HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201300102 Review Comments Miscellaneous Submittal 2013-12-10s
17111-1
�411111QM 6XI]WEITi1:311u /:\ :114 �
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
December 10, 2013
Richard Ball
Bradley & Ball Architects, PA
5921 -H West Friendly Ave.
Greensboro, NC 27410
RE: ARB- 2013 -102: Crown BMW Lighting Amendment
Dear Rick,
I have reviewed the revised submittal (Sheets P -1 revised 11/20/2013 and C31 revised 11/25/13) for the
above - referenced application for a county -wide Certificate of Appropriateness. With the revisions
included in these drawings, your proposal now meets all of the design criteria outlined by the
Architectural Review Board for this type of Certificate. You may consider this letter your Certificate of
Appropriateness.
This approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed for review, will be used.
The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the
site plan, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change in the
approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and a new application.
Please note the following: Certificates of Appropriateness are valid for the same period that the
corresponding site plan is valid. If there is no site plan required for the proposed work, the Certificate of
Appropriateness is valid for 3 years. Applicants requesting an extension of the period of validity must do
so in writing. The letter must be received by the Director of Planning prior to the expiration date.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Maliszewski
Principal Planner
cc: ARB- 2013 -102
Sarah Baldwin (via email)