject to the capital proffers. Page 4 of 6 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke 3. Cash proffers need to be provided. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Recently, the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: $123.10 Cost for newspaper advertisement $200.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200 + actual postage /$'1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $323.10 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. $123.10 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing $446.20 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is cgrant @albemarle.org Sincerely, Claudette Grant Senior Planner, Community Development Department Page 5 of 6 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke c: VA Land Trust, Charles W. Hurt, Shirley L. Fisher, Trustees 195 Riverbend Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22911 enc: VDOT.Comments Fire - Rescue Comments Action After Receipt of Comments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Form Page 6 of 6 Revised 4 -25 -11 eke COMMONWEAL-1H of VIC :GENTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 -3819 Gregory A. Whirley Commissioner of Highways August 23, 2013 Ms. Claudette Grant Senior Planner Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: ZMA -2013 -00013 Keswick Lake Dear Ms. Grant: We have reviewed the plan showing the Zoning Map Amendment for Keswick Lake Subdivision dated 7/15113 as submitted by Dominion Engineering and offer the following comments: 1. For the section of road shown as Public ROW to be accepted into the secondary system, all. appropriate requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (SSAR) must be met. 2. Randolph Mill Lane will need to be designed and constructed to current VDOT standards. 3. The dedicated road should end just to the south of the entrance to the parking area. 4. There needs to be a maintenance agreement for the trail to the boat landing. 5. The trip distribution into the site from south of Randolph Mill Lane (the 6/3) seem off with the AM trips into the site being the larger number. We believe that the AM trips into the site should be larger coming from Route 250. Likewise, the AM trips leaving the site should be larger towards Route 250. 6. The turn lane analysis indicates turn lanes are not currently warranted. 7. Intersection sight distance for Randolph Mill Lane must be verified. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 70K *4 Troy "Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District VirginiaDOT.org . WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING ALBEMARLE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — Information from Service Providers To be filled out by ACSA for ZMA's and SP's ZMA201300013: Keswick Lake 1. Site is in jurisdictional area for (NOT IN ACSA'S JURISDICTIONAL- AREA) 2. Distance_ to the closest water line if in the development area is 600 feet (Located along North Milton Road). Water pressure is with gallons per minute at psi. 3. Distance to the closest sewer line if in the development area is 550 feet (Public sewer is located within the Glenmore Boundary). 4. Capacity issues for sewer that may affect this proposal: As previously discussed with the ACSA, the sanitary sewer capacity at the Glenmore WWTP cannot serve this development. 5. Requires Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority capacity certification _Yes ✓ No 6. . Water flow or pressure issues that may affect this proposal 7. Red flags" regarding service provision (Use attachments if necessary): The development is currently outside of the ACSA's Jurisdictional Area. Water mains are within the vicinity of the development, but can only be utilized if the Board of Supervisors revise the jurisdictional area map for this development. Altho gh the development is not in the Jurisdictional Area for sewer service the ACSA would like to comment that there are currently no sewer mains in the vicinity of the development that can be utilized if the jurisdictional area map is revised for sewer. