Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400023 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2014-05-20COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 March 25, 2014 Rev1: April 21, 2014 Rev2: May 20, 2014 Ammy George Roudabush, Gale & Associates 914 Monticello Ave Charlottesville, VA 22902 ageorge @roudabush.com RE: SDP201400023 Keswick Golf Maintenance Facility — Minor Amendment Dear Ms. George: Your Minor Amendment application has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required: 1. [32.5.1b] Revise the scale to 1 inch equals 20 feet and orient the plan so that the top of the sheet is approximately north or east. Rev1: Comment addressed - exception granted allowing for scale of 1 inch = 30 feet and allowing bottom of sheet to be approximately northeast. 2. [32.5.2a] Include descriptions and conditions of previously approved special use permits relating to this site. This facility was permitted via SP 95 -12, SP 92 -58 and SP 86 -03. Rev2: Comment addressed 3. [32.5.2b] Indicate the use of the proposed structure and total square footage. Also include a parking schedule showing the required parking and provided parking (including handicapped parking). The approved plan shows 29 spaces and the proposed plan appears to show 28 spaces (it is not clear) but the note indicates there will be no loss of parking. Rev2: Comment addressed 4. [32.5.2f and 32.7.9.4b] Show existing landscape features and any proposed changes to existing features. An area of at least 5% of the paved parking and vehicular circulation area shall be landscaped with trees or shrubs within or around the parking lot. Please provide all relevant information to verify this requirement is satisfied. Rev2: Comment addressed 5. [32.6.2j & 32.7.9.8] The tree canopy requirement for this site is 10 %; if existing trees are to be used to satisfy this requirement, provide relevant information to verify this requirement is satisfied. Rev2: Comment addressed. 6. [32.5.2n] Show existing and proposed lighting, if any. Rev 2: The cut sheet and the photometric plan show two different lamp lumens for the proposed light (3,000 on cut sheet and 3,200 on photometric plan). Based on the wattage and type of lighting the 3,200 figure is likely more accurate. A lamp which emits 3,000 or more maximum lumens is required to be a full cutoff fixture (per section 4.17.4); therefore you must either use a light of less than 3,000 lumens or use a full cutoff fixture. 7. [Comment] Show and label the stream buffer limits on the site. Rev1: Comment addressed 8. [Comment] For minor site plan amendments the Planner's signature is all that is required. You may delete the other reviewers from the approval panel. Rev1: Comment addressed 9. [Comment] This amendment cannot be approved until Inspections, Engineering, and ARB complete their reviews and grant their approval. Inspections, ACSA, and ARB have reviewed the plan and have no objections. Engineering approval is needed. Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me at rfalkenstein @albemarle.org or at 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3272. Sincerely, Rachel Falkenstein Senior Planner Planning Division