HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400018 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2014-04-07�pF A
vt�r�1Q
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Chick -Fil -A - Initial
Plan preparer: Horton & Dodd, P.C. [757- 487 -4535]
Owner or rep.: Chick- Fil -A, Inc.
Plan received date: 25 Feb 2014
Date of comments: 7 Apr 2014
Reviewer: Michelle Roberge
Engineering has completed the review of application SDP201400018.
A. Site Development Plan (SDP201400018)
This is a condition of the initial site plan.
1) Provide a road plan for the proposed N Pantops Drive. Also, it appears the horizontal curve of
200' per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix B, Section (B)- 3 Table 1 is not met at the NE
corner of the site. There are also sight distance issues at the NE entrance of the Chick -Fil -A site.
Please address.
2) Clarify sight distance triangles. It is not clear how measurements are taken when looking east.
3) The entrance into Martha Jefferson Hospital shall maintain, at a minimum, an 18' separation
distance from the parking space to the street. Please address.
These comments can be addressed at the final site plan phase.
4) The TMP # is incorrect. Please revise.
5) The southern boundary line abutting Rte 250 does not appear to be correct. It should be closer to
the concrete sidewalk, according to the Albemarle County GIS. Please verify.
6) Remove E &S control plans. Also, remove the details pertaining to them. These will be reviewed
with a WPO application.
7) Provide the date and source of the topographic info. For example, provide the surveyor name and
date of survey. All topo should be field verified within the last year.
8) It appears there are critical slopes along the southern boundary. These are considered "managed
slopes." Please show.
9) Label the catching curb on C -2. 1 with VDOT CG -6. The spilling curb and gutter should be
labeled with an equivalent VDOT detail.
10) Label the VDOT curb type in the parking lot.
11) The minimum radius for a curbed island is 3' in the parking lot. Please revise.
12) Remove one parking space at both entrances to address policy of 18' separated distance between
parking and street.
13) Sidewalk in front of bldg and adjacent to parking should be 5' (excluding curb and gutter).
Provide concrete blocks for all parking spaces in this area.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
14) Sidewalk in all other areas shall be a minimum of 5' (excluding curb). The plan is showing 4' and
the detail on C -4.0 is showing 6.5'. Please revise.
15) The asphalt entrance on the NW corner is too narrow. I recommend reducing the size of the
ad since the min
IMF®
is 8'. The a_
frv�
/
r
= - -1
travelway can be increased to 24' wide.
16) The NE entrance grade should not exceed 4% for a distance of 40' from the intersected street.
17) The angle at intersections shall not be less than 80 degrees. Please revise.
18) The travel lane pavement striping should be yellow for opposing traffic. Please revise at the area
near median.
19) What are arrows on signal? They do not appear to be directional arrows.
20) Easements for all proposed utilities should be shown.
21) The travelway from Rte 250 should be graded to a max of 10 %. Please revise.
22) Clarify finished grading on SE corner of the site near the entrance. There is a riprap area.
23) Tie the proposed 527.5 contour at the entrance to an existing contour. It is currently shown to fill
over the FES.
24) Near the entrance, label top of wall elevation where the ground elevation is 526'.
25) Is A2 - A3 necessary since A2 -A4 is already shown.
26) The retaining wall north of site has an incorrect bottom of wall elevation where the TW is 547.50.
Please revise.
27) Any walls supporting roads or necessary infrastructure require engineered plans and computations.
28) Please show low maintenance ground cover for areas with greater than 3:1 slopes at retaining wall
north of site.
29) Tie the 542.5 contour to an existing contour NW of site.
30) Show a minimum of 25' radius in drive thru.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
31) Detail 5 on C -4.0 should show 10' wide parking stalls to match plans.
32) Remove all landscaping on stormdrain structures.
33) Filterra does not capture enough for quality. Please provide more to treat onsite impervious areas.
34) Show limits of disturbance and label in acres.
35) What is the sign on the lower SW corner of the property? It is an existing sign.
36) Provide easements for all proposed utilities.
37) Please provide the existing DB and page number for the access easement at the NW corner of N
Pantops Drive.
38) Provide existing drainage easements with DB and page # if any.
39) There is work outside the property line: retaining wall, road, sidewalk, landscaping, etc. Provide
the temporary construction or grading easements. Also, provide agreements on maintenance.
40) A portion of N Pantops is to be removed. It will be clearer to define limits with hatching instead of
notes. Please provide.
Sincerely,
r&zde--
Michelle Roberge