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following; (1) Resubmit in response to review comments (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application (1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments if you plan to resubmit within 30 days, make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date as published in the project review schedule. The full resubmittal schedule may be found at www,albemarle.org in the "forms" section at the Community Development page. Be sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your subl, The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.) (2) Request Indefinite Deferral If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter, you need to request an indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requestingthe deferral, (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit /request a public hearing be set with the Planning Commission after the 30 day period.) (3) Request Planning Commission Public Hearing Date be Set At this time, you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However, we do not advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be addressed with a resubmittal. After outstanding issues have been resolved and /or when you are ready to request a public hearing, staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with Page 1 of Revised 4 -25 -11 eke the Planning Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and the County, The staff report and recommendation will be based on the latest information provided by you with your initial submittal or resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date. By no laterthan twenty -one (21) days before the Planning Commission's public hearing, a newspaper advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid. (See attached Fee Schedule) Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper advertisement is also required twenty -two (22) days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing. These dates are provided on the attached Legal Ad Payments for Public Hearings form. Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission meeting, (4) Withdraw Your Application If at anytime you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing. Failure to Respond If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that time, you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your application, b) request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff, or c) request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these choices is made within 10 days, staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal date. Fee Payment Fees may be paid in cash or by check and must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Male checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. Page 2 of Revised 4- 2.5-11 eke FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONING APPLI CAT] ONS A. For a special use permit: ], Addlt10nal IOtS LI11(ler SeCtl oil] 0.5.2.1; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................. ............................... .....................$;1,000.00 Each additional I'eSllbnlit'tal ....................................... ............................... ........................$500.00 2, Public utilities; application and fil -St I'eS11bIl11SS1011 Fee..................................................................... ...:........................... ....................$;1,000.00 Each additional resubnlittal ........................................ ............................... .......................5;500.00 3. Day Care center; applic;,16011 and fil -St reSllbmissioll Fee................................................................................ ...........I................... ..................$;1,()00.()() Each additional resubmittal ........................................ ............................... .......................$;500.00 4, 1 =tome occupation Class B; application and first Msu bill lssion Fee.............................................................................. ............................... ....................$1,()00.00 Each additional reSUbmittal .......................................... ............................... .....................$500.0() 5. 5. Amend existing special use permit; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................. ............................... .....................$;1,000.00 Eachadditional resubmittal ....................................... ............................... ........................$500,00 6. Extend existing special use permit; application and first resubmission Fee... ..................................................................... ............................... ......................$1,000.00 Each additional resubmittal ....................................... ...I.........,................. ........................$500.00 7. All other special use permits; application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$2,000,00 Eachadditional resubmittal ................................................. . ................................... .,... $1,000.00 S. Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request Fee............................................................................. ............................... ........................$180.00 B. For amendment to text of zoning, ordinance: Fee................................................................................... ............................... .......................$1000.00 C. Amendment to the zoning, map: 1. Less than 50 acres; application and first resubmission Fee.............. I ..... ...........,...................... ..............,................ ....,........;,,.,....$2,500.00 2, Less than 50 acres; each additional resubiriission Fee............................................................................. ............................... .....................$1,250.00 3, 50 acres orb eater. application and first resubmission Fee............................................................................ ............................... ......................$3,500,00 4. 50 acres or greater; each additional resubmission Fee............................................................................. ............................... .........,...,,......$1,750.00 5. Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request Fee.............................................................................. ............................... .........................$180.00 D, Board of Zoning, Appeals: 1, Request for a variance or sign special use permit Fee.................................................................. ............................... ....... .,.....................$;500.00 2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including appeals of zoning administrator's decision) — Fee (to be refunded if tile decision of the zo11111g, administrator is overturned) .,.....$240.00 N, Required notice: 1, Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices: Fee............................................................................. ............................... ........................$200.00 plus the actual cost of first class postage 2. Preparing and mailing or delivering, per notice more than fifty (50): Fee............................................................................... ............................... ..........................$1.00 plus the actual cost of first class postage 3. Published notice: Fee.............................................................................. ............................... .........................Actual cost Page 3 of 6 Revved 4 -25 -11 eke 2013 Submittal and Review Schedule Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments Resubmittal Schedule Written Comments and Earliest Planning Commission Public Hearing* Resubmittal Dates Comments to applicant for decision on whether to proceed to Public Hearing k' Legal Ad Deadline and Decision for Public Hearing* Planning Cominission Public Hearing No sooner thank Monday Wednesday Monday Tuesday Nov 5 2012 Dec 5 2012 Dec 17 2012 Jan 8 Nov 19 2012 Dec 19 2012 Jan 7 Jan 29 Dec 3 2012 Jan 2 Jan 7 Jan 29 Dec 17 2012 Jan 16 Feb 4 Feb 26 Jan 07 Feb 5 Feb 11 Mar 5 Tue Jan 22 Feb 20 Feb 25 Mar 19 Feb 4 Mar 6 Mar 18 Apr 9 Tue Feb 19 Mar 20 Apr 1 Apr 23 Mar 4 Apr 3 Apr 15 May 7 Mar 18 Apr 17 Apr 29 May 21 Apr 1 May 1 May 13 Jun 4 Apr 15 May 15 May 27 Jun 18 May 6 Jun 5 Jun 24 Jul 16 May 20 Jun 19 Jun 24 Jul 16 Jun 3 Jul 03 Jul 8 Jul 30 Jun 17 Jul 17 Jul 29 Aug 20 Jul 1 Jul 31 Aug 19 Sep 10 Jul 15 Aug 14 Aug 19 Sep 10 Aug 5 Sep 4 Sep 16 Oct 8 Aug 19 Sep 18 Sep 30 Oct 22 Tue.Sep :3 Oct 2 Oct 21 Nov 12 Sep 16 Oct 16 Oct 28 Nov .19 Oct 7 Nov 6 Nov 18 Dec 10 Oct 21 Nov 20 Nov 25 Dec 17 Nov 4 Dec 4 Dec 23 :.Jan 14.2014 Nov 18 Dec 18 Jan 6 2014 Jan 28 2014 Dec 2 ..Jan '1 2014 Jan 62014 Jan28 2014-: Dec 16 Jan 1.5 2014 Feb .3 2017-1 Feb 252014. Dates shown in italics are changes due to a county holiday The reviewing planner will contact applicant to discuss comments of reviewers and advise that changes that are needed are significant enough to warrant an additional submittal or advise that the the project is ready for a public hearing. If changes needed are minor, the planner will advise that the project go to public hearing. - The legal ad deadline is the last date at which an applicant can decide whether to resubmit or go to public hearing. If an applicant decides to go to public hearing against the advice of the reviewing planner, a recommendation for denial will likely result. Generally, the