HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201300113 Review Comments Miscellaneous Submittal 2013-08-28Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 12:14 PM
To: 'Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc.'; David Benish
Cc: 'Gwen Lacy'; rogerwray @earthlink.net; Francis MacCall; Bill Fritz
Subject: RE: sub201300113 Christopher Gordon Rural Division
Roger,
I've since followed up on your request on comment #4 and after further review it appears that the requirements
for a mitigation plan for a Rural Subdivision are not "applicable" per section 14 -305B where no development is
proposed as found in Section 17 -322 or 17 -321 as the act of subdividing property is not "development" as
defined by Chapter 17. Thus the comment #4 shall be omitted from my August 16th comment letter, please
disregard the item. All other comments stand.
In response to the other portion of your question about the refund being split 1/3 and 2/3 to two parties, after
discussions with intake this is not possible outcome for a refund. Rather the initial item of the groundwater
study was paid by one party w/ one check thus the refund shall commence to that party. If you would like to
discuss this item further intake would be the appropriate party to have this discussion with (Jennifer Durrer ext
3835 is familiar with this item).
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc. [mailto:rwrinc(abearthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:49 AM
To: Christopher Perez; David Benish
Cc: 'Gwen Lacy'; roaerwray(a)earthl ink. net; Francis MacCall
Subject: FW: sub201300113 Christopher Gordon Rural Division
David,
I'm sending this on to you since I got an email from Chris saying he is out of the office this week.
Please see the email below. The fees where split between the two clients.
Chris,
We've reviewed the comments and believe comment 4 does not apply.
On June 10, 2013 we met with Francis MacCall before beginning this project and discussed the stream buffers, access,
etc.
Francis stated that since no construction was required for a rural division, these sections of the code would not apply.
We've reviewed Section 17 -300, which states "each owner shall comply with the requirements of this article prior to
commencing any land development"
The definition of land development in Section 17 -104 (23) states "land development" means a human -made change to,
or construction on, the land surface that changes its runoff characteristics.
The clients only proceeded with the soil testing, survey, etc. based on the information we discussed with Francis.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Brian Ray, L.S.
Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc.
1717 -1b Allied Street
Charlottesville, Va 22903
434 - 293 -3195 tel.
434 - 293 -4202 fax.
From: Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc. [mailto:rwrinc @earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 2:59 PM
To: 'Christopher Perez'; 'Gwen Lacy'
Cc: 'rogerwray @earthlink.net'
Subject: RE: sub201300113 Christopher Gordon Rural Division
Chris,
Thanks for the comments.
As we discussed yesterday, Gordon paid a third of the total (review fee and groundwater assessment) Crown paid two -
thirds.
The refund should be $110 to Gordon and $220 to Crown.
Thank you,
Brian Ray, L.S.
Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc.
1717 -1b Allied Street
Charlottesville, Va 22903
434 - 293 -3195 tel.
434 - 293 -4202 fax.
From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(abalbemarle.org]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 2:30 PM
To: Gwen Lacy
Cc: Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc.
Subject: sub201300113 Christopher Gordon Rural Division
Attached is the comment letter for sub201300113 Christopher Gordon Rural Division.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443