applicant will will have only one opportunity to defer the PC public hearing for the project once it has been advertised for public hearing. Additional deferrals will not be allowed except in extraordinary circumstances such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. N O Oi r � 0 0) ci W a z CD W = �L f� U 7 W- V) L O N N Q. U) O a L MO W m" L N z U J n. N N 0 U %7 N a 0 0 U N 0 a v (11 !C U N O a U a 0 fd CI M M M M !'1 M N f2 M !2 M f2 M C) f1 C) C) (1 C/ C) () [) ", oD m. (D 1` m. M I` m (D O (O O CD V M N N m O I- T N ('ri T Q�7: vi u) (6 =- fU N M 'S L7 (O I- I'- CJ7 m G'i r r CV O u� O m a N' M M M N M LO r N m I+ fM <I' r O) N (O N M O co Q' n N M �1 N N M `1 4 N N N O N I+ `1 CA N Gi N M N r N N N •- \I N M = `Q' V �) O N I+ .- m r O) m O r N N N N: r r N N Co It V ) L) (O I- 1+ CO m m O r a rn a� J m N N �") M M () CI !1 C) (2 M M M M M M () M c) f1 M M M M T W�-o 4') W tf) In N O h I v N m m N M N N r N r N r J N N r r N N CI M c Q !O n co (O 1+ 1'- !b Go O O O O r N. M M C) C) (•7 [) N f) C7 C) M M M C7 M M C7 M C) C) C) C7 C) a O m co 1- 70 Q In N Q N. r r1I <i `(\I 1iN (D I- [fJ O O N r N N ro N r r N N M Q [O I+ I+ Cf.J Gi r O r m m J N N t2 M M M f'7 (2 e1 (2 f) M M M M M f) f2 0 N CO M O O I N N m (D J m m O Q to Lo (O (D 1-- r C) f7 M () C) 07 (1 () a G` a) - - CJ - �_ r N r ly �J 1+ r `•; r \ r M m N G G ry l U I+ r - 0 O 7--. d T ca Q-'! N a 0 0 U N 0 a v (11 !C U N O a U a 0 fd CI M M M M !'1 M N f2 M !2 M f2 M M M M M M CO M M M M oD m. (D 1` m. M I` m (D O (O O CD V M N N m O I- r N m 7 L7 (D I- I+ W m m fU to 0 U a N' M M M M M M N M M M C) M M M M M M C) M M M C7 [1 00 � � r +�- ifl m (7 N N O O ZZ C) N \I = N r Q= I- N N .- m r M r Z N N N N: r r N N Co It V ) L) (O I- 1+ CO m m O r 7 a Q m !s m J N. M M C) C) (•7 [) N f) C7 C) M M M C7 M M C7 M C) C) C) C7 C) O m co 1- 70 Q In N N. r r1I <i `(\I 1iN (D I- [fJ O O N r N N N r r N N M Q [O I+ I+ Cf.J Gi r O r a Q 0 N J M C 1 c-" 11 C) f7 M () C) M (1 () G` - - CJ - �_ r N r ly �J 1+ r `•; r \ r M m N G G l U I+ r - 0 O fG a N a 0 0 U N 0 a v (11 !C U N O a U a 0 fd Pee Amounl 5 Date Paid By who? Receipll! Clul 131': Resubmittal cif j�If'c)j- mHtic>n for Special Use Permit or In :,. PROJECT NUMBER: '?11T9,Qn j ?�h.,�l'� PItC),1L C 1' NAM.G; ke5 I U iGL o� ❑ Resubmittal rte is Required ❑ Per Request tesubmittal Sec is Noi Required Ccnnnumily ►ievelopnlenl I'rojecl Coordinidor y�,� /i3 c -�o 9�� SIonature Bale Dealt of Applicant 1'hcmc 1 lumber Signature Date; FEES Resubmittal fees jor SPeCial Use Permit -- OrigiIlal Special Use Permit fee of'S1,000 S.2OU+ actual cost of first -c }ass h�oslage • First resubmission FP`EE • Each additional resubmission 5500 i Leal ach erlisenr nt (published t\vice in the ne\\ spaper for each public hearingl (minimum of ,;2tiC1 far total of 4 . uh,licationsj Resubmittal fees for original Special Use Permit fee of 52,000 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission 51,000 Resubmittal fees for oribinal Zoning Map Amendment fee of 52,500 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission 51,250 Resubmittal fees for oribinal Zoning Map Amendment fee of S3,500 First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission $1,750 r . ❑ Deferral of scheduled public hcaring at applicant's request — Add'l notice fees will be required $180 To be Paid after staff review for nublic notice: Most applications for Special Use Permits and Zoning heap Amendment require at least one public hcaring by the Planning Commission and one public hcaring, by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia Stntt Code requires that notice for public hearings be matte by publishing n legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, nt least tivo fees for public notice lll,e I- eclilll•cd before q Zoning Map Amendment cony be heard by the Board of Supervisors: The total fee for public notice will be provided to lilt applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. „rT r�L7Tr vc m (,r,TWTV r)r el .P.rT\/f AR1.- RIPA-\'NgT -.N'T AT C'ONTNgiNITY DMIT?LOTImFNT (Y)TINTT?R r Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices S.2OU+ actual cost of first -c }ass h�oslage S1.00 for each additional notice+ actual � Preparing and mailing . or delivering each notice after Fit, 5) cost of first -class postage Actual cost i Leal ach erlisenr nt (published t\vice in the ne\\ spaper for each public hearingl (minimum of ,;2tiC1 far total of 4 . uh,licationsj Countl, of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,YA 22902 Voice: (434) 296---)832 Fay:: (434) 972 -4126 6ni1011 Page i